60 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN- 2014-13 Reduce All Minimum Allocation/Assignment Units to /24.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
62 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements.
Advertisements

1 Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 26 August 2009 Beijing, China.
60 Draft Policy ARIN Remove Web Hosting Policy.
Draft Policy Clarifying Requirements for IPv4 Transfers.
ARIN Policy Experience Report Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or.
Improving 8.4 Anti-Flip Language. Problem Statement Current policy prevents an organization that receives BLOCK A in the previous 12 months from.
ARIN Transfer Policy Slow Start and Simplified Needs Verification.
Recommended Draft Policy Section 8.4 Inter-RIR Transfer of ASNs.
Open Policy Hour. Overview 1.Preview of Draft Policies on ARIN XXV agenda 2.Policy Experience Report 3.Policy Proposal BoF.
60 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Anti-hijack Policy.
ARIN Clarifying Requirements for IPv4 Transfers Dan Alexander- Primary Shepherd David Farmer- Secondary Shepherd.
2010-8: Rework of IPv6 Assignment Criteria David Farmer ARIN XXVI.
Draft Policy ARIN : Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments.
2009-3: Allocation of IPv4 Blocks to Regional Internet Registries.
Policy Implementation and Experience Report Leslie Nobile.
Policy Experience Report Richard Jimmerson. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
Policy Proposal 109 Standardize IP Reassignment Registration Requirements ARIN XXV 18 April, 2010 – Toronto, Ontario Chris Grundemann.
Recommended Draft Policy RIR Principles 59.
Policy Implementation & Experience Report Leslie Nobile Director, Registration Services.
Open Policy Hour Einar Bohlin, Policy Analyst. OPH Overview Draft Policy Preview Policy Experience Report Policy BoF.
POLICY EXPERIENCE REPORT Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
Getting Internet Number Resources from ARIN Community Use Slide Deck Courtesy of ARIN May 2014.
Standardize IP Reassignment Registration Requirements Draft Policy
Draft Policy Standardize IP Reassignment Registration Requirements ARIN XXVI 6 October, 2010 – Atlanta, Georgia Chris Grundemann.
Life After IPv4 Depletion Leslie Nobile. Overview ARIN’s current IPv4 inventory Trends and observations Ways to obtain IP addresses post IPv4 depletion.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Out of Region Use.
Policy Experience Report Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
Draft Policy Revising Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size.
Simplified M&A transfer policy Draft Policy
ARIN Section 4.10 Austerity Policy Update.
PROP Leif Sawyer. Draft Policy ARIN Eliminating Needs-based Evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 Netblocks Author:
AC On-Docket Proposals Report John Sweeting Advisory Council Chair.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Remove Operational Reverse DNS Text.
Draft Policy Transfers & Multi-National Networks Kevin Blumberg.
Draft Policy Preview ARIN XXVII. Draft Policies Draft Policies on the agenda: – ARIN : Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy – ARIN : Protecting.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Remove Web Hosting Policy.
Draft Policy IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement.
ARIN Change Utilization Requirements from last-allocation to total-aggregate.
Draft Policy Allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space to Out-of-region Requestors 59.
APNIC Policy SIG report: Open Policy Meeting Masato Yamanishi, Chair APNIC 40 Jakarta, Indonesia.
Draft Policy IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement.
ARIN Revising Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size Bill Sandiford ARIN AC.
ARIN Update Aaron Hughes ARIN Board of Trustees Focus Increased focus on customer service – Based on feedback and survey Continued IPv4 to IPv6.
Draft Policy Return to 12 Month Supply and Reset Trigger to /8 in Free Pool.
Draft Policy Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy 1.History including origin & shepherds 2.Summary 3.Status at other RIRs 4.Staff/legal assessment.
Draft Policy ARIN Modify 8.4 (Inter-RIR Transfers to Specified Recipients) Authors: David Huberman and Tina Morris AC Shepherds: Cathy Aronson and.
Draft Policy Aligning 8.2 and 8.3 Transfer Policy.
Draft Policy ARIN Section 4.10 Austerity Policy Update.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Remove Sections 4.6 and 4.7.
Draft Policy Merge IPv4 ISP and End-User Requirements 59.
Draft Policy Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers.
Advisory Council Shepherds: David Farmer & Chris Grundemann Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms by the IANA.
60 Draft Policy ARIN Improving 8.4 Anti-Flip Language.
1 Madison, WI 9 September Part 1 IPv4 Depletion Leslie Nobile Director, Registration Services.
60 Draft Policy ARIN NRPM 4 (IPv4) Policy Cleanup.
Draft Policy ARIN Christian Tacit. Problem statement Organizations that obtain a 24 month supply of IP addresses via the transfer market and then.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN
59 Draft Policy Allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space to Out-of-region Requestors.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN David Farmer
2011-4: Reserved Pool for Critical Infrastructure
Draft Policy ARIN Amy Potter
ARIN Scott Leibrand / David Huberman
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Post-IPv4-Free-Pool-Depletion Transfer Policy Staff Introduction.
Draft Policy Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Change timeframes for IPv4 requests to 24 months Tina Morris.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Eliminate HD-Ratio from NRPM
Recommended Draft Policy Section 8
Permitted Uses of space reserved under NRPM 4.10
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Modify 8
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Transfers for new entrants
Presentation transcript:

60 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Reduce All Minimum Allocation/Assignment Units to /24

History – Origin: ARIN-prop-208 (Apr 2014) – AC Shepherd: Kevin Blumberg, Bill Darte – AC accepted as Draft Policy in May – AC made Recommended in May – Text Online & in Discussion Guide

3 Staff Understanding – This policy would reduce the minimum allocation/assignment size to /24 for all networks, whether end user or ISP and whether single or multi-homed. Additionally, it would eliminate the existing multi-homed policies.

4 Staff Comments It is not clear in this proposal what criteria would be used to determine any allocation size other than a /24. Current policy provides clear criteria for how to qualify for a /22, /21, and a /20. Would the same criteria still apply for organizations that request more than an initial allocation of a/24? Staff uses current criteria defined in in conjunction with section (slow start) to establish a de facto /20 maximum initial allocation size for ISPs new to ARIN. Staff recommends that a maximum initial allocation size of a /20 be noted in section to codify existing practice and provide clarity, and that it be renamed to “Minimum and Maximum Allocation”. This proposal would benefit smaller ISPs who are unable to qualify currently under IPv4 policies, and particularly would be unable to qualify for 8.3 and 8.4 transfers in a post-depletion world. *Note, this was a point raised in the policy experience report in Chicago. ARIN will likely have many discontiguous /24s as we near depletion and fewer and fewer larger prefixes. This policy would actually allow more organizations to use these smallest prefixes, thus ensuring the efficient run-out of ARIN’s IPv4 address pool.

5 Legal Assessment – This proposal does not appear to pose any legal risk.

6 Presentation by the AC

ARIN Reduce All Minimum Allocation/Assignment Units to /24

Problem Statement As we approach runout, more and more end users and smaller ISPs will be unable to obtain space from their upstreams and will be seeking space from ARIN. In order to meet these needs to the extent possible and to make policy more fair to a broader range of the ARIN constituency, we should reduce the minimum assignment and allocation units for IPv4 to /24 across the board.

Policy Statement Remove all references to minimum allocations /20 and /22 replacing them with the term allocation or with /24 when referencing minimum size blocks. Change the title of to "ISP Requirements" with revised text stating: – All ISP organizations must satisfy the following requirements...thus eliminating the entire Multi-homed section and subsections along with other superfluous example text. Delete the special case allocations/assignments for the Caribbean as the new /24 minimums are an improvement.

Discussion Do you support the policy as written? Do the changes outlined create any additional unforeseen issues? Should maximum allocation sizes for initial requests be re-inserted? Questions, Comments?

Redline Text Changes

Minimum allocation In general, ARIN allocates /20 /24 and larger IP address prefixes to ISPs. If allocations smaller than /20 /24 are needed, ISPs should request address space from their upstream provider. For multihomed ISPs, ARIN allocates /22 and larger IP address prefixes. If allocations smaller than /22 are needed, multihomed ISPs should request address space from their upstream provider.

Standard or non-multihomed ISP Requirements All ISP Oorganizations that do not meet the requirements described in the multihomed section below (Section ) must satisfy the following requirements:

Use of /20 /24 The efficient utilization of an entire previously allocated /20 /24 from their upstream ISP. This /20 allocation may have been provided by an ISP's upstream provider(s), and does not have to be contiguous address space. The organization must meet the requirement of efficient use of 16 /24s. For example, if an organization holds a smaller allocation, such as 12 /24s, from its upstream provider, the organization would not meet the minimum utilization requirements of a /20.

Renumber and return ISPs receiving a new /20 allocation may wish to renumber out of their previously allocated space. In this case, an ISP must use the new /20 allocation to renumber out of that previously allocated block of address space and must return the space to its upstream provider.

Multihomed When prefixes are allocated which are smaller than /20, they will be from a block reserved for that purpose. In order to receive an initial allocation from ARIN, organizations applying under the multihomed policy must: – When requesting a /22, demonstrate the efficient utilization of a minimum contiguous or noncontiguous /23 (two /24s) from an upstream. – When requesting a /21, demonstrate the efficient utilization of a minimum contiguous or noncontiguous /22 (four /24s) from an upstream. – When requesting a /20, demonstrate the efficient utilization of a minimum contiguous or noncontiguous /21 (eight /24s) from an upstream.

Multihomed (cont’d) Efficient utilization Provide reassignment information for /29 and larger blocks using the Shared Whois Project (SWIP) or by providing the same information fields in an RWhois server. If additional address space is later requested, this information must be available at the time of the request. Utilization for blocks smaller than /29 can be documented via SWIP or RWhois server or by providing detailed utilization information Three months Provide information showing that the requested IP address space will be utilized within three months and demonstrating an intent to announce the requested space in a multihomed fashion Renumber and return Agree that the newly requested IP address space will be used to renumber out of the current addresses which will be returned to their upstream provider(s) Additional requests following the initial allocation To receive additional address space following the initial allocation, multihomed organizations must have returned the original IP address space to its provider in its entirety and must provide justification for a new allocation as described above in the section titled Requirements for Requesting Initial Address Space.

Minimum assignment Single Connection The minimum block of IP address space assigned by ARIN to end-users is a /20 /24. If assignments smaller than /20 /24 are needed, end-users should contact their upstream provider Multihomed Connection For multihomed end-users who demonstrate an intent to announce the requested space in a multihomed fashion to two or more distinct ASNs not owned or controlled by the end-user, the minimum block of IP address space assigned is a /24. If assignments smaller than a /24 are needed, multihomed end-users should contact their upstream providers. When prefixes are assigned which are smaller than /20, they will be from a block reserved for that purpose so long as that is feasible.

4.9 Minimum Allocation in the Caribbean Region and North Atlantic Islands The minimum IPv4 allocation size for ISPs from the Caribbean and North Atlantic Islands sector of the ARIN region is / Allocation Criteria – The requesting organization must show the efficient utilization of an entire previously allocated /22 from their upstream ISP. This allocation (/22) may have been provided by an ISP's upstream provider(s), and does not have to be contiguous address space. The organization must meet the requirement of efficient use of 4 /24s. – Utilization Reporting and Justification. All other ARIN policies regarding the reporting of justification information for the allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 address space will remain in effect.