Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 614-995-2296.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Improvement Grants Tier I and Tier II Schools March, 2010.
Advertisements

April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APRIL 27, 2010 VANDERBILT MARRIOTT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ROLLOUT 1.
META PHELPS-HODGES SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION COACH NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION District and School Transformation.
How does Wisconsin Use Indistar to Establish Goals and Track Results? Aundrea Kerkenbush, MS Education Consultant; Title I WI Department of Public Instruction.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Program Improvement Year 3 Corrective Action.
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
OKLAHOMA SIG SCHOOLS State Profile – Cohort 1 Tier I SIG Schools: 8 – Cohort 2 Tier I and II SIG Schools: 3 Total SIG Schools: 11 Total Funding Awards.
Next Generation of Accountability Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Summer 2012.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
1 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT COHORT 2 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 5, 2011.
Support for the Change, Challenge, and Commitment All Maryland Students College and Career Ready.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
School Improvement Grants. Over 13,000 schools are currently under some form of improvement status schools = 5% of schools in some form of restructuring.
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
1 Tier 1 Education: Review Participant Training January AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
ARRA Title I: The chance of a lifetime to address our most vexing challenges Reform and Restore: Implementing the ARRA Michigan Institute for Educational.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (SIG): A New Opportunity for Turning Around Low-Performing High Schools January 29, 2010.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
Indistar Summit – Coaching with Indistar February 2012 Presenters: Yvonne Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Office of School Improvement Michael Hill.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of School Recovery November 18, :30-4:30 Committee of Practitioners Meeting School Improvement Grant 1003(g)
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Supporting the Improvement of Washington Districts and Schools.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Indistar Summit February 28-29, 2012 Biloxi, Mississippi Mississippi Department of Education School Improvement Grants: SIGnaling Positive Changes in Mississippi.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 17, 2011 Presented by: California Department of Education.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
Carlas McCauley Educational Program Specialist U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
ESEA Renewal What does it Mean for Title I? Program Improvement and Family Support Branch Title I Administrative Meeting September 17, 2015.
SAM REDDING ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING CENTER ON SCHOOL TURNAROUND BUILDING STATE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER.
Statewide Systems of Support Oregon School Improvement Facilitators Carol Larson, Willamette ESD Christina Reagle, Oregon Dept. of Education.
Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.
WVDE System of Support Michele Blatt Office of School Improvement.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
School Improvement Overview September 17-18, 2015 Tyson Carter School Improvement Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 We Can Do Better: Becca Walawender, Deputy Division Director,
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
Interrelationships: Plans + Funding = Student Proficiency Ingham ISD Curriculum Director’s Meeting November 4, 2015.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
Office of Improvement and Innovation Jo Hannah Ward, Director Office of Improvement and Innovation.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
School Improvement Grant (SIG) Title I Section, 1003g Renewal Requirements March 2012.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
TTIPS Model Overview.
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Lessons from Virginia: Growing a System of Support for
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Margaret Boorady Mary Jo Conrad Casandra Wright
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
School Improvement Grants
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio Jeanne Paliotto, Executive Director School Improvement Grant at a Glance In 2010, Ohio received nearly $132 million through the federal SIG program to raise student achievement in the state’s persistently lowest achieving schools. The funds are part of the $3.5 billion in school improvement funding for states in the 2009 federal budget and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The Office of School Turnaround provides support and monitoring oversight for identified persistently low achieving schools known as priority schools to build the capacity of the schools’ leaders and teacher teams to engage in inclusive, continuous, and targeted improvement in order to raise student achievement that is sustainable. Thirteen identified Transformation Specialists work in the field to provide monitoring oversight, policy guidance, support and resources, to 85 identified SIG or priority buildings in Tier I, II, and III. Each specialist is responsible for supporting and monitoring the implementation of one of four intervention models and other identified school improvement strategies. Transformation Specialists are assigned up to 7 schools and conduct weekly site visits to document the progress of the school toward increasing student achievement and document fidelity of implementation of each of the components of the selected intervention model. The State utilizes four different monitoring protocols in order to focus upon different aspects during each monitoring visit. In addition, the monitoring visits are used to identify Best Practices as well as document challenges encountered in each building. This information is used to plan and conduct technical assistance focused upon the individual needs of each PLA. In collaboration with The Fisher College of Business at The Ohio School University, the Office of School Turnaround has designed a school turnaround leadership program for priority and focused schools aimed at increasing leadership skills in order to guide the school to dramatic improvement in a short period of time and build capacity to sustain the turnaround efforts in the lowest performing schools. All leaders in priority schools as well as focused schools are attending this program. At the completion of the project, over 300 leaders will have been trained. Five SEA providers provide intensive support to identified schools as well as provide technical assistance for all priority schools in the areas of Data Use and management, turnaround strategies, using technology to support instruction, leadership coaching, working with external providers, restructuring the school day to provide increased learning time for students and closing the achievement gap. The goals for the Office of School Turnaround are:  Target majority of funds to each state’s chronically low-performing schools, including high schools and their feeder schools  Implement robust and comprehensive reforms to dramatically transform school culture and increase student outcomes  Increase graduation rates  Ensure every student is taught by an effective teacher  Provide specific data to classroom teachers to better measure student performance  Build and strengthen the capacity of school leaders  Eliminate the achievement gap  Turnaround underperforming schools School Improvement Grant Overview School Improvement funds are provided to school district buildings through a competitive process in amounts ranging from $50,000 to $2,000,000 per year for three years for implementing a school improvement plan that is focused on the specific reasons that caused the building to be identified for school improvement under the No Child Left Behind Act. Districts and buildings must use the Ohio Improvement Process as approved in the Differentiated Accountability proposal approved by the U.S. Department of Education. School Improvement Grants, to local educational agencies (LEAs) for use in Title I schools identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring that demonstrate the greatest need for the funds and the strongest commitment resources in order to raise substantially the achievement of their students so as to enable the schools to make adequate yearly progress and exit improvement status. School improvement funds are to be focused on Ohio’s persistently lowest-achieving Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring (“Tier I schools”) and, at an LEA’s option, persistently-lowest achieving secondary schools that are eligible for, but do not receive, Title I, Part A funds (“Tier II schools”). An LEA may also use school improvement funds in Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring that are not identified as persistently lowest-achieving schools (“Tier III schools”). Intervention Models Districts in Ohio must implement one of the following four federally defined improvement models in their persistently lowest achieving schools:  Transformation Model 62 Schools  Turnaround Model 16 Schools  Restart 1 School  Tier III Strategies 6 Schools Intensified SIG Support 1. Office of Transforming Schools 5. SEA and LEA External Providers 2. Diagnostic Reviews 6. Weekly Site Visit & Report 3. Technical Assistance Meetings 7. Quarterly Site Visit and Report 4. Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) 8. School Turnaround Leadership Program

Turnaround Specialists Who We Are…… There are currently thirteen transformation specialists assigned to support 85 priority schools. The highest priority for the team is to support and monitor the identified schools to improve student achievement in all buildings. Jeanne Paliotto, Executive Director What We Do…. Assist the BLT in establishing benchmark testing to inform teachers on where to target their instruction. Work with the BLT to focus instruction and targeted to meet student needs. Help BLT to understand all the components of the Intervention Model identified during the competitive application process Help Principal and Building Leadership Team understand how to create flexibility to implement reform. Monitor and support the implementation of 300 hours of quality extended learning time for all students and staff. Help BLT establish benchmark testing to focus instruction by analyzing data and developing a work plan and process for continual review. Develop a common understanding of the role of the District Leadership Team, the Building Leadership, and the Teacher Based Teams. Help the Building Leadership Team align all resources and build leadership capacity for job embedded professional development. Connect Schools to resources such as the SST’s and ESC’s. Provide on going technical assistance to administrators and staff in accordance with the Ohio Leadership Framework and School Turnaround Model. Monitor the implementation and evaluate the effectiveness of the Building’s SIG plans. In conjunction with the building staff, develop an evaluation system that uses student growth as a significant factor. Evaluate the, “Improvement Process,” and make necessary changes to improve instructional practices and student performance. Review documentation provided during the monitoring process and provide feedback for growth. Implement and monitor focused plans and turnaround goals instituted by the school district and individual buildings along with federal requirements. Bring new strategies and knowledge to schools. Transformation Specialist Assignments Sue MurphyRegion 6,7,10,11Stephanie PattonRegion 11 Pam SzegedyRegion 3Diane LongstrethRegion 2,3,5 Jennifer VargoRegion 10,13,15,16Lee WillisRegion 10,13 Kelly WashingtonRegion 1,3Eileen DiamondRegion 13 Jeanette OsbornRegion 10,13Jon ReinhardRegion 1,11 Sharon Reedus-SandersRegion 1,8,9TBDRegion 1,7,11 TBDRegion 1,3