Understanding the Power Curve Interpolation Issue Power Curve Working Group, 2016-03-10, Hamburg Axel Albers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 1 Chapter 5: Multiple Regression 5.1 Fitting a Multiple Regression Model 5.2 Fitting a Multiple Regression Model with Interactions 5.3 Generating and.
Advertisements

ALBERTA WIND POWER VARIABILITY STUDY Represented by Tommi Pensas.
Inflow angle and Energy Production Jørgen Højstrup Wind Solutions / Højstrup Wind Energy Power Curve Working Group, Louisville 6 October 2014.
FTP Biostatistics II Model parameter estimations: Confronting models with measurements.
Linear Motion Chapters 2 and 3.
Challenge the future Delft University of Technology Blade Load Estimations by a Load Database for an Implementation in SCADA Systems Master Thesis.
1 G Lect 14b G Lecture 14b Within subjects contrasts Types of Within-subject contrasts Individual vs pooled contrasts Example Between subject.
Dr. S.M. Malaek Assistant: M. Younesi
Parameterised turbine performance Power Curve Working Group – Glasgow, 16 December 2014 Stuart Baylis, Matthew Colls, Przemek Marek, Alex Head.
5.6 Maximization and Minimization with Mixed Problem Constraints
1 PCWG Peter Stuart 02 September Agenda (1) 2 Morning Session: 10am-1pm – “Welcome” Peter Stuart (RES) – “Review of Actions.
PCWG 9 th Meeting: 12 December Glasgow Round Robin 4 Results: Conditions Specific Power Curves.
LiDAR analysis at a site with simple terrain Alex Clerc, Lee Cameron Tuesday 2 nd September
Christopher Dougherty EC220 - Introduction to econometrics (chapter 3) Slideshow: prediction Original citation: Dougherty, C. (2012) EC220 - Introduction.
Chapter 5 DESCRIBING DATA WITH Z-SCORES AND THE NORMAL CURVE.
United Nations Statistics Division Backcasting. Overview  Any change in classifications creates a break in time series, since they are suddenly based.
Radial Basis Function Networks
1 PREDICTION In the previous sequence, we saw how to predict the price of a good or asset given the composition of its characteristics. In this sequence,
Uncertainty in Wind Energy
Calibration & Curve Fitting
Introduction to Linear Regression and Correlation Analysis
Review Significant Figures, Vector Math Velocity, Acceleration, Force.
Unit 1 Significant Figures.  When does = 4?  When 2 = 1.7 rounded  & 3 = 2.6  = 4.3 = 4.
Understanding Multivariate Research Berry & Sanders.
UNCERTAINTY The Classical Approach ALAN DERRICK SENIOR TECHNICAL MANAGER September
1 G Lect 10a G Lecture 10a Revisited Example: Okazaki’s inferences from a survey Inferences on correlation Correlation: Power and effect.
Geo479/579: Geostatistics Ch12. Ordinary Kriging (1)
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Part 4 Curve Fitting.
Regression analysis Control of built engineering objects, comparing to the plan Surveying observations – position of points Linear regression Regression.
Methodology for producing the revised back series of population estimates for Julie Jefferies Population and Demography Division Office for.
Chapter 9 Risk Management of Energy Derivatives Lu (Matthew) Zhao Dept. of Math & Stats, Univ. of Calgary March 7, 2007 “ Lunch at the Lab ” Seminar.
Dynamic Response Characteristics of More Complicated Systems
Curve-Fitting Regression
Chapter 5: z-Scores x = 76 (a) X = 76 is slightly below average x = 76 (b) X = 76 is slightly above average 3 70 x = 76 (c) X = 76 is far.
Motion in One Dimension
9.2 Linear Regression Key Concepts: –Residuals –Least Squares Criterion –Regression Line –Using a Regression Equation to Make Predictions.
Chapter 3- Model Fitting. Three Tasks When Analyzing Data: 1.Fit a model type to the data. 2.Choose the most appropriate model from the ones that have.
Copyright © 2015, 2008, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 6.1, Slide 1 Chapter 6 Polynomial Functions.
Curve Fitting Introduction Least-Squares Regression Linear Regression Polynomial Regression Multiple Linear Regression Today’s class Numerical Methods.
…. a linear regression coefficient indicates the impact of each independent variable on the outcome in the context of (or “adjusting for”) all other variables.
PCWG 15 th Meeting December 2015 – Kings Langley PCWG 2016 Roadmap: Detailed Survey Results.
Upflow correction method EWEA Power Curve Working Group London, 2015 December.
Software Reliability Estimates/ Projections, Cumulative & Instantaneous Presented by Dave Dwyer With help from: Ann Marie Neufelder, John D. Musa, Martin.
1 CHANGES IN THE UNITS OF MEASUREMENT Suppose that the units of measurement of Y or X are changed. How will this affect the regression results? Intuitively,
PCWG-Share-01 Initial Results PCWG Meeting Kings Langley 9 th December 2015 Peter Stuart (RES), Lee Cameron (RES), Alex Clerc (RES) & Andy Clifton (NREL),
CHEMISTRY CHAPTER 2, SECTION 3. USING SCIENTIFIC MEASUREMENTS Accuracy and Precision Accuracy refers to the closeness of measurements to the correct or.
Engineering College of Engineering Engineering Education Innovation Center Analyzing Measurement Data Rev: , MCAnalyzing Data1.
Lecture 8: Measurement Errors 1. Objectives List some sources of measurement errors. Classify measurement errors into systematic and random errors. Study.
1 © A. Kwasinski, 2016 Power vs. energy delivery profile technologies Ragone chart: More information and charts can be found in Holm et. al., “A Comparison.
Chapter 14 Introduction to Regression Analysis. Objectives Regression Analysis Uses of Regression Analysis Method of Least Squares Difference between.
Lecture 7: Bivariate Statistics. 2 Properties of Standard Deviation Variance is just the square of the S.D. If a constant is added to all scores, it has.
PCWG-Share-01 Current Status PCWG Meeting Hamburg 10 th March 2016 Peter Stuart (RES) and Andy Clifton (NREL), on behalf of the Power Curve Working Group.
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative 10 August 2016 NREL, Colorado, US.
1 FINITE ELEMENT APPROXIMATION Rayleigh-Ritz method approximate solution in the entire beam –Difficult to find good approximate solution (discontinuities.
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative Update
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative Update 13 December 2016
Examining Achievement Gaps
IEA Task 32 Power Performance Uncertainty Round Robin
Notes on Weighted Least Squares Straight line Fit Passing Through The Origin Amarjeet Bhullar November 14, 2008.
Contents Cumulating of uncertainties across site calibration and power curve test Cumulating of uncertainties across wind speed bins Order of uncertainty.
Alternative Turbulence Correction Methods
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative
Turbulence and Heterogeneous Wind
Basic Estimation Techniques
Determining How Costs Behave
Power Curve Interpolation, What We’ve Learnt?
High Resolution Turbine-Specific Matrix
Basic Estimation Techniques
Where did we stop? The Bayes decision rule guarantees an optimal classification… … But it requires the knowledge of P(ci|x) (or p(x|ci) and P(ci)) We.
Validation of mesoscale generalisation procedure for the WRF model
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the Power Curve Interpolation Issue Power Curve Working Group, , Hamburg Axel Albers

Illustration of Interpolation Problem 1 Power curve raw data P Actual (t) is first bin-averaged (baseline power curve in inner range) Bin averages are interpolated in order to derive power from bin-averaged power curve for actual wind speed: P Baseline (t) or P Candidate (t) Source: P. Stuart, PCWG meeting London Dec. 2015

Inner Range Baseline Error 2 If NME is calculated for the inner range, it is expected to be zero (inner range baseline error) But it isn’t: NME positive where power curve left-curved and negative where power curve right-curved Source: P. Stuart, PCWG meeting London Dec. 2015

Explanation of Interpolation Error 3 The cause of the non-zero inner baseline error is the difference of the bin average of the power curve raw data and the bin average of the interpolated data The cause is not the lack of representation of the raw data by the bin averages (as illustrated in last meeting)

Simulation of Effect P Actual (t): cubic increase of P with wind speed, c p =0.45, cut-in wind speed of 3m/s, 50 (100) values per 0.5m/s (1.0m/s) wide bin, equally distributed 4

Simulation of Effect for 0.5m/s wide bins Simulated inner range baseline NME significant at low wind speeds 5

Simulation of Effect for 1.0m/s wide bins Inner range baseline NME significantly increased compared to 0.5m/s bins 6

Solution 1 to Overcome Effect (sophisticated) Treat P Actual in the same way as P Baseline and P Candidate : - First bin-average P Actual (t): - Then interpolate bin averages according to actual wind speed: P Actual,interpolated (t) Calculate NME as: The inner range baseline error is then zero by definition The interpolation effect cancels out in  Candidate or  Baseline (outer range) as P Actual,interpolated (t) undergoes the same interpolation as P Candidate (t) or P Baseline (t) (outer range) 7

Solution 2 to Overcome Effect (simple) Problem in case of linear interpolation between bin averages: two line assumptions with two slopes in each bin Solution: use only one line per bin, which passes through bin average, Model in bin i: Only issue: The model reproduces the exact bin average only if the wind speed is evenly distributed over the wind speed within the bin (is mostly the case). 8

Time Series Approach for Wind Resource Assessment? The interpolation problem is fully present if a bin-averaged power curve is used to simulate the power output based on a time series of the wind speed (overestimation of power at ankle of power curve, underestimation at knee) No error occurs when using a bin-averaged power curve in combination with a frequency distribution of the wind speed for the calculation of the energy production Consequence: The candidate methods may better be used only to transform the inner range power curve to the bin average of the meteorological variables (e.g. turbulence, shear) as present in the outer range. Alternative: The inner range power curve is transformed to different target values of the meteorological variables. The respective power curves in the outer range are then weighted by the frequency of each target value. 9

First 4 Round Robin Tests of PCWG The former round robin tests of the PCWG are not affected by the interpolation problem: - no power measurement was used - P Actual (t) has been interpolated from a binned power curve - P Candiate (t) has been calculated based on P Actual (t) - As P Candiate (t) and P Actual (t) are affected in the same way by the interpolation, the effect cancels out in the comparison. 10

Interpolation Effect was Present also at Relative Power Curve Analysis Approach of equal treatment of power curves helped to improve self-consistency test of Relative Power Curve Analysis 11 Original Self-Consistency Test in Training Period Improved Self-Consistency Test in Training Period

12 Thank you contact: