OAQPS Update NESCAUM PMC Meeting New London, CT May 30, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
Advertisements

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Felicia Barnett Ronald B. Landy USEPA Office of Research and Development Office of Science Policy Regional Science Program.
Immediate Office Health and Environmental Impacts Division Air Benefit and Cost Group Ambient Standards Group Sector-Based Assessment Group Climate, International.
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
An Update on the Activities of the Western Regional Air Partnership ‘WRAP v2.0’ Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
Climate Change Science Program Climate Policy & Voluntary Programs Mercury & Water Quality Pesticides & Other POPs Local & Regional Air Quality Intercontinental.
Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.
1 OAR Guidance on -- “Consulting with Indian Tribal Governments” May 21, 2012.
1 Current Issues And Problems Encountered For Projections In The United States And Canada Presented by Ms. Rebecca Lee Tooly USEPA Office of Air Quality.
WRAP Status Report EPA/RPO Meeting Durham, NC February 6, 2002.
Overview of EPA Policy and Guidance Supporting Innovation Presented by: Lydia Wegman Director, Air Quality Strategies and Standards Division EPA’s Office.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Air Quality Management China City Mobilization Workshop Joseph Paisie USEPA Beijing, China.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
Development of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch 2012 CMAS Conference October 16,
Energy Resource Development Fulfilling the Potential for Native Communities U.S. Department of the Interior Office of Indian Energy and Economic Development.
1 Environmental Information Exchange Network - Principles and Components Molly O’Neill, State Director, Network Steering Board Pat Garvey, EPA Director,
1 Partners in Progress US EPA’s Memorandum of Understanding with Organizations Involved in Decentralized Wastewater Management April 29, 2008.
RESPONSIBLE CARE ® POLLUTION PREVENTION CODE David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
The National Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy and Network Design Westar Spring 2007 Business Meeting April 4, 2007 Bruce Louks, Idaho Department of Environmental.
Working together for clean air Tacoma Clean Air Performance Commitment May 2010.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Welcome Office of Radiation & Indoor Air (ORIA) Tribal Strategy and Plan National Tribal Forum May 21, 2012.
November 7, 2013 WRAP Membership Meeting Denver, CO Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council.
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System CMAQ Air Quality Data Summit February 2008.
Stationary Sources Joint Forum Update Eric Massey Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Lee Alter and Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association.
WESTAR Strategic Plan 2005 Update WESTAR Staff May 6, 2005 Juneau, Alaska.
Fine scale air quality modeling using dispersion and CMAQ modeling approaches: An example application in Wilmington, DE Jason Ching NOAA/ARL/ASMD RTP,
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
SIP Improvement: Current initiatives Anna Marie Wood Director Air Quality Policy Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. EPA WESTAR.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
September Lori Hanson, Lead worker Dispersion Modeling (515)
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division S.T. Rao Director, NERL/AMAD U.S.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Models-3 Adel Hanna Carolina Environmental Program University of North Carolina.
TRI-NATA Explorer 2008 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) National Training Conference Washington, DC February 12, 2008 Ted Palma - EPA Office of Air Quality.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
Proposed Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models
INTEGRATED ARCTIC MANAGEMENT Brendan P. Kelly Assistant Director for Polar Sciences Office of Science and Technology Policy
8 th Modeling Conference: Welcome & Opening Remarks Research Triangle Park September 22-23, 2005.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
National and Regional Programs to Reduce Ozone Transport Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP Board Meeting November 12, 2003 Tempe, AZ Rick Sprott.
Carolina Environmental Program At UNC 2003 Models-3 Workshop Status of the CMAS Center Bob Imhoff, CMAS Director.
Integrated Energy-Environmental Modeling for Regional Scenario Analysis Timothy Johnson U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development Research Triangle Park,
Request for Proposals Q&A Webcast – February/March
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For NESCAUM Monitoring Meeting April 29, 2011 Tim Hanley – US EPA, OAQPS 1.
Funding of Regional Planning Organizations May, 2006.
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
FHWA Update SHRP2 Implementation and Other Agency TSMO R&D Efforts Tracy Scriba, FHWA 12/8/15 1.
Source: Javier Fochesatto Regulatory Context for Modeling Robert Elleman EPA Region 10.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
DRAFT USEPA Office of Compliance Update: 90 CWA Action Plan, State Review Framework, & OECA National Priority Selection Presentation to NACAA Chris Knopes.
1 Four State / EPA Region 7 State Implementation Plan (SIP) Kaizen Process.
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
Key Findings from May & July 2008 WRAP Technical Workshops September 30, 2008 Steve Arnold, Colorado DPHE & Bob Kotchenruther, EPA R10 (Co-Chairs, WRAP.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Pulp & Paper Sector Strategy & New Source Performance Standards Strategy Peter Tsirigotis, Director Sector Policies & Programs Division National Association.
Air Modeling Updates 2015 Region 4 Grants/Planning Meeting May 19-21, 2015 Atlanta, Georgia 1.
OAQPS Update June 24, NESCAUM PMC Annual Meeting.
Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment
Steve Page Office Director, OAQPS NACAA Spring Meeting 2010
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
Initiatives Oversight Committee Update on Other Activities
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Presentation transcript:

OAQPS Update NESCAUM PMC Meeting New London, CT May 30, 2007

Outline OAQPS Reorganization Update Air Quality Modeling Group Activities Model Clearinghouse AERMOD Modeling System CALPUFF Modeling System Next Steps

Immediate Office Health and Environmental Impacts Division Air Benefit and Cost Group Ambient Standards Group Sector-Based Assessment Group Climate, International and Multi-Media Group Air Quality Policy Division Geographic Strategies Group State and Local Programs Group Integrated Implementation Group Operating Permits Group Air Quality Assessment Division Air Quality Modeling Group Measurement Technology Group Air Quality Analysis Group Ambient Air Monitoring Group Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group Outreach and Information Division Tribal, Community and Urban Programs Group Voluntary and Innovative Programs Group Outreach Group Information Transfer Group National Air Data Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Program Design Group Measurement Policy Group Metals and Minerals Group Coatings and Chemicals Group Natural Resources and Commerce Group Energy Strategies Group Policy Analysis and Communications Staff Washington Operations Staff Central Operations And Resources Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Air Quality Modeling Group Conducts air quality modeling for regulatory and policy assessments –e.g., NOx SIP Call, Heavy Duty Diesel, Nonroad Rule, Clear Skies, CAIR, CAMR, NAAQS RIAs Provides guidance for the application of air quality models for SIP demonstrations and NSR/PSD permitting –Appendix W, O3/PM/RH Guidance Partners and coordinates w/ others (e.g, ORD, scientific community, etc) on model evaluations and development efforts NOAA Branch w/in our division provide meteorological & dispersion modeling expertise

FY06 Accomplishments Regulatory/policy modeling –CAIR/CAMR/CAVR petitions for reconsideration –Developed CMAQ-based RSM for PM2.5 –PM NAAQS & OTAQ Rules –Pulp & Paper sector modeling –ICAP & related international modeling projects Permit modeling –AERMOD Promulgation & Implementation –8 th Modeling Conference & R/S/L Modelers workshop –Model Clearinghouse & RO coordination SIP Modeling Guidance & Support –O3 & PM/RH Modeling Guidance for SIP Demos –Detroit Multi-pollutant Pilot Study (ongoing) Coordination w/ ORD and scientific community –CMAS, AMD/AQMG retreat, NARSTO, monthly meetings –Hg tagging source appt into CMAQ & sensitivity analyses

FY07 Focus Areas 2002 Multi-pollutant Modeling Platform Integrated O3/PM/RH SIP Modeling Guidance Regulatory/Policy Modeling –O3 NAAQS, O3/PM Implementation, OTAQ rules, 812 Study –RTR & 2002 NATA, Sector initiatives, Mercury NSR/PSD Permit Modeling –Model Clearinghouse and R/S/L technical support –AERMOD/CALPUFF Implementation & Updates Modeling Infrastructure Investments –Multi-pollutant ‘hybrid’ modeling capability (CMAQ/AERMOD) –Sector-based, Multi-pollutant Source Appt Techniques –Deposition Modeling & Linkages w/ Eco, Watershed & Related Models –Multi-pollutant response surface modeling w/ CMAQ Accountability/Multi-pollutant Report

Need for Improved Modeling Support In May 2006, the ROs presented two recommendations to the Air Division Directors: –OAQPS need to enhance its technical expertise regarding the “new generation” of near-field models –OAQPS needs to accelerate its reinstatement of an active and effective Model Clearinghouse to provide technical expertise for permitting and SIP applications OAQPS has responded and taken actions

40CFR, Part 51, Appendix W, Section 3.3 states “As appropriate, the Regional Office may request assistance from the Model Clearinghouse after an initial evaluation and decision has been reached concerning the application of a model, analytical technique or data base in a particular regulatory action.” Appendix W – Model Clearinghouse

Formal Clearinghouse Process State contacts Region Region writes memo to clearinghouse: –Statement of Issue –Desired approach –Justification Clearinghouse facilitates solutions and writes formal response Clearinghouse summarizes & archives decisions: –Searchable database (MCHISRS) via web access (SCRAM) –Present summary at annual Regional/State/Local workshop –Write annual report OAQPS develops guidance as appropriate: Policy memo, EPA Report, Rule Making

Clearinghouse helps to insure consistency! Timely interpretation of guidance (as issues arise) Minimizes bad precedents: –Get in early on issues –Memoranda provide essential support to regions, states and locals Guidance development through consensus building

AERMOD Modeling System AERMOD Implementation Workgroup –Co-chairs = Roger Brode & Randy Robinson –Guide OAQPS resources on model development w/ AERMIC & community –3 State-led subgroups on ASOS/MET issues, surface characteristics, & urban issues AERMIC reinstituted wrt science issues Update to AERMOD Regulatory Code –January 2007 AERSCREEN/AERSURFACE Tools Gridded MET tool development

CALPUFF Modeling System Update to Regulatory Approved Version –June 2006, Version 5.7 to 5.711a Issues with planned update to VISTAS version –Discussions across Federal agencies –BART apps separate from NSR/PSD –Engaged TRC through VISTAS –Despite delays and frustrations, value of update process and need for community to work together demonstrated Update outcome to be resolved soon (we hope!) –Need to clarify role/responsibility/expectations of model developer and modeling community

Next Steps: Items of Interest AIWG outcomes & report AERMOD & CALPUFF updates AERSCREEN & AERSURFACE release Gridded MET tool demo Model Clearinghouse upkeep & usage Continued interaction with policy staff Potential for “Interim” Modeling Conference