Parent Education Meeting February 16, 2016. Agenda Understanding PLAAFPS Understanding IEPs State Assessment – STAAR, STAAR-A, and STAAR-ALT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recipe for Developing and Implementing an Effective IEP
Advertisements


New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Module 1: IEP Overview – A Plan for Guiding Instruction and Service Provision.
Participation in Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills.
Testing Accommodations for Students with Disabilities.
Are Your STAARs Aligned? i2 Institute June 15, 2012 Laura Abbott.
Standards-Based IEPs Aligning the IEP and Academic Content Standards to Improve Academic Achievement.
TEKS BASED IEPs PLAAFPS GOALS & OBJECTIVES
Making the Grade Grading Practices for Students with Disabilities By Cathy Sartain Industries
Individual Education Plan Overview Presented By: Pamela Cameron Winter 2013.
IEP Annual Goal Development Question & Answer Document
THE IEP PROCESS REBECCA ROTONDO, M.ED. NORRISTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.
Parent Advisory Council Seven Hills Classical Academy May 10, 2012.
Septembe DRAFT 5, 2014 TETN # STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with intellectual disabilities. STAAR Alternate, as it was originally.
PED 383: Adapted Physical Education Dr. Johnson.  Who needs them?  Students with Disabilities  Students with Unique needs  Individualized Education.
What Parents Need to Know  TABS (Texas Assessment of Basic Skills)  TEAMS (Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills)  TAAS (Texas Assessment.
ARD Training Education Service Center and School District Training TEA Student Assessment Division.
11 th Grade Michigan Merit Examination 2010 compared to 2012.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Consistency of Assessment
Special Education Assessment Update. Cari Wieland Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division.
Developing Short-Term Instructional Objectives For Effective Implementation of Common Core State Standards.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
Strategies for Writing Meaningful, Measureable IEP Goals Presented to all Davis School District Related Service Providers November 2011 Based on a presentation.
Special Education Review & Update for Regular Educators.
Get To Know Your Neighbors Let’s Play HUDDLE! 1. November ESE Meeting Chapter 4 – IEP – ESE Reminders – Reviewing Present Levels – Accommodations and.
STANDARDS BASED GOALS and OBJECTIVES
1/12/09Module 6 - Cypress-Fairbanks I.S.D.1 Module 6: 2 Hours Developing Objectives Aligned to State Standards.
Developing the Foundation for the PLAAFP
School Improvement Improving what’s happening in the classroom for students with disabilities: instruction & its impact on student learning Systems that.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
Smarter Balanced Accommodations – Knowing and Using Allowed Resources Presenters: Donna Gearns Alicia Skelly 8/20/2014.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Eva M. Kubinski, MS Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 2009 Children Come First Conference November 16, 2009.
How to Modify & Accommodate for Autism Dallas Independent School District Special Education Department IDEA Coordination and Specialized Programs.
The IEP: Individual Education Plan. The IEP Team  (1) The parents of the child;  (2) At least one regular education teacher of the child (if the child.
10/8/20151 Focusing on the IEP Process Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District.
Setting High Academic Expectations that Ensure Academic Achievement TEAM PLANNING STANDARDS & OBJECTIVES TEACHER CONTENT KNOWLEDGE.
In the State-Required Assessment and Accountability Programs 703 KAR 5:070 1.
PSSA-M January 19, 2012 LEA meeting January 19, 2012 LEA meeting.
Instructional Accommodations/ Modifications in Cypress-Fairbanks ISD Teacher Implementation Guide.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
Suggested training for region, district, and campus professionals 9/24/2014Texas Education Agency – Student Assessment Division 1.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
MAKING ASSESSMENT DECISIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Presented by: Curriculum & Instruction Melissa Schramme, Supervisor of Elementary.
Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.
STAAR Decision Making Process for LPAC for Teachers.
ACCOMMODATIONS Using Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment in the classroom.
Steps to Creating Standards-Based Individualized Education Programs The following highlights the major steps Committees on Special Education (CSEs) can.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
FACULTY MEETING OCTOBER 14, 2009 Standards-Based IEPs.
“ IT IS PROOF NOT TRUTH” THE IEP IS THE PROOF Dr. Jodi Roseman Director of Special Education School District of Springfield Township.
INCLUSION The Road to Success for Students with Disabilities.
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
WHS Implementation Guide for Special Education IEP’s
Oral Administration Training
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Quick Overview- Seven Step Process to Creating Standards Based IEPs
Participation Requirements
TELPAS Alternate Student Eligibility
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
WHS Implementation Guide for Special Education IEP’s
Presentation transcript:

Parent Education Meeting February 16, 2016

Agenda Understanding PLAAFPS Understanding IEPs State Assessment – STAAR, STAAR-A, and STAAR-ALT

PLAAFP stands for... Present Level (PLAAFP) utilizes CURRENT data Academic Achievement (PLAAFP) focuses on what specific kinds of academic information and skills the student has mastered – such as reading at a certain grade level / rate, or performing certain mathematical calculations for example. Functional Performance (PLAAFP) refers to other areas of achievement that are not academic. It can include information about your child’s social skills, communication skills, and other activities of daily living (ADL).

TEA Resource Region 20 IEP Goad Development Q & A Document revised 6/14/2015

Develop the PLAAFP Strengths & Needs – What do we know about the student’s response to academic instruction? – What programs, accommodations and/or interventions have been successful? – What have we learned form previous IEPs and student data that can inform decision making? – Are there assessment data (i.e., state, district, classroom, formal) that can provide useful info about strengths & needs (patterns in data?)?

Factors related to disability – How does the disability affect participation and progress in the general curriculum? – What supports does the student need to learn and attain skills to progress in the general curriculum? – Is the student on track to achieve grade level proficiency within the year? Develop the PLAAFP

PLAAFP is the basis on which the ARD Committee will write goals for the student’s Annual Review year.

After reading the PLAAFP, we should know… 1.How the child’s disability affects the involvement & progress in the general education curriculum 2.Current Progress 3.Current accommodations & modifications 4.Student’s strengths / needs 5.Current supports the student used in the year 6.Baseline data

Region 20 IEP Goal Development Q & A Document revised 2015 TEA Resource Questions 1.15, 1.16, 1.17 & 1.18 Measurable annual goals are developed from information contained in the PLAAFP Separate goals will need to be written for each subject area where the PLAAFP indicates a critical need The PLAAFP provides the baseline of where the student is performing. That information is then used to determine the progress that can be reasonable expected in 1 year

PLAAFP Annual Goal Short Term Objectives PLAAFP OBJ. #1 OBJ. #3 OBJ. #2 Annual Goal STAAR ALT 2 participants MUST have at least 2 objectives per academic goal

Success Ed has identified Five PLAAFP areas: Physical Behavior Discipline Functional Academic

PLAAFP Annual Goal Short Term Objectives PLAAFP OBJ. #1 OBJ. #3 OBJ. #2 Annual Goal: Kelly will solve mathematics problems using visual support 7 out of 10 times 1.trace her name with assistance, 2.bath, eat & dress herself 3.likes nursery rhymes and country music 4.likes looking at picture books 5.match some colors and shapes 6.responds to verbal praise and reinforcers 7.repeats words/phrases

PLAAFPs in Success Ed SE Manager – Physical – Behavior – Discipline – Functional… including Transition Vocational communication skills – Academic SE IEP Goals – Student Narrative

PLAAFPs that give a good picture of the student follow these steps… Baseline data is measurable / observable / comparative Define how the student's disability affects their involvement and progress in the general curriculum Describe the student as of today and indicate amount of progress over the past year(s) Defines your data source – use both qualitative & quantitative

This defines why they needed special education for the disability. Do not use disability / eligibility condition but how the disability affects them in the educational setting. How does this weakness get in the way of doing well in the general education curriculum (TEKS)? Define how the student's disability affects their involvement and progress in the general curriculum

1.What are the current accommodations / modifications in place? 2.Knowing data on student performance “with / without” certain specially designed instruction provides justification for why a particular acc / mod is included in the IEP 3.Helpful if an Accommodation Request Form (ARF) is needed for state testing Describe the student as of today and indicate amount of progress over the past year(s)

Accommodations change the how of learning Modifications change the what of learning Describe the student as of today and indicate amount of progress over the past year(s)

Accommodations ARE… Service or support that helps students access content and instruction Allows student to accurately demonstrate what he/she knows ARE NOT… Changes to content or performance expectations Major changes to standards Alterations to the big idea or learning outcome (Nolet & McLaughlin, 2005)

Modifications “Practices and procedures that change the nature of the task or target skill.” (TEA IEP Q & A 2013)

Modifications ARE… Changes to content or performance expectations Thoughtfully planned and tightly aligned to enrolled grade-level standards Used when “all” accommodations have been exhausted ARE NOT… “Dumbing Down” the curriculum Reducing a student’s opportunity to learn critical knowledge and skills Teaching off grade level, resulting in greater gaps (Content courtesy of the IRIS Center, Peabody College, 2004)

How do I know which it is? It all depends on the standards… – What is the intent of the goal / standard? *what should student know and be able to do? *what ways must student demonstrate competency of the standard? – How does the teaching strategy / practice / procedure impact the integrity of the content standard?

How do I know which it is? The important concept is not what particular strategy is an accommodation but the purpose of that accommodation. It is something that offsets the impact of the disability without changing the content standard or performance expectation. In contrast, a modification, whatever it may be, and it could be exactly the type of strategy or device that is mentioned under an accommodation, but in this case when it is applied, it actually changes or alters the content standard or the performance expectation. Margaret McLaughlin, Ph.D., Department of Special Education, University of Maryland, Courtesy of IRIS Center, Peabody College, 2004

Know the TEKS Readiness Standards Supporting Standards Essence Statements

“Shorten Assignments” When might we recommend this? When is it an accommodation? When is it a modification?

“Calculation Device” to help with Xs 4 th Grade Standard (4.4) Number, operation, and quantitative reasoning. The student multiplies and divides to solve meaningful problems involving whole numbers. The student is expected to: (D) Use multiplication to solve problems (no more than two digits times two digits without technology) 8 th Grade Standard (8.2) Number, operation, and qunatitative reasoning. The student selects and uses appropirate operations to solve problems and justify solutions. The student is expected to: (D) Use multiplication by a given constant factor (including unit rate) to represent and solve problems involving proportional relationships including conversions between measurement systems.

Accommodation or Modification? AdaptionAccMod Adding more white space to a test or assignment Providing a student with a list of five words to include in a chapter summary A student is to learn six new words when the standard state that 10 new words will be learned Allowing a student to respond orally to test questions rather than taking a written test The student uses an alternate curriculum rather than the general education curriculum for a specific subject level

Accommodation or Modification? AdaptionAccMod Adding more white space to a test or assignment Providing a student with a list of five words to include in a chapter summary A student is to learn six new words when the standard state that 10 new words will be learned Allowing a student to respond orally to test questions rather than taking a written test The student uses an alternate curriculum rather than the general education curriculum for a specific subject level

State Assessments STAAR STAAR-A (Participation Requirements) STAAR-ALT (Participation Requirements)

STAAR & STAAR-A STAAR A is the same as STAAR in the following ways: Same passing standards Same time limits Same assessed curriculum Same test blueprint Same progress measures

STAAR vs. STAAR-A STAAR A is different than STAAR in the following ways: STAAR A contains accommodated STAAR test questions and selections; however, not necessarily the same ones as STAAR on the day of the test No field test questions (this applies to EOC only since STAAR 3-8 have no field test items in 2016) Online administration Embedded accommodations and accessibility features Braille and Spanish versions of the assessment are not available