NOvA: The NuMI Offaxis º e Appearance Experiment A.Norman for the NOvA Collaboration A.Norman (U.Virginia)1DPF 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MINOS+ Starts April 2013 for three years April
Advertisements

TAUP 2007 R. Plunkett 14 September,2007 Status of the NOvA Experiment Robert Plunkett Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL, USA TAUP 2007.
A long-baseline experiment with the IHEP neutrino beam Y. Efremenko detector Presented by.
Karol Lang, University of Texas,NOvA, XII International Workshop on “Neutrino Telescopes”, Venice, March 6-9, Karol Lang University of Texas at.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February The NO A Experiment P5 Meeting SLAC 21 February 2008 Gary Feldman.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Leon Mualem — NNN07 The NO A Experiment Status Leon Mualem California Institute of Technology (for the NO A collaboration) Workshop on Next Generation.
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
The Design of MINER  A Howard Budd University of Rochester August, 2004.
Doug Michael Jan. 12, First goal is to be ready to select an optimal technology in ~one year. –Demonstrate that fundamental technologies are ready.
1 Neutrinos: Past, Present and Future Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University.
NuMI MINOS The MINOS Far Detector Cosmic Rays and their neutrinos are being collected now. How does this work, and of what use is this data? Alec Habig,
Fermilab Scientific Computing Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA. The Power of Data Driven Triggering DAQ Topology.
Fermilab Fermilab Scientific Computing Division & Computing Enabling Technologies Department, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois,
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
The Status of the NOvA Experiment Sarah Phan-Budd Argonne National Laboratory Miami 2011 December 16, 2011.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
The NOvA Experiment At Fermilab Mark Messier Indiana University 34th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP’08) Philadelphia, PA July 30,
NO A goals & physics NO A goals & physics NO A sites & detectors NO A sites & detectors NO A now & future NO A now & future.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Sampling Detectors for e Detection and Identification Adam Para, Fermilab NuFact02 Imperial College Interest de jour: what is sin 2 2  13  oscillations.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
NO A Experiment Jarek Nowak University of Minnesota For NOvA Collaboration.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
The NOvA Experiment The NOvA Experiment Mark Messier.
F Axis The NO A Experiment: Phase 2 of the Fermilab NuMI Program Workshop on Physics with Atmospheric Neutrinos and Neutrinos from Muon Storage Rings Maury.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
The NO A Experiment Status Leon Mualem California Institute of Technology (for the NO A collaboration) Fermilab Users’ Meeting 2009.
 Leslie Camilleri CERN, PH November 23, NO A is a Long Baseline experiment using the NUMI beam from Fermilab Now being used for MINOS (732km)
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Future Neutrino Physics Mitch Soderberg Fermilab Institutional Review June 6-9, 2011.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
21-Aug-06DoE Site Review / Harvard(1) Front End Electronics for the NOvA Neutrino Detector John Oliver Long baseline neutrino experiment Fermilab (Chicago)
Fermilab Neutrino Program Jim Strait Neutrino Discussion at CERN 26 November 2013.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Gary Feldman MINOS in Cambridge 24 March NO A Update MINOS Collaboration Meeting Cambridge, England 24 March 2009 Gary Feldman.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
Mass Hierarchy Study with MINOS Far Detector Atmospheric Neutrinos Xinjie Qiu 1, Andy Blake 2, Luke A. Corwin 3, Alec Habig 4, Stuart Mufso 3, Stan Wojcicki.
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment R. D. McKeown Caltech On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration CIPANP 2009.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Harvard Neutrino Group DoE Review August 21, 2006.
Low Z Detector Simulations
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
An experiment to measure   with the CNGS beam off axis and a deep underwater Cherenkov detector in the Gulf of Taranto CNGS.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
NO A Zebulun Krahn University of Minnesota NNN2009 Estes Park, CO October 8-10 th 2009.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
15-Aug-08DoE Site Review / Harvard(1) Front End Electronics for the NOvA Neutrino Detector John Oliver, Nathan Felt, Sarah Harder Long baseline neutrino.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
2008 European School of High-Energy Physics - Trest, Czech Republic - 19 August - 1st September Target Tracker Data Analysis In OPERA Experiment S. Dmitrievsky,
NOvA in light of non-zero θ 13 Gavin S. Davies Iowa State University for the NOvA Collaboration nuTURN Workshop Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy.
Status of the NOνA Experiment Satish Desai - University of Minnesota For the NOνA Collaboration APS Meeting - April 2013 Denver, Colorado.
The NOnA Experiment Survey of the NOvA Far Detector Gary Feldman
Status of the NO A Experiment Kirk Bays (Caltech) on behalf of the NO A collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Saturday, Feb 22, 2014.
GOOD RUN SELECTION FOR NO ν A ANALYSIS Barnali Chowdhury 1, Louise Suter 2, Joao Coelho 3, Jim Musser 4 1 University of South Carolina, 2 Argonne National.
The NO A Near Detector: An overview Jose A. Sepulveda-Quiroz For the NO A Collaboration Iowa State University and Argonne National Laboratory APS April.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Event Display The DAQ system architecture The NOA Data Acquisition system with the full 14 kt far detector P.F. Ding, D. Kalra, A. Norman and J. Tripathi.
1 Status of the NO A Experiment Sarah Budd Argonne National Lab On behalf of the NO A Collaboration Fermilab Users’ Meeting 2010 June 2, 2010.
NOnA NuMI Off-axis ne Appearance
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
SoLid: Recent Results and Future Prospects
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
Peter Litchfield Minnesota University For the NOA collaboration
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February
Presentation transcript:

NOvA: The NuMI Offaxis º e Appearance Experiment A.Norman for the NOvA Collaboration A.Norman (U.Virginia)1DPF 2009

The NOvA Collaboration A.Norman (U.Virginia)DPF Scientists & Engineers from 26 Institutions Argonne National Laboratory University of Athens California Institute of Technology University of California, Los Angeles Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Harvard University Indiana University Lebedev Physical Institute Michigan State University University of Minnesota, Duluth University of Minnesota, Minneapolis The Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow Technische Universität München, Munich State University of New York, Stony Brook Northwestern University University of South Carolina, Columbia Southern Methodist University Stanford University University of Tennessee Texas A&M University University of Texas, Austin University of Texas, Dallas Tufts University University of Virginia, Charlottesville The College of William and Mary Wichita State University

The NOvA Collaboration A.Norman (U.Virginia)DPF Scientists & Engineers from 26 Institutions ProtoType Detector Planes Argonne National Lab – April 25, 2009

NOvA Overview NOvA NOvA is a second generation accelerator based neutrino oscillation experiment, optimized for detection of the oscillations: NOvA NOvA is: – A 14 kton, “totally active”, far site detector – A 222 ton near detector, utilizing an identical detector technology and geometry – An upgrade of the NuMI beam intensity from 320 kW to 700 kW Both detectors are “totally active”, highly segmented liquid scintillator calorimeter designs The detectors are placed 14mrad off the primary beam axis to achieve narrow º ¹ energy spectrum, peaked at 2GeV. The far detect sits on a 810km baseline between Chicago and Northern Minnesota at the first oscillation maximum A.Norman (U.Virginia)4DPF 2009

NOVA SENSIVITIES Physics Motivations A.Norman (U.Virginia)DPF 20095

The NO º A experimental program addresses 7 of the 8 questions posed by the P5 strategic plan for neutrino physics : ► What is the value of µ 13 ? ► Is µ 23 maximal? ► Do neutrinos violate CP? ► What is the mass structure of the known neutrinos? ► Are neutrinos their own anti-particles? ► What can neutrinos tell us about physics beyond the standard model? Sterile Neutrinos? ► What can we learn from the neutrino burst of a near galatic Supernova? Questions for NOvA to Answer A.Norman (U.Virginia)6DPF 2009

The Off-Axis Beam 7 The Off-Axis Effect In the pion rest frame the kinematics are all completely determined for the decay But when we boost into the lab frame the neutrino’s energy depends on the angle relative to the boost direction. This ends up projecting neutrino energy spectrum down till it’s almost flat. The Off-Axis Effect In the pion rest frame the kinematics are all completely determined for the decay But when we boost into the lab frame the neutrino’s energy depends on the angle relative to the boost direction. This ends up projecting neutrino energy spectrum down till it’s almost flat. ¹ ¼ º ¹ ¼ º Boost ° µ A.Norman (U.Virginia)DPF 2009

The Effect of Going Off-Axis By going off-axis, the neutrino flux from ¼ ! ¹ + º is reduced at a distance z to: But the energy narrows as µ 2 : For NO ν A, moving 14 mrad off axis makes the NuMI beam energy – peak at 2 GeV – E º width narrows to 20% The detector is matched well to this narrow band beam with an energy resolution » 4% for º ¹ CC events 8 1 st Osc. Max A.Norman (U.Virginia)DPF 2009

This suppresses the high energy tail (NC background) Significantly reduces the backgrounds from Kaons by shifting the neutrino energy Energy spectrum in the signal region becomes almost insensitive to the  /K ratio Results in neutrino peak primarily from  decays Essential for making the high precision µ 23 measurement 9 The Advantage of Going Off-Axis A.Norman (U.Virginia)DPF 2009

Measuring º e appearance in the NuMI º ¹ beam will give evidence for º ¹ ! º e transitions and a non-zero U e3 component to ¢ m 2 32 This is done through the º e CC channel The º ¹ NC is the dominant background, Controlled through the identification of initial vertex and displaced shower conversion point. NO º A’s energy (2GeV) and baseline (810km) and segmentation (0.15X 0 ) are chosen to maximize the physics reach of accessing these transitions P( º ¹ ! º e ) and U e3 The U e3 contribution to the third mass state is small, requiring a precision measurement of º e appearance A.Norman (U.Virginia)10DPF 2009

Sensitivity for µ 13 from º ¹ ! º e Nova is sensitive to electron neutrino appearance down to » 0.01 at 90% CL The physics reach for µ 13 is shown for 3 years of running each on º and º -bar. There are hints that µ 13 may be large A.Norman (U.Virginia)11

Sensitivity for µ 13 from º ¹ ! º e Nova is sensitive to electron neutrino appearance down to » 0.01 at 90% CL The physics reach for µ 13 is shown for 3 years of running each on º and º -bar. There are hints that µ 13 may be large

The detector’s excellent energy resolution, allows NO º A to perform the disappearance measurement to 1% Typical 2GeV º ¹ CC-quasielastic event has » 120 hit cells If sin 2 (2 µ 23 ) , we can then resolve quadrant of the mixing ( µ 23 > ¼ /4 or µ 23 < ¼ /4, ) Measure if º 3 couples more to º ¹ or º ¿ If sin 2 (2 µ 23 )  then this could be a new basic symmetry Sensitivity to sin 2 (2 µ 23 ) A.Norman (U.Virginia)

CP Violation NOvA gives us our first access to CP violation in the neutrino sector The Large Mixing Angle (LMA) solution gives sensitivity in º ¹ ! º e transitions to the CP violating phase ±. In vacuum, the transition probability is shifted with ±. At the first oscillation maximum the shift is: Since the shift is proportional to the importance of the sub-leading terms grow, as gets small. In matter, the ultimate sensitivity of NO ν A for resolving the CP ambiguities depend on both θ 13 and ± A.Norman (U.Virginia)14DPF 2009

Mass Ordering From solar and atmospheric data we know: This leads to two possible mass hierarchies A “normal” order which follows the charged lepton mass ordering An “inverted” order where m 3 is actually the lightest NO º A can solve this by measuring the sign of m 23 using the MSW effect over the 810km baseline Natural Inverted A.Norman (U.Virginia)15DPF 2009

Matter Effect The forward scattering amplitudes for neutrinos and anti- neutrinos through normal matter differ due to the inclusion of the extra diagram for interactions off electrons This difference breaks the degeneracy in the neutrino mass spectrum and modify the oscillation probability If the experiment is performed at the first peak in the oscillation then the matter effects are primarily a function of the beam energy and approximated by: In the normal hierarchy this matter effect enhances the transition probability for neutrinos and suppresses the probability for antineutrinos transitions With an inverted hierarchy the effect is reversed For the 2 GeV neutrino beam used for NO º A, the matter effect gives a 30% enhancement/suppression in the transition probability. A.Norman (U.Virginia)16DPF 2009

Matter Effect The forward scattering amplitudes for neutrinos and anti- neutrinos through normal matter differ due to the inclusion of the extra diagram for interactions off electrons This difference breaks the degeneracy in the neutrino mass spectrum and modify the oscillation probability If the experiment is performed at the first peak in the oscillation then the matter effects are primarily a function of the beam energy and approximated by: In the normal hierarchy this matter effect enhances the transition probability for neutrinos and suppresses the probability for antineutrinos transitions With an inverted hierarchy the effect is reversed For the 2 GeV neutrino beam used for NO º A, the matter effect gives a 30% enhancement/suppression in the transition probability. A.Norman (U.Virginia)17DPF 2009 Resolution of the hierarchy

More NOvA Physics Dirac/MajoranaSterile Neutrinos A.Norman (U.Virginia)DPF The high granularity of the NOvA detector makes clean measurements of the NC cross sections possible, and allows for Sterile neutrino searches If NOvA can establish the inverted mass hierarchy, then the next generation of neutrinoless double- ¯ decay experiments should see a signal, else it is highly likely that neutrinos are Dirac in nature.

SuperNO º A Detection Primary SuperNO º A Signal: For a supernova at 10kpc the total signal is expected to contain: – 5000 total interactions over a time span of ¼ 10s – Half the interactions in the first second – Energy peaks at 20MeV and falls off to » 60MeV Challenge is triggering in real time – Need data driven open triggering – Long event buffering ( » 30sec) – Time window correlation & merging NO º A – farm 180 trigger/buffer PCs (min 30s total event buffering) Signal: » 5000 event excess Sig. to Noise: 1:3 (first second) Signal: » 5000 event excess Sig. to Noise: 1:3 (first second) Signal Cosmic Bkg (25kHz) Signal+Bkg Expected Energy Spectrum (10Kpc SN) A.Norman (U.Virginia)19DPF 2009

THE NOVA DETECTOR The Experiment A.Norman (U.Virginia)DPF

NOvA Detectors 21 Far Detector 14kTons – 930 layers Alternating X/Y measuring planes Design has 30 modular “blocks” for assembly Over 357,000 independent measurement cells > 70% of total mass is active Located 14mrad off axis 810km baselines Near Detector 222 Tons – 206 layers 2 modules wide, six blocks deep Includes muon catcher for ranging out ¹ ’s Located 14mrad off axis in NuMI, next to MINOS cavern Beam Direction

A.Norman (U.Virginia)DPF The Ash River site: – Provides 810km baseline – Sits 11.8 km (14.5 mrad) off the NuMI beam axis – Is the most northern site in the United States that was accessible by road (and we had to build an extra 3.6miles of road to get there) Far Site (Ash River) NOvA Detector Detector Hall – Designed for up to an 18kt detector – Detector is build in place using modules blocks which are assembled and raised. – Production physics data collection can start after commissioning of the first few blocks

A.Norman (U.Virginia)DPF The Ash River site: – Provides 810km baseline – Sits 11.8 km (14.5 mrad) off the NuMI beam axis – Is the most northern site in the United States that was accessible by road (and we had to build an extra 3.6miles of road to get there) Far Site (Ash River)

Far Site – First Blast A.Norman (U.Virginia)DPF

NO º A Detection Cell The base detector unit 3.9x6.6cm cell 15.7m long, filled with a mineral oil based liquid scintillator. High reflectivity PVC gives » 8 reflections for emitted light before capture in a wave shifting fiber 0.7mm wave shifting fiber loop captures the light and transports it up the cell Both fiber ends are read out by a single pixel of the APD. Light Collection The scintillator/fiber detection cell is measured to delivers p.e. for a muon traversing the far end of the cell NO º A uses over 14,000km of fiber Detector Cell Fiber and Scintillator 15.5m 6.6cm 3.9cm Particle Trajectory Scintillation Light Waveshifting Fiber Loop To APD Readout Fiber The fiber is a double clad 0.7mm fiber doped with 300ppm of a K27 fluorescent dye. The fiber exhibits a long attenuation length for the peak emission spectrum with tests at 300ppm of dye concentration over 15m for the 550nm peak of the spectrum.Fiber Fiber Attenuation Length Absorption/Emission Single Cell There are 357,120 cells in NO ν A

Two 16 cell extrusions NO ν A Modules The NO ν A detector module forms the base unit for the detector. Each module is made from two 16 cell high reflectivity PVC extrusions bonded into a single 32 cell module Includes readout manifold for fiber routing and APD housing Combined 12 module wide X or Y measuring planes. Each module is capped, and filled with the liquid scintillator. These are the primary containment vessel for the 3 million gallons of scintillator material. There are 11,160 detector modules with a total of 357,120 separate detection cells in the NO ν A Far Detector. Detector Modules PVC Extrusions Each extrusion is a single 15.7m (51.5ft) long set of 6x3.9cm cells. Two extrusions are joined to form a single 1.3m wide module PVC Extrusions Each extrusion is a single 15.7m (51.5ft) long set of 6x3.9cm cells. Two extrusions are joined to form a single 1.3m wide module 6cm 3.9cm 15.7m 1.3m Single Cell One Module

The NO ν A Readout Require 357,120 optical readout channels Custom designed 32 channel APD (Hamamatsu) High 85% Q.E. above 525nm Cooled to -15 ° to achieve noise rate < 300 electrons Operated at gain of 100 for detection of photon signal from far end readout Signal to noise at far end 10:1 Avalanche Photodiodes ̶ APDs Pixel Geometry Each pixel is designed to have an active area 1.0mm by 1.9mm to accommodate the aspect ratio of the two 0.7mm fiber ends from a single cell Pixel Geometry Each pixel is designed to have an active area 1.0mm by 1.9mm to accommodate the aspect ratio of the two 0.7mm fiber ends from a single cell 1.0mm 1.9mm 0.15mm 0.25mm The bare APD is bonded to the carrier board to provide the optical mask and electrical interface The 32 pixel APD array for the NO ν A Readout System APD Module Carrier Board w/ APD chip “Clam Shell” Optical Housing Heat Sink Interface 64 fiber bundle FEB 32 Module Fiber Feed (64 ends) APD Module

Use a continuous digitization and readout scheme APDs are sampled at a 2MHz and a dual correlated sampling procedure is used for signal recognition/zero suppresion Done real time on the FPGA, the signals are then dispatched to Collector nodes as “time slices” Data Concentrator Modules assemble/order the data and dispatch macro time windows to a “buffer farm” of 180 compute nodes Provides minimum 30sec full data buffer for trigger decision Dead-timeless system with software based micro/macro event triggering Front End Electronics FEB ASIC The custom designed ASIC is an integrator/shaper with multiplexer running at 16MHz. The channels are Muxed at 8:1 and sent to a 40MHz quad ADC for digitization. For the higher rate near detector the channels are muxed at 2:1 and sent to 4 quad ADCs. ASIC is a low noise device with expected noise < 200 e. rms. FEB ASIC The custom designed ASIC is an integrator/shaper with multiplexer running at 16MHz. The channels are Muxed at 8:1 and sent to a 40MHz quad ADC for digitization. For the higher rate near detector the channels are muxed at 2:1 and sent to 4 quad ADCs. ASIC is a low noise device with expected noise < 200 e. rms. NO ν A Front End Board ASIC ADCFPGA I/O Power Data Concentrators (DCM) The digitized data streams from 64 front end boards are broadcast over 8B/10B serial links to an associated data concentrator module which orders, filters and buffers the data stream, then repackages the data into an efficient network packet and rebroadcasts it to a specific buffer node for trigger decisions. Data Concentrators (DCM) The digitized data streams from 64 front end boards are broadcast over 8B/10B serial links to an associated data concentrator module which orders, filters and buffers the data stream, then repackages the data into an efficient network packet and rebroadcasts it to a specific buffer node for trigger decisions.

NOvA Status & Funding NOvA Received 55M$ in American Recover & Reinvestment Act funding Ground was broken on the far site May 1 st 2009 NOvA under went a CD-3b review last week NOvA will attempt to use the dramatic change in funding to advance the project schedule Near detector is now schedules for construction & commissioning on the surface in spring/summer 2010 A.Norman (U.Virginia)DPF FY08 Supplement FY09 Recovery Act FY10 President’s Budget includes $59M for NOvA

BACKUP SLIDES Additional Materials A.Norman (U.Virginia)DPF

Moving towards  13 & δ CP (World Data) 31 T2K+ Daya Bay can push the upper limit on sin 2 2 µ 13 to NOvA pushes the non-zero discovery past 99% CL. NOvA‘s sensitivity to  CP can cover half the  CP space M.Messier (NOvA CD-3b Review)

Event Parameters Reaction: E º = 10.6GeV E p = 1.04GeV E ¼ = 1.97GeV Suppressed by vertex/shower displacement identification º ¹ Neutral Current Background º ¹ Neutral Current Background Localized E&M Shower Primary Vertex Displacement

Event Parameters Reaction: E º = 2.5GeV E p = 1.1GeV E ¼ = 0.2GeV E e = 1.9GeV Shower spans » 65 of the 1178 planes º e Charged Current Channel Localized E&M Shower Primary Vertex

& Recycler New Injection line from MI to Recycler New extraction line from Recycler to MI New RF stations added and acceleration rate switched to 240GeV/s Beamline Upgrade Proton source upgraded from 320kW to 700kW NuMI will deliver 4.9×10 12 protons per pulse 1.33s rep-rate. This results in 6×10 20 pot/yr. NuMI Accelerator Upgrade Changes Recycler runs proton not anti-protons New injection/extraction lines for Recycler to Main Injector transfers Main Injector cycle time reduced from 2.2s to 1.5s (stack in the recycler) Cycle time reduced again to 1.33s with 2 more RF stations at MI-60 and with transition of the MI from 204 GeV/s to it’s design acceleration rate of 240 GeV/s. NuMI target redesign for high fluxChanges Recycler runs proton not anti-protons New injection/extraction lines for Recycler to Main Injector transfers Main Injector cycle time reduced from 2.2s to 1.5s (stack in the recycler) Cycle time reduced again to 1.33s with 2 more RF stations at MI-60 and with transition of the MI from 204 GeV/s to it’s design acceleration rate of 240 GeV/s. NuMI target redesign for high flux

Supernova Neutrinos Neutrinos and Antineutrinos are produced via: The neutrinos are trapped in core collapse, reach thermal equilibrium and then escape in a burst Duration of the neutrino burst: 1-10s The neutrino luminosity is upwards of 100 times greater than the optical luminosity Neutrino flash proceeds primary photons by 5-24 hours. Each flavor takes away the same energy fraction Different neutrino temperatures are due to allowed reaction channels

DAQ and Trigger A.Norman (U.Virginia)DPF Global Trigger Processor Buffer Nodes Data Ring Data Ring 5ms data blocks Data Driven Triggers System Trigger Processor …. Data Logger Beam Spill Indicator (Async from FNAL) Data Driven Triggers OR Event builder Data Slice Pointer Table Data Time Window Search Trigger Reception Grand Trigger OR Broadcast to all Buff Nodes & Logger Triggered Data Output Data DCM 1 DCMs Round Robin Data Slice Flow Data