Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Justice & Economic Distribution (2)

Advertisements

Medical Ethics What’s it all about?.

Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.

Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, And Decision-Making Guidelines

Contrasting Cold War Terms United States v. Soviet perspective.

PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.

360 Business Ethics Chapter 4. Moral facts derived from reason Reason has three properties that have bearing on moral facts understood as the outcomes.

Applying Moral Philosophies to Business Ethics

Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.

L To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism:

Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, And Decision-Making Guidelines

Ethics and Morality Theory Part 2 11 September 2006.

Ethics and ethical systems 12 January

COMP 381. Agenda  TA: Caitlyn Losee  Books and movies nominations  Team presentation signup Beginning of class End of class  Rawls and Moors.

Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,

Ethical Decision Making Process. How to Resolve Ethical Dilemmas in Business Identify relevant facts Identify relevant issue(s) Identify primary stakeholders.

THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham

Ethical Principle of Justice principle of justice –involves giving to all persons their "rights" or "desserts" –the distribution of various resources in.

Deontological tradition Contractualism of John Rawls Discourse ethics.

THE RIGHTS APPROACH Jill Stiemsma M, 8:30 Ethical Theories Presentation April 21, 2008.

THEORIES ABOUT RIGHT ACTION (ETHICAL THEORIES)

January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.

Business Ethics and Social Responsibility

Utilitarianism: calculation of costs(-) and benefits(+) Universalism: duty Virtue: character Relativism: societal consensus.

Chapter One: Moral Reasons

JUSTICE OR FAIRNESS APPROACH

 Rawls was influenced by Kant and Aristotle  An American Philosopher  Wrote the Following: A Theory of Justice, Political Liberalism, The Law of Peoples,

Chapter 4 Ethics, Law, Business. I. Ethics and Values Why Study Ethics? What is Ethics? Value Systems and Moral Beliefs 6 Influences That Shape Value.

BAM321 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Session 7 Business and Management.

Ethics Theory and Business Practice

“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.

CODE TO WORD: ETHICS IN THE WORKPLACE Florida Gulf Coast University Hudson Rogers Fall 2003.

Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.

Contractualism and justice (1) Introduction to Rawls’s theory.

Justice Paradox of Justice Small volcanic island has two villages, “South Town” (Pop 300) and “North Village” (Pop 500). Threat of devastating volcanic.

Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.

January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.

© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC A Practical Approach For Decision Makers SECOND EDITION EILEEN E. MORRISON.

Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.

Situation Ethics What is meant by situation ethics?

Ethics and Morality Theory Part 3 30 January 2008.

Contractualism and justice (4) Methodological issues.

Justice as Fairness John Rawls PHL 110: ETHICS North Central College.

Business Ethics Chapter # 3 Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, and Decision-Making Guidelines  The best kind of relationship in the world is the one in.

Prescriptive Approaches to Ethics Geoffrey G. Bell, PhD, CA University of Minnesota Duluth October 2003.

Normative Ethics Section 3 Deontology, Contractarianism and Consequentialism.

Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.

Justice/Fairness Approach Learning Plan #5 Sara Deibert, Sara Roxbury, Allie Forsythe, Robert Phillips March 31,2008.

DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (CH. 2.0) © Wanda Teays. All rights reserved.

By Aaftab Ullah. Normative theories Normative theories Consequencialist theory Consequencialist theory Egoism Egoism Utilitarianism Utilitarianism Non-

WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)

ETHICAL ISSUES IN HEALTH AND NURSING PRACTICE Present by: Dr.Amira Yahia.

Social Ethics continued Immanuel Kant John Rawls.

© 2012 Wanda Teays. All rights reserved. Rawls, like Kant, is a Deontological Ethicist. He emphasizes moral duty and obligations, rather than end goals.

Ethics Topic 3.

Chapter 2 Discussion: Ethical Principles in Business

Moral Principles Paul L. Schumann, Ph.D.

PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.

Deontological tradition

Political theory and law

universalizability & reversibility

John Rawls’ theory of justice

Principles of Health Care Ethics

Rawls’ Theory of Justice

Theory of Health Care Ethics

Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.

Three Dimensions of Justice

John Rawls Theory of Justice.

Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.

Social and economic inequalities are arranged so that they are both:

Presentation transcript:

Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you make decisions is what makes it moral. The end does not justify the means Results are not ethical unless the ethical means used to produce them

Kant’s Three Standards Do not make exceptions for self since everyone is worth the same. Let others make their own choices - treat people as ends rather than means to an end (everyone is equal). Would my action pass the publicity test - would it be adopted by rational people. Could action be explained & would it be acceptable (grandmother test).

Human Rights Standard No action should violate fundamental human rights Rights - what’s needed to live a life that expresses value. Rights - justifiable claim, entitlement or protection against collective goals. Liberty Rights ( free speech, freedom of conscience, self determination ); Welfare Rights ( food, housing, employment, education, health care )

Justice Standard Justice - Fair distribution of Benefits & Burdens Which is the fair distribution standard - equality, effort, need, accomplishment, contribution? We need a justice standard to show which distribution scheme is fair in each situation.

Justice Standard Seek the standard that distributes benefits and burdens most fairly. Rawls’ method - Use “veil of ignorance” to decide the rule for a just society.

Justice Standard Fair Distribution follows three principles: Equal Liberty - max liberty compatible with liberty of others Difference Principle - inequities ethical if benefit least advantaged Equal Opportunity Principle - benefits equally open to all.

Religious Ethics Does the action fit the central tenets of the faith? Does the action follow the rule? Jesus Christ: “Love Your Neighbor” Buddha: “The Cause of suffering is desire”

Seven-Step Process of Making Ethical Decisions 1. What are the Facts 2. What are the Ethical Issues 3. What are the Alternatives? 4. Who are the Stakeholders? 5. What are the Ethics of the Alternatives? 6. What are the Practical Constraints? 7. What Actions Should we Take?