25/05/2007POSIPOL 20071 FOUR MIRRORS Fabry Perot resonator at LAL-Orsay Y. Fedala With help of F. Zomer, R.Cizeron.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Name (Lab)Presentation title (Place, date) 1 IN2P3 Les deux infinis Optical cavity Revue ThomX mécanique (25/01/2011) Optical cavity Yann Peinaud & Mickael.
Advertisements

CAVITY RING DOWN SPECTROSCOPY
Chapter 2 Propagation of Laser Beams
Nonlinear Optics Lab. Hanyang Univ. Chapter 2. The Propagation of Rays and Beams 2.0 Introduction Propagation of Ray through optical element : Ray (transfer)
VARISPOT FS BEHAVIOR IN COLLIMATED AND DIVERGING BEAMS: THEORY AND EXPERIMENTS Liviu Neagu, Laser Department, NILPRP, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.
Fundamental of Optical Engineering Lecture 4.  Recall for the four Maxwell’s equation:
©UCL TH IEEE/LEOS Conference Puerto Rico, 7-11 th November, 2004 Multimode Laterally Tapered Bent Waveguide Ioannis Papakonstantinou, David R.
Compton Experiment at the ATF Update since TILC09 Positron Workshop Durham 28-October-2009 Junji Urakawa instead of T.Takahashi KEK for collaborators.
1 Laser Beam Coherence Purpose: To determine the frequency separation between the axial modes of a He-Ne Laser All sources of light, including lasers,
Precision Tilt and Radius of Curvature Sensor Using Double-Pass AOM Kyuman Cho Department of Physics Sogang University.
Status of IPBSM Improvement N. Terunuma, KEK 2012/July/13 ATF2 Weekly Meeting.
Polarization-preserving of laser beam in Fabry Perot Cavity Accelerator center, IHEP Li Xiaoping.
Installation of a Four-mirror Fabry-Perot cavity at ATF 1.Our setup/goal 2.Why 4 mirrors ? 3.The ATF 4-mirror cavity 4.The optical scheme 5.The laser/cavity.
1 Polarisation effects in 4 mirrors cavities Introduction Polarisation eigenmodes calculation Numerical illustrations F. Zomer LAL/Orsay Posipol 2008 Hiroshima.
SAM PDR1 SAM LGS Mechanical Design A. Montane, A. Tokovinin, H. Ochoa SAM LGS Preliminary Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
GWADW, May 2012, Hawaii D. Friedrich ICRR, The University of Tokyo K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata, T. Mori, S. Kawamura QRPN Experiment with Suspended 20mg Mirrors.
Experimental Effort for Alternative Schemes Experimental Effort for Alternative Schemes Hirotaka Shimizu Hiroshima University ILC2007 at DESY Hamburg.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
OPTICAL SYSTEM FOR VARIABLE RESIZING OF ROUND FLAT-TOP DISTRIBUTIONS George Nemeş, Astigmat, Santa Clara, CA, USA John A. Hoffnagle,
Introduction to Optical Electronics
1 Fabry-Perot cavity & pulsed laser J. Bonis, V. Brisson, J.N. Cayla, R. Chiche, R. Cizeron, J. Colin, Y. Fedala, G. Guilhem, M. Jacquet-Lemire, D. Jehanno,
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
IPBSM status and plan ATF project meeting M.Oroku.
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
LPOL-cavity Mechanics Test cavity (pb of the gain)
Nonplanar Cavity Construction and Locking Technique for High Finesse Cavity Soskov V., Chiche R., Cizeron R., Jehanno D., Zomer F. Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
Status of the optical cavity R&D at ATF IWLC2010 Geneva 20-October-2010 T.Takahashi Hiroshima University for collaborators.
European Gravitational Observatory12/12/2005 WG1 Hannover 1 Mode Matching of the Fabry-Perrot cavities Julien Marque.
ATF1/2 laser-wires Stewart T. Boogert on behalf of UK Extraction line laserwire collaboration A. Aryshev, G. Blair, S. Boogert, A. Bosco, L. Corner, L.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
Compton Experiment at ATF LCWS10 28-March-2010 T. Takahashi (Hiroshima) / T. Omori (KEK) for collaborators.
LIGO-G D LIGO II1 AUX OPTICS SUPPORT Michael Smith, 6/11/03 STRAY LIGHT CONTROL ACTIVE OPTICS COMPENSATION OUTPUT MODE CLEANER PO MIRROR AND PO.
Anne-Laure Fehrembach, Fabien Lemarchand, Anne Sentenac,
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 First Results from the Mesa Beam Profile Cavity Prototype Marco Tarallo 26 July 2005 Caltech – LIGO Laboratory.
1 Advanced Virgo Workshop 14/06/2007 M Laval Fabry Perot cavity for LG and Flat modes Mikael Laval (OCA/ARTEMIS) Outlines: Tools: The optical simulation.
Flat top beam profile cavity prototype J. Agresti, E. D’Ambrosio, R. DeSalvo, J.M. Mackowski, A. Remillieux, B. Simoni, M. G. Tarallo, P. Willems CNRS.
1 Thermal noise and high order Laguerre-Gauss modes J-Y. Vinet, B. Mours, E. Tournefier GWADW meeting, Isola d’Elba May 27 th – Jun 2 nd, 2006.
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
Plan in summer shutdown Magnet -SF1FF -Swap of QEA magnet - Multipole field of Final Doublet IP-BSM improvement.
Kerr-lens Mode Locking Without Nonlinear Astigmatism Shai Yefet, Valery Jouravsky and Avi Pe’er Physics Department and the Institute of Nanotechnology.
Specifications for OMC telescope in AdVirgo R. Gouaty, E. Tournefier Estimation of carrier HOM power at the dark port Constraints on OMC waist and position.
LASER FRAME: Straightness monitor (Tentative results of resolution test) Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF May 30-31,2005 KEK Nano BPM Group Y.Higashi,
Equivalence relation between non spherical optical cavities and application to advanced G.W. interferometers. Juri Agresti and Erika D’Ambrosio Aims of.
Current Status of LASER FRAME for KEK-Nano BPM (Tentative results of resolution test) Second Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF December 11-12, 2004.
Some Ideas on Coatingless all-reflective ITF Adalberto Giazotto & Giancarlo Cella INFN- Pisa.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
IPBSM Operation 11th ATF2 Project Meeting Jan. 14, 2011 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Menlo Park, California Y. Yamaguchi, M.Oroku, Jacqueline Yan.
Compton Experiment at ATF DR 2009 Summary and Plan ATF2 Project Meeting 15-Dec-2009 T. Omori (KEK) for collaborators.
SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors G. Burtin, R.J. Colchester, G. Ferioli, J.J. Gras, R. Jung,
§3.3 Optical Resonators with Spherical Mirrors We will show the field solutions inside the spherical mirror resonator are Gaussian Beams Z=0 00 z R2R2.
Narrow-band filtering with resonant gratings under oblique incidence Anne-Laure Fehrembach, Fabien Lemarchand, Anne Sentenac, Institut Fresnel, Marseille,
Optical Cavity construction at LAL  2000 : polarimeter at HERA 2-mirror cavity cw ND:YAG laser, F=30000 (  ~ )  2005 : Ti:sapph pulsed laser.
Compton Gamma-ray Generation Experiment by Using an Optical Cavity in ATF POSIPOL 2007 Workshop at LAL Hirotaka Shimizu Hiroshima University.
Lab 2 Alignment.
SPARCLAB: PW-class Ti:Sa laser+SPARC
Fabry-Perot cavity R&D at Orsay
Goals Technical solution  Fabry-Perot optical resonator
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Control of laser wakefield amplitude in capillary tubes
Thin-disk laser multi-pass amplifier
Flat-Top Beam Profile Cavity Prototype: design and preliminary tests
Measurements from Viktor Mechanics from Richard Model from Fabian
First Results from the Mesa Beam Profile Cavity Prototype
Thermal noise and high order Laguerre-Gauss modes J-Y. Vinet, B
Scalar theory of diffraction
Laser oscillation Laser is oscillator
High finesse cavity for Polarised Positron Source on ILC.
Experience with photoinjector at ATF
Presentation transcript:

25/05/2007POSIPOL FOUR MIRRORS Fabry Perot resonator at LAL-Orsay Y. Fedala With help of F. Zomer, R.Cizeron

25/05/2007POSIPOL Outline of the talk Introduction 2D four mirrors cavity –theoretical and experimental results of: Eigen modes Astigmatism Minimum waist size 3D four mirrors cavity –theoretical and experimental results of: Eigen modes Minimum waist size Reduction of astigmatism –Waist size stability mechanical design of final four mirrors cavity (R. Cizeron)

25/05/2007POSIPOL Introduction Reduction of the laser beam waist with 2 mirrors  Concentric cavity R ≈ > L/2 2m long concentric cavity: IF  0 =50  m, =800nm for an axial and angular mirror misalignment of 1  m and 1  rad.  spot size shift of 30mm on the mirrors !!!  Mechanical constraints very strong … A mechanical solution: Four mirrors cavity optical axis c c 1mm 10 mm 10  rad R = 1m laser  0 ≈200  m

25/05/2007POSIPOL Four mirrors 2D or 3D cavities Non planar cavity advantages : reduction of astigmatism Circular polarisation much less sensitive to mirror misalignment φ X Y Y X Z P1P1 P2P2 S1S1 S2S2 plane mirror spherical mirror plane mirror spherical mirror φ=0  2D cavity. φ  0  3D cavity V1V1 V2V2 laser w 0  0 when R  L 2D Ring cavity L R R

25/05/2007POSIPOL for  0  0: with 4m optical path, 6cm between 2 adjacent mirror centres –  x i =±0.1mm;  xi =±0.1mrad [ = configurations for a 3D cavity ] max displacement on: plane mirrors: 0.6mm on spherical mirrors: 1.1mm At beam waist: 0.3mm: 0.5mrad  High mechanical stability Mechanical tolerances for 4 mirrors cavity  Max. beam movement on mirrors (K. Moenig & F.Zomer)

25/05/2007POSIPOL D cavity The axis passes in the center of the entrance mirror 2 platines supports adjacent mirrors 1 fixed in Z and the other adjustable 1 cylinder which allows to position the mirror holders 1 point of rotation on the table Cw laser diode in extended cavity config (Littrow configuration)

25/05/2007POSIPOL D cavity modes Exp. modes Calculated modes Similar to usual modes of 2 mirrors FP cavity TEM20 TEM10 TEM00 LG11

25/05/2007POSIPOL D cavity waist size laser L R R D Z Fm=2R=1000mmF=200mm W 0e W 0s CCD w s ²=f(Z) Quadratic fit Waist after the end mirror(W 0s ) Waist in the cavity Transport matrix Equivalent scheme

25/05/2007POSIPOL Astigmatism of 2D cavity Astigmatism increases with the focusing strength Variation of TEM00 profile with respect to L Diffraction on mirror edges elliptic fit L>R LRLR

25/05/2007POSIPOL Astigmatism of 2D cavity Calculated contour view of the intensity profile of the 00 mode versus the distance Z (F. Zomer) Inside the cavity After the lens End mirror of the cavity Limited with mirrors width Effect seen experimentally [see J.A. Arnaud 'Nonorthogonal optical waveguides and resonators‘, Bell Syst. Tech. J.49 (1970)2311]

25/05/2007POSIPOL D cavity waist size Mesured waist size WX  40µm Wy  12µm The ellipse turns Limited by mirror size calculation End mirror of the cavity

25/05/2007POSIPOL D cavity  X Y Y X Z 11 22 11 22 plane mirror spherical mirror plane mirror spherical mirror   0  3D cavity V1V1 V2V2

25/05/2007POSIPOL D cavity modes Exp. Higher order Modes Th. results

25/05/2007POSIPOL D cavity eigen modes Z Z Propagation of the modes outside the cavity Fundamental mode

25/05/2007POSIPOL D cavity Waist size Wx  54µm Wy  56µm To be verified Exp.data Th. calculation good agreement of theory & exp. measurements

25/05/2007POSIPOL beam size A shift of ~1.5mm Same phenomenon outside the cavity calculations

25/05/2007POSIPOL Reduction of the astigmatism Inside the cavity End mirror of the cavity After the lens Result of calculation

25/05/2007POSIPOL Comparison of astigmatism in 2D & 3D config. 2 waist positions inside the cavity Third position  circular beam with small waist Strong astigmatism 2D 3D Zoom around the waist position (calculations) astigmatism compensated in 3D config.  results reproduced with measured data.

25/05/2007POSIPOL Effect of laser wave length Variation of the waist for =800nm & =820nm for ∆ =20nm small variation of the waist and no effect on its position For 1ps, ∆ =0.49nm  the effect is negligible

25/05/2007POSIPOL Stability of the beam size There is ~ three populations  ~ 3 modes 5µm < 5µm The beam is stable in time without any isolation of the setup  drift of beam size outside is only ~3% in 2 hours.

25/05/2007POSIPOL Design Study of a four mirror cavity implementable around electron beam R. Cizeron

25/05/2007POSIPOL Confocal non planar 4 mirrors cavity scheme laser entrance 2 flat mirrors 2 spherical mirrors - Laser 75 MHz Optical path de 4m - Distance between the mirrors 1m & 100 mm - Radius of curvature of spherical mirrors 1 m - Angle of Compton interaction 8° - Laser injection & the axis of the 2 spherical mirrors is parallel to the optical table 100 mm 1 m e- beam tube IP

25/05/2007POSIPOL Degrees of freedom needed to align the cavity  x et  y for all the mirrors  z = ± 1 mm on the 2 spherical mirrors to approach the confocal config.  z = ± 1 mm on the 2 flat mirrors to remain the optical length of cavity constant θy θy θxθx ∆Z Challenge  insure all the adjustments with keeping the stability of the set up

25/05/2007POSIPOL Keep UHV  Mirrors aligned with actuators  put the actuators in capsules to avoid vacuum contamination 3 degrees of freedom for each mirror  12 actuators Avoid the transport of environmental noise and vibrations via the isolation  the system set on an independent beam System isolation beam Optical Table Vacuum chamber

25/05/2007POSIPOL e- beam tube Vacuum chamber Support beam Support Length 1.5m tube diameter : 420 mm

25/05/2007POSIPOL e- beam tube beam Interaction point e- beam

25/05/2007POSIPOL Spherical mirrors 3 Beam supports Flat mirrors Flat mirror Invar ( Fe-Ni alloy)

25/05/2007POSIPOL Holders to align the mirrors

25/05/2007POSIPOL Mirrors holders actuator θx Cardan θx & θy actuator θy Z displacement

25/05/2007POSIPOL Z Displacement  Flex // Displacement Negligible variation on height ∆Z=1mm  12 µm 0.5mm  3µm 0,1mm  0.1 µm All the parts are related to the flex

25/05/2007POSIPOL Actuators Micro-Controle DC actuators of mini increment 0,05 µm (0.5 µrad) with a coder bidirectional repeatability 2 µm Axial charge Capacity de 120 N Course 25 mm Course after encapsulage ± 2 mm Useful Course ± 1 mm  ± 10 mrad  ± 20mm

25/05/2007POSIPOL piezos at 120° membrane to support mirror piezo Cardan (gimble) Ø 1 inch

25/05/2007POSIPOL summary 4 mirrors cavity is a good solution to provide a very small beam waist with high mechanical stability. 3D configuration allows the reduction of astigmatism effects –Experimental results well described by ‘Nonorthogonal resonators’ theory of Arnaud –But : 2 waist positions inside the cavity To be done : –measurement of the polarisation eigen modes Need for a very high finesse cavity –Study of the Compton e-laser beam interaction