10-30-02IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Nitrogen Inerting Requirements – A Lit. Review International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement, FAA, WJ Hughes Technical Center
Advertisements

Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement, FAA, WJ Hughes Technical Center Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.
Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement, FAA, WJ Hughes Technical Center Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.
JET A VAPORIZATION IN A SIMULATED AIRCRAFT FUEL TANK (INCLUDING SUB-ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURES AND LOW TEMPERATURES) C. E. Polymeropoulos, and Robert Ochs Department.
Modeling of Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J
Scale Model Inerting Testing ___________________________________ AAR-422 Fire Safety R&D July 17-18, 2001 International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection.
IASFPWG – Seattle, WA Fuel Tank Ignition Experiments at Reduced Oxygen Concentrations International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group.
Modeling Wing Tank Flammability Dhaval D. Dadia Dr. Tobias Rossmann Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway, New Jersey Steven Summer Federal.
IASFPWG – Ottawa, Canada Limiting Oxygen Concentration (LOC) Work Update International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Ottawa, Canada.
Cargo Bay Fire Protection with a Fuel Tank Inerting System William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration.
Limiting Oxygen Concentration of Aviation Fuels Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 Limiting Oxygen Concentration of Aviation Fuels Steve Summer Project.
An Update on FAA Fuel Tank Ullage Modeling
State of the Art of Fuel Tank Ullage Oxygen Concentration Measurement William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
European Aviation Safety Agency IASFPWG May London Certification Directorate Slide 1 ISO2685 Revision Fire Testing For Propulsion Rémi DELETAIN.
Modeling of Single Bay Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
FIREPROOF AND FIRE RESISTANT MATERIALS Federal Aviation Administration Project Manager: J. Reinhardt William J. Hughes Technical Center Airport and Aircraft.
Modeling In-flight Inert Gas Distribution in a 747 Center-Wing Fuel Tank William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Inerting Background Inerting refers to rendering the ullage (air above fuel) unable to propagate a reaction given flammable conditions and ignition source.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 FTFAM – Version 11 Update May 19 th, Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Version 11 Update Steve Summer.
Safety Determine conditions where fires and /or explosions can occur.
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 RTCA Update Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Bremen,
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group, Atlantic City, NJ By: Robert Ian Ochs Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 Federal Aviation.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability April 2-3, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Federal Aviation Administration Status of Research & Testing to Replace Halon Extinguishing Agents in Civil Aviation Fire Safety Team FAA Wm. J. Hughes.
FAA R&D Efforts Leading to Fuel Tank Inerting
Presented to: International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group. Atlantic City, NJ By: Dave Blake. FAA Technical Center. Atlantic City, NJ.
Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Wiring 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Bremen, Germany.
Outline Background Explosion Phenomena Experiments Correlation Conclusion/Summary Questions.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration In-Flight Burn- Through Tests Aluminum vs. composite materials Aircraft Systems Fire Working Grp.
VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE Crash Simulation of a Vertical Drop Test of a B737 Fuselage Section with Overhead Bins Karen E. Jackson and Edwin L. Fasanella.
Federal Aviation Administration Radiant Panel Test for Thermal/Acoustic Insulation 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire.
Federal Aviation Administration Measuring Ullage Oxygen Concentration November 17-18, Measuring Oxygen Concentration in a Fuel Tank Ullage Federal.
IASFPWG – Seattle, WA Jet-A Vaporization Computer Model A Fortran Code Written by Prof. Polymeropolous of Rutgers University International Aircraft.
Federal Aviation Administration COMPOSITE MATERIAL FIRE FIGHTING Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Atlantic City,
Reticulated Foam Advantages: 100% protection Passive System
NexGen Fire Test Burner Update
Presented to: IAMFTWG, Renton, WA By: Robert Ochs Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing.
Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Ducting 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Savannah, GA.
Background Numerous FAR’s mandate fire protection in aircraft powerplant fire zones Parts 23, 25, 27, 29, 33… FAR Part 1 Section 1.1 – Definitions and.
1 MAE 5310: COMBUSTION FUNDAMENTALS Chemical Kinetics: Steady-State Approximation and Chain Reactions October 1, 2012 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.
Cargo Bay Fire Protection with a Fuel Tank Inerting System
Federal Aviation Administration Halon 1211 Stratification/ Localization in Aircraft Louise Speitel Fire Safety Branch FAA Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability November 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing.
6/13/02IASFPWG – London, UK Ongoing Fuel Flammability Work at the FAA Technical Center International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group London,
Federal Aviation Administration Measuring Ullage Oxygen Concentration February 10-12, Measuring Oxygen Concentration in a Fuel Tank Ullage Federal.
Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, ATO-P (formerly.
OBIGGS Sizing Data for Transport Canada Trade Study William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration.
March 26-27, 2003 International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Phoenix, Az Inerting of a Scale 747SP Center-Wing Fuel Tank During a Typical.
Halon Contamination SIB R1 Deletain Rémi Powerplant Installation & Fuel Systems Certification Directorate Novembre 2011.
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 RTCA Update Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Savannah,
Federal Aviation Administration Wiring Test 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
October 30-31, 2002 International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ Inerting of a Scale 747SP Center Wing Fuel Tank During.
Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration WJ Hughes Technical Center Fire Safety Branch, AJP6320 Bldg.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 19 th, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
IASFPWG – Ottawa, Canada In-Flight Fuel Tank Flammability Testing Steve Summer Project Engineer Federal Aviation Administration Fire Safety Branch.
Federal Aviation Administration Status of Research & Testing to Replace Halon Extinguishing Agents in Civil Aviation Douglas Ingerson Louise Speitel Constantine.
MULTI-COMPONENT FUEL VAPORIZATION IN A SIMULATED AIRCRAFT FUEL TANK C. E. Polymeropoulos Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University.
IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Limiting Oxygen Concentration (LOC) Work Update International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic.
Federal Aviation Administration Slide Evacuation Test Method TSO C69A 0 Slide Evacuation Test Method TSO C69A Federal Aviation Administration International.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Seat Test Round Robin Materials Working Group Patricia Cahill June 26, 2007 Interim.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 EFB Hazard Assessment November 17, Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) Hazard Assessment Steve Summer Federal Aviation.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 11, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
IASFPWG – Ottawa, Canada Low Fuel Load Flammability Work International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Ottawa, Canada February.
The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method Steve Summer.
Presented to: International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group. London, UK By: Dave Blake. FAA Technical Center. Atlantic City, NJ.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Douglas.
Wing Tank Flammability Testing William Cavage Steven Summer AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration International.
Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Ducting 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Atlantic City,
Presentation transcript:

IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Nitrogen Inerting Requirements – A Lit. Review International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ October , 2002 Steve Summer Project Engineer Federal Aviation Administration Fire Safety Branch, AAR-422

IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Background  Recent tests at the Tech Center produced inerting requirement data as a function of altitude.  This data contradicts the typical requirement of 9% O 2 used by the military, but a literature search shows that it does not contradict any previous data on the subject.

IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ

IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Background  Values lower than 11 – 12% have arisen due to two things: A difference in ignition criteria  Pressure rise should be used as criteria, as overpressurization is what will cause catastrophic failure. Safety factors added on to experimental values  Data has been taken at stoichiometric levels with a large ignition source (worst-case scenario), so a certain amount of SF is built into the data.

IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Ref. Kuchta (1986)

IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Previous Jet Fuel Data  Sam Zinn (1971) – Examined data as far back as 1946 from Boeing, Bureau of Mines, U of Cal., WADC, Convair, and Wright Pat All found levels of between 11 – 12% O 2 were sufficient to suppress ignition except for one.

IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Previous Jet Fuel Data  Stewart & Starkman (1955) determined a level of 9.8% Criteria for ignition was any visual flame front. It is noted in their report that at times, flame occurred with little to no pressure rise. Their data does however verify the trend of decreasing inerting requirements as altitude increases.

IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Previous Jet Fuel Data  of Mines (1970) suggested a SF of 20% be added on to the LOC value. It appears that this is where the current military standard of 9% has come from. This added SF might not be needed as the tests were performed under worst-case conditions (i.e. stoich. mixture, large ignition source)

IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Conclusions  A literature search of previous experimental data shows excellent agreement with the current dataset that was obtained.  All reported levels that were lower than 11 – 12% O 2 were due either to a disparity in ignition criteria or excessive safety factors added onto the experimental data.