NWFSC A short course on data weighting and process error in Stock Synthesis Allan Hicks CAPAM workshop October 19, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Stock Synthesis
Advertisements

Modeling Recruitment in Stock Synthesis
Sardine Two-Stock Hypothesis: Results at the Posterior Mode SPSWG Meeting 28 th August 2013 Carryn de Moor Doug Butterworth Marine Resource Assessment.
An exploration of alternative methods to deal with time-varying selectivity in the stock assessment of YFT in the eastern Pacific Ocean CAPAM – Selectivity.
458 Quantifying Uncertainty using Classical Methods (Likelihood Profile, Bootstrapping) Fish 458, Lecture 12.
Sheng-Ping Wang 1,2, Mark Maunder 2, and Alexandre Aires-Da-Silva 2 1.National Taiwan Ocean University 2.Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission.
An evaluation of alternative binning approaches for composition data in integrated stock assessments Cole Monnahan, Sean Anderson, Felipe Hurtado, Kotaro.
Tradeoffs between bias, model fits, and using common sense about biology and fishing behaviors when choosing selectivity forms Dana Hanselman and Pete.
Growth in Age-Structured Stock Assessment Models R.I.C. Chris Francis CAPAM Growth Workshop, La Jolla, November 3-7, 2014.
C3: Estimation of size-transition matrices with and without molt probability for Alaska golden king crab using tag–recapture data M.S.M. Siddeek, J. Zheng,
AIGKC Model North Pacific Fishery Management Council Crab Modeling Workshop Report.
Modeling Selectivity in Stock Synthesis Modeling population processes 2009 IATTC workshop.
Black Sea Bass – Northern Stock Coastal-Pelagic/ASMFC Working Group Review June 15, 2010.
Integration of sensory modalities
The current status of fisheries stock assessment Mark Maunder Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) Center for the Advancement of Population.
Reporter: Hsu Hsiang-Jung Modelling stochastic fish stock dynamics using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.
Case Study - Dover Sole Range from Baja California to the Bering Sea. On mud or muddy-sand, at 35 to 1400 m depths. Feed on polychaete worms, shrimp, brittle.
1 STOCK SYNTHESIS: Integrated Analysis of Fishery and Survey Size, Age, and Abundance Information for Stock Assessment Modified from Richard Methot NOAA.
Hui-Hua Lee 1, Kevin R. Piner 1, Mark N. Maunder 2 Evaluation of traditional versus conditional fitting of von Bertalanffy growth functions 1 NOAA Fisheries,
Linear Regression and Correlation Topic 18. Linear Regression  Is the link between two factors i.e. one value depends on the other.  E.g. Drivers age.
How many conditional age-at-length data are needed to estimate growth in stock assessment models? Xi He, John C. Field, Donald E. Pearson, and Lyndsey.
The (potential) value and use of empirical estimates of selectivity in integrated assessments John Walter, Brian Linton, Will Patterson and Clay Porch.
Time-Varying vs. Non-Time- Varying Growth in the Gulf of Mexico King Mackerel Stock Assessment: a Case Study Southeast Fisheries Science Center Jeff Isely,
Linear Trend Lines Y t = b 0 + b 1 X t Where Y t is the dependent variable being forecasted X t is the independent variable being used to explain Y. In.
Modeling Parameters in Stock Synthesis Modeling population processes 2009 IATTC workshop.
Richard Methot NOAA Fisheries Service Seattle, WA
Name: Angelica F. White WEMBA10. Teach students how to make sound decisions and recommendations that are based on reliable quantitative information During.
Why Is It There? Getting Started with Geographic Information Systems Chapter 6.
ASSESSMENT OF BIGEYE TUNA (THUNNUS OBESUS) IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN January 1975 – December 2006.
Where does my data go? Preparation of files for the assessments of IOTC stocks and use of data for the assessments of IOTC species Mauritius, March.
VI. Evaluate Model Fit Basic questions that modelers must address are: How well does the model fit the data? Do changes to a model, such as reparameterization,
MANOVA Multivariate Analysis of Variance. One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Comparing k Populations.
Spatial issues in WCPO stock assessments (bigeye and yellowfin tuna) Simon Hoyle SPC.
A retrospective investigation of selectivity for Pacific halibut CAPAM Selectivity workshop 14 March, 2013 Ian Stewart & Steve Martell.
Evaluation of a practical method to estimate the variance parameter of random effects for time varying selectivity Hui-Hua Lee, Mark Maunder, Alexandre.
The Stock Synthesis Approach Based on many of the ideas proposed in Fournier and Archibald (1982), Methot developed a stock assessment approach and computer.
Workshop on Stock Assessment Methods 7-11 November IATTC, La Jolla, CA, USA.
M.S.M. Siddeeka*, J. Zhenga, A.E. Puntb, and D. Pengillya
What is the likelihood that your model is wrong? Generalized tests and corrections for overdispersion during model fitting and exploration James Thorson,
The effect of variable sampling efficiency on reliability of the observation error as a measure of uncertainty in abundance indices from scientific surveys.
Extending length-based models for data-limited fisheries into a state-space framework Merrill B. Rudd* and James T. Thorson *PhD Student, School of Aquatic.
1 Yi-Jay Chang 2 Brian Langseth 3 Mark Maunder 1 Felipe Carvalho Performance of a stock assessment model with misspecified time-varying growth 1 – JIMAR,
Before Data Weighting: An ensemble model approach to fishery management advice CAPAM Workshop on Data-Weighting October 2015 Richard D. Methot NOAA Fisheries.
ASSESSMENT OF BIGEYE TUNA (THUNNUS OBESUS) IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN January 1975 – December 2005.
Simulation analysis using stock synthesis Maunder, Piner, and Lee.
Modeling biological-composition time series in integrated stock assessments: data weighting considerations and impact on estimates of stock status P. R.
Using distributions of likelihoods to diagnose parameter misspecification of integrated stock assessment models Jiangfeng Zhu * Shanghai Ocean University,
CAN DIAGNOSTIC TESTS HELP IDENTIFY WHAT MODEL STRUCTURE IS MISSPECIFIED? Felipe Carvalho 1, Mark N. Maunder 2,3, Yi-Jay Chang 1, Kevin R. Piner 4, Andre.
Some Insights into Data Weighting in Integrated Stock Assessments André E. Punt 21 October 2015 Index-1 length-4.
MSE Performance Metrics, Tentative Results and Summary Joint Technical Committee Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Pacific Biological Station, DFO.
Yellowfin Tuna Major Changes Catch, effort, and length-frequency data for the surface fisheries have been updated to include new data for 2005.
Lecture 10 review Spatial sampling design –Systematic sampling is generally better than random sampling if the sampling universe has large-scale structure.
UALG Statistical catch at age models Einar Hjörleifsson.
Data weighting and data conflicts in fishery stock assessments Chris Francis Wellington, New Zealand CAPAM workshop, “ Data conflict and weighting, likelihood.
Influence of selectivity and size composition misfit on the scaling of population estimates and possible solutions: an example with north Pacific albacore.
Estimating Uncertainty. Estimating Uncertainty in ADMB Model parameters and derived quantities Normal approximation Profile likelihood Bayesian MCMC Bootstrap.
MONTE CARLO SIMULATION MODEL. Monte carlo simulation model Computer based technique length frequency samples are used for the model. In addition randomly.
Recommended modeling approach Version 2.0. The law of conflicting data Axiom Data is true Implication Conflicting data implies model misspecification.
Population Dynamics and Stock Assessment of Red King Crab in Bristol Bay, Alaska Jie Zheng Alaska Department of Fish and Game Juneau, Alaska, USA.
Is down weighting composition data adequate to deal with model misspecification or do we need to fix the model? Sheng-Ping Wang, Mark N. Maunder National.
ETHEM ALPAYDIN © The MIT Press, Lecture Slides for.
The simple linear regression model and parameter estimation
Chapter 20 Linear and Multiple Regression
Pacific-Wide Assessment of Bigeye Tuna
Sardine Two-Stock Hypothesis: Results at the Posterior Mode
ASAP Review and Discussion
SAFS Quantitative Seminar
Data Literacy Graphing and Statisitics
Bristol Bay Red King Crab Assessment in Spring 2019
Presentation transcript:

NWFSC A short course on data weighting and process error in Stock Synthesis Allan Hicks CAPAM workshop October 19, 2015

Working definitions Process error – Variability of a process (time-varying) e.g., recruitment or selectivity Data weighting – Balancing data sources such that the expected variability matches input variability SE on indices of abundance Input vs. effective sample sizes on composition data – Allowing some data sources to influence results more than others

A brief introduction to SS Four required input files 1)Starter.ss 2)Forecast.ss 3)Data file 4)Control file A possible 5th file 5)wtatage.ss Executable Ss3.exe

SS I/O & Associated Tools Input files starter.ss MyControlFile.ss MyDataFile.ss forecast.ss SS3 Output with results Report.sso CompReport.sso covar.sso Forecast-report.sso Output for debugging warning.sso echoinput.sso ParmTrace.sso Output that mirrors input starter.ss_new control.ss_new data.ss_new forecast.ss_new to get comments or simulated data Excel Viewer R4SS any text editor Excel Sheets

Starter and forecast files Starter file – Define names of data and control files – Other definitions for minimization, output, and more Forecast file – Set up benchmarks and forecast settings

Data File sections (in order) Model dimensions Catches Abundance index Discards Mean weight Length compositions Age compositions Mean size-at-age Environmental observations Size frequencies Tag data Morph compositions

Data weighting methods in SS Data file Indices of abundance – Typically a lognormal likelihood – Input SE(log space) Higher values give less weight Allows for year-specific weighting Compositions – Multinomial likelihood – Input sample sizes Lower values give less weight Allows for year-specific weighting

Pacific Hake Example Index of abundance Age compositions

Control file sections (in order) Biological and time-block setup Biological parameters Stock-recruitment parameters and setup Fishing mortality Catchability Selectivity Tag-recapture Variance adjustments Lambdas (multipliers to likelihood) Extra standard deviation reporting

Data weighting methods in SS Variance adjustment factors

Data weighting methods in SS Lambdas

Data weighting methods Extra SD on indices of abundance

Estimate additive SD for indices Two concepts for weighting length and age data 1.Effective N Commonly referred to as McAllister & Ianelli (1997) a)Multiply input N’s by a factor so that harmonic mean of effective N matches the mean of the input N b)By eye, fit a line through the scatterplot of the effective N vs. the input N 2.Adjust input N so that variation around the mean contains the observed mean (Francis weighting) Data weighting guidance

Extra SD for indices (Widow Rockfish)

Length composition weighting Adj mean (inputN*Adj)meanEffN HarMean (effN) Widow Rockfish Midwater Trawl MeaneffN/ MeaninputN HarMeanEffN/ MeanInputNFrancis ( )

Fits to composition data

Process error Recruitment – Estimate recruitment as deviations with a defined variance (σ R ) – Define “eras”: early, main, forecast – Main era is the most informed – Tune the variance such that the RMSE (variability) of the deviates in the main era is slightly greater than σ R

Process error Time-varying quantities – For example, growth and selectivity 1.Link to an environmental variable 2.Deviations 3.Random walk 4.Blocks 5.Trend Deviations (N std. dev. pars.) Random walk (N -1 std. dev. pars.) Blocks (1 par. per block) Trend (3 pars.)

Parameter elements #Natural Mortality #LO HI INIT PRIOR PR_type SD PHASE env-var use_dev dev_minyr dev_maxyr dev_stddev Block Block_Fxn #M Short parameter lines (7 elements) Full parameter lines (14 elements) #_Spawner-Recruitment Parameters #_LO HI INIT PRIOR PR_type SD PHASE #Ln(R0) Bounds PriorInitial value Estimating phase Optional comment Bounds PriorInitial value Estimating phase Optional comment Time-varying properties

Final thoughts Data weighting is an art It is basically trying to make the residuals (or lack of fit) consistent – Don’t want standardized residuals much greater than 2 standard deviations – Can look at residuals plots to see this These values do not need to be exact You may want to down-weight (or up-weight) some data sources based on your belief – Not related to the guidance above Process error can interact/confound data weighting

Example Let’s first look at Pacific Hake – Annual deviations on selectivity – Estimates of extra SE on indices of abundance – Recruitment and σ R – Age composition weighting If we have time, let’s look at Widow Rockfish – Block setup for time-varying factors – Output for guidance on σ R and composition weights – R4SS output for effective N and Francis weighting