5.4 Cladistics The images above are both cladograms. They show the statistical similarities between species based on their DNA/RNA. The cladogram on the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linnaeus developed the scientific naming system still used today.
Advertisements

Slide 1 of Modern Evolutionary Classification.
 Species evolve with significantly different morphological and behavioural traits due to genetic drift and other selective pressures.  Example – Homologous.
Phylogenetic Trees Systematics, the scientific study of the diversity of organisms, reveals the evolutionary relationships between organisms. Taxonomy,
Classification This is Panorpa japonica. Commonly known as the scorpion fly.
18.2 Modern Evolutionary Classification
Warm-Up 3/24 What is a derived characteristic? What is a clade?
Phylogenetic reconstruction
D.5: Phylogeny and Systematics. D.5.1: Outline Classification Called Systematics or classification –Based on common ancestry and natural relationships.
18-2 Modern Evolutionary Classification
Classification systems have changed over time as information has increased. Section 2: Modern Classification K What I Know W What I Want to Find Out L.
5.4 Cladistics Nature of science:
Phylogeny and classification
5.4 Cladistics The ancestry of groups of species can be deduced by comparing their base or amino acid sequences.
Classification Organizing the Diversity of Life. Why do we classify things? – Supermarket aisles – Libraries – Classes – Teams/sports – Members of a family.
D.5: Phylogeny and Systematics
and the three domain system
Pathways of Evolution.
The Evolutionary History of Biodiversity
SB3C. Examine the evolutionary basis of modern classification systems.
Similar traits often indicates common ancestry Phylogeny (fahy-loj-uh-nee): evolutionary histories of a species Determined by examining: – Fossils –
MODERN EVOLUTIONARY CLASSIFICATION In a way, organisms determine who belongs to their species by choosing with whom they will __________! Taxonomic.
17.2 Modern Classification
Agenda Microevolution Test Reflection
PHYLOGENY AND THE TREE OF LIFE CH 26. I. Phylogenies show evolutionary relationships A. Binomial nomenclature: – Genus + species name Homo sapiens.
5.4 Cladistics Essential idea: The ancestry of groups of species can be deduced by comparing their base or amino acid sequences. The images above are both.
Classification. Cell Types Cells come in all types of shapes and sizes. Cell Membrane – cells are surrounded by a thin flexible layer Also known as a.
Classification.
Phylogeny.
Cladograms or Phylogenetic Trees. Phylogenetic Trees or Cladograms By studying inherited species' characteristics and other historical evidence, we can.
Chapter 26 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
17.1 The Linnaean System of Classification KEY CONCEPT Organisms can be classified based on physical similarities.
 Phylogenetic trees and Cladograms are hypotheses. The only guarantee is that they will change as we gather and analyze more data. From Young and Strode.
Taxonomy & Phylogeny. B-5.6 Summarize ways that scientists use data from a variety of sources to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary.
Essential idea: The ancestry of groups of species can be deduced by comparing their base or amino acid sequences. By Chris Paine
Topic Cladistics.
5.4 Cladistics Essential idea: The ancestry of groups of species can be deduced by comparing their base or amino acid sequences. The images above are.
Section 2: Modern Systematics
5.4 Cladistics Essential idea: The ancestry of groups of species can be deduced by comparing their base or amino acid sequences. The images above are both.
Lecture 81 – Lecture 82 – Lecture 83 Modern Classification Ozgur Unal
17.2 Classification based on evolutionary relationships
5.4 Cladistics Essential idea: The ancestry of groups of species can be deduced by comparing their base or amino acid sequences. The images above are both.
Topic 5.1 Evidence for Evolution
Section 2: Modern Systematics
Cladistics.
shape of plants seed coat Shape of birds bill
5.4 Cladistics.
Classification and Diversity
Topic 5.4: Cladistics.
Chapter 26 Phylogeny.
Classification & Taxonomy (5.3)
Modern Evolutionary Classification 18-2
Topic Cladistics.
D.5: Phylogeny and Systematics
5.4 Cladistics.
SB3C. Examine the evolutionary basis of modern classification systems.
Phylogeny and Systematics
PHYLOGENETIC CLASSIFICATION
5.4 Cladistics Essential idea: The ancestry of groups of species can be deduced by comparing their base or amino acid sequences. The images above are both.
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Cladistics.
5.4 Cladistics.
Chapter 26 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Chapter 20 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Cladistics 5.4.
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
1 2 Biology Warm Up Day 6 Turn phones in the baskets
Evolution Biology Mrs. Johnson.
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Presentation transcript:

5.4 Cladistics The images above are both cladograms. They show the statistical similarities between species based on their DNA/RNA. The cladogram on the left show bacteria classified using the 16 S ribosomal RNA gene. The cladogram on the right uses retroviral sequences which have been incorporated into ape DNA and then inherited to build a picture of the relationships between apes. It’s an Interesting fact that humans have around 100,000 endogenous retroviruses incorporated into their DNA. g

5.4 Essential idea: The ancestry of groups of species can be deduced by comparing their base or amino acid sequences.

5.4.U5 Cladograms are tree diagrams that show the most probable sequence of divergence in clades. A cladogram is a tree diagram showing the similarities and differences between different species The branching points on cladograms are called nodes. Nodes denote a speciation event when a common ancestor splits into two, or more, species.

5.4.U1 A clade is a group of organisms that have evolved from a common ancestor. Species may evolve over time to form a new species. Consequently there are groups of species derived from a common ancestor. Such groups are called Clades. Clades can be large (large clades can contain smaller clades) Clades can be small Not all members of a clade may exist today, e.g. dinosaurs Common ancestors often do not exist, as they have evolved into modern species or have become extinct. *Clades can be identified by snipping a branch under a node.

Derived characters are traits shared in different degrees by clade members. o more closely related species share more derived characters o represented on cladogram as hash marks

These two cladograms are identical (although they don’t look it) The shape and the order of the terminal nodes does not matter. The only information to be gathered from the cladograms below is the order of nesting of sister clades and the relative relatedness of species U5 Cladograms are tree diagrams that show the most probable sequence of divergence in clades.

Human Chimp Gorilla Root Terminal nodes Sister clades: have a common ancestor Out group: Defines the ancestral characters Nodes: Common ancestors

Morphology is only part of the story in cladistics. Genetics are the primary basis for grouping organisms into clades and determining likely paths of evolutionary descent Ex: Crocodiles are more closely related to birds than lizards… Cladograms are mostly based on DNA base sequences or the amino acid sequences in a protein. Software applications combine multiple sequences* to find the most probable pattern of divergence. *Cladograms can show different relationships between species depending on the DNA/amino acid sequences used in the analysis. It is important therefore to use multiple sequences when trying to identify the true evolutionary relationships between species.

All known organisms use DNA as genetic material The genetic code is universal. Gene sequences inserted in different organisms express the same proteins U2 Evidence for which species are part of a clade can be obtained from the base sequences of a gene or the corresponding amino acid sequence of a protein.

The same 20 amino acids are used to make all proteins

5.4.U3 Sequence differences accumulate gradually so there is a positive correlation between the number of differences between two species and the time since they diverged from a common ancestor. Mutations in DNA that persist and are inherited* occur at a predictable rate #. The rate at which mutations occur at can be used as a molecular clock to calculate how long ago species diverged. * In species that reproduce sexually for mutations to be inherited they must occur during the creation of sex cells. #When considering multiple changes in the base sequence of DNA. The sample size is large enough to estimate a mean rate of mutation.

The assumption is that these changes occur at a regular rate. (which may not always be the case) Therefore if species A had 5 differences from species B and 10 differences from species C, then the lineages for A and C must have split twice as long ago as for A and B CBA Time The length of the lines separating species on cladograms is often used to represent the estimated time since they diverged.

Mitochondrial DNA from humans and primates has been completely sequenced and used to construct a cladogram between them A1 Cladograms including humans and other primates. The DNA evidence used to build this cladogram of primates, including humans, can also be used to estimate when species diverged and hence when the common ancestor existed.

The protein cytochrome c is not identical in all species because single point mutations in the DNA that codes for it can lead to different amino acids making up the protein. Both humans and chimpanzees have identical cytochrome c molecules, while rhesus monkeys share all but one of the amino acids. This suggests that humans and chimpanzees are more closely related to each other than to rhesus monkeys. / 5.4.U2 Evidence for which species are part of a clade can be obtained from the base sequences of a gene or the corresponding amino acid sequence of a protein. 5.4.U3 Sequence differences accumulate gradually so there is a positive correlation between the number of differences between two species and the time since they diverged from a common ancestor.

5.4.S1 Analysis of cladograms to deduce evolutionary relationships. 1.What animal is most closely related to a squirrel? 1.What animals are more closely related to humans than old world monkeys? 3.Tarsiers share a common ancestor with which animals? 3.Elephant shrews, Elephants, Manatee and dugong all share a common ancestor. Which animal diverged from the ancestor first?

5.4.U4 Traits can be analogous or homologous.

Evolutionary Links Classification allows us to see evolutionary relationships. Organisms that are grouped together share a lot of similar features (homologous structures). These shared characteristics help us see how organisms have evolved from a common ancestor. HOWEVER, morphology has its limitations in terms of evolutionary classification and DNA/ Amino Acid evidence is now far more accurate and trustworthy… e.g. Llamas were originally compared to sheep but a study of their genetics later placed them in the camel family 5.4.U6 Evidence from cladistics has shown that classification of some groups based on structure did not correspond with the evolutionary origins of a group or species.

Until recently, Scrophyulariaceae (commonly known as Figworts) were the 8 th largest family of angiosperms (flowering plants). It grew from 16 genera in 1789 to 275 genera Taxonomists recently examined chloroplast genes and found the 5000 figwort species should be split into 5 different clades rather than just one 5.4.A2 Reclassification of the figwort family using evidence from cladistics.

The general flower shape and form of the seed capsule evolved many times from different ancestors (convergent evolution). Different plant species adapted to similar pollinators and adopted similar seed dispersal strategies. The similarities among the members of the old Scrophulariaceae family were superficial.

Less than half of the original species remain in the Figwort family; now only the 36 th largest among angiosperms Reclassification was helpful since the old Figwort family was too large and dissimilar to be a helpful grouping No longer a Figwort. Sad  5.4.A2 Reclassification of the figwort family using evidence from cladistics. DNA evidence has cast doubt on some traditionally classified groups, but equally it has given support to others. Though DNA evidence is very important, it must be remembered that is not the only evidence used to decide evolutionary relationships.