On the morning of 21 September 2001 an explosion occurred in Shed 221 of the AZF Grande Paroisse plant in Toulouse. The shed contained about 300 metric.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By: Alexander Dobson Tyler Gach Sean Sullivan. Outline of Presentation  Introduction  Process Description  Timeline  Results  Root Causes  Lessons.
Advertisements

Trial Procedures. Pleadings – papers filed with the beginning of a trial – establish the issues the court is being asked to decided Spell out allegations.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE
Sandra Abbott th ST. Suite D Charlottesville, VA Phone: Fax: 434—
Chapter 13: Chapter 13 Packet #1.
U.S. Vs. Nixon Michael and Ryan Fischer. Watergate Scandal Major political scandal that occurred in the United States in the 1970s as a result of the.
By: Megan Devin Political Science December 4, 2014.
Chapter 13: Criminal Justice Process ~ Proceedings Before Trial Objective: The student should be able to identify the required procedures before a trial.
Crime Scene Investigation. Arriving at a Crime Scene  A crime scene is the site where the offense took place  When officers first arrive at the crime.
Chubaka Producciones Presenta :.
CRIMINAL COURTS AND PROCEEDINGS IN IRAQ Wilson Myers Justice Must Be Won IX" ACDLA Summer Seminar & Annual Meeting June 22,
2012 JANUARY Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
The Criminal Courts: Procedure and Sentencing
FLIXBOROUGH DISASTER.
Korean Crime Cases Min. Relationship between Various Crime 1 st Question.
Industrial risk / Accident in Toulouse : And now, what consequences ? Certu Kick-Off Conference, 24 th & 25 th February 2005, Certu, Bernard Guézo.
CRIMINAL LAW 2.5 INVESTIGATION & PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Investigations Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
LAW 1: CRIMINAL LAW PRETRIAL PROCEDURES PRETRIAL PROCEDURES.
Ch. 13 Clicker Review.
Journal– 3/8/12 Read the article “Searching for Details Online, Lawyers Facebook the Jury” and answer the questions on the back of your packet .
1 CRIMES AGAINST THE JUSTICE SYSTEM Learning Domain 39 Learning Domain 39.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002.
Belgian victim support policy and compensation system The Day of the Victims of Crime (22nd of February, 2010, Budapest) Salih Sivri.
Paralegal Regulation – C.O.B.A. November 1, 2007 Presenter: Zeynep Onen Director of the Professional Regulation Division Law Society of Upper Canada.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 12 Civics – Mr. Blough.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Prosecutions Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
Crime Scene Investigation. Arriving at a Crime Scene  A crime scene is the site where the offence took place  When officers first arrive at the crime.
American Criminal Justice: The Process
The Arrest and Pretrial Process Social Science Final Project By: Jacqueline Smith Social Science Final Project By: Jacqueline Smith.
Chapter 5 The Criminal Justice System. Components of the Criminal Justice system The criminal justice system is far more than law enforcement officers.
Trial Procedures Law 120 MHS Mr. Binet.
Chapter 6 Civil and Criminal Law Compared. Chapter 6 Tort Lawsuit and Criminal Prosecution for the Same Act As person suddenly attacks Joe as he is walking.
1. Criminal pre-trial procedures refer to the;  initial arrest of the suspect,  the granting of bail  Released without charge  Remanded in custody.
Criminal Procedure Chapter 16.2 Review. What is a crime? An action that breaks the law Felonies are serious crimes Misdemeanors are less serious crimes.
Aim: How are federal judges appointed?. Appointment of Federal Judges The US Constitution authorizes the President to appoint anyone that the Senate will.
Justice Denied The Donald Marshall Jr. Story In January 1982 the RCMP reopened the investigation into Sandy Seale’s murder As Staff Sergeant Harry Wheaton.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Dr. Terry M. Mors, Ed.D. © Mors Copyright 2010 American Dual Court System The United States has courts on both the federal and state levels. This.
CHAPTER 13 METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION. INFIELD SHOWUPS An In-Field show-up is a one on one viewing of a suspect by a victim/witness in the field, shortly.
MEDIATION as a bridge between Victim and Offender? Law februari 2011 Petra Sampers Victim-Offender mediator Leuven
Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Financial Corp., 306 F.3d 99 (2d. Cir. 2002).
July 2007 SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
WHAT’S THE VERDICT? LEGAL SERVICES/SECURITY & PROTECTIVE SERVICES.
Christopher Jozwiak Baillon Thome Jozwiak & Wanta LLP Penelope Phillips February 19, 2016 Termination & Retaliation 1.
 March 1931 nine black youth got into a fight on a train with some white boys.  They were asked to leave the train.  After that two white girls accused.
Types of Courts Unit A Objective Dual Court System Federal Court System State Court System.
CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES. WHAT EXACTLY ARE CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES?  Processes and procedures that occur before a trial or hearing commences.
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial Chapter 13.
Bell Ringer Criminal Law: Stages of a Criminal Case  Criminal prosecution develops in a series of stages.  Try to place the following stages in the correct.
IN THIS Slide show YOU WILL LEARN ABOUT ALL VERSIONS OF "MS OFFICE"
Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation
Criminal Law 2.5 Investigation & Pre-Trial Proceedings
Outline of the U.S. and Arizona Criminal Justice Systems
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
Crime Scene Investigation
American Criminal Justice: The Process
Key terms and procedures involved in criminal cases
The Judicial Branch And the Federal Courts.
Crime Scene Investigation
Crime Scene Investigation
Crime Scene Investigation
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
Vocabulary Activity Indictment Grand Jury
Key terms and procedures involved in criminal cases
Ministry of Social Security and Labour
February 2007 Note: Source:.
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Presentation transcript:

On the morning of 21 September 2001 an explosion occurred in Shed 221 of the AZF Grande Paroisse plant in Toulouse. The shed contained about 300 metric tons of ammonium nitrate awaiting shipment to plants manufacturing fertilizers. The explosion left a crater dozens of metres across where the pile of ammonium nitrate had been. The explosion was heard up to 40 km from Toulouse, and the shock wave was recorded at 3.4 on the Richter scale. The explosion caused the death of 30 people, including 21 plant employees. More than 4,500 people in the area were injured and 27,000 buildings of various types in the surrounding area were damaged. None of the inquiries held so far has determined the exact cause of the explosion.

22 September 2001: TOTAL S.A. sets up a fund of several million euros for emergency relief and assistance to victims. 24 September 2001: The Public Prosecutor announces that: “we are 99% certain that the explosion was an industrial accident”. 11 January 2002: The Public Prosecutor in Toulouse declares that: “There is no longer any reason at all to suspect a terrorist attack or any malicious act. Everything points to an accident” June 2002: 19 people employed by Grande Paroisse or contractors working at the site are taken into custody. 13 of them are placed under judicial investigation (11 Grande Paroisse and 2 contractor employees). All have now been exonerated except the former General Manager of the plant.

15 June 2002: 1st report on investigation progress released by the experts, suggesting the cause was the accidental mixing of chlorine and nitrates. 9 & 11 October 2002: Re-enactments of events prior to the explosion are carried out in the presence of the experts, the police and lawyers. They fail to show how 500 kg of chlorine could have come into contact with the pile of ammonium nitrate in Shed September 2003: Nine of the 11 Grande Paroisse employees and one of the contractor employees under investigation are exonerated. Two other people are exonerated later. 3 August 2004: 2nd report on investigation progress released by the experts, still suggesting the same cause: accidental contact with chlorine.

11 May 2006: Final report released by the experts: they still maintain the accident was caused by contact with chlorine derivatives but specify only a few kilos of NaDCC instead of 500 kilos. 31 May 2006: Grande Paroisse is placed under formal investigation. 20 September 2006: The judicial investigation is closed. 15 June 2007: Closing statement by the Public Prosecutor’s Office. 13 July 2007: Shortly before his appointment to the Monaco Court of Appeal, the investigating magistrate Thierry Perriquet orders the case to go to trial: proceedings against Grande Paroisse and the former plant General Manager Serge Biechlin are referred to the Toulouse Magistrate’s Court. 18 September 2008: An association among the civil parties requests the court to summons TOTAL S.A. (as a legal person) and Thierry Desmarest (as Chairman and CEO at the time of the explosion). This request will be heard by the court at the proceedings starting on 23 February 2009.