Going remote – enabling tomorrow’s Air Traffic Services ART Kick-off Niclas Gustavsson, LFV Manager ATM Business Development

13 November 2007 Air Navigation Services Division2 ATM Landscape of Europe Eurocontrol (36 + European Community) ECAC (42) EU (25) X

13 November 2007 Air Navigation Services Division3 Air Transport Landscape Society Noise & Climate change Safety Security Sustainable growth Airspace Users High cost pressure (+fuel) 9/11 and economic downturn Low cost airlines UAVs Airports Aviation: just a business ANSPs Corporatisation/privatisation -> new behaviours Under pressure of users Supply Industry Concentration Global

13 November 2007 Air Navigation Services Division4 CEATS Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Croatia Czech Republic Hungary Italy (Padua UIR) Slovenia Slovak Republic EFP Plan France Portugal Spain AEFMP Plan Algeria France Morocco Portugal Spain Balkan States Regional Development Albania FYROM Greece Middle East Regional Development Cyprus Egypt Israel Jordan Lebanon Syria Air Traffic Management Cooperation in South-Eastern Europe (ACE) Bulgaria Romania Turkey Moldova (FYROM) (Serbia and Montenegro) ANS Providers ? Maastricht UAC Belgium Germany (Hanover UIR) Luxembourg The Netherlands Nordic ANS Programme Denmark Finland Iceland Norway Sweden CHIEF Development France Switzerland Italy Spain Baltic States Regional Development Lithuania Poland (Estonia) (Latvia) RADA (Black Sea Regional ATSP Cooperation) Azerbaijan Ukraine Georgia Armenia Moldova (Kazakhstan)

13 November 2007 Air Navigation Services Division5 Motivating the costs… Eurocontrol: PRC

13 November 2007 Air Navigation Services Division6 EU – US comparison 13.8 M km² 18 M flights 851 km/flight 11 M km² 8.9 M flights 826 km/flight 2004 data +92%

13 November 2007 Air Navigation Services Division7 Industry

13 November 2007 Air Navigation Services Division8 Demand vs capacity Assuming that airspace and ATC capacity will grow in due time 2.5 growth factor if sufficient airport capacity 2.0 growth factor with max achievable airport capacity 4.3 % p.a. Top-3 capacity expansion constraints as reported by airports: 1. Physical site & infrastructure limits 2. Environmental issues 3. Surrounding airspace & geography

13 November 2007 Air Navigation Services Division9 Single European Sky - design goals Key system features Gate-to-gate system integration One dynamic airspace continuum Performance Based Requirements Co-operative ATM 4D Trajectory & Contracts New roles / task distribution for controllers Airborne separation assistance Collaborative Decision Making (ATM / Airline operations / Airport –Airside / Landside) System-Wide Information Management & Interoperability Exploit satellite technology (GALILEO & communications) Key system features Gate-to-gate system integration One dynamic airspace continuum Performance Based Requirements Co-operative ATM 4D Trajectory & Contracts New roles / task distribution for controllers Airborne separation assistance Collaborative Decision Making (ATM / Airline operations / Airport –Airside / Landside) System-Wide Information Management & Interoperability Exploit satellite technology (GALILEO & communications) Design Goals for Future Air Transport Performance Capability Safety: accident rate divided by 5Safety: accident rate divided by 5 Capacity: capability to handle 3 times trafficCapacity: capability to handle 3 times traffic Delay: less than 15 min delay for 99% of timeDelay: less than 15 min delay for 99% of time Passenger handling: less than min in airportPassenger handling: less than min in airport Environment: half noise & emissionsEnvironment: half noise & emissions Design Goals for Future Air Transport Performance Capability Safety: accident rate divided by 5Safety: accident rate divided by 5 Capacity: capability to handle 3 times trafficCapacity: capability to handle 3 times traffic Delay: less than 15 min delay for 99% of timeDelay: less than 15 min delay for 99% of time Passenger handling: less than min in airportPassenger handling: less than min in airport Environment: half noise & emissionsEnvironment: half noise & emissions

13 November 2007 Air Navigation Services Division10 New paradigm Procedural Estimate the current and planned a/c positions Past Radar Know the current and estimate planned a/c positions Today Trajectory Know & share the current and planned a/c positions A320 Future

North European ANSP Cooperation – NEAC AVINOR – Norway Finavia – Finland NAVIAR – Denmark EANS – Estonia ISAVIA – Iceland IAA – Ireland LFV – Sweden

Geographical scope Square/km 3 millions flights

NEAC in figures

NEAC performance today

13 November 2007 Air Navigation Services Division15 ART expectations Translate new requirements into possible solutions Develop Remote towers to become a viable alternative to traditional tower services at ANY kind of airport Validate technologies for enhancing current tower operations Deliver prototypes for SESAR – market leader Establish a dialogue with Air traffic controller community. Communicate - be there – be prepared….

13 November 2007 Air Navigation Services Division16 Future NEAC Tower services – it’s remote 20%50%90%(100%)

13 November 2007 Air Navigation Services Division17 Thank you !