Triple negative (TN) vs. positive (TP) breast cancer (BC) analysis with public genomic data yields AGR3 as a biomarker Anita Umesh, Jenny Park, James Shima,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Most Random Gene Expression Signatures are Significantly Associated with Breast Cancer Outcome Venet, et al. PLoS Computational Biology, 2011 Molly Carroll.
Advertisements

Biomarker Analyses in CLEOPATRA: A Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Study of Pertuzumab in HER2- Positive, First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Baselga.
Comparison of Mutations and Protein Expression in Potentially Actionable Targets in 5500 Triple Negative vs. non-Triple Negative Breast Cancers Joyce A.
Cancer-inducing genes - CRGs (cooperation response genes) Paper Presentation Nadine Sündermann.
Departments - Surgery - Gerontology and Geriatrics Department of SurgeryDepartment of Gerontology & Geriatrics Prof. dr. C.J.H. van de VeldeProf. dr. R.G.J.
MiRNA-drug resistance mechanisms Summary Hypothesis: The interplay between miRNAs, signaling pathways and epigenetic and genetic alterations are responsible.
Model and Variable Selections for Personalized Medicine Lu Tian (Northwestern University) Hajime Uno (Kitasato University) Tianxi Cai, Els Goetghebeur,
Gene Co-expression Network Analysis BMI 730 Kun Huang Department of Biomedical Informatics Ohio State University.
Estrogen and its receptors play an important role in breast carcinogenesis. In humans, there are two subtypes of estrogen receptors (ER), ER  and ER ,
 MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small RNA molecules, about ~21 nucleotide (nt) long.  MicroRNA are small non coding RNAs (ncRNAs) that regulate.
Genetic Regulators of Large-scale Transcriptional Signatures in Cancer Presented by Mei Liu September 26, 2007.
Cell Signaling Lecture 10. Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, cell survival and cellular metabolism The signaling.
Introduction The goal of translational bioinformatics is to enable the transformation of increasingly voluminous genomic and biological data into diagnostics.
Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology
Apostolos Zaravinos, Myrtani Pieri, Nikos Mourmouras, Natassa Anastasiadou, Ioanna Zouvani, Dimitris Delakas, Constantinos Deltas Department of Biological.
Results grade1 grade2 grade3 (1) Can we identify metabolites or metabolic pathways that are associated with breast cancer clinical parameters? Alex-CIS-GCTOF.
A 14-gene prognosis signature predicts metastasis risk in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, Tamoxifen-treated breast cancer in different ethnogeographic.
Advanced Cancer Topics Journal Review 4/16/2009 AD.
Enabling biomarker validation in breast cancer molecular subtypes: sensitivity and specificity of array-based subtype classification in 983 patients Balázs.
Amandine Bemmo 1,2, David Benovoy 2, Jacek Majewski 2 1 Universite de Montreal, 2 McGill university and Genome Quebec innovation centre Analyses of Affymetrix.
Supplemental Figures Loss of circadian clock gene expression is associated with tumor progression in breast cancer Cristina Cadenas 1*, Leonie van de Sandt.
Sgroi DC et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-9.
Dubsky P et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S4-3.
Head and Neck Cancer: microRNA analysis
Huidi Liu, M.D. & Ph.D Genomics Research Centre Harbin Medical University, China Reduced expression of SOX7 in ovarian cancer: a novel.
Michael Birrer Ian McNeish New Developments in Biology and Targets of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
Computational biology of cancer cell pathways Modelling of cancer cell function and response to therapy.
Marco Magistri , Journal Club. A non-coding RNA (ncRNA) is any RNA molecule that is not translated into a protein “Structural genes encode proteins.
OncomiR and tumor-suppressor miR expression in triple-negative primary breast cancer. Jelena Radojicic 1, Apostolos Zaravinos 2, Thomas Vrekoussis 1, Maria.
Supplementary Figure S1 eQTL prior model modified from previous approaches to Bayesian gene regulatory network modeling. Detailed description is provided.
Breast cancer in elderly patients (70 years and older): The University of Tennessee Medical Center at Knoxville 10 year experience Curzon M, Curzon C,
Snyder D, Heidel RE, Panella T, Bell J, Orucevic A University of Tennessee Medical Center – Knoxville Departments of Pathology, Surgery, and Medicine BREAST.
COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF MULTILEVEL OMICS DATA FOR THE ELUCIDATION OF MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF CANCER Presented by Azeez Ayomide Fatai Supervisor: Junaid.
Prognostic and Predictive Factors: Current Evidence for Individualized Therapy Predictive Molecular Markers: Hormone Receptor Status Presented by Kathleen.
ICNCT-16, June 2014, Helsinki Glioma heterogeneity and the L-Amino acid transporter-1 (LAT1): A first step to stratified BPA-based BNCT? D. Ngoga 1 ; C.
Lecture 11. Topics in Omic Studies (Cancer Genomics, Transcriptomics and Epignomics) The Chinese University of Hong Kong CSCI5050 Bioinformatics and Computational.
CBioPortal Web resource for exploring, visualizing, and analyzing multidimentional cancer genomics data.
Case Study: Characterizing Diseased States from Expression/Regulation Data Tuck et al., BMC Bioinformatics, 2006.
Methodology U937 Human Immune Cells Control (No treatment) (n=4) Estrogen (5 uM) (n=4) 4-nonylphenol (5 uM) (n=4) Cultured Cells, RNA Isolation, RT (to.
Statistical Analysis for Expression Experiments Heather Adams BeeSpace Doctoral Forum Thursday May 21, 2009.
NCode TM miRNA Analysis Platform Identifies Differentially Expressed Novel miRNAs in Adenocarcinoma Using Clinical Human Samples Provided By BioServe.
The Effect on pCR of Bevacizumab and/or Antimetabolites Added to Standard Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: NSABP Protocol B-40 1 Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab and Anthracycline–Taxane-Based.
(1) Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Largest systematic study of genetic regulation in multiple tissues to date 53 tissues, 500+ donors, 9K samples, 180M.
Different microarray applications Rita Holdhus Introduction to microarrays September 2010 microarray.no Aim of lecture: To get some basic knowledge about.
 We investigated for biomarkers that distinguish metastatic or recurring disease with non-metastatic disease, with a particular focus on breast cancer.
COMPARING DISEASE OUTCOME OF WOMEN WITH HORMONE RECEPTOR NEGATIVE/HER2 POSITIVE (HR-/HER2+) OR TRIPLE NEGATIVE (TN) METASTATIC BREAST CANCER (MBC) RECEIVING.
An Overview of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)
Multi-scale network biology model & the model library 多尺度网络生物学模型 -- 兼论模型库的建立与应用 Jianghui Xiong 熊江辉
Yuna Jo. Introduction Prostate cancer (PCa) continues to burden the Western world with its high rates of incidence and mortality despite the.
Comparison between Pathologic Characteristics of Her2 Negative and Positive Breast Cancer in a Single Cancer Center in Jordan DR Majdi A. Al Soudi, MD,
A graph-based integration of multiple layers of cancer genomics data (Progress Report) Do Kyoon Kim 1.
Figure 2. DNA methylation mediated MORT gene silencing is linked to luminal, receptor positive breast cancers. (A) MORT expression level plotted versus.
Transcriptional heterogeneity of breast cancer subtypes,
Yu-fang huang, yi-hui wu, cheng-yang chou*
Figure S1. DCYTB expression is higher in ER+ than ER- patients
Strategy Description Discovery Validation Application
Regulatory T Cells Exhibit Distinct Features in Human Breast Cancer
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Patterns of Somatically Acquired Amplifications and Deletions in Apparently Normal Tissues of Ovarian Cancer Patients  Leila Aghili, Jasmine Foo, James.
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e5 (September 2018)
Long Noncoding RNA BC as a Novel Therapeutic Target for Colorectal Cancer that Suppresses Metastasis by Upregulating TIMP3  Jiaxin Lin, Xin Tan,
Patterns of Somatically Acquired Amplifications and Deletions in Apparently Normal Tissues of Ovarian Cancer Patients  Leila Aghili, Jasmine Foo, James.
Altered Caspase-8 Expression
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Nadia Howlader, PhD National Cancer Institute
CXCL14-positive CAFs induce overexpression of LINC00092 in ovarian cancer. CXCL14-positive CAFs induce overexpression of LINC00092 in ovarian cancer. A,
EN1 expression in breast cancer and clinical outcome.
CREBBP loss-of-function results in gene expression repression signature. CREBBP loss-of-function results in gene expression repression signature. A–D,
Identification of putative TET1 targets in TNBC
Presentation transcript:

Triple negative (TN) vs. positive (TP) breast cancer (BC) analysis with public genomic data yields AGR3 as a biomarker Anita Umesh, Jenny Park, James Shima, Joseph Delaney, Robert Wisotzkey, Erin Kelly, Elizabeth Beatrice Chiu, Mamatha Shekar, Ilya Kupershmidt NextBio, 475 El Camino Real, Suite 100, Santa Clara, CA Abstract Objectives Materials & Methods Results Summary of results To identify differences in genomic signatures amongst TNBC versus triple positive breast cancer (TPBC) patients in the TCGA breast cancer dataset. To identify novel potential biomarkers candidates that are not within the category of hormone receptors. Background: TNBCs have an aggressive clinical phenotype with worse prognosis than TPBC. Here we sought to identify other genomic changes in patients with TN vs. TPBC, by mining TCGA breast cancer genomic data using the NextBio Clinical platform. Methods: Breast cancer patients with decreased (n=61) and increased (n=33) ER/PR/Her2 mRNA levels were selected with the molecular filter in NB Clinical. Top- ranked differentially expressed genes were identified then analyzed via NB Research, which comprises a library of individually curated publicly available research and clinical grade genomic data. Results: Whole transcriptome analysis of TNBC and TPBC patients identified anterior gradient-3 (AGR3), a gene encoding a protein disulfide isomerase, as most downregulated (TNBC vs. TPBC, fold change = , p=1.3E-27). AGR3 mRNA was reduced in 95% of TNBC and increased in 88% of TPBC patients. AGR3 was hypomethylated in 100% of TPBC vs. 52% of TNBC patients, suggesting regulation by methylation. When the entire breast cancer cohort was stratified by AGR3 expression, underexpression was more prevalent in younger patients (<50 yr) compared to those with overexpression (<50 yr). Further, 68% of AGR3 underexpressing patients had severe TP53 mutations vs. 13% with AGR3 overexpression. Breast cancer was most correlated to AGR3 in the NextBio Disease Atlas, with supporting data from 124 studies. AGR3 expression was decreased in ER- vs. ER+, PR- vs. PR+, Her2- vs. Her2+, and G3 vs. G1 tumors, and AGR3 promoter was hypermethylated in ER- vs. ER+, consistent with the TCGA results. Body Atlas showed strongest AGR3 expression in mucosa, fallopian tube, breast, and epithelial cells, in line with its proposed role in epithelial barrier function. Knockdown Atlas results showed TP53 mutation associated with reduced AGR3 mRNA, and the PharmacoAtlas showed positive regulation of AGR3 by estrogen analogues. Conclusions: Using the NextBio Clinical and Research platforms, we identified AGR3 as a marker of TNBC vs. TPBC that correlates with TP53 mutation status. AGR3 may provide an alternate route of TNBC treatment. Its potential in regulating epithelial barrier function may provide insights into the mechanism of disease progression. AGR3 RNA is downregulated in TNBC patients and upregulated in TPBC patients AGR3 promoter is differentially methylated between TNBC and TPBC breast cancer patients NextBio Clinical This specialized platform allows for exploration of relationships between genomic data, clinical observations, and clinical outcomes of individual patients. Molecular changes in each sample are calculated and organized in a manner such that clinically relevant changes can be easily displayed for a given patient. Selection of patient cohort: The NextBio Clinical platform was used to mine TCGA Breast Cancer patients, and to select TNBC and TPBC patients based on RNA expression levels of ESR1, PGR, and HER2. The Group Comparison feature in NextBio Clinical was used to select patients with the following criteria: -2.0 fold downregulation of ESR1, PGR, and Her2 for the TNBC cohort, and 1.6 fold upregulation of ESR1, PGR, and Her2 for the TPBC cohort. This resulted in the selection of 61 patients in the former group, and 33 patients in the latter group with data for RNA expression. Biomarker analysis: The biomarker analysis feature in NextBio Clinical was used determine candidate genes that were differentially regulated in TNBC versus TPBC patients. Upon identifying a specific candidate (AGR3) that was differentially regulated when assessed by both significance p-value and magnitude of RNA expression fold change difference, Biomarker analysis was used to stratify the TCGA breast cancer patient population by downregulation of AGR3 RNA expression (>= -2.0 fold) versus upregulation (> = 2.0 fold). This identified close to 200 patients in each arm of the cohort, respectively. NextBio Research Over 10,000 genomic studies containing nearly 78,000 signatures from 13 species and multiple datatypes have been curated and included in the NextBio library. Individual studies were obtained from public data sources, analyzed and imported to NextBio. All data points are organized in a framework of accredited biomedical ontologies such as SNOMED CT and MeSH. Scores and ranks are recomputed each time new datasets are added. Disease atlas: This application allows for the identification of rank-ordered diseases from studies containing statistically significant measurements for the gene. Disease centric studies are manually tagged according to their experimental design and biomedical attributes. Knockdown atlas: This application identifies all studies in which any gene perturbation experiments were performed, that result in statistically significant measurements for a queried gene of interest. These studies are grouped together by perturbed gene and then scored to yield a list of ranked genetic perturbations. Pharmaco atlas: Compound treatment-related experiments are manually tagged according to their experimental design and treatment conditions. The results are presented in a rank ordered list of compounds that regulate the queried gene in a statistically significant manner. Stratification of TCGA breast cancer patients by AGR3 RNA downregulated (Group A) vs. upregulated (Group B) shows increased TP53 mutation frequency in AGR3 downregulated patients B. 1.In a cohort of TCGA breast cancer patients stratified by hormone receptor RNA expression levels, TNBC patients had statistically significant high-magnitude downregulation of AGR3 RNA levels compared to TPBC patients. 2.TNBC patients had AGR3 promoter hypermethylation compared to TPBC patients, providing potential mechanism for the regulation at the RNA level. 3.Higher proportion of younger patients had AGR3 RNA downregulated compared to older patients. 4.Patients selected for AGR3 downregulation had higher TP53 mutation frequency and ER-/PR- protein status. 5.Amongst all diseases, AGR3 gene was most highly correlated with Breast cancer, with notable downregulation in (1) ER and/or PR negative versus positive tumors, and (2) grade 3 versus grade 1 tumors. 6.AGR3 levels are significantly upregulated in 4-hydroxytamoxifen, estradiol and tibolone treated breast cancer cells, suggesting that AGR3 expression is regulated by the estrogen signaling pathway. Conclusion A. B. A. Using a genomic patient stratification approach, we identify AGR3 as a biomarker that is downregulated in TNBC versus TPBC. Given that AGR3 protein expression has recently been associated with longer median survival in serous ovarian carcinomas (King et al 2011 Am J Surg Pathol.), we propose AGR3 RNA expression as a candidate biomarker indicative of a more favorable disease outcome in breast cancer AGR3 RNA expression (log 2 [patient signal/disease median]) TNBC patients (n = 61) mean fold change = mean fold change in log2scale = TPBC patients (n = 33) mean fold change = 1.64 mean fold change in log2scale = 0.71 Fold change difference = Fold change difference in log2scale = p = 1.3E-27 AGR3 promoter % differential methylation TNBC patients (n = 21) mean = TPBC patients (n = 17) mean = Methylation change difference = 24.4 p = 1.1E-6 Stratification of TCGA Breast Cancer patients by downregulated (Group A) versus upregulated (Group B) ESR1/PGR/HER2 RNA expression in NextBio Clinical returns differentially regulated genes, of which PGR and ESR1 are the most significantly regulated by RNA expression. C. Group A = AGR3 RNA expression downregulated Group B = AGR3 RNA expression upregulated Mutation frequency difference = 54.91%, p = 1.8E-21 NextBio Clinical: Discovery and exploration of novel biomarkers in individual TCGA breast cancer patients NextBio Research: Validation and further characterization of AGR3 biomarker using a library of curated public genomic data 7 Disease Atlas returns Breast cancer as the most significantly correlated disease with AGR3 expression Disease Atlas for AGR3 Querying AGR3 for all studies in NextBio Research where AGR3 expression in a given disease is compared to normal tissue expression returns Breast cancer as the most significantly correlated disease amongst all other diseases with AGR3 expression. AGR3 is downregulated in Breast cancer compared to normal tissue. This finding is supported by 124 studies of different datatypes including Methylation (ME), RNA expression (RE), Copy number variation (CN), and miRNA expression (MI). A. Breast cancer studies that correlate significantly with AGR3 were predominantly those where ER and/or PR negative status were compared to receptor positive status. This figure shows a subset of such studies, where all show negative fold change expression of AGR3 in receptor negative vs. positive samples. Breast cancer studies that correlate most significantly with AGR3 expression show a correlation with signatures for ER/PR status (A) and tumor grade (B) 8 B. AGR3 expression correlated significantly with many signatures that compared grade 3 tumors to grade 1 tumors. This figure illustrates 14 such signatures from 14 independent studies where AGR3 was underexpressed in grade 3 tumors compared to grade 1 tumors Negative fold change of AGR3 expression ER and/or PR negative vs. positive Individual study number A. B Negative fold change of AGR3 expression Individual study number Grade 3 vs. Grade 1 tumors Knockdown Atlas returns 16 independent studies showing correlation of TP53 status with AGR3 downregulation Knockdown Atlas for AGR3 Querying AGR3 for all studies in NextBio Research in which gene perturbations are introduced, returns a list of genes that affect AGR3 expression. Most notable amongst these, is the perturbation of the TP53 gene. Sixteen independent RNA expression (RE), Copy number variation (CN), and miRNA (MI) studies show that TP53 mutations lead to downregulated AGR3. Pharmaco Atlas returns 4-hydroxytamoxifen, estradiol, and tibolone as correlating with upregulation of AGR Querying AGR3 for all studies in NextBio Research in which compound treatments are performed, returns a list of compounds that affect AGR3 expression. Most notable amongst these, is the upregulation of AGR3 by 4-hydroxytamoxifen, estradiol, and tibolone which all bind steroid hormone receptors. Three, 17 and 1 independent studies respectively support this result. 4 […] 5.9E E E E-42 Biomarker Analysis for RNA Expression n=8 n=118 n=203 n=83n=61 Stratification of TCGA breast cancer patients by AGR3 RNA downregulated vs upregulated shows higher proportion of younger patients with AGR3 downregulated Biomarker Analysis for Somatic Mutations Stratification of TCGA breast cancer patients by AGR3 RNA downregulated vs. upregulated identifies patients with ER-, PR- and ER+, PR+ protein expression status, respectively, as indicated by TCGA provided information. Her2 protein expression status does not correlate with AGRAGR3 RNA expression