RA workshop presentation Karl Meeusen, Ph.D. Senior Advisor – Infrastructure Policy CPUC Resource Adequacy Workshop February 18, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NERC TPL Standard Issues TSS Meeting #146 Seattle, WA August 15-17, 2007 Chifong Thomas.
Advertisements

2007 Goals. Introduction Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) will be primarily defined throughout the 2007 year by Electric Reliability.
Why TADS Is Needed No systematic transmission outage data collection effort exists for all of North America Energy Information Administration data (Schedule.
SPP’s 2013 Energy Consumption and Capacity 2 12% annual capacity margin requirement CapacityConsumption Total Capacity 66 GW Total Peak Demand 49 GW.
Congestion Management in a Market Environment 2 nd CIGRE / IEEE PES International Symposium San Antonio, Texas October 5, 2005 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
Electricity Markets Overview Lo-Cal seminar, 09/21/2010.
Compare and Contrast ELCC Methodologies Across CPUC Proceedings
Electric Power Infrastructure: Status and Challenges for the Future Mark Lauby Director, Reliability Assessments and Performance Analysis.
1 FRCC Compliance Organization and Entity Registration 2008 FRCC Compliance Workshop.
Anjali Sheffrin, Ph.D. Chief Economist & Director, Market Design & Product Development Essential Features of California’s New Market Design Market Redesign.
Anjali Sheffrin, Ph.D. Chief Economist & Director, Market Design & Product Development Integration of Wind Resources in CAISO Markets and Grid Operation.
ERCOT SOL Methodology for the Planning and Operations Horizons Stephen Solis 2014 OTS 1.
PacifiCorp Participation in the California ISO. 2 Full participation provides significant benefits beyond those of the Energy Imbalance Market EIM BenefitsFull.
ISO Grid Planning Presentation to CREPC October 1, 2002
2006 Reliability Study Scope Name Date. DRAFT 2 Purpose of Study Assess the PEC and Duke transmission systems’ reliability Develop a single reliability.
Steve Rueckert Director of Standards TPL Discussion – PCC Steering Committee March 25, 2014.
March 2003 Operations Summary Bill Blevins Manager Operations Engineering.
Integration of Variable Generation Task Force Preliminary Conclusions and Actions.
1 The Costs of Participating in Restructured Wholesale Markets American Public Power Association February 5, 2007 William M. Bateman Robert C. Smith.
LAREDO PLANT RMR EXIT STRATEGY Presentation to Board of Directors March 16, 2004 Transmission Services Operations.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Discussion of Market Participant Choice for Transmission Connections Stakeholder Session October 14, 2011.
California ISO – Internal Use Only Flexible Capacity Requirement CPUC RA Workshop March 30, 2012 Mark Rothleder Executive Director Market Analysis and.
Regulation Energy Management Overview CPUC Energy Storage Workshop March 9, 2011.
Benefits of a Multi-year Resource Adequacy Program May 20, 2014 Karl Meeusen, Ph.D., Market Design and Regulatory Policy Lead Market and Infrastructure.
Entergy AFC Stakeholder Meeting February 16, 2005 Houston, TX.
Review of CAISO Wholesale Electricity Market Trends APEX Sydney Conference California Electricity Wholesale Market Trends October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin,
COMPLIANCE ROLLOUT Vann Weldon Compliance Training Administrator March 23, 2005 NERC FUNCTIONAL MODEL REVIEW.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
ISO Proposed Flexible Capacity Requirements Stephen Keehn Senior Advisor California ISO CPUC Workshop January 26, 2012.
1 PNW Regional Contingency Resources Resource Adequacy Technical Committee April 6 th, 2011.
May 11, 2012 RPG meeting YTP Scope and Process – RPG Comments.
Outage Planning Subcommittee Mark Wilson. Outage Planning Subcommittee Created to address Market Participant concerns with existing rules and procedures.
Operations Report Kent Saathoff System Operations ERCOT.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Workshop on the Staff Draft 2006 Summer Outlook Report December 8, 2005 Hearing Room B.
RiversidePublicUtilities.com Arts & Innovation RiversidePublicUtilities.com MOD GENERATOR TESTING REQUIREMENTS RESOURCE PLANNERS LeeAnne Uhler, Regulatory.
Steve Rueckert Director of Standards TPL Discussion – PCC Steering Committee March 25, 2014.
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Integrated Energy Policy Report Workshop Landscape-Scale Environmental Evaluations for Energy Infrastructure.
Coordinated Planning Concept (For Discussion Only) revised 11/30/04 07/01/04.
Long Term Transmission Integration Planning at the California ISO Intermittency Analysis Project (IAP) Energy Commission Staff Workshop February 13, 2007.
2006 Reliability Study James Manning Bryan Guy May 12, 2006.
Energy Storage and Distributed Energy Storage (ESDER) Initiative California Independent System Operator CAISO – CPUC Energy Storage Workshop May 3, 2016.
Planning the Networked Grid Transmission Planning J.E.(Jeff) Billinton Manager, Regional Transmission - North Building the Networked Electricity Grid –
1 Meredith Younghein Energy Division Local RA Requirements for Demand Response Resources: Staff Proposal.
1 NPCC – A-2 Dr. Mayer Sasson Transmission Planning Consolidated Edison of New York June 1, 2006 Presented to the NYSRC-RRS.
CPUC Resource Adequacy Program – LAO briefing May 25, 2009.
Reliability Must Run Workshop RMR Study Process May 24, 2016.
Availability Assessment Hours for SCP/RAAIM Portfolio Management Commercial Policy, Planning & Compliance May 18, 2016.
LNBA Subgroup: Avoided Transmission Value
Modeling DER in Transmission Planning CAISO Experience
Transmission-Distribution Interface Working Group Meeting
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Southern Cross Directives Planning Items
GMD Research FERC Order No. 830 Research Work Plan Mark Olson, NERC
Columbia Grid Wind Integration Study Team Dynamic Transfer Capability Studies Update 9/10/09.
Mike Jaske California Energy Commission
Grid Integration of Intermittent Resources
GMD Data Request NERC Rules of Procedure Section 1600
Out of Region Market Assumptions
CMPLDWG Composite Model with Distributed Generation Approval
Integration of Variable Generation Task Force (IVGTF)
Workshop Session 1: Overview
Mandatory Reliability Standards
Workshop Session 1: Overview
Integration of Variable Generation Task Force (IVGTF)
CMPLDWG Composite Model with Distributed Generation Approval
GMD Research FERC Order No. 830 Research Work Plan Mark Olson, NERC
Palo Verde-COI RAS Retirement
Palo Verde-COI RAS Retirement
Energy Storage System Drivers and Use Cases for Energy Storage Systems
Presentation transcript:

RA workshop presentation Karl Meeusen, Ph.D. Senior Advisor – Infrastructure Policy CPUC Resource Adequacy Workshop February 18, 2016

Summary of the ISO comments The ISO recommends the Commission align its resource adequacy program with the ISO’s planning standards and North American Mandatory Standards –As a NERC-registered entity, the ISO must comply with all Applicable Reliability Criteria under its FERC- approved Transmission Control Agreement –Local capacity area resource requirements specified in Section 40.3 of the ISO tariff ISO must maintain local capacity reliability under NERC Planning Event 6 (P6, formerly Category C) contingencies –Requires sufficient capacity to readjust the system to prepare for the loss of a second transmission element (N-1-1) Page 2

Summary of the ISO comments Based on requirement to reposition the system within 30 minutes, the ISO has two options: 1.By assessing the system and issuing a dispatch instruction and have a response within 20 minutes* 2.By dispatching a resource precontingency so as to have sufficient energy available The ISO has consistently applied these standards in its Local Capacity Technical Studies –ISO recently issued a clarification to its BPM providing additional details regarding these study parameters * 10 minutes is used at beginning of contingency. If resources do not respond, the ISO will not meet reliability requirement Page 3

Excerpts from the ISO’s Local Capacity Technical Report [I]nputs, assumptions and methodology were discussed and agreed to by stakeholders at the 2016 LCT Study Criteria, Methodology and Assumptions Stakeholder Meeting held on October 30, Time allowed for manual readjustment: This is the amount of time required for the operator to take all actions necessary to prepare the system for the next contingency. This time should be less than 30 minutes, based on existing CAISO Planning Standards. Page 4

Three scenarios show how ISO can meet NERC requirements for local capacity areas Scenario assumptions for local capacity area A: –Multiple transmission lines serve the area –Import limit is not binding with all transmission in service –With one transmission line out of service, import is limited by system voltage stability so imports must be reduced within 30 minutes Scenarios shown: –All resources are fast response –All resources are slow response –Resources are a mix of fast and slow response Page 5

All fast response Page 6 Hours in a day Imports into local capacity area A (MW) Import limit with all lines in service Stability limit with one transmission line out of service 30 minutes total (10 for dispatch; 20 for response) When a line trips, call fast response DR or fast-response gas-fired resources

All slow response Page 7 Hours in a day Imports into local capacity area A (MW) Import limit with all lines in service Stability limit with one transmission line out of service Slow resources must be dispatched ahead of time so that flows are below the line limit, regardless if a line trips or not This may mean slow resources are committed in the day-ahead market, regardless of whether contingency occurs or not.

Combination of fast and slow (more likely) Page 8 Hours in a day Imports into local capacity area A (MW) Import limit with all lines in service Stability limit with one transmission line out of service With a combination of fast and slow resources, slow resources must be dispatched ahead of time while fast response resources are dispatched after a contingency occurs Dispatch slow resources to get within “range” of fast response 30 minutes total (10 for dispatch; 20 for response)

Conclusion NERC reliability criteria require the ISO return the system to precontingency conditions within 30 minutes during a P6 contingency The ISO local capacity study utilizes resources that can either receive a dispatch instruction and respond in 30 minutes or be dispatched precontingency to respond in 30 minutes The NERC reliability requirements and the ISO administration of these requirements have not changed for many years The ISO recommends the Commission align its resource adequacy program with the ISO’s planning standards and North American Mandatory Standards Page 9

Questions? Page 10