Proposal for Consideration Regarding Holistic Solution to Congestion Irresolvable in SCED Issue:How do you identify when constraint is irresolvable Proposal:Adopt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
Advertisements

Electricity Facts Label (EFL) Workbook Process MIKE McCARTY Supervisor Business Operations and Reporting RETAIL MARKET SUBCOMMITTEE MARCH 20, 2013.
SCED Power Balance Penalty Curve
Critique of Proposal to Designate SAPS-Shrew as CRE Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) June 4, 2009.
Congestion Management in a Market Environment 2 nd CIGRE / IEEE PES International Symposium San Antonio, Texas October 5, 2005 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
Robert G. Ethier, Ph.D. Director, Market Monitoring May 4, 2005 ISO New England State of the Market Report 2004.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
1 TAC Review of PRR 650 August 3, Board Charge to TAC Board remanded PRR 650 to TAC for: “an analysis of how to ensure that consumers pay only.
Real-Time Transmission Congestion Management & Market Effects
INTEGRATION COST. Integration Cost in RPS Calculator While “Integration Cost” is included in NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration.
Utah Schedule 37 Update June 25, Schedule 37 Background Schedule 37 – Published rates for standard power purchase agreements with qualifying facilities.
THE PJM INTERCONNECTION STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2001 Joseph E. Bowring Manager PJM Market Monitoring Unit Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June.
July 30, 2015 TAC Meeting Update to COPS Michelle Trenary August 12, 2015.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes January 28, 2009 WMS Meeting.
Proposed Revision to the Shadow Price Cap and Power Balance Penalties in SCED Same Transmission Element.
WHY CAPACITY OBLIGATIONS AND CAPACITY MARKETS? Paul L. Joskow June 3, 2005.
Market Mitigation Concept Group Update Jim Galvin April 26, 2004.
April, 2008 Maximum Shadow Price. April, 2008 Protocol Requirement: Transmission Constraint Management (2)ERCOT shall establish a maximum Shadow.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project How the DSO Calculates Nodal Prices DAMWG October 20, 2003.
NPRR385, Security Violation Analysis and Reporting and Negative Price Floor WMS Meeting February 15, 2012.
1Texas Nodal Market Trials Update. 2Texas Nodal Full System Market and Reliability Test 24-Hour Test Observations Duration of Test for Week of 8/ Hour.
RPRS ERCOT System Wide Insufficiency Charge Presented at the Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
Proposed Generation Expansion Process For Review and Discussion March 1, 2011.
Chad Thompson, ERCOT Special ROS PGRR011 Workshop October 21 st, 2011 SCED Overview and Results.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
CMWG Update to WMS Report of CMWG Meeting of M Wagner Edison Mission Marketing & Trading.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
Resource Adequacy Task Force (RATF) Update to WMS June 12, 2013.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
Appeal of PRS Action NPRR 351, Calculate and Post Projected Non-Binding LMPs for the Next 15 Minutes Floyd Trefny Texas Steel Companies.
CMWG Update to WMS Report of CMWG Meetings of &
Wholesale Market Subcommittee Update May 2 nd, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
ERCOT Public 1 Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services Co-ordination of Power Balance Penalty Curve, VOLL, SWOC for AS Demand Curves.
Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April 2007 (which is in March)
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2006 TAC Subcommittee Review ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board November 14, 2006.
Discussion on FGR Settlement Protocol Language David Maggio CMWG February 17, 2014.
WMS 1/9/20131 Priority Power Management, LLC Proposed Changes to Holistic Solution WMS January 9, 2013 James Z. Brazell Law Office of James Z. Brazell.
2% Shift Factor dispatchable rule discussion and alternatives for the 2% rule Kris Dixit 1.
RDTF June 1, Purpose “The effect of the Shadow Price cap for the Power Balance Constraint is to limit the cost calculated by the SCED optimization.
NPRR 520 Resmi Surendran ERCOT. Current CCT Process Annual CCT (ACCT) is run every year to feed the results to Monthly CCT (MCCT) MCCT is run every month.
RCWG Update to WMS March 7, Draft NPRR, Caps and Floors for Energy Storage Resources Chair of ETWG gave high level overview ERCOT had questions.
1 WMS Report To TAC October In Brief One Working Group Report One Working Group Report One Task Force Report One Task Force Report Three Staff.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
Response to TAC Questions on PGRR031 TAC– January 28, 2014 Jeff Billo, ERCOT 1.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
Valley Import Constraint Resmi Surendran. Valley Import Constraint Range of SFs – to in valley area – 0.03 to outside valley area Not.
Long-term Solution Task Force Ellis Rankin & Bob Wittmeyer Co-Chairs.
Use of ONTEST Resource Status over Telemetry: – ERCOT protocol permits the use of telemetered Resource Status code “ONTEST” during periods of start-up.
NPRR784 Mitigated Offer Caps for RMR Units Protocol Revision Subcommittee June 16,
TAC Rejection of NPRR Mitigated Offer Caps for RMR Units
Wind Management at MISO
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
PRS Rejection of NPRR Mitigated Offer Caps for RMR Units
Southern Cross Directives Planning Items
Market Design in New England
Back-up flexibility for this winter Slow R3 non-reserved power
Presentation transcript:

Proposal for Consideration Regarding Holistic Solution to Congestion Irresolvable in SCED Issue:How do you identify when constraint is irresolvable Proposal:Adopt criteria developed by task force A non-competitive constraint is deemed irresolvable if the constraint cannot be resolved through SCED dispatch for more than two consecutive hours for more than 4 consecutive days or more than 20 hours in a rolling thirty day period. Those hours will be priced at the current shadow price cap pursuant to Section 3.5., Current Values for the Transmission Shadow Price Caps in the ERCOT Business Practice Manual for Setting the Shadow Price Caps and Power Balance Penalties in SCED.

Proposal for Consideration Regarding Holistic Solution to Congestion Irresolvable in SCED Issue:Adjustment of the shadow price cap when the constraint is irresolvable Some themes heard in the task force meetings – THEME: Shadow price cap needs to be re-evaluated when constraint is deemed irresolvable and the Irresolvable Shadow Price Cap shall not be higher than current shadow price caps pursuant to Section 3.5, Current Values for the Transmission Shadow Price Caps in the ERCOT Business Practice Manual for Setting the Shadow Price Caps and Power Balance Penalties in SCED THEME: Irresolvable Shadow Price Cap needs to maximize the dispatch of generation Calculation of shadow price cap needed to maximize dispatch of generation Mitigated Offer Cap of lowest shift factor unit/shift factor of lowest unit used to resolve constraint THEME: Shadow price cap should rely on scarcity pricing concepts from the Commission Resource Adequacy Rule and send a price signal that reflects the marginal cost to resolve the constraint (firm load shed) and provide adequate incentive/development opportunity for peaking capacity (Direct Energy Proposal) To meet this objective Direct Energy proposes a floor of $2000 per MWh for the Irresolvable Shadow Price Cap THEME: There needs to be a back-stop in place to protect consumers from inefficient transfer of wealth Direct Energy proposes including a back-stop based upon peaker net margin Peaker net margin based upon annualized fixed cost of new gas turbine unit ($95,000 per MW/year) and measured by either tracking shadow price per MWh for the irresolvable constraint or resource node LMPs that impact irresolvable constraint during congested intervals for the irresolvable constraint If peaker net margin exceeds $95,000 per MW/year, then lower shadow price cap to currently effective LCAP pursuant to PUC Subst. R (currently $500 per MWh) for the remainder of the calendar year or shadow price cap necessary to dispatch generation Reset shadow price cap to Irresolvable Shadow Price cap on January 1 st of the next calendar year

Proposal for Consideration Regarding Holistic Solution to Congestion Irresolvable in SCED Direct Energy believes the following formula could be applied holistically to irresolvable constraints and it addresses each of the objectives identified in the task force (Irresolvable Shadow Price Cap) Irresolvable Shadow Price Cap in a calendar year = Minimum of A or B until peaker net margin threshold exceeded then implement Option 1 or 2 A = current value for the Transmission Shadow Price Cap in Section 3.5 of the ERCOT Business Practice Manual for Setting Shadow Price Caps and Power Balance Penalties in SCED B= max of (Mitigated Offer Cap of lowest shift factor unit/shift factor of lowest unit used to resolve constraint) or $2000 per MWh Option 1:If peaker net margin exceeds $95,000 per MW/year, then lower Irresolvable Shadow Price Cap to currently effective LCAP pursuant to PUC Subst. R for the remainder of the calendar year. ERCOT shall reset shadow price cap to the Irresolvable Shadow Price Cap on January 1 st of the next calendar year. Option 2:If peaker net margin exceeds $95,000 per MW/year, then lower Irresolvable Shadow Price Cap to Minimum of A or C A = current value for the Transmission Shadow Price Cap in Section 3.5 of the ERCOT Business Practice Manual for Setting Shadow Price Caps and Power Balance Penalties in SCED C = max of (mitigated offer cap of lowest shift factor unit/shift factor of lowest unit used to resolve the constraint) or currently effective LCAP pursuant to PUC Subst. R for the remainder of the calendar year. ERCOT shall reset the shadow price cap to the Irresolvable Shadow Price Cap on January 1 st of the next calendar year. Issue:When does ERCOT terminate the Irresolvable Shadow Price Cap for the constraint? Proposal:ERCOT terminates the Irresolvable Shadow Price Cap when ERCOT determines the constraint is resolvable and ERCOT must provide 30 day notice to the market before implementation. The Irresolvable Shadow Price cap would increase to the current transmission shadow price cap pursuant to the Business Practice Manual.