Status of the NO A Experiment Kirk Bays (Caltech) on behalf of the NO A collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Saturday, Feb 22, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Advertisements

A long-baseline experiment with the IHEP neutrino beam Y. Efremenko detector Presented by.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February The NO A Experiment P5 Meeting SLAC 21 February 2008 Gary Feldman.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Leon Mualem — NNN07 The NO A Experiment Status Leon Mualem California Institute of Technology (for the NO A collaboration) Workshop on Next Generation.
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
Searching for Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at MINOS Andy Blake Cambridge University April 2004.
1 Neutrinos: Past, Present and Future Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University.
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
The Status of the NOvA Experiment Sarah Phan-Budd Argonne National Laboratory Miami 2011 December 16, 2011.
Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
NO A goals & physics NO A goals & physics NO A sites & detectors NO A sites & detectors NO A now & future NO A now & future.
NEW RESULTS FROM MINOS Patricia Vahle, for the MINOS collaboration College of William and Mary.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Sampling Detectors for e Detection and Identification Adam Para, Fermilab NuFact02 Imperial College Interest de jour: what is sin 2 2  13  oscillations.
NO A Experiment Jarek Nowak University of Minnesota For NOvA Collaboration.
November 6, 2004Carl Bromberg, FNAL LAr Exp. Workshop Nov. 4-6, Particle ID, energy resolution, neutrino flavor tagging, efficiencies, backgrounds,
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
The NO A Experiment Status Leon Mualem California Institute of Technology (for the NO A collaboration) Fermilab Users’ Meeting 2009.
 Leslie Camilleri CERN, PH November 23, NO A is a Long Baseline experiment using the NUMI beam from Fermilab Now being used for MINOS (732km)
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
The Status of MINOS Mike Kordosky University College London for the collaboration.
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Gary Feldman MINOS in Cambridge 24 March NO A Update MINOS Collaboration Meeting Cambridge, England 24 March 2009 Gary Feldman.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment R. D. McKeown Caltech On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration CIPANP 2009.
Detector possibilities: scintillator based detectors EUCARD 1 st Annual Meeting, RAL, 13 April 2010 Paul Soler.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Harvard Neutrino Group DoE Review August 21, 2006.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Low Z Detector Simulations
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Status and oscillation results of the OPERA experiment Florian Brunet LAPP - Annecy 24th Rencontres de Blois 29/05/2012.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
PAC questions and Simulations Peter Litchfield, August 27 th Extent to which MIPP/MINER A can help estimate far detector backgrounds by extrapolation.
NOvA in light of non-zero θ 13 Gavin S. Davies Iowa State University for the NOvA Collaboration nuTURN Workshop Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy.
Status of the NOνA Experiment Satish Desai - University of Minnesota For the NOνA Collaboration APS Meeting - April 2013 Denver, Colorado.
MIND Systematic Errors EuroNu Meeting, RAL 18 January 2010 Paul Soler.
The NO A Near Detector: An overview Jose A. Sepulveda-Quiroz For the NO A Collaboration Iowa State University and Argonne National Laboratory APS April.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Event Display The DAQ system architecture The NOA Data Acquisition system with the full 14 kt far detector P.F. Ding, D. Kalra, A. Norman and J. Tripathi.
Monitoring and Commissioning the NOνA Far Detector M. Baird 1, J. Bian 2, J. Coelho 4, G. Davies 3, M. Messier 1, M. Muether 5, J. Musser 1 and D. Rocco.
The NOνA data driven trigger Matthew Tamsett for the NOνA collaboration NOνA Neutrino 2014, XXVI International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
New Results from MINOS Matthew Strait University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration Phenomenology 2010 Symposium 11 May 2010.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
NOnA NuMI Off-axis ne Appearance
Neutrino factory near detector simulation
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Status of the OPERA experiment
Peter Litchfield Minnesota University For the NOA collaboration
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
6. Preliminary Results from MINOS
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February
Presentation transcript:

Status of the NO A Experiment Kirk Bays (Caltech) on behalf of the NO A collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Saturday, Feb 22, 2014

NO A Overview Source: NuMI beam (FNAL) Far Det (FD) and Near Det (ND) Liquid Scintillator, APDs High resolution tracking calorimeter Appearance and disappearance oscillation physics Feb NO A: ~160 scientists 30 institutions 7 countries Kirk Bays

NO A Detector Cells Cells filled with liquid scintillator, wavelength shifting optical fiber Fiber traps light, channels it to an Avalanche Photo Diode (APD) One APD per 32 fibers (~85% QE) Feb cm 4 cm 16 m long 0.7 mm fibers APD pixels PVC Cells one cell Kirk Bays

Feb Radiation length = 38 cm = 6-10 cells FD (at Ash River, MN, 810 km baseline): – 16m x 16m x 60m, 14kton, above ground – ~2/3 LS by mass, ~344,000 cells, 28x32 planes ND (at Fermilab, 1km along beam): – 4m x 4m x 14m, 0.3kton, 105 m underground – ~18,000 cells, design identical to FD 16 m square FD Hall layers alternate direction NO A Detector Design

NuMI Beam Feb NO A detectors 14 mrad off-axis This tightly peaks the beam energy at 2 GeV, optimizing physics > 1.35e20 POT delivered since restart Kirk Bays

NO A will measure: –  13 –  23 –  m 2 32 And will determine or constrain: –  CP – the mass hierarchy – the octant Feb Expected physics Cosmic rays: – FD on surface – reject > % for fully contained sample with < 5% loss in efficiency NC: – reject > 95% of NC – ~20% loss in efficiency Important Backgrounds: Kirk Bays Neutrino parameters all interact Plotting one requires assuming values for others

Expected physics: Appearance Feb Electron Neutrino Appearance Muon Neutrino Disappearance Other Physics Statistics: 100 events / 6 years For 3 yrs + 3 yrs anti- 6e20 POT/yr Background cuts included Signal: 68 / 32 anti- Background: 29 NC / 5  CC /13 beam e Signature: – EM shower, no muon – contained – beam directed Kirk Bays e + p e + n  e - + X EM shower 2 GeV Visible E simulated event

Electron Neutrino Appearance Muon Neutrino Disappearance Other Physics Feb Signature: – high energy muon – contained – beam directed Expected physics: Disappearance Statistics: 740 events / 6 years 1 year, full beam/detector /anti- mode (0-5 GeV vis E, after cuts) : total: 160/86 clear fully contained QE: 27/16 other fully contained: 55/26 uncontained: 78/45 Kirk Bays + p Quasi-elastic (QE):  + n   - + p Resonance (RES):  + n   - + n +  + Deep Inelastic Scatt. (DIS):  + n   - + c 1 n + c 2  muon proton Michel e - 2 GeV Visible E simulated event

Expected physics: Other Physics Feb Supernovas Monopoles WIMP searches Neutrino Magnetic Moment Electron Neutrino Appearance Muon Neutrino Disappearance Other Physics Kirk Bays Sterile Neutrinos Cross Sections … and more!

Construction status Feb Far Detector: Last block nearly complete 90% full of scintillator 11 blocks instrumented Complete this summer Data is being recorded now Near Detector: All blocks built! Scintillator filling now APD installation in April FD status Feb Kirk Bays Near Detector beam

First Data Collecting data since the NuMI beam restarted In a combination of hand scanning and preliminary analyses, have identified first neutrino candidates at far detector Candidates confirm our timing is properly aligned Feb expected background in timing window: 0.05 events Kirk Bays

Feb neutrino beam direction Kirk Bays up sides Candidate Event Display

Kirk Feb neutrino beam direction sides up Candidate Event Display: with Reconstruction vertex

Feb Projected Physics Reach: Disappearance Kirk Bays

How well we can measure hierarchy depends on value of  CP 3  /2 optimal for normal hierarchy measurement,  /2 optimal for inverted Can combine with T2K data to get > 1  significance everywhere Kirk Feb Projected Physics Reach: Hierarchy

Kirk Feb Projected Physics Reach: CP and Octant Octant Measurement: – Whether  o – At least 2  significance, no matter  CP – Combines disappearance and appearance data CP: – Can constrain, depending on value –  /2 and 3  /2 optimal for measurement

Conclusions Construction nearing completion Beam back on We’ve seen first neutrino candidates! Analyzing first data Watch for more in coming months! Feb Kirk Bays

Backup Feb Kirk Bays

Projected Physics Reach: Hierarchy Feb NO A + T2K Kirk Bays

Feb Projected Physics Reach: CP NO A + T2K Kirk Bays

Feb Projected Physics Reach: Octant Kirk Bays

Feb APD Photodetector Manufacturer Pixel Active Area1.95 mm × 1.0 mm Pixel Pitch2.65 mm Array Size32 pixels Die Size15.34mm × 13.64mm Quantum Efficiency (>525 nm)85% Pixel Capacitance10 pF Bulk Dark Current (I B ) at 25 C12.5 pA Bulk Dark Current (I B ) at -15 C0.25 pA Peak Sensitivity600 nm Operating Voltage375 ± 50 volts Gain at Operating Voltage100 Operating Temperature (with Thermo-Electric Cooler) -15 º C Expected Signal-to-Noise Ratio (Muon at Far End of Cell) 10:1 APD channels per plane384 APD arrays per plane12 Total number of planes930 Total Number of APD arrays11,160 APD pixels total357,120

Feb Detected Spectra Kirk Bays

Feb Projected Physics Reach: Example Contours Kirk Bays

Simulation tuning Feb Kirk Bays

(simulated events with 2 GeV visible) X 0 = 38 cm (6 cell depths, 10 cell widths) + p e + p 0 + p gap muon EM shower proton 1 meter Michel e - Kirk Feb

Kirk Feb

Feb candidate event 1 unzoomed Kirk Bays

Feb Kirk Bays

Feb Kirk Bays

Feb Kirk Bays

Oscillation Theory Feb   flavor state i  mass state (in vacuum) PMNS matrix Kirk Bays

NDOS (Near Detector On Surface) Feb Prototype detector, completed May 2011 Still running! Can see neutrinos since NuMI beam restart Useful for checking beam timing Physics analyses on all past data ongoing 3x4x13m, same cellular fine resolution design Muon catcher (steel planes) in most downstream end Kirk Bays