Universal Screening for Behavior: SRSS & SRSS-IE SSD PBIS TEAM, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Functional Assessment-Based Interventions. HELPFUL RESOURCES: 1. FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT- BASED INTERVENTION (FABI) PARENT GUIDE 2. FABI TERMS AND DEFINITIONS.
Advertisements

MASP Fall Conference Jennifer Rollenhagen
Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered (CI3T) Models of Prevention: Why does my school – and district – need an integrated approach to meet students’
PBIS Overview Wohlwend Elementary. Purposes of Presentation  To provide an overview of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS)  To review.
Universal Screening: A Look at Behavior Screening Tools in Tiered Systems of Support Chicago, October 29, 2014 Kathleen Lynne Lane, Ph.D., BCBA-D, University.
Statewide Assessment Test Administrator Training 2015 PAWS & SAWS.
Does this look like your RTI team?. Maybe this looks like your team!
Response to Intervention Habersham County Schools.
Shawnee Mission Schools Outcomes for Today Basic Knowledge of Positive Behavior Supports The Role of the PBS Team PBS Training System and Timeline.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
Establishing Training Capacity for Classroom Management Part 2 Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Kim Herrmann, S.S.P. University of South Florida Marla Dewhirst.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY EARLY IDENTIFICATION AND INTERVENTION PROGRAM (JHU EIIP)
1 Role of the Case Manager Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District 2009.
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About the Second Grade Gifted Child Find Procedures
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
Agenda Access EDplan™ Login to EasyPEP™ Set Forgotten Password View Caseload View Student Profile Develop a PEP Resources.
Student Support Team (SST) Training A Humanware Strategic Plan Activity Cleveland Metropolitan School District 1.
Understanding and Administering the School- Wide Evaluation Tool (SET)
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
Establishing Training Capacity for Classroom Management Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Kim Herrmann, S.S.P. University of South Florida Marla Dewhirst Illinois.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Low Intensity Strategies: A Look at Instructional Choice.
PBIS Tier 1 Coaches Training
Quality Indicators for Secondary Transition (QuIST) – Webinar #5 April 21, 2010 Presented by: Center for Change in Transition Services Cinda Johnson, Wendy.
Agenda Access EDplan™ Login to EasyPEP™ Set Forgotten Password View Caseload View Student Profile Develop a PEP Resources.
“Working hand in hand to improve
E11: Secondary/Tertiary Systems Development, Part 2: Tools & Strategies Michele Capio, Illinois PBIS Network Pam Horn, School District U-46 (IL)
Tier 2 Strategies: A Look at Self-Monitoring Wendy Peia Oakes, Ph.D. Arizona State University Kathleen Lynne Lane, Ph.D., BCBA-D University of Kansas.
Targeted and Intensive Interventions: Assessing Process (Fidelity) Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD University of Oregon.
Wisconsin PBIS Leadership Conference E8 ISIS/SWIS Overview Marla Dewhirst ISIS/SWIS Trainer of Trainers
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) University of Oregon October, 2012.
Check-In/Check-Out Introduction: CICO Point Staff An Intervention for Tier II Students.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
1 Response to Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D. Director, Research to Practice Division Office of Special Education Programs June 21, 2006.
1 Response to Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D. Director, Research to Practice Division Office of Special Education Programs June 21, 2006.
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Tier Two Systems in High Schools Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
Low Intensity Strategies: A Look at Precorrection
Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Family & Community Team Member Network Meeting Thank you for coming! Please make yourself comfortable.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1/31/20161 If you modify this powerpoint, update the version information below. This.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
PBIS Overview Cedar Hill Elementary. Purposes of Presentation  To provide an overview of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS)  To review.
Comprehensive, Integrated Three- Tiered(CI3T) Model of Prevention and Intervention- Integrating RtI and SW- PBIS Matt Berry, Taryn Gaskill, Jamie Grieshaber,
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS) Overview and Tools Narrated by Dr
Insert School Picture Elementary. Acknowledgments Staff PBIS Team Principal Etc..
21 st CCLC APR System Webinar Tanya Morin Gary Sumnicht Alison Wineberg April 25 and 26, 2016.
Coaching at the Grade Level: Using Screening Data to Inform Instruction Presented by: Kathleen Lynne Lane, Ph.D., BCBA-D University of Kansas Catherine.
Logistics of behavior screenings: How and why do we conduct behavior screenings at our school? Oakes, W. P., Lane, K. L., Cox, M., & Messenger, M. (2014).
A Look at Systematic Screening Tools in Secondary Schools TASN Transition Summit Lawrence, KS June 10, 2015 Kathleen Lynne Lane, Ph.D., BCBA-D.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Information taken from the Kansas Special Education Process handbook. See
Implementing Comprehensive, Integrated, Three- Tiered (Ci3T) Models of Prevention: Installing Systematic Screening for Behavior Council for Children with.
Progress Monitoring Graphs Tell the Story of Student Achievement Cindy Braun Title One Elementary Lead Teacher for Twin Falls School District Secondary.
Developing Intervention Guidelines with Student Outcomes in Mind PBIS CI3T Summer Institute June 8, 2015 Matthew Berry.
Scott Crooks Alicia Sachan Judy Felts Matthew Berry Systemic Supports & Interventions for Students with Behavioral Challenges Fall Regional Meeting November.
Low Intensity Strategies: A Look at Instructional Choice.
Tier 2 & Tier 3 Meetings. MTSS Focus Team The purpose of the MTSS Focus Team: To analyze school-wide and class-wide data for attendance, behavior, and.
Universal Screening for Behavior
Introduction of Universal Screening for Behavior in PA
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
XXXXX School Ci3T Implementation Report Social Validity and Treatment Integrity 20XX – 20XX ____________________________________ Fall 20XX Lane and Oakes.
<School Name> Behavior Screening Data Summary
Kindergarten Assessment Approaches to Learning Training Required for DTCs, STCs, and Kindergarten Teachers Hello, my name is Holly Dalton and.
<School Name> Behavior Screening Data Summary
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Presentation transcript:

Universal Screening for Behavior: SRSS & SRSS-IE SSD PBIS TEAM, 2014

We would like to thank… Center for SW-PBS College of Education University of Missouri Dr. Kathleen Lane Professor of Special Education, University of Kansas Dr. Wendy Oakes Assistant Professor at Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College Arizona State University Dr. Lucille Eber Illinois PBIS Network Director Dr. Joanne Malloy Assistant Clinical Professor, University of New Hampshire

Agenda  CI3T and a framework for universal screening for behavior  Overview, rationale, and best practices of the Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS)  Setting up the SRSS Teacher File  Administering the SRSS  Scoring and Analyzing  Introduction of the Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SRSS-IE)

CI3T and a Framework for Universal Screening for Behavior

Goal: Reduce Harm Specialized Individual Systems for Students with High-Risk Goal: Reverse Harm Specialized Group Systems for Students At-Risk Goal: Prevent Harm School/Classroom-Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings AcademicBehavioral Social Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tier Model of Prevention (Lane, Kalberg, & Menzies, 2009) Tertiary Prevention (Tier 3) Secondary Prevention (Tier 2) Primary Prevention (Tier 1) ≈ ≈ ≈ PBIS Framework Positive Action; Social Skills Improvement System, Character Ed

Universal Screening for Behavior  Happens at the Universal Level (all students at all grade levels are screened).  Aligns to academic screening schedule:  Three times per year  Along with academic screening, except for the first screen.  Is a first/primary data source in identifying students who may need additional behavioral/social supports.  It is not the only data source...

Student- from AIMSweb Data Mild or High Risk ODR (2+ referrals) Attendance (+ 3days absent) IEP (Y/N) Academics (2+ Ds or Fs) Teacher ReferralDecisions Made

The Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS)

The SRSS (Drummond, 1994) The SRSS is a universal behavioral screening tool used to identify students at risk, and is meant to be used with additional data sources.  Universal screening for behavior is documented and aligned to the adademic screening data schedule, (all put the first of the year). It is administered 3 times per year:  Fall – around 4-6 weeks after the start of school so teachers have the opportunity to learn and observe student behavior  Winter – 2-3 weeks prior to Winter Break  Spring – 6-8 weeks prior to the end of the school year  A 7-item tool, teachers rate student (externalizing) behaviors in the following: (1) Steal, (2) Lie, cheat, sneak, (3) Behavior problems, (4) Peer rejection, (5) Low academic achievement, (6) Negative attitude, and (7) Aggressive behavior.

It’s important to remember... The seven categories are labeling behaviors, not students.

Benefits to Screening with the SRSS  FREE!  Efficient: typically takes around minutes to screen a class (around 25 students)  Effective: Research-validated for K-12  Data can be collected electronically

Considerations  Who will be coordinating the SRSS administration?  How will necessary information be communicated to staff?  Is the SRSS included in your school’s assessment schedule?  What time will be set aside for teachers to complete the SRSS for their class?  Who will be coordinating the data and data system?  What is the plan to share the SRSS data with the PBIS team and communicate how the data will be used?  What supports do we have for students who screen at risk, and how is SRSS data included in our intervention guidelines?  How have families been involved in the process to identify a screening tool? How was the purpose communicated to them?  How does your district support the universal screening process for behavior? (Purpose and process)

Setting up the System

Setting Up  Best practice is to have support at the district level set up the data collection process.  Note: The SRSS cannot be modified in any way (items added, deleted, or changed, wording changed, etc.), or it will compromise the validity of the tool.

Setting Up  Columns C will be prefilled for each teacher. (Possible that B and D can be prefilled as well, or teachers can complete these columns.)  Ensure that each teacher has the correct students in their SRSS file.  Disseminate or make the files available to teachers in a safe manner, (secure , shared drive, etc.)

Setting Up - Teacher Steps  May have to fill in columns B and D for each student.  Enter “School Name.”  Enter “Date Administered.”  Enter “Number of Students Screened in class.”

Administering the SRSS

Steps to Administer the SRSS  Use the following rating scale to rate each of the behaviors (columns F-K)  Be sure to use only a 0, 1, 2, or 3 rating  Higher numbers indicate a greater concern  Complete individually – do not attempt to provide examples or define the categories. Follow typical school practices regarding confidentiality.  If the student has not been in your class for at least 30 days, it is recommended that you DO NOT screen that student. You can indicate that the student is new by typing “New” into the cell for the first item (column E).  When you have rated each student’s behaviors, check to make sure that each of the items have been rated for all students.  Do not skip any rows.  Once the sheet has been completed and reviewed, it can be sent back to the SRSS data coordinator. SOURCE: LANE, K.L. & MSLBI (2014). STUDENT RISK SCREENING SCALE : OVERVIEW AND TOOLS

Scoring and Analyzing

Using the electronic SRSS Files: Scores will automatically sum and display in both the teacher and school files

Scores  0-3 = LOW RISK  4-8 = MODERATE RISK  9-21 = HIGH RISK

If you click the SRSS_FFers tab:

Data Generated:

The Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SRSS-IE)

SRSS-IE Although very similar to the SRSS, the SRSS-IE differs in the following:  It is a 12-item tool that includes 5 items referring to internalizing behaviors:  Emotionally flat  Shy; withdrawn  Sad; depressed  Anxious  Lonely  There are no cutoff scores for the Internalizing Behavior Items  Scores for these items are not included in the overall score.  Scores for these items can be used in analyzing where individuals fall school-wide, or in identifying instances of co-morbidity.  Just as with the SRSS – If you add, delete, or modify items, the screening tool is invalidated.

Data Generated:

Coming Soon... A version of the SRSS-IE Data System that also gives users the opportunity to add academic screening data for comprehensive data analysis, and to look at data over time.

If you have questions, or if your district would be interested in working with us to develop a system, please contact: Tricia Diebold, MTSS/PBIS Data Analyst