NIH Genomic Data Sharing (GDS) Policy Kathleen Calzone, PhD, RN, APNG, FAAN Anjan Purkayastha, PhD February 22, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Christina Hansen, Assistant Vice Chancellor Bob Johnson, Research Librarian for Nursing & Allied Health May 2008 NIH Public Access Policy UCI Libraries.
Will you be sending data/specimens that meet the criteria of “Identifiable” under HIPAA regulations? No  If data/specimens were collected under UVa protocol-
ARC: Open Access and Research Data Justin Withers Director, Policy and Integrity Australian Research Council.
NIH Public Access Policy What it means to OHSU Researchers Presented by: Andrew Hamilton Date: 10/22/2009.
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting November 2, 2011 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
How does the process work? Submissions in 2007 (n=13,043) Perspectives.
Identification & Distinction of Clinical Trial Participant Charges Bethany Martell Office of Clinical Research Associate Director- Financial Operations.
1 NIH PUBLIC ACCESS POLICY Overview Office of Research & Sponsored Programs Compliance Subgroup 1, 2 & 3 Meeting April 1, 2008.
Capturing IRB Protocol-Proposal Congruency For NIH research involving human subjects at Just-In-Time (JIT) Cynthia Kane, Associate Director Laura Kozma,
IRB Monthly Investigator Meeting Columbia University Medical Center IRB October 11, 2005.
NIH Public Access Policy What it means to OHSU Researchers Presented by: Andrew Hamilton Date: 3/18/2007.
1 NIH Public Access Policy Policy on Enhancing Public Access to Archived Publications Resulting From NIH-Funded Research (Public Access Policy)
Integrated Online Research Compliance System (iORC)
Unlocking the Mystery of General Information Reporting Research Compliance Administration Training Presentation Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Presenter:Heather.
Office of Sponsored Programs November  Focus on What is Important  Proposal Structure  Proposal Development Process  Proposal Review.
Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
NIH Data Sharing Policy University of Nebraska Medical Center.
Sponsored Projects Office 1 RAPID Data Quality Phyllis M. Housel Gale Sponsored Projects Office SPO Process Review Meeting August 25, 2008.
ORO Reviews: Frequent Findings Related to IRBs Bob Brooks Associate Director Research Compliance Education and Policy VHA Office of Research Oversight.
Pre-Award Issues Related to Human Research and Animal Use March 15, 2013.
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
Future Use of Stored Samples & Data and the NIH Policy on GWAS and dbGaP NIAID/DAIDS Dione Washington, M.S. -- ProPEP Sudha Srinivasan, Ph.D.-- TRP Tanisha.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
1 Sex/Gender and Minority Inclusion in NIH Clinical Research What Investigators Need to Know! Presenter: Miriam F. Kelty, PhD, National Institute on Aging,
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research 1 Update on PHS New Rule on Financial Conflicts of Interest (FCOI) Presentation to Business Managers January.
HIPAA and Research Basics for IRB Tim Atkinson Director, Research and Sponsored Programs Director, Institutional Review Board Research Privacy Officer.
American Recovery and Reinvention Act (ARRA) Dartmouth College Updates March 2009.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting February 1, 2012 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting July 6, 2011 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
SARC: Participation and Protocol / Concept Review Robert Maki, MD PhD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
Western Oregon University INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
IRB Process Overview Ling Wang IRB Representative Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences.
Policy and Implementation Plan for Public Access to Scientific Publications and Digital Data from VA-Funded Research Tom Puglisi, PhD, ORO Executive Director.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing (GDS) Policy Kathleen Calzone, PhD, RN, APNG, FAAN Anjan Purkayastha, PhD December 2, 2015.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Jacquelyn L. Goldberg, J.D. VA IRB Chair Training April 8, 2004.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Use of Data from the Electronic Medical Record in Research Opportunities & Pit Falls Kristin West.
MPS Workshop 1: Gauging the Impact of Requirements for Public Access to Data November 19, 2015 Jennie Larkin, Ph.D. Office of the Associate Director for.
Office for Research Subjects (ORS) & Research Administration (ORA) In-Sync to Help Make your Research Happen Stephanie Gaudreau, Sr.Research Subjects Specialist,
Emerging SACHRP Issues K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Director, PRIDE Office of Research & Development Department of.
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting June 6, 2012 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
ROAD MAP: Getting a Cancer Study Done at Jefferson Sylvia O’Neill, MD Associate Director of Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance Clinical Trials Office.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
May 5, 2016 Working With CTO Contracting: How Do I Get My Clinical Trial Contract Negotiated & Why Isn’t It Signed Yet? Jaci Brown, Manager, CTO-Contracting.
Contract Compliance Training. Department Personnel Office of the General Counsel (OGC) Mario K. Castillo General Counsel John Guest Deputy General Counsel.
ROAD MAP: Getting a Cancer Study Done at Jefferson Meghan Wakefield,RN,CCRP Senior Director of Clinical Trials Office Clinical Research Organization.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network Data Management and Coordinating Center (RDCRN DMCC) Rosalie Holland LDN Investigator Meeting at WORLDSymposium.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Monitoring Practices
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.
Conditional IRB Approval
Award Set-Up and Advances
Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program
Clinicaltrials.gov Update
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Ceding Review: Using the new SmartIRB Online Reliance System
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP November 13, 2013
Anca Miron, PhD IRB Chair, UW Oshkosh Kelly Schill, BS, CIP
Informed Consent (SBER)
Purchasing Contracts Training
TRTO (Translational Research Trials Office)
CTSA27 So you want COMIRB to be your sIRB: What you need to know.
Presentation transcript:

NIH Genomic Data Sharing (GDS) Policy Kathleen Calzone, PhD, RN, APNG, FAAN Anjan Purkayastha, PhD February 22, 2016

The GDS Policy applies to all NIH-funded research that generates large-scale human or non-human genomic data as well as the use of these data for subsequent research Large-scale data include data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays, as well as genome sequence, transcriptomic, metagenomic, epigenomic, and gene expression data, irrespective of funding level and funding mechanism GDS Scope

The GDS Policy takes effect for competing grant applications and contract proposals submitted to NIH on or after January 25, The first round of grant applications submitted for the January 2015 cycle would likely receive funding in the late Summer or early Fall of To align with this the intramural programs were directed to comply with GDS on data generated on or after August 31, Genomic Data Sharing Policy Effective Dates

Within CCR, GDS will be implemented in phases. In the first phase all Human studies will implement the GDS policy effective December 1, For ongoing Human studies Genomic Data Sharing Plans should be submitted by December 31, Implementation of GDS policy across non-human studies will start in the second phase, date TBD. Genomic Data Sharing Policy Effective Dates

Thresholds for Data Sharing Expectations * Includes distinct individuals, species, strains, samples, treatments, time points, tissues, etc. Example: Data from 25 patients at 4 time points after treatment would reach a 100 sample threshold; Data from 50 tumor-normal comparisons would reach a 100 sample threshold.

Shareable Data: Additional Criteria Examples of smaller-scale projects that the NCI anticipates data sharing for (regardless of study design) include, but are not limited to: Projects examining rare cancers or rare cancer related outcomes, rare cancer subtypes. Projects focusing on under-studied populations. Based on NIH IC priorities, GDS policy may apply to smaller data-sets: State of science NCI’s programmatic priorities Utility of data to research community Journal(s) may require data sharing before publishing your manuscript

Examples of Research Outside the Scope of the GDS Policy Examples of projects outside the Policy’s scope include, but are not limited to, those that do not meet the criteria in the above examples and involve: XInstrument calibration exercises. XStatistical or technical methods development.

Genomic Data Sharing Plan (GDSP) Purpose of the GDSP Dataset value for use in secondary analyses Costs and other resource issues pertaining to data deposition, management, or access needs ( e.g., the availability of appropriate public data repositories or other data sharing mechanisms) Compliance and utility tracking Clinical Trial GDSP should be submitted to at the time of IRB review and as approval is being made.  CCR PSO working on study amendments for open protocols Other Research The GDSP should be submitted prior to data generation.  Ongoing studies must submit a GDSP if data generated on or after August 31, 2015.

Institutional Certification (IC) An IC must accompany the submission of all human data to the dbGaP at the time of study registration Explicit informed consent for open access data sharing should be provided by research participants for studies depositing full genome sequence into open access, whether sample or data collection is prospective or retrospective Assures that the Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviewed the informed consent and protocol to assure that that data sharing is appropriate and identified any data use limitations that may exist based on the language found in the consent Clinical Trials IC memo(s) should be filled immediately following IRB approval Other Research IC memo(s) should be filled out prior to data generation

Requests for Exceptions to Data Sharing, contd. In rare cases, NCI will consider requests for an exception to usual data submission expectations. Submission of genomic data may be precluded by: – international laws; limitations in the original informed consents; concerns about harms to individuals or groups; or other cases where expectations for data submission cannot be met. Exception Requests: Investigators provide a justification for any data submission exceptions prior to data generation and include an alternative data sharing plan. The Exception Request form should be signed by – Branch Chief – GPA and/or IRB, if using a consent justification for exception – CCR Scientific Director Trans-NCI Data Sharing Working Group for a recommendation NCI Scientific Program Leaders (SPL) for a consensus recommendation NCI Director for approval and signature NIH Deputy Director for Intramural Research for approval and signature.

Requests for Exceptions to Data Sharing NCI uses the following criteria to assess exception requests: Impact of data sharing compliance on scientific merit Unique resource High value resource Regulatory considerations – Missing consent from patients Ethical considerations NIH data sharing exception precedents Is there an acceptable alternative data-sharing plan (ADSP)? – Impact of ADSP on data re-use – Impact of ADSP on data discoverability – Burden – Feasibility In all cases where an ADSP is determined to be appropriate, information on how to request access to data and a basic summary of the study and study data will be listed in dbGaP (or other appropriate data repository).

Infrastructure, Resources for CCR GDS Policy

Developing a Genomic Data Sharing Plan (GDSP) The GDSP outlines a PI’s plan for generating genomic data: sample size; data type; estimated timeline; repository Each project/protocol requires a separate GDSP Each project under an Omnibus protocol needs its own GDSP A GDSP SOP ( SOP-RPS-21 ) has been developed for CCR GDSP Submission Process Overview: PI completes and submits a GDSP to the GPA The SD, or their delegate, and GPA reviews GDSP

Developing a GDSP: An example The CCR GDS website:

Registering a Clinical Study Institutional Certification (IC) : PIs are responsible for assuring, through an IC, that data have been collected with informed consent from participants and in accordance with federal regulations safeguarding participant privacy. A Clinical Study Registration SOP has been developed for CCR- RPS- 23. Clinical Study Registration Process Overview: – Before data generation On IRB approval develop a GDSP and submit to GPA and SD for approval After GDSP has been accepted, fill IC; sign; submit to GPA GPA reviews; forwards to SD for review SD reviews, signs and returns to PI with a copy to GPA Mail a signed copy of IC to PSO

Registering a Clinical Study contd. Clinical Study Registration Process Overview: – After data generation/QC/cleaning Contact GPA with a request to register study in dbGaP. Attach a copy of IC. You must register your study even if you have been granted a data-sharing exception. GPA will send you: –dbGAP study configuration template –dbGAP Basic Study Information Sheet. Complete forms and mail back to GPA GPA will: –Ensure that forms are completely and accurately filled out –Register the study in the dbGAP portal –Invite PI to review the registered study and determine who will be the data submitter – PI or designee as assigned by the PI Once registration is complete, dbGaP will send PI an invite to review study details After this you are ready to load your data into the SRA portal

Registering a Clinical Study: An example The CCR GDS website:

Questions and Answers Genomic Program Administrator (GPA) Kathleen Calzone, PhD, RN, APNG, FAAN , GPA Administrator Anjan Purkayastha, PhD ,

Scientific Director PI GPA/ GPA admin Protocol Support Office Fill. to GPA GDSP OK? YES. to SD NO. to PI with requested corrections Revise GDSP as per SD/GPA recommendations. Retain all versions for your records. Genomic Data Sharing Plan (GDSP) GDSP OK? YES. Sign. to GPA Retain copy for records. to PI Retain copy for records. to PSO Retain copy for records. NO. Send back to GPA Workflow for developing a GDSP for a Clinical Study

dbGaP PI GPA/GPA admin Scientific Director dbGAP docs OK? YES. Register study. Receive IRB approval. Develop GDSP. IC memo Fill and sign IC memo. GPA. Generate data. Complete QC. GPA. Request study registration. Attach signed IC memo. IC memo Sign. Return to PI. Signed IC memo PI dbGAP study docs dbGAP docs NO. Return w/ comments. Make edits. to GPA. dbGAP study Invite PI to review. Review dbGAP study. Work with GPA to make edits. Review and store IC memo. Fill. to GPA. Before data generation After data generation/QC Store. to PSO. Workflow for registering a Clinical Study Review. Send to SD IC memo