Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December 9 2004 Launch System Outline General Layout Incidence Angle Effect of the broad bandwidth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The waves spread out from the opening!
Advertisements

Strecher, compressor and time structure manipulation
Announcements Exam 2 is scheduled for two weeks from today (April 2) but, due to all the missed days it will be pushed back one week to April 9 Homework:
Lecture 33 Review for Exam 4 Interference, Diffraction Reflection, Refraction.
Philippe Hering October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe.
Physics 1402: Lecture 35 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: graded soon … »solutions –Homework 09: Wednesday December 9 Optics –Diffraction »Introduction.
Diffraction Physics 202 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 26.
1 Injector Lasers Overview Sasha Gilevich, SLAC April 29, 2004 Drive Laser Specifications Challenges System Description Laser Procurement R&D Effort UV.
Dave Dowell, Sasha GilevichFacilities Advisory Committee October Injector Drive Laser Update Injector Drive Laser Update.
Sasha GilevichFacilities Advisory Committee October Injector Drive Laser Update 1 Facilities Advisory Committee Meeting.
Optical Instruments Chapter 25.
Bill White Drive Laser April 16, Drive Laser Commissioning Experience Reminder of requirements on Drive Laser.
COrE+ Optics options.
Vacuum optical compressor: Tentative ideas, layout, size … Mikhail Martyanov, CERN AWAKE TB and PEB meeting December 2014.
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. { Chapter 36 Diffraction (cont.)
Sasha GilevichFacilities Advisory Committee April Injector Drive Laser Update Facilities Advisory Committee Meeting April.
The Ray Vector A light ray can be defined by two co-ordinates: x in,  in x out,  out its position, x its slope,  Optical axis optical ray x  These.
Space-time analogy True for all pulse/beam shapes Paraxial approximation (use of Fourier transforms) Gaussian beams (q parameters and matrices) Geometric.
BSRT Optics Design BI Days 24 th November 2011 Aurélie Rabiller BE-BI-PM.
Factors affecting the depth of field for SEM Afshin Jooshesh.
© Copyright 2015 Rockwell Collins, Inc. All rights reserved. Proprietary Information Waveguide Displays Rob Brown.
Integration and Alignment of Optical Subsystem Roy W. Esplin Dave McLain.
Microscope.
Visual Angle How large an object appears, and how much detail we can see on it, depends on the size of the image it makes on the retina. This, in turns,
Optical Design Work for a Laser-Fiber Scanned
Lenses Are classified by their Focal Length. The distance from the optical center of a lens to the front surface of the imaging device.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Subsystem Optical Designs R.A.Buchroeder.
A diffraction grating with 10,000 lines/cm will exhibit the first order maximum for light of wavelength 510 nm at what angle? (1 nm = 10-9 m) 0.51° 0.62°
Diffraction and Limits of Resolution. Diffraction through a circular aperture of diameter D Intensity Diameter D Image on Screen θ = 1.22 λ /D Because.
PACS IIDR 01/02 Mar 2001 FPFPU Alignment1 D. Kampf KAYSER-THREDE.
Chang,Liang YNAO,CAS July 09-10,2011 Fore Parts of Optical Design Scheme of FASOT (from telescope to spectrograph)
High Resolution Echelle Spectrograph for Chinese Weihai 1m Telescope. Leiwang, Yongtian Zhu, Zhongwen Hu Nanjing institute of Astronomical Optics Technology.
Principal maxima become sharper Increases the contrast between the principal maxima and the subsidiary maxima GRATINGS: Why Add More Slits?
Geometrical Optics Chapter 24 + Other Tidbits 1. On and on and on …  This is a short week.  Schedule follows  So far, no room available for problem.
AWAKE Electron Spectrometer Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon, Matthew Wing 28 th January 2015.
Optical Subsystem Roy Esplin Dave McLain. Internal Optics Bench Subassembly 2 Gut Ray Dichroic Beamsplitter (MWIR reflected, LWIR transmitted) LWIR Lens.
DECam Daily Flatfield Calibration DECam calibration workshop, TAMU April 20 th, 2009 Jean-Philippe Rheault, Texas A&M University.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optics 2----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics1 Diffraction Introduction: Diffraction is often distinguished.
The waves spread out from the opening!
Difference of Optical Path Length Interference Two waves One wave Many waves Diffraction.
1.Stable radiation source 2.Wavelength selector 3.Transparent sample holder: cells/curvettes made of suitable material (Table 7- 2) 4.Radiation detector.
Synopsis of Yang/Wang’s Analysis and Optimization on Single-Zone Binary Flat-Top Beam Shaper Blake Anderton Mon, Dec
Image at:
Telescopes Resolution - Degree to which fine detail can be distinguished Resolution - Degree to which fine detail can be distinguished Fundamentally an.
Bill White Commissioning October 9, 2006 Drive-Laser Commissioning Status and Plans Requirements Where do we stand today?
In Photography, there is an Exposure Triangle (Reciprocity Theory) Aperture – size of the iris opening, how much light come into the “window” Shutter Speed.
Space-time analogy True for all pulse/beam shapes
Compressor Helium filled optional equivalent plane imaging laser beam dump hole in mirror for e-beam SSA and more.
PACS IIDR 01/02 Mar 2001 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE.
Sasha Gilevich, Alan Miahnahri Drive Laser 11/4/2004 Agenda General Information Project Status Transport Tubes Design.
1 HMPID Project Assembly & Tests of CsI QE monitors: VUV-scanner and ASSET Milestone: December 2002.
Sept 16, 2005Ast 920 Meeting 21 Astronomy 920 Commissioning of the Prime Focus Imaging Spectrograph Meeting 2 Intro; VPH Grating Spectroscopy Ken Nordsieck.
Diagnostic Radiology II X-ray Tubes. Anode angle Anode angle defined as the angle of the target surface with respect to the central ray in the x-ray field.
Lab 2 Alignment.
6.2 Extending Human Vision
Lenses Are classified by their Focal Length.
UNIT-3 ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
Drive-Laser Commissioning Status and Plans
Pulse energy measurement for the CTF lasers.
6.2 Extending Human Vision
Extending Human Vision
Lenses Are classified by their Focal Length.
Proposal for optimizing the cathode laser shape for photo injector
6.2 Extending Human Vision
Drive Laser Facility Layout Drive Laser Architecture Technical Issues
Drive Laser Commissioning Status
LCLS Injector Laser System Paul R. Bolton, SLAC April 24, 2002
The waves spread out from the opening!
EXTENDING HUMAN VISION
Injector Drive Laser Technical Status
Presentation transcript:

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Outline General Layout Incidence Angle Effect of the broad bandwidth Adjustment of the beam diameter

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Layout (downstream from the shaper) Lens is attached to the cathode window Aperture in front of the grating allows to adjust the beam diameter on the cathode Second aperture after the grating corrects the ellipticity Grating 3600g/mm. Incidence angle at the cathode degrees Beam Shaper Aperture Grating Lens F=475mm Beamsplitter (for virtual Cathode Diagnostics) Lens F=150mm Window Cathode Aperture (grating) is imaged to the cathode plane 3:1

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Beam at the cathode Bandwidth =3nm First aperture R=3.95mm Second aperture R>4mm Efficiency=99.9% Spectrum was modeled as 21 wavelengths from 253.5nm to 256.5nm with the same weight

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Illumination on the cathode λ = 253.5nm λ = 255nm λ = 256.5nm

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Incidence Angle Issues For the off shelf grating (3600g/mm) and λ=255nm incidence angle at the cathode is 66.6 degrees The angle could be changed by changing the incidence angle on the grating Increasing of the incidence angle at the cathode will increase anamorphism. (see Tech note, written by Paul Bolton). This effect is more significant for the broad spectrum Change in the time slew is insignificant Mechanical Issues

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Adjustment of the beam diameter by closing of the first aperture First Aperture R=2.5mm Second Aperture R >4mm Efficiency=58.5%

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Illumination on the cathode (1 apertures) λ = 255nm λ = 256.5nm λ = 253.5nm

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Correction of the spatial beam shape with the second aperture First Aperture R=2.5mm Second Aperture R=3.5mm Tilt X=70 0 Decenter Y=-0.2mm Beam shaper decentered Y=0.04mm Efficiency=56%

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Illumination on the cathode (2 apertures) λ = 253.5nm λ = 255nm λ = 256.5nm λ = 253.5nm

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Bandwidth 4nm First aperture R=3.9mm Second aperture R>4mm Efficiency=99.7%

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Size of the input window For 3nm bandwidth the beam size on the window is about 3 x 12 mm Window diameter should exceed 20mm In case of broader spectrum and larger beam size it should be larger

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Adjustment of the beam diameter on the cathode Adjustment of the input aperture size It is possible in the small range Power loss Anamorphism Remotely adjustable iris is not available Zoom Telescope Complicated system, contains additional optics Expensive Takes more space Insertion of the fixed telescope Positive – positive telescope can image the output of the shaper to the grating, but has internal focus and requires more space Positive – negative telescope can cause the distortion of the spatial pulse shape

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Beam Radius = 0.4mm Telescope inserted in front of the first aperture ( and N distance 92mm) telescope

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Beam at the cathode Layout with the telescope. Bandwidth =3nm Without Apertures 15%

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Adjustment of the beam diameter by closing of the first aperture First Aperture R=1.1mm Second Aperture R >4mm Efficiency=82%

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Trim Aperture adjustment The similar set in the X-plane

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Correction of the spatial beam shape with the second trim aperture set First Aperture R=1.1mm Top Aperture Decenter -1.75mm Bottom Aperture Decenter +1.6mm Left and Right Aperture Decenter Y=+/-1.44mm Efficiency=77.4% 9%

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Relative Illumination on the Cathode Telescope, 2 Apertures

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Issues to be resolved Specify the incident angle at the cathode Check whether the mechanical dimensions of the cathode assembly, including window, are consistent with the proposed optical design Evaluate the spatial pulse shapes achievable with the proposed design. Will it allow to meet the e-specs? Specify the requirements to the beam diameter on the cathode. Is the continuous adjustment needed? Will the discrete adjustment proposed in this design work? Which adjustments should be done remotely? Scanning over the cathode. Requirements to the beam diameter and beam shape

Sasha GilevichDrive Laser Meeting December Launch System Unresolved Issue How does the imaging affect the temporal pulse shape?