Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/1309r0 November 2012 Non-TIM Mode Negotiation Date: 2012-11-09 Slide 1 Authors: Kaiying Lv, ZTE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0342r0 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Power Efficient PS Poll Date: Authors: Date: March, 2012.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0608r2 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Low-Power PS-Poll Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Slide 1 Prioritized PS-Polls Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0328r0 Nokia Internal Use Only March 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: PS-Poll Enhancements Chittabrata Ghosh, Nokia.
Doc.: IEEE /0881r0 Submission July 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 PS Mode Enhancements with Timing Indication Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1325r0 Submission Nov PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: David Xun Yang, Huawei, et. al.Slide 1.
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
/0853r1 Submission July 2008 Jakub Majkowski (Nokia)Slide 1 Peer Traffic Indication enhancements Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1357r3 Nov Slide 1 Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation Date: Authors: Weiping Sun, Seoul National University.
Doc.:IEEE /0860r0 July 2012 Qualcomm Inc. Collision reduction after TIM Date: Authors:
1 Power Management in IEEE Yu-Chee 1. Possible Access Sequences for a STA in PS Mode 2. PS in Infrastructure Network 3. PS in Ad.
1 Power Management in IEEE Yu-Chee 1. Possible Access Sequences for a STA in PS Mode 2. PS in Infrastructure Network 3. PS in Ad.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r1 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0285r0 March 2013 Submission Resource Allocation Frame Format for RAW- based Medium Access Date: Authors: Chittabrata Ghosh,
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0288r0 TXOP Sharing Operation for Relay Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom Authors: March 2013.
Submission Vida Ferdowsi, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0856r0July 2015 Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame Date: Authors:
1 Chapter 8 Power Management in IEEE Yu-Chee 1. Possible Access Sequences for a STA in PS Mode 2. PS in Infrastructure Network 3.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r2 Submission Jan 2012 Slide 1 Authors: MAC Header Design for Small Data Packet for ah Date: Lv kaiying, ZTE.
Doc.: IEEE /0089r0 Submission Listen interval update Jan 2013 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jinsoo Choi, LG Electronics.
Doc.: IEEE /0103r0 Submission January 2008 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Peer Service Period Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /0102r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 TGah Power Saving Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0071r0 January 2013 Submission Channel indication in RAW/TWT Date: Authors: Merlin, Qualcomm Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1378r0 Submission November 2008 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 Improving Multicast Reliability Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /2215r4 Submission August 2007 Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Proposal –Radio Resource Measurement Capability Enabled.
Doc.:IEEE /0114r0 January 2012 Low Power Medium Access Date: Slide 1 Authors:
1/23 Power Management in IEEE Yu-Chee Tseng.
Doc.: IEEE /1324r0 November 2012 Very Low Energy Paging Date: Authors: Slide 1 S. Merlin et al.
Submission November 2010 doc.: IEEE /1236r0 Enhancements to Enablement Procedure Slide 1 Santosh Abraham, Qualcomm Incorporated Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0592r0 May 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 More Power Save Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1204r1 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework Date: Authors: Sept 2011.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1361r0 November 2015 Slide 1 Dmitry Akhmetov (Intel) Energy consumption with Scheduled PSP Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0409r6 Submission July 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Channel Access Supporting Low Power Operation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0409r5 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Supporting Low Power Operation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1101r1 Submission Sept Active Polling Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /891r0 Submission July 2012 AID reassignment for TIM and non-TIM modes switching Date: Slide 1 Authors: Betty Zhao, et.
Doc.: IEEE /0618r0 Submission Listen interval for sensor devices May 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jinsoo Choi, LG Electronics.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /465r0 Submission Wim Diepstraten, Agere Systems July 2002 Slide 1 WiSP Wireless Sidelink Protocol Wim Diepstraten Gerrit Hiddink Agere.
Supporting Low Power Operation
Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
Consideration on Max Idle Period Extension for ah Power Save
DLS Power Save Delivery Mechanism
BSS Max Idle Period and Sleep Interval
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Integration of WUR to Power Save Mode
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
Power Efficient PS Poll
Wake up packet contents
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
Wake Up Response mode to WUR frame
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
TD Control field with Response indication in WUR frame
Consideration on Max Idle Period Extension for ah Power Save
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
Traffic Filter based Wakeup Service
Peer Traffic Indication enhancements
Enhancement of Low Power Medium Access STAs
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Non-TIM Mode Negotiation Date: Slide 1 Authors: Kaiying Lv, ZTE

Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Slide 2 Authors : Kaiying Lv, ZTE

Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Slide 3 Authors : Kaiying Lv, ZTE

Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Slide ah Power Save Operation Overview Low power operation mode is introduced as a new power saving method in ah specification framework : ah draft shall define the following operation mode: –STA may send a PS-Poll at any time –AP shall respond immediately to a PS Poll with either Data for the requesting STA, or ACK frame with 1bit-field indicating –1: traffic is buffered (as indicated in the TIM map), stay awake (i.e. a service period starts) –0: no traffic is buffered, go back to sleep –The bit used in current ACK frame format is the More Data field 11ahSTA chooses not to have a TIM entry for the DL traffic signalling when working in Non-TIM mode. For these stations, the AP will store the DL data and deliver it when the STA request it. Kaiying Lv, ZTE

Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Listen interval Listen interval is carried in Association REQ frames. AP may delete BUs using aging function based on listen interval. In PS mode, listen interval is used to indicate to AP how often a STA wakes up to listen to Beacon frames. In Non-TIM mode, listen interval is the max interval for a STA to send at least one trigger frame(e.g. Ps-Poll) to AP to fetch BUs. Slide 5Kaiying Lv, ZTE

Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Low Power Operation Discussion (1) Non-TIM operation mode is suitable for sensor-like services since they have low duty cycle and DL data only makes up a very small proportion of the whole traffic. A large number of ah STAs may select to work in Non-TIM mode. In current scheme, listen interval is carried in (Re)association Request frames, which means this parameter is only decided by non-AP STAs Two issues should be considered with Non-TIM STAs: AP should be able to control the number of STAs working in Non-TIM mode in order to avoid excessive uncontrolled uplink channel access induced contention due to Non-TIM STAs sending unsolicited PS-Poll or trigger frame. Too many STAs entering Non-TIM mode will bring challenge to AP’s buffer management capability. The worst case is that AP needs a bigger buffer due to non-TIM STA’s unpredictable sending PS-Polls or trigger frame to fetch data. Slide 6Kaiying Lv, ZTE

Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Low Power Operation Discussion (2) Trade-off between TIM scheme and Non-TIM scheme –PS mode with TIM scheme enables pre-scheduling with RAW concept, which can spread out PS-POLLs and DL traffics to avoid excessive uncontrolled channel access induced contention and reduce the buffer size needed to store the overall DL traffic. –Non-TIM PS mode allows STAs to send PS-POLL at any time without listening to the beacon frame, which provides better power save performance. Therefore, to allow AP to control the number of Non-TIM STAs based on AP’s buffer status by Non-TIM mode negotiation provides a trade-off between STA’s power save performance and AP’s buffer management pressure as well as excessive uncontrolled channel access induced contention. Slide 7Kaiying Lv, ZTE

Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Proposed Non-TIM Mode Negotiation (1/2) AP and STA inform each other their capability of supporting Non-TIM mode in association procedure with a non-TIM support field in Extended Capabilities element.  STA carries a “Non-TIM ” indication in Association Request frame to inform AP whether it supports Non-TIM mode.  Upon receiving STA's Association Request frame with Non-TIM indication, AP confirms STA whether it allows the STA entering Non-TIM mode in Association Response frame. Slide 8 BitInformationNote Non-TIM supportFor non-AP STA: 0: STA dose not support Non-TIM mode, it needs TIM entry as in legacy PS mode 1: STA request Non-TIM mode and it does not need TIM entry when in Non-TIM mode For AP: 0: AP does not support STA ‘s Non-TIM mode 1: AP can support STA ‘s Non-TIM mode Kaiying Lv, ZTE

Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Proposed Non-TIM Mode Negotiation (2/2) AP may recommend a value of listen interval different from that in Association Request frame based on its buffer management consideration in Association Response frame. If a STA is NOT allowed to be in Non-TIM mode through negotiating by association procedure, the STA shall work in TIM mode. Slide 9Kaiying Lv, ZTE

Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Pre-motion 1 Do you support the proposed Non-TIM Mode Negotiation as described in slide 8 and 9? Y N A Slide 10Kaiying Lv, ZTE

Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Reference [1] ah-specification-framework-for-tgah [2] ah-lowe-power-medium-access Slide 11Kaiying Lv, ZTE