SEARCH FOR DIRECT PRODUCTION OF SUPERSYMMETRIC PAIRS OF TOP QUARKS AT √ S = 8 TEV, WITH ONE LEPTON IN THE FINAL STATE. Juan Pablo Gómez Cardona PhD Candidate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From Quark to Jet: A Beautiful Journey Lecture 1 1 iCSC2014, Tyler Dorland, DESY From Quark to Jet: A Beautiful Journey Lecture 1 Beauty Physics, Tracking,
Advertisements

Investigation on Higgs physics Group Ye Li Graduate Student UW - Madison.
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
First look of ME study on ttH(  bb) channel Univ. of Tokyo Y.Kataoka
Recent Results on the Possibility of Observing a Standard Model Higgs Boson Decaying to WW (*) Majid Hashemi University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Summary of Results and Projected Sensitivity The Lonesome Top Quark Aran Garcia-Bellido, University of Washington Single Top Quark Production By observing.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
Top Physics at the Tevatron Mike Arov (Louisiana Tech University) for D0 and CDF Collaborations 1.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
On the Trail of the Higgs Boson Meenakshi Narain.
S. Martí i García Liverpool December 02 1 Selection of events in the all-hadronic channel S. Martí i García CDF End Of Year Review Liverpool / December.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Search for resonances The fingerprints of the Top Quark Jessica Levêque, University of Arizona Top Quark Mass Measurement Top Turns Ten Symposium, Fermilab,
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
1 Techincolor and Heavy Top/B search Tulika Bose Meenakshi Narain (Brown University) Work done in the context of Les Houches 2007.
Top Results at CDF Yen-Chu Chen/ 陳彥竹 中央研究院物理所 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Taiwan, ROC For the CDF collaboration ICFP /10/03-08.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Institute for Anything of the University of Everything Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz New Physics at the LHC C.-E. Wulz (Institute of High Energy Physics) 1 Institute.
Reconstruction of High Transverse Momentum Top Quarks at CMS Gavril Giurgiu (Johns Hopkins University) For the CMS Collaboration 2009 DPF Meeting Wayne.
1 ZH Analysis Yambazi Banda, Tomas Lastovicka Oxford SiD Collaboration Meeting
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Experimental aspects of top quark physics Lecture #2 Regina Demina University of Rochester Topical Seminar on Frontier of Particle Physics Beijing, China.
Janice Drohan, Simon Dean, Nikos Konstantinidis UCL Christmas Meeting 12/12/2005 Search for Low Mass SM Higgs in the Channel ttH(H  bb)
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Experimental aspects of top quark mass measurement Regina Demina University of Rochester 2008 Winter Conference Aspen, CO 01/15/08.
1 ttbar Cross-Section Studies D. Jana*, M. Saleem*, F. Rizatdinova**, P. Gutierrez*, P. Skubic* *University of Oklahoma, **Oklahoma State University.
LCWS14, Belgrade, October M. Pandurović, H→WW at 350 GeV and 1.4 TeV CLIC Measurement of H→WW* in HZ at 350 GeV and WW fusion at 1.4 TeV CLIC.
B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics
Feasibility of Detecting Leptoquarks With the CDF Detector Althea Moorhead Mentor: Darin Acosta.
Top mass error predictions with variable JES for projected luminosities Joshua Qualls Centre College Mentor: Michael Wang.
Moriond EW 2013BSM Higgs Searches at the Tevatron 1 Beyond the SM scalar boson searches in TeVatron Elemér Nagy CPPM on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations.
Lake Louise (February 2002) Ivo van Vulpen 1 Z boson pair production Ivo van Vulpen Outline: LEP and its operation between ZZ production & final.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
Dave Toback Texas A&M University HCP 2004 June 17 th Run II Searches for Supersymmetry Dave Toback Texas A&M University June 17 th 2004 HCP2004.
SEARCH FOR AN INVISIBLE HIGGS IN tth EVENTS T.L.Cheng, G.Kilvington, R.Goncalo Motivation The search for the Higgs boson is a window on physics beyond.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Searching for the Higgs boson in the VH and VBF channels at ATLAS and CMS Dr. Adrian Buzatu Research Associate.
Particle Physics II Chris Parkes Top Quark Discovery Decay Higgs Searches Indirect mW and mt Direct LEP & LHC searches 2 nd Handout.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Top Higgs Yukawa Coupling Analysis – Status Report Hajrah Tabassam Quai-i-Azam University, Islamabad ON BEHALF OF: R. Yonamine, T. Tanabe, K. Fujii, KEK.
Jet reconstruction with Deterministic Annealing Davide Perrino Dipartimento di Fisica – INFN di Bari Terzo Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di Alice – 13/11/2007.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
Trilepton+top signal from chargino-neutralino decays of MSSM charged Higgs bosons 17 June 2004, 9 th Nordic LHC Physics Workshop, Copenhagen Christian.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
A Precision Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark Abazov, V. M. et al. (D0 Collaboration). Nature 429, (2004) Presented by: Helen Coyle.
Marcello Barisonzi First results of AOD analysis on t-channel Single Top DAD 30/05/2005 Page 1 AOD on Single Top Marcello Barisonzi.
Search for Pair Produced Stops Decaying to a Dileptonic Final State at CMS David Kolchmeyer.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Suyong Choi (SKKU) SUSY Standard Model Higgs Searches at DØ Suyong Choi SKKU, Korea for DØ Collaboration.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
American Physical Society Meeting St. Louis, MO April th, 2008 Measuring the top mass at DØ using the Ideogram Method Amnon Harel
An Important thing to know.
Top mass measurements at the Tevatron and the standard model fits
Experimental and theoretical Group Torino + Moscow
Outline Physics Motivation Technique Results
C.M.S.:.
Northern Illinois University / NICADD
Presentation transcript:

SEARCH FOR DIRECT PRODUCTION OF SUPERSYMMETRIC PAIRS OF TOP QUARKS AT √ S = 8 TEV, WITH ONE LEPTON IN THE FINAL STATE. Juan Pablo Gómez Cardona PhD Candidate Universidad de los Andes Carlos Avila Marcello Maggi Andres Florez Advisor Coadvisor Coadvisor Universidad de los Andes INFN Universidad de los Andes 1

2 1.To develop an analysis to discriminated between t* t* and t t (signal/main background) with very high efficiency. 2.To implement several tools to achieve the goal given in the last numeral: Chi Squared-based Method Merged Jet Method Splitted MET Method Matrix Elements Method 3.To run the analysis with the data collected by CMS at 8 TeV. 4.To analyze the results obtained. Objectives

3 This search is motivated by the fact that if SUSY is a natural solution to the hierarchy problem, the mass of the main squarks (stops) should be relatively lower than 1 TeV. Under this condition, the corrections to the Higgs field caused by a given boson, are almost entirely canceled by corrections due to its superpartner, since in this case the particle and superparticle masses are similar. This search focuses on two decay channels: t~ → tχ0 t~ → bχ± → bWχ0 which present a final state given by an isolated lepton with high amount of energy, 4 jets (two are the associated to b quarks) and MET. Motivation

4 Feynman Diagrams of the direct production of Stops and their main decays. Channels to Study The final state in both cases is conformed by 4 jets (2 of them are b- jets), 1 lepton and MET.

Main Backgrounds Semi-leptonic decay of tt~ 5 Leptonic decay of tt~ with lepton reconstructed as MET

6 “Events are required to contain one isolated lepton (e or ), no additional isolated track or hadronic t-lepton candidate, at least four jets with at least one b-tagged jet, and MET > 100 GeV. Signal regions are defined demanding MT > 120 GeV. “ Standard Analysis

7 This method is used to select the best permutation of jets that matches the decay process of the signal to be studied. For this purpose, it is used a variable based on Chi Square. The variable is constructed using relevant sub-variables such as: The Pt of the bjet associated with the leptonic branch (bLep). The difference in phi between the lepton and the bLep. The Chi-Square of the Invariant masses of the W and t in the hadronic branch (Whad and tHad). b-tagging. Basic Analysis (Chi Square based)

8 In order to find a good variable to select the best permutation, a study is required to find the weights, the means and the errors to be used. The variable is given by the following equation: V= S w i (sv i -mv i ) 2 /ev i Where: V: Variable used to select the best permutation sv i : Subvariable i used to construct V mv i : Mean of sv i mv i : Error of sv i W i : Weight assigned to the Chi Square of sv i Tunning Chi-Square

9 This results where obtained with the variable given by: V= ( IM_WHad-80. ) 2 / 15 + ( IM_tHad-173. ) 2 / 30 + ( IM_tLep-173. ) 2 / 45 Where: IM_ means Invariant Mass. Partial Results With Basic Analysis

10 Partial Results With Basic Analysis tt~SingleElec Wjets

11 Partial Results With Basic Analysis tt~SingleElec Wjets

12 Partial Results With Basic Analysis tt~SingleElec Wjets

13 Partial Results With Basic Analysis tt~SingleElec Wjets

14 This method is a generalization of the basic method. In this method each jet assigned to the process decay, can be composed by several jets reconstructed by the standard algorithm used at CMS (AK5). This method is expected to give a better resolution, because it can be used to have into account the final state radiation. In the same way it is possible to use this method to find the jets originated as a consequence of the initial state radiation. This method helps when two jets are generated together and only one is reconstructed. W is allowed to be reconstructed using one only jet!!! Analysis Using Merged Jets Method

15 This method calculates the likelihood that a certain event is observed at the detector as a consequence of a given process. The likelihood is given by: Predictions of the theory (matrix elements). Detector resolution. Analysis Using Matrix Elements Method

16 Matrix Elements is a method that is very time demanding, for such reason, it is a good idea to make a preselection in order to only use this method with a small fraction of all the different combinations. The preselection is made using a Chi Square-based variable. In this case, the idea is to find a subset of all permutations that have the biggest probability to match the process decay. Then MadWeight is used to select the best permutation from this subset. A study was done in order to find a good variable and the number of combinations to be used with MW. This study was done using the standard matching algorithm used at CMS. Study of Chi Square-based Preselection Method

17 Study of Chi Square-based Preselection Method (II)

18 In order to setup MW, several cards are used, among them we can find: -Process Card: It defines the process decay. -Transfer Function Card: It defines the transfer function to simulate the detector resolution. Cards Used to Setup MadWeight (MW)

19 Cards Used to Setup MadWeight (MW)

20 In order to construct the transfer function, the following steps were done: 1.Histograms showing the difference in Pt between the genParticle and the associated jet/lepton. This histograms were done for different ranges (20-40, 40-60, …, ) of the genParticle’s Pt. 2.A fit using a double-gaussian of the previous histograms. 3.A fit for each one of the six parameters w.r.t the mean value of the genParticle’s Pt (30, 50, 70, …, 310). 4.At the end we have a double gaussian where each one of the six parameters is a function of the genParticle’s Pt. Transfer Function (MW)

21 Transfer Function (MW)

22 Transfer Function (MW)

23 Transfer Function (MW)

24 Transfer Function (MW)

25 Transfer Function (MW)

26 This is the format of the files that are used as inputs to MW. LHCO Files

27 In order to reduce the time computing we made a study about the minimum number of points to be used in the integration process. Study About Integration Points

28 At this point we have developed several tools in order to be ready to used them in the analysis: Chi-Squared Method Merged Jets Method Matrix Elements Method We have found several optimal working points: Points of Integration Number of combinations to be used with MW. Variable to be used to select the subset of combinations. Now, we are in the tuning step: To find a good variable for the Chi-Square Method. We also need to finish the development of the code to be able to run the last two methods using the grid. Conclusions