Illinois Pension Crisis By: Kaitlyn O’Shea, Connor Francesca, Nealkanth Patel, Darshan Kamdar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 An electronic presentation by Norman Sunderman Angelo State University An electronic presentation by.
Advertisements

© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.16-1 Chapter 16 Retirement Planning.
Actuarial Valuations & Unfunded Liabilities Derek Osborne, Horizonow Consultants Atlantic Connection, Miami July 11, 2012.
McGraw-Hill /Irwin© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS Chapter 17.
An Overview: Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana Prepared for the Advisory Group on Civil Service and Employee Benefits August 25, 2009.
Pensions ACCTG 5120 David Plumlee.
Chapter 16 Retirement Planning Social Security Employer Plans Individual Plans Self Employed Plans.
Group 6.  Definition: a plan for setting aside money to be spent after retirement. ◦ Individual retirement account (IRA )  contribute a limited yearly.
Oregon PERS Policy Options: Effects on Employer Rates and the State General Fund ECONorthwest April 10, 2003.
Public Employee Pension Plans Steven Kreisberg Steven Kreisberg Collective Bargaining Director Collective Bargaining DirectorAFSCME 1.
Contribution Rates and Benefits of the U.S. Pension System International Pension Conference FIAP and the Chilean Pension Funds Administrations Association.
Retirement Planning and Employee Benefits for Financial Planners
FA3 Lesson 7. Pension costs and obligations 1.Pensions 2.Defined contribution vs. defined benefit 3.Accounting for pensions 4.Pension worksheet.
1 Why DC is better for us Andrey Pavlov Professor of Finance Beedie School of Business.
McGraw-Hill /Irwin© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS Chapter 17.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 An electronic presentation by Norman Sunderman Angelo State University An electronic presentation by.
State & Local Pensions + IRAs Monday October 3, 2005.
11/27/2007 Pension Reforms in China and Taiwan Hongxia Jiao Yi-Ying Chen.
PASA PENSION BRIEFING Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Charles B. Zogby, Secretary of the Budgetwww.budget.state.pa.us Pennsylvania Pension System Reform March.
Illinois SURS Member Guide –Contributions (page 2) –Disability Benefits (pages 7-9) –Disability Retirement Allowance (page 10) –Retirement Benefits (pages.
Increasing contributions presentation Increasing contributions in your retirement plan account.
1 City of Fresno’s Deferred Retirement Option Program “DROP” Police Department Retirement Planning Seminar 2008.
1 Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 19.
The Illinois Pension Problem What is Wrong with Illinois Pensions?
OPEN – C&HR – 1 June 13-14, 2013 OPEN – C&HR – 1 June 13-14, 2013 Board of Curators Compensation and Human Resources Committee June 13-14, 2013.
8 th Atlantic Connection Public Pensions Assumed Rate of Return & Pension Deficits: New Ideas, New Solutions Jeanna M. Cullins, Partner.
TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008.
Take Charge of Your Money when you leave your job LFD [Presenter's Name] [Presenter's Title] [Presenter's Firm Information] [Date of Presentation]
1 Statewide Retirement Systems Funding Updates Presentation to the Legislative Commission on Pensions & Retirement Dave Bergstrom, MSRS Executive Director.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning Unit #6.
Arizona State Retirement System Presentation to the Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona January 7, 2011.
Public Act and its Effect on Illinois’ Teachers By Marc Ansay and Jill Kaner.
Collin County Retirement Plan Briefing September 7, 2010.
Christine Bailey New York City Board of Education Retirement System
WHO’S COUNTING ON US? 307,600 active public employees 194,256 retirees, survivors, and disabled people 11% of Minnesota’s population (586,897 people)
NCCCMA Winter Seminar Michael Williamson Director, North Carolina Retirement Systems.
Vermont’s Expanding Pension Crisis Presented by David Coates to the Ethan Allen Institute June 19,
Design features of an IA System: What Can We Learn from Other Countries? By Estelle James.
Presented by: G.S. Curran & Co. GASB 68 FOR COST SHARING EMPLOYERS OF THE ASSESSORS’ RETIREMENT FUND.
Unit 6 Seminar Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.
UC Retirement System and the Restart of Contributions UCI Financial Expo April 15, 2010.
Board Retreat – Oct 20, 2011 FCERA 2011 Retirement Board Retreat October 20, 2011 Paul Angelo, FSA Andy Yeung, ASA The Segal Company, San Francisco v2.
Switching from NEST to PFG Retirement Plan David Berry Group Pensions Manager.
1 Mid-Atlantic Plan Sponsors (MAPS) Trustee Educational Conference June 9, 2011 What Type of Retirement Plan Do You Want & Can You Afford It? David Boomershine.
Ch. 7: LIFE-CYCLE ASPECTS OF LABOR SUPPLY. Choice of retirement age.
DEFINED BENEFITS/DEFINED CONTRIBUTIONS Defined Benefits A traditional defined benefit (DB) plan is a plan in which the benefit on retirement is determined.
BUDGET DAY PENSION BRIEFING Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Charles B. Zogby, Secretary of the Budgetwww.budget.state.pa.us Pennsylvania Pension System Reform.
1 Accounting for OPEB Retiree Health Benefits Committee September 11, 2006.
Copyright © 2015 GRS – All rights reserved. RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan January 13, 2015 Pension Fund Status As of January 1, 2014.
Illinois Pension Crisis: Evaluation and Proposed Solutions Doug Palzer, Luke Hamilton, Michael Sherman, Sebastian Vermaas.
New Member Mid-CareerNearRetirementAfterRetirement Municipal Pension Plan Operations and Financial Review December 31, 2002.
STRATHCLYDE PENSION FUND ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 14 JUNE 2013.
Pensions GOMB Response to Budgeting For Results Commission Pension Questions.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning.
1 Foregone revenue & lost savings $ Impact on TRA Foregone revenue from 1% ER contribution increase$43.0 million Permanent foregone savings if delay COLA.
The Houston Pension Question How the City’s Pension Liability Grew And the Options for Reform August 2016.
EMPLOYEE PENSIONS March 24, Quiz Which costs the city of Houston the most? A) Parks B) Libraries C) Trash collection D) Firefighters’ pension payments.
Pension Reform Effective Date July 1, 2017.
CHAPTER 17 Pensions 2.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits
The Road to Hell is Paved With Bad Public Pensions: An Analysis of Illinois’ Public Pension System Trevor Rogers.
RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan February 9, 2016 Pension Fund Status
California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS)
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
Personal Finance Retirement Planning – 1 Employer Plans
Texas’ Retired Employees Obligations: Case Study – City of Houston
City of Houston Retired Employees Obligations
Fiscal and Economic Issues Discussion Group - Illinois
Senate E-12 Finance March 19, 2018
Actuarial Audit of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth October 21, 2008.
Presentation transcript:

Illinois Pension Crisis By: Kaitlyn O’Shea, Connor Francesca, Nealkanth Patel, Darshan Kamdar

Our Focus SURS- State Universities Retirement System of Illinois 51,631 SURS currently in retirement Average Salary of $50, unfunded liability of $20,038,650,000

What were the problems? ❏ 3% COLA ❏ Manipulating the last 4 years of salary ❏ Kick it down the road ❏ 1994 “Reform” Plan: Edgar Ramp ❏ Missed Payments: 2 years by Governor Bladgojevich

Defined Benefit Plan ❏ Nationwide State Pensions: 2.5 trillion in debt ❏ Political cycle: 2 year cycles ❏ Get re-elected! ❏ Help the people ❏ Who will make the decisions down the road?

What about the 7.25% rate of return? ❏ SURS = 8.2% over 20 years ❏ Diversify the risk ❏ We don’t think it’s a problem

Possible Solutions? ❏ Lower the benefits ❏ Reduce the 3% COLA ❏ The annuity amount given to each employee (80%) ❏ Problem: Court cases  unconstitutional

Putting the solution into perspective ❏ The problem lies within multiple fields: ❏ Politics, Legal, Accounting & Finance, and Actuarial Assumptions ❏ Politics: Democrats and republicans have differing views ❏ Legal: The courts disallow changes in benefits and certain actions ❏ Accounting and finance: Investing and Unfunded ratio ❏ Actuarial assumptions: Life expectancy, rate of returns

Retired EmployeesCurrent EmployeesNew Hires Lump Sum Payment Retirement Tax Defined Contribution Plan (401 k) Service Tax $ Our Solution

New Hires

Proposed 401k System All new employees will be placed into defined contribution plans Retirement funds will depend on portfolio performance No benefits will be promised

Proposed 401k System Financial Advisor Program Hire advisors to monitor 401k portfolios SURS meet initially with advisor Yearly follow up to review goals

Proposed 401k System Financial Advisor Program 390 SURS added monthly 13 financial advisors needed Suggested 8% salary contribution per year, (7.6% State Match)

Per Employee 401k Projected Assets 40 Years (9.2% Return) $341, Per Employee Contribution 40 Years $285, Employee Net Assets $55, Total SURS Employees 401k Projected Assets 40 $312,707,962, Total SURS Employee 401k Liabilities 40 Years $32,146,593, Cost of Advisor Program 40 Years $70,042,140 Total State Liabilities 40 Years $30,609,322,245.03

Why Switch to a 401k? Illinois’ Perspective Stops the “bleeding” Unfunded liability stops growing

Why Switch to a 401k? Illinois’ Perspective No guaranteed benefits Burden does not fall onto taxpayers

Why Switch to a 401k? Retiree’s Perspective Funds will be sufficient for retirement Employees have a say in their investments Yearly contribution will be equal to current pension obligation Will receive “free” money through state matching

Current Employees

Service Tax Based on Sales Tax Revenue of about $10.9 billion Divided Sales Tax Revenue by Sales Tax % of 6.25% Total Sales were about $174.5 billion $174.5 billion X 0.50% (Service Tax) to gain a revenue of $872.8 billion

Retired Employees

Lump Sum Average life expectancy= Average annuity this year is $38,064 Based on age and how much annuity a person receives each year determines their present value lump sum to offer 7.25% is the assumed interest rate Likelihood someone will take offer 75% payout to individuals

Age Employees per age Life Expectancy (85.45-Age) Total Annuity Per Year Assumed Interest Rate Lump Sum Per Person% LikelihoodTotal Lump Sum% PayoutPayout $39, %$565, %$196,927, %$147,695, $40, %$566, %$285,004, %$213,753, $41, %$567, %$338,610, %$253,957, $42, %$567, %$357,568, %$268,176, $44, %$565, %$275,212, %$206,409, $45, %$562, %$220,846, %$165,635, $46, %$557, %$142,481, %$106,861, $48, %$551, %$184,031, %$138,023, $49, %$542, %$203,043, %$152,282, $51, %$532, %$187,472, %$140,604, $52, %$520, %$171,617, %$128,712, $54, %$505, %$155,560, %$116,670, $55, %$487, %$139,400, %$104,550, $57, %$466, %$123,248, %$92,436, $59, %$443, %$107,235, %$80,426, $61, %$415, %$91,508, %$68,631, $62, %$385, %$76,234, %$57,175, $64, %$350, %$61,603, %$46,202, $66, %$310, %$47,832, %$35,874, $68, %$266, %$35,160, %$26,370, $70, %$216, %$23,862, %$17,897, $72, %$161, %$14,243, %$10,682, $75, %$100, %$6,643, %$4,982, $77, %$32, %$1,443, %$1,082,791.77

Total Lump Sum Total Lump Sum: $2,585,096, Liability Reduction: $3,231,370, Amount Saved: 646,274,140.70

Retirement Income Tax  Illinois only 1 of 3 states not currently taxing retirement income  2015 retirement income valued at $48.2 billion  Foreseeing retirement income tax as unfavorable amongst retirees Assuming 20% of retirement income filers emigrate IL  2% retirement income tax rate $771.9 million retirement income tax revenue

Financial Summary

Projected Income 1. Required contribution from current pension employees 2. Service Tax Revenue 3. Retirement Tax Revenue

Projected Expenses 1. Lump sum payments (Year 1) 2. State 401k matching (every year) 3. Financial Advisor Salary (every year) 4. Annuity payouts to current retirees (every year)

Yearly Assets/Liabilities Calculation Assets Current Market Assets  Service Tax Revenue  Retirement Tax Revenue  Required Contribution by current pension members  Interest on market investments  Lump Sum Payments  Retiree Annuity Payments  401 k matching  401 k advisors = Next Year Market Assets Liabilities Current Total Liabilities  Accruing benefits for current employees  Lump Sum Payments  Deceased Employees  Annuity Payouts for retired employees =Next Year Total Liabilities

Our solution: 7 years YearNet Assets (Market)Accrued LiabilityUnfunded Liability 2014$17,391,300,000.00$37,429,950, $20,038,650, $16,263,891,071.25$32,783,990, $16,520,099, $17,858,414,482.19$31,403,836, $13,545,422, $19,603,515,691.92$30,061,459, $10,457,944, $21,514,201,928.85$28,760,369, $7,246,167, $23,606,855,476.51$27,504,253, $3,897,397, $25,899,352,773.14$26,296,981, $397,629, $28,411,193,529.95$25,142,618,910.71$3,268,574,619.25

Importance of Findings Our plan solves one component of the crisis This program can be used as a pilot for other programs The basic outline can be applied to any state retirement system

Sources numbers/37662/ F

Retired EmployeesCurrent EmployeesNew Hires Lump Sum Payment Retirement Tax Defined Contribution Plan (401 k) Service Tax $ Questions?