OR Some of Warren’s Mistakes. Professor Emeritus University of New Mexico.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation Team Chair Training
Advertisements

Roles and Monitoring Best Buddies Canada 2005 National Leadership Conference Be the change you want to see in the world. Gandhi.
Interpreting & Applying the Standards October 4, 2006 Dr. Luis J. Pedraja, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
LESSON 2: COLLABORATION FOR IEP DEVELOPMENT Module 2: Creating Quality IEPs for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders.
EVALUATOR ORIENTATION Serving on Off-Site and On-Site Committees OVERVIEW.
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Diversity Issues in Research Charlotte Brown, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychiatry Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic PMBC Summer Institute, Pittsburgh,
Consulting on the Telephone OOH GP Training Day. Learning Objectives Review our approach to consulting on the phone Address concerns over this format.
Introduction Introduction King Abdulaziz university ha always been employing all efforts possible in order to ensure the success of its student that.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
Effective Strategies and Process Prepared for the Walmart Foundation, AIHEC, HACU, and NAFEO Student Success Collaborative Meeting at Sitting Bull College.
Providing Effective Feedback and Evaluation of Competency Development UW School of Social Work Field Educator Training Program.
How to Request Technical Assistance Sera Morgan Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration HIV/AIDS Bureau Division.
The Canadian Partnership Model of Immigrant Settlement and Integration Services: Perspectives from ISO’s outside Ontario Lucia Lo Professor Department.
Purpose of Instruction
Research Findings and Issues for Implementation, Policy and Scaling Up: Training & Supporting Personnel and Program Wide Implementation
Agenda Objectives Coaching Is Teaching Motivating/Encouraging Communicating/Listening Setting Goals Providing feedback Informal (day-to-day coaching)
+ The APN role of “Consultation” A Panel Presentation Serena Butler Abi Fitzgerald Renee Latoures.
University of Central Missouri College of Education Office of Clinical Services and Certification.
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
Results of the 2007 North Dakota Licensed Child Care Dismissal Study HNDECA Meeting Bismarck, ND April 23, 2008 Dr. Richard Rathge Professor and Executive.
I. Why Proposals Do Get Funded Or Do Not Get Funded Why proposals do get funded –Tangible Reasons: Good Idea Well thought out program/well structured proposal.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
Informational Interviewing Presented by Clark University Career Services.
Performance Management 2012 Conducting Performance Evaluations Office of Human Resources UMW: “Putting U First”
Joint Staff School Committee Training. Why do we need a JSSC? Provide orderly and professional means of improving educational programs, conditions within.
Putting It all Together Facilitating Learning and Project Groups.
Disability and special educational needs: local area responsibilities under the Children and Families Act, 2014 Charlie Henry HMI National lead for disability.
Preceptor Orientation For the Nurse Practitioner Program
Involving Parents 1. DeAnn Lechtenberger — Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley — Project Coordinator Doug Hamman — Project Evaluator Tonya Hettler—Business.
Commission on Accreditation for Respiratory Care The Site Visitors Are Coming! Transitioning from Successful Self- Study to Successful Site Visit Bradley.
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Board Retreat Discussion and Review Non Profit Board Retreat Review and Discussion April 5, :30 AM- 11:30 AM Diana A. Bing 4/5/2011.
Working Effectively with Parents July 2013 Pre-Service By Laurie Ocampo.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
1 October, 2005 Activities and Activity Director Guidance Training (F248) §483.15(f)(l), and (F249) §483.15(f)(2)
Market Meeting Support Susan Munson ERCOT Retail Market Liaison Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) June 10, 2008.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES FIRST THINGS FIRST Invitation of a mission Information meeting self-assessment.
Judy Dean Managing Director Tips in Addressing Carrier Medical Directors.
Coalition 101. RESPECT AND VALUE “The group respects my opinion and provides positive ways for me to contribute.” EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS “The roles.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
The Joseph Sam’s School CAMPAIGN MARKETING PLAN Target: Obtain Benefits for Teachers and Para pros Developed by Randy Gaddo PADM 7040 October 2005.
Educating Physicians: A Call for Reform of Medical School and Residency David M. Irby, PhD IAMSE Webinar September 1, 2011.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
NATIONAL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES COLLABORATIVE Report of Independent Evaluation Presentation – 7 th February 2012 NATIONAL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES COLLABORATIVE.
1 Consulting Dr. G. Roy Mayer. 2 Four Interconnected Phases of Consultation I. Develop an Environment Conducive to Teacher Growth and Change (Initial.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Community Planning Training 5- Community Planning Training 5-1.
November 15, 2007 The “ABC” of Effective Field Monitoring & Supervision November 15, 2007.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Program Evaluation Workshop Overview of the Site Visit Process Rita Marie Cain Professor of Business Law, Bloch School.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
Global Education Consulting What Do Consultees Want From Us?
Transforming Passive Rotations Blake Fagan, MD Lisa Ray, MD MAHEC Family Practice Residency Program Asheville, NC April 2012.
1 MODULE 4 On-Site Visit CAPTE: On-site Reviewer Training This module will address the purpose and process of the on-site visit. 6/11/2016.
Anatomy and Physiology of Global Health Consultations Structure and Function Warren Heffron MD.
Tasks, responsibilities and ethics of the evaluator Helka Kekäläinen Baku.
Boston University Global Health Collaborative
Preceptor Orientation For the Nurse Practitioner Program
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Lorain City Schools 90 Day Entry Plan Update.
International Consultations Breadth and Depth
You Say You Want a Revolution:
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
The On-Site Evaluation Visit
Family Medicine Cares International: Patient Care, Service, Medical Education and Faculty Development in Haiti Donald Briscoe, MD Anna Doubeni, MD MPH.
Program Review Guidelines & Processes at SUNY New Paltz
Presentation transcript:

OR Some of Warren’s Mistakes

Professor Emeritus University of New Mexico

 Incomplete pre trip communication  Logistical support  Contractual needs, written  On site contact information  How do you prevent problems?  Have you had any pre trip boo-boo’s?

 Contractual understanding of who pays, how, and when. Travel costs, international, local Lodging, meals, car rental, misc expenses Honorarium, Insurance, Dress expectations  Pre site visit questionaire

 Insufficient Time.  How do you correct?

Adequate travel time Appropriate jet lag correction time Assessment of data collection Logistics of scheduling all the people you will meet Time for summary conference Time for immediate report writing Avoid late night, early morning syndrome

 Incomplete communication re the desired outcomes of the consultation. “ do a consultation to make our residency / department better”  Can you guarantee total mutual understanding of what they want?

 At the end of the consultation you get four more requests  1. Can you develop our curriculum?  2. We have differing opinions about what we want to do.  3. Faculty members come to you unhappy with the program director.  4. Where can we get out of country funding?

 Prior written determination of What they want What you can deliver Pre site visit questionairre

 Let’s compare your residency to the RAP guidelines. “ We are not a North American residency, and we do not want to be one”

 Involve the consultee in determining criteria.  Mutually developed criteria included the relevant RAP suggestions and she was happy because she now had ownership in what we were goung to do together.

 Perceived superiority attitude. ( might as well be real)  Comments: How much better things things are in US How little they have “Developing countries” Any term they might consider derogatory

 Communication  Service attitude ( Humility )  Honest and open sharing  Learning attitude, listen attentively  Avoid expert trap  Realize our model may not be for all  Recognize your own biases

 Cultural inattentiveness  Shook hqands with covered Saudi resident  Any of you stories?

 Constant awareness of cultural differences  Read about cultural issues, history, geography  Ask advice  Importance of personal talk  Respect all, especially elderly and leaders

 Incomplete awareness of “political” ramifications of the consultation.  Aware only of those who support the program and meeting only with this group  Unaware of those who do not support or who actively oppose the program.

 Meet with all key persons in the program  Meet with key administrative staff who will provide resources and continued support  Meet with persons who do not support or oppose the program  Explore internal political interactions, factions, and power struggles

 Lack of local understanding of family medicine and what it is and what we do  Not recognizing the significant variability in training and function of family doctors / general practitioners  Assuming RRC standards and RAP criteria have universal relevance

 Educate yourself—Pre trip study  Early in consultation meet with MOH, Dean, Chairs, Program Directors, faculty, staff, students, other specialists  Warn people, your recommendations may take years to accomplish, CME programs,mentoring,post MD training

 Unorganized consultation  Delegate the process to some one else

 Mutual understanding of goals  Pre arranged mutualld developed schedule, yet with flexibility for reflection and additions  Systematic data gathering and synthesis  Presentation of preliminary recommendations  Formal written recommendations

 Non maximized consultation  May need more than one consultant, varied expertise  Insufficient time

 Consider a consultant team, ( even training )  Capitalize on different types of expertise  Divide responsibilities, and meetings, or one active and one observing at different times  Identify local resources for collaborating for ongoing plans

 Leaving them with uncertainties or unknown expectations regarding your opinions at the end of the consultation

 Have an oral exit interview ( group ) outlining your key recommendations  Seek input from consultees re key recommendations  Tie your recommendations into their ?s  Ask advice before includibg comments that are “far afield”

 Written report

 Formal, timely, complete written report  Include recommendations they feel are important  Tie to their requests for the consultation  Review before releasing by the person requesting ( paying for ) the consultation  Care with who gets the report and in non changeable format

 “Snapshot”, or one time consultation without developing an ongoing relationship

 Offer e mail, written or phone continuity  Continuity of consultations  Address sustainability of program  Confirm agreements and support  Include long term planning  Plan for broadly based support  Develop jobs for graduates

 Evaluation process