Professional simulations of neutron spectrometers and experiments by VITESS software package Primary authors : Dr. MANOSHIN, Sergey (FLNP JINR) Co-authors.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Notation for Mirrors and Lenses
Advertisements

Chapter 13 Preview Objectives Electromagnetic Waves
Light and Optics Chapters 22 and 23 By Aaron Jones.
Flat Mirrors Consider an object placed in front of a flat mirror
Chapter 2 Propagation of Laser Beams
Suppose that you hold the transparency in the photograph below in front of a mirror. How will its reflection appear? Is the image: (1) inverted top-to-bottom?
Chapter 31 Images.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
Chapter 36 Image Formation.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses. Medical Physics General Physics Mirrors Sections 1–3.
Chapter 26 Geometrical Optics. Units of Chapter 26 The Reflection of Light Forming Images with a Plane Mirror Spherical Mirrors Ray Tracing and the Mirror.
Physics 2225: Optics 1 - Activities with Light Rays Purpose of this Minilab Apply the basics of ray tracing to learn about reflection and refraction of.
Chapter 32Light: Reflection and Refraction. Electromagnetic waves can have any wavelength; we have given different names to different parts of the wavelength.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses. Notation for Mirrors and Lenses The object distance is the distance from the object to the mirror or lens Denoted by p.
COMPUTER MODELING OF LASER SYSTEMS
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
Light: Geometric Optics
© 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall This work is protected by United States copyright laws and is provided solely for the use of instructors in teaching their.
WAVES Optics.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 32 Light: Reflection and Refraction.
c = km/sec I F = I 0 x (cosθ) 2.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
Physics 1502: Lecture 29 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: Monday Nov. 16 … –Homework 08: due Friday Optics –Index of Refraction.
Lecture 14 Images Chapter 34. Law of Reflection Dispersion Snell’s Law Brewsters Angle Preliminary topics before mirrors and lenses.
Lecture 14 Images Chapter 34 Geometrical Optics Fermats Principle -Law of reflection -Law of Refraction Plane Mirrors and Spherical Mirrors Spherical refracting.
Lecture 14 Images Chp. 35 Opening Demo Topics –Plane mirror, Two parallel mirrors, Two plane mirrors at right angles –Spherical mirror/Plane mirror comparison.
Review Doppler Radar (Fig. 3.1) A simplified block diagram 10/29-11/11/2013METR
Optics 1 - Activities with Light Rays Purpose of this Minilab Apply the basics of ray tracing to learn about reflection and refraction of light.
1 GEOMETRIC OPTICS I. What is GEOMTERIC OPTICS In geometric optics, LIGHT is treated as imaginary rays. How these rays interact with at the interface of.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Development of Spin-Echo Scattering Angle Measurement Wai Tung Hal Lee 1, Roger Pynn 1,2, Paul Stonaha.
© 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall This work is protected by United States copyright laws and is provided solely for the use of instructors in teaching their.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Outline Chapter 26 Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker.
Geometric Optics Conceptual Quiz 23.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
Chapter 24 Geometrical Optics.
1 Optical Diffraction Theory and Its Applications on Photonic Device Design.
3.18. Defects caused by reflections We have assumed that the paraxial approximation applies in that all rays make small angles with respect to the optical.
PROOF OF d i = d o ii rr 11 22 . DESCRIPTION OF d i = d o  Ray of light leaves base & strikes mirror at  i (reflected at same  )  Angles.
3/4/ PHYS 1442 – Section 004 Lecture #18 Monday March 31, 2014 Dr. Andrew Brandt Chapter 23 Optics The Ray Model of Light Reflection; Image Formed.
NCNR, NIST Gaithersburg, MD Internet: Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy (NSE) Dobrin P. Bossev, Steven.
Chapter 13 The Characteristics of light. Objectives Identify the components of the electromagnetic spectrum. Calculate the frequency or wavelength of.
In describing the propagation of light as a wave we need to understand: wavefronts: a surface passing through points of a wave that have the same phase.
5th workshop on scientific collaboration/JINR/Dubna HJL Basis HFR IBR-2 user policy collaboration Project REMUR: Investigation of the structure.
Optical Density - a property of a transparent medium that is an inverse measure of the speed of light through the medium. (how much a medium slows the.
Beam Polarimetry Matthew Musgrave NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct. 15, 2010.
Electromagnetic Waves and Their Propagation Through the Atmosphere
Unit 12: Part 1 Physical Optics: The Wave Nature of Light.
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
MCNSI meeting, February 2006 Contents: People –V. Ryukhtin left for part time only Multichannel focusing benders – continuation –resolution functions.
Physics 1202: Lecture 21 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Lectures posted on: –HW assignments, etc.
GEOMETRICAL OPTICS. Laws of Reflection Laws of Refraction.
Light Waves Physics 1 L Mrs. Snapp. Light Light is a transverse wave. Light waves are electromagnetic waves--which means that they do NOT need a medium.
PHY 102: Lecture Wave Fronts and Rays 9.2 Reflection of Light
Image Formation. The light rays coming from the leaves in the background of this scene did not form a focused image on the film of the camera that took.
Part 10 Optics --Mirrors and Lenses Chapter 24 Geometric Optics.
Light Spectrum. Remember when we said that light travels as electromagnetic waves? Well, what is an electromagnetic wave? EM wave: coupled, changing electric.
Chapter 32Light: Reflection and Refraction LC Oscillations with Resistance (LRC Circuit) Any real (nonsuperconducting) circuit will have resistance.
Geometrical Optics.
Reflection of Light Reflection – The bouncing back of a particle or wave that strikes the boundary between two media. Law of Reflection – The angle of.
Geometrical Optics.
Reflection of Light Reflection – The bouncing back of a particle or wave that strikes the boundary between two media. Law of Reflection – The angle of.
Chapter 23: Reflection and Refraction of Light
Chapter 32Light: Reflection and Refraction
A. WAVE OPTICS B. GEOMETRIC OPTICS Light Rays
Light.
Reflection and Refraction of Electromagnetic Waves
IMAGE FORMATION e.g. lens, mirors
Chapter 33 Continued Properties of Light Law of Reflection
Reflection and Refraction
Antenna Theory Chapter.4.7.4~4.8.1 Antennas
Presentation transcript:

Professional simulations of neutron spectrometers and experiments by VITESS software package Primary authors : Dr. MANOSHIN, Sergey (FLNP JINR) Co-authors : Dr. BELUSHKIN, Alexander (FLNP JINR) ; Dr. BODNARCHUK, Viktor (FLNP JINR) ; Dr. ALEXANDER, Ioffe (JCNS FZ-Juelich) ; Dr. ERHAN, Raul (FLNP JINR, Horia Hulubei Institute of Physics and Nuclear Energineering) Presenter : Dr. MANOSHIN, Sergey (FLNP JINR)

NEW VITESS MODULES* Scientific interests of JCNS/FLNP have been defining the choice of developed modules 1)New NSE technique based on time dependent magnetic fields: RF flippers, adiabatic gradient flipper, spin turners with rotating and linear rising magnetic fields,…) 2) Polarized neutron technique (Spin echo spectrometry for example) 3)Focussing SANS: refractive lenses or focussing guides and elliptical mirrors 4) Backscattering spectroscopy: phase space transformer * Future modules = developed within last few years, but not release officially in the VITESS versions

VITESS polarized neutron suite Developed by the central VITESS Team (HMI) Coil flipper Polariser_sm Polariser_He3 Polarizer_mirror Precession field Developed by the JCNS/Dubna Team Rotating field, import_magnfield Drabkin Resonator Adiabatic Gradient flipper New modules and/or versions of modules already come for JINR and JCNS using: Rotating field – now is a complex module (significant changes since 2005) Import_magnfield: to move simulations from „ideal systems“ to „real systems (close to experimental one)“: input of extermal data (B(x,y,z) - measured or simulatated by MagNet, ANSYS, RADIA, Maxwell, etc.) Prism shaped constant magnetic fields are included as well (for SESANS) Pulsed field (linear-dependent and triangle magnetic fields) Time gate – the gating of the neutron detector Adiabatic gradient flipper, Drabkin resonator and RF flipper RF flipper Pulsed field (linear and triangular)

VITESS polarized neutron suite: completed tasks 1) Radio-Frequency (RF) flipper 2) Adiabatic gradient flipper 3) Generic NSE (constant magnetic fields  Mezei  ), NRSE (RF magnetic fields  Golub & Gähler  ) 4) Generic SESANS (constant magnetic fields  Rekveldt  ) and SERGIS (RF magnetic fields  Felcher  ) 5) NSE with rotating fields (  A. Ioffe  ) including SESANS 6) NSE with linear dependent magnetic fields (  A. Ioffe  ) including SESANS 7) MIEZE technique  Golub & Gähler , 8) Drabkin resonator  Drabkin , Multiple-polarizing cavities

A general principle for simulations of time-dependent magnetic fields a) Presentation of the field area with N sub-layers and K × M in-plane domains. (b) Magnitudes of the simulated outgoing spin components in dependency on N (to achieve the “saturation”) a)b) Simplified FEM method

RF (radio-frequenced) flipper RF-field = Two counter rotating fields B0B0 where - velocity of neutron, d – thickness of flipper in the X- direction,  - gyromagnetic ratio. RESONANCE CONDITIONS B s x Spin precession S in the magnetic field B (classical treatment)

Up Down c) The evolution of the spin vector in the RF-flipper. (a) The resonance curve for the RF flipper with resonance frequency of 290 kHz. (b) Resonance curves for different monochromatizations of the neutron beam of Maxwell distribution. The blue curve corresponds to the flat spectral distribution. RF flipper simulations a) b) c) Black line -  / =6% Red line -  / =10% Green and blue lines -  / =20% Thickness 3 cm B = 100G = 2.35Å

Adiabatic gradient flipper and NSE spectrometer 10cm long magnetic field area (B=100G,  B=15G) 5cm long RF coil: f=289 kHz, B RF =15G. The NSE signal for =4Å neutron beam (  / =10%). NSE spectrometer using adiabatic gradient flippers The reversal of the neutron polarization in the adiabatic gradient spin flipper:,.

VITESS polarized neutron suite: simulations of the NRSE spectrometer 4 RF-flippers: thickness a=3cm Bo=171G B RF =5.6G f=500kHz Incoming neutron beam: =4Å and  / =10%. NSE signal

Sample   The NSE signal an uncollimated incident beam. Black curve -straight beam Red curve - beam deflected on 0.006° The MIEZE signals for a quasielastic scattering samples Red curve – elastic scattering case VITESS polarized neutron suite: SESANS and MIEZE First flipper f=50kHz Second flipper f=51kHz Neutron beam =4Å (  / = 20%).

SESANS (SERGIS) with RF flippers L α L2L2 L θ B=0

Rotating magnetic field NSE spectrometer z Spin flipper F1 y L1L1 Spin flipper F2 x z Spin flipper F3 yL2L2 Spin flipper F4 Initial polarisation Pz=1 Final polarisation Pz Sample NSE signal obtained for f = 50 kHz and L 1 = L 2 = 1 m. Neutron wavelength 0 = 20 Å (  / 0 = 20%). The foils’ thickness d = cm and the field magnitude B = 3392 Oe are selected to satisfy the spin flip condition  =  only for the central wavelength 0 = 20 Å. The result of the simulations of the spin-echo signal show the well-known spin-echo signal of a high quality

VITESS module “Lenses“ the intersection point at the 1 st surface, the normal to the 1 st surface, the incident angle on the 1 st surface, the refraction angle by the Snell*s law, the intersection point at the 2 nd surface, the propagation length in the lense, the attenuation factor, the refraction angle at the 2 nd surface Refractive index for neutrons: n = 1 – δ, δ ~ 10 -5, n < 1 Hence concave lenses must be generally used to focus neutron beams Algorithm: calculations from the “first principles”: - the Snell’s law - subsequent calculations of neutron refraction (the Snell’s law) on the lens surfaces: A neutron refractive lens

McStas component “LENS” (H. Frielinghaus et al.,submitted to J.Appl. Cryst.) describes the basic functionality of the neutron lens The set of N lenses is considered as one equivalent lens with focal length F/N (F- the focal length of the single lens) Gravitational effects inside/between the lenses are neglected VITESS module “Lenses“ (S.Manoshin, A.Ioffe, NIM A586 (2008) 81) Calculations from the “first principles” Gravitational effects included (both inside and outside of lenses) Arbitrary number of subsequent lenses Accounting for shape deviations and surface waviness Attenuation of neutron fluxes inside the lens can be taken into account Visualization of trajectories (under Linux – PGPLOT lib) Trajectories can be saved in a file Parabolic and spherical geometries of lenses are included Incorporated refraction indices for 15 materials

Additional modules for module lenses Several additional modules have been written to make simulations easier 1)Module “ImageSearch” – automatically finds the cross-section with minimal FWHM in the focused beam. Two optimisation methods are incorporated: Golden section search and Brent’s method (parabolic interpolation) 2) Module “Grating” – simulate the amplitude diffraction grating as an object 3) Module “Monitor1sans” – intensity distribution in polar coordinates Intensity= F(r,θ) and in Q– space (Intensity= F(Q) )

VITESS Module “Lenses” visualization Two concave surfaces Visualisation: Points are intersections with lens‘ surfaces N

1 st and 2 nd surfaces: radius of curvatures = 1.27cm Radius of a lense = 1.0 cm Thickness of a lense = 0.01 cm Refraction coefficient = 0.5 Another example of simulations and visualization Visualisation is useful for the check of geometry

Example of simulations Focusing ! R1R1 R2R2 d r Focal plane Radial distributions of the intensity for different positions along OX X O X

Beam size effects: diaphragm before the stack of lenses Distribution in the focal plane in polar coordinates Sphrerical abberation! Incoming wavelength 20 Å Incoming divergence = 0 10 sphrerical lenses

Beam size effects: diaphragm before the stack of lenses Distribution at the focal plane in polarcoordinates Incoming wavelength 20 Å Incoming divergences = 0 3 parabolical lenses

New module: Phase Space Transformer (PST) Y 0 X Top view Crystal Incident neutron beam Diffracted neutron beam Intensity gain vs. the crystal velocity for the system “PST transformer with crystal” Horizontal offset, deg Center of disk: “position center X”, “position center Y”, “position center Z” “position center X”, Z PST: transforms the beam divergence in the wavelength band (e.g. to improve the monochromatization of the diffracted neutron beam by the price of increased beam divergence).

New module: Phase Space Transformer 0 X Rotating disk with 4 crystals Rotating disk Z Crystal Y Radius Incoming neutron beam Reflected neutron beam Radius

0X’ Rotating disk with 4 crystals Z Crystal Height Width Radius X New module: Phase Space Transformer

Modules Phase Space Transformer Module „PhaseSpace“: existing VITESS module monochromator_flat can be used to simulate the monochromator crystal Any external VITESS module can be used to simulate monochromator Any number of crystals at the disk Simulation of the translational motion of crystals Simulation of the rotating disk with crystals It is possible to use any crystal monochromator using Module „PST“

Acknowledgments This work was supported the European Commission under the 7 th Framework Programme through the 'Research Infrastructures' action of the 'Capacities' Programme, Contract No: CP- CSA_INFRA Number NMI3 This effort was supported by grants of the Romanian Plenipotentiary at JINR-Dubna. Thanks for valuable scientific advices: Dr. A.V. Belushkin – FLNP, JINR-Dubna Dr. V. Bodnarchuck – FLNP, JINR-Dubna Thanks for the additional efforts of: Dr. R.V. Erhan – NIPNE and JINR-Dubna A. B. Rubtsov – JINR-Dubna

Thank you!