Time to HAART Resume after Structured Treatment Interruption is Strongly Associated with HIV DNA Level in PBMC at Interruption: Results of the ANRS 116.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kuala Lumpur, July 2nd 2013 The ANRS International VISCONTI Post Treatment Controller Cohort.
Advertisements

Tuberculosis incidence and risk factors among adult patients receiving HAART in Senegal: a 7-year cohort study Assane DIOUF et al. IRD/UMR 145 CRCF, CHNU.
Monica Gandhi MD, MPH Associate Professor and Women’s HIV Clinic provider, HIV/AIDS Division San Francisco General Hospital/ UCSF Safe Poz Love, U.S. Positive.
A Phase II non-comparative multicenter trial Fagard C. 1, Descamps D. 2, Dubar V. 3, Colin C.1,Taburet AM. 4, Roquebert B. 2, Katlama C. 5, Jacomet C.
Should we treat HIV Controllers ? IAS 2013 Pr Olivier Lambotte Department of internal medicine and clinical immunology Bicêtre Hospital, University Paris.
Morbidity During the 5 Years Following Initiation of Protease Inhibitor Therapy in HIV-infected Patients. Vincent Le Moing 1, Geneviève Chêne 2, Lise Cuzin.
TMC125 Safety and Tolerability: 24-week Results of the Pooled DUET-1 and -2 Trials R Haubrich, M Schechter, S Walmsley, M Peeters, M Janssens, G De Smedt.
Protective HLA Class I alleles are associated with reduced immune activation in Primary HIV infection Elizabeth Hamlyn 1, Stephen Hickling 2, Abdel Babiker.
T-cell activation positively correlates with cell-associated HIV-DNA level in PBMCs in viremic patients with acute or chronic HIV-1 infection Laurence.
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
Factors associated with a low HIV reservoir in patients with prolonged suppressive antiretroviral therapy S. Fourati 1, R. Calin 2, G. Carcelain 3, P.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Background There is uncertainty regarding the frequency, predictors, and outcomes of IRIS events Prior studies on IRIS have been limited to convenience.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
Catherine Kober Margaret Johnson Martin Fisher Caroline Sabin On behalf of UK-CHIC BHIVA/BASHH Manchester 2010 Non-uptake of HAART among patients with.
Determinants of long term adherence to antiretroviral drugs among adults followed over 54 months in Dakar (Senegal) M. Ciss 1, A. Desclaux 2, K. Diop 3,
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
HIV i-Base: SMART Study & CROI Feedback UK-CAB - Feb 2006 UK-CAB 24 February 2006 CROI Feedback: SMART Study Simon Collins.
Impact of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy on the Incidence of HIV- encephalopathy among perinatally- infected children and adolescents. Kunjal Patel,
Neurocognitive Impairment in HIV-Infected Subjects on HAART: Prevalence and Associations Kevin Robertson *1, Kunling Wu 2, Thomas Parsons 1, Ron Ellis.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 30 June - 3 July 2013 In chronically HIV-1-infected patients long-term antiretroviral therapy initiated above 500.
Immune Discordance on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Can Still be Regarded as a Therapeutic Success Nur F. Önen MD, MRCP 1, Rachel Presti MD PhD.
Glomerular lesions in HIV-1-infected patients: evolution from 1996 to 2007 on 88 consecutive renal biopsies. Clara Flateau, François-Xavier Lescure, Emmanuelle.
46 th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy September , 2006 San Francisco, California Poster #78 Tenofovir DF + Efavirenz.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Supported by: NIAID/NHLBI R24 AI067039, NIAID R21 AI Viremia copy-years: A measure of cumulative HIV burden among patients initiating antiretroviral.
12th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections February 22-25, 2005 Boston, Massachusetts, USA Poster No. 830 Hematological Benefit of Switching.
Maintenance therapy with Trizivir® after 6 months induction with Trizivir® plus either efavirenz or lopinavir/r in naïve patients. Trizefal study J. Mallolas*
Progressive histological liver improvement after sustained virological response to therapy in HCV / HIV coinfected patients. Jose L. Casado,
02-15 INFC Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: The SPIRAL study* 1 Date of preparation:
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
INTRODUCTION A previous cohort study from our unit suggested a benefit for the use of efavirenz compared to nevirapine in a group of patients initiating.
Transplantation in HIV Michelle Roland, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine UCSF Positive Health Program at SFGH.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy Study Wafaa El-Sadr and James Neaton for the SMART Study Team.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
T-cell activation positively correlates with cell-associated HIV-DNA level in PBMCs in viremic patients with acute or chronic HIV-1 infection Laurence.
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
Efavirenz Use Not Associated With Depressive Episodes, According to Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trial Outcomes Slideset on: Journot V, Chene G, De.
The JUPITER Trial Reference Ridker PM. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207.
Long-term clinical and viro-immunologic outcomes of post-treatment controllers (PTCs) in the ANRS-VISCONTI study Laurent HOCQUELOUX, MD Orléans’ Regional.
First-Line Treatment of HIV Infection With Either NNRTI- or PI-Based Regimens Effective for Long-term Disease Control Slideset on: MacArthur RD, Novak.
1 Predictors of virological failure in a Cambodian setting Sokkab An, M.D Sihanouk Hospital Center of HOPE (SHCH), Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
KLEAN Study: Fosamprenavir/Ritonavir Associated With Similar Efficacy and Safety as Lopinavir/Ritonavir SGC in Treatment- Naive Patients Slideset on: Eron.
Y. Yazdanpanah 1, C. Fagard 2, D. Descamps 3, A.M. Taburet 4, B. Roquebert 3, I. Tschope 2, C. Katlama 5, G. Pialoux 6, C. Jacomet 7, C. Piketty 8, D.
Tipranavir/Ritonavir Superior to Comparator PI/Ritonavir at Week 48 in Multiclass-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Hicks CB, Cahn P, Cooper DA, et al.
Adefovir Suppresses HBV DNA Levels in Lamivudine-Resistant HIV/HBV Patients Slideset on: Benhamou Y, Thibault V, Vig P, et al. Safety and efficacy of adefovir.
#AIDS2016 Dolutegravir (DTG) plus Rilpivirine (RPV) in Suppressed Heavily Pretreated HIV-Infected Patients A. Díaz, J.L. Casado, F.
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-2 (TMC125-C216)
1.
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Validating Definitions of Antiretroviral Treatment Failure in Malawi
Better Retention Rates Observed in Patients on Lopinavir than Atazanavir in Uganda
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-1 (TMC125-C206)
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Long-Term Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes Are Similar in HIV-Infected Persons Randomized to NNRTI versus PI versus NNRTI+PI-based Antiretroviral Regimens.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Presentation transcript:

Time to HAART Resume after Structured Treatment Interruption is Strongly Associated with HIV DNA Level in PBMC at Interruption: Results of the ANRS 116 SALTO trial C. Piketty 1, L. Weiss 1, S. Bachir-Cherif 2, L. Assoumou 2, M. Burgard 3, J-M. Ragnaut 4, M. Bentata 5, P-M. Girard 6, C. Rouzioux 3, D. Costagliola 2 and The ANRS 116 SALTO study group 1 Georges Pompidou hosp and Univ Paris 5, Paris; 2 INSERM U720 and Univ Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris; 3 Necker hosp and Univ Paris 5; 4 Pellegrin hosp, Bordeaux; 5 Avicenne hosp, Bobigny; 6 Saint-Antoine hosp, Paris, France.

Background Patients who started HAART under previous more aggressive treatment guidelines may wish to discontinue HAART Predictors of outcome in these patients would allow clinicians to make recommendations for these patients Measurable virologic and immune markers may reflect clinical stability after treatment interruption (TI)

Primary hypothesis A subset of patients who started HAART early based on previous guidelines ( ) could safely discontinue HAART without significant risk of disease progression

Objectives The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TI in chronically HIV- infected patients who started treatment based on earlier guidelines and to assess the predictive factors of the duration of TI including HIV DNA level in PBMCs at TI

Methods A prospective, open-label, multicentre trial of TI in patients who have been treated –with CD4 cell count >350 x10 6 /L and plasma HIV-RNA (VL)<50,000 copies/ml, –who have CD4 cell count >450 x10 6 /L and stable VL <5000 copies/ml and, –Stable HAART treatment within 6 months prior to inclusion and, – who experienced no more than one prior treatment failure. Criteria to resume HAART were a decrease in CD4 cell count to < 300 x10 6 /L or the occurrence of a B or C defining event.

Baseline demographics N = 99 Gender : male63 (64%) Age (years) median (range) 39.5 (24.8 – 79.6) Transmission group Homo/bisexual men Heterosexuals IVDUs 50 (51%) 38 (38%) 8 (8%) Prior AIDS event3 (3%)

Baseline laboratory values CD4 count (x 10 6 /L), median (IQR)809 (696 – 949) HIV RNA (log/mL), median (IQR) < 400 copies / mL 2.6 (2.6 – 2.6) 95 (96%) Nadir CD4, median (IQR) < 300 cells / mm cells / mm3 > 500 cells / mm3 382 (340 – 492) 12 (12%) 66 (67%) 21 (21%) Pre HAART VL, median (IQR) HIV DNA in PBMCs at inclusion 4.2 (3.9 – 4.5) 2.3 (1.9 – 2.8)

HAART history Time on HAART (y), median (IQR)5.3 (3.4 – 5.9) Triple Nucleoside based regimen37 (37%) NNRTI based regimen40 (41%) PI based regimen20 (20%) PI / NNRTI combination2 (2%)

Change in CD4 cell count Nbr pts

Change in HIV viral load Nb pts99 95% 94 56% 98 19% 97 9% 93 9% 92 10% 87 8% 89 7% 82 7% 78 9% 73 10% 60 3% 58 5% VL < 400

Change in HIV DNA in PBMC Nbr pts

Results: Primary End Point To month 12 –2 patients CD4 < 300/mm 3 –1 severe thrombocytopenia –No CDC C events –5 reinitiated HAART for other reasons Month 12 – Month 24 –7 additional patients CD4 < 300/mm 3 –1 additional severe thrombocytopenia –1 CDC C event (cutaneous KS with CD4=364/mm 3 ) –7 reinitiated HAART for other reasons From Month 24 –11 additional patients CD4 < 300/mm 3 (total 20) –No CDC B event (total 2) –1 additional CDC C event (cutaneous KS with CD4=648/mm 3 ) (total 2) –7 reinitiated HAART for other reasons (total 19)

Proportion of patient who did not meet the criteria to resume HAART Intent to treat*Observed data M1296.9% (91.2 – 98.9)91.9% (84.8 – 95.8) M2486.6% (78.0 – 92.2)75.4% (65.9 – 82.9) M3669.3% (58.0 – 78.7)52.7% (42.2 – 62.9) *CD4 < 300 or CDC B or C event

Predictors of time to CD4 < 300 or CDC B or C event (24/99) VariablesRelative Risk (CI 95); p HIV DNA (log10) > 2.56 CD4 nadir (log2) Pre HAART CD4 (log2) CD4 at inclusion (log2) Pre HAART VL (log10) Prior AIDS event Gender (female =1) Age (year) Transmission Group Duration of HAART 3.22 (1.38 – 7.54); (0.02 – 0.38); < (0.02 – 0.89); (0.08 – 1.36); (0.51 – 3.32); (2.01 – 43.36); (0.59 – 3.16); (0.94 – 1.04); (0.43 – 2.31); (0.74 – 1.29); 0.89

Predictors of time to CD4 < 300 or CDC event by month 36 multivariate analysis VariablesRelative Risk (CI 95); p HIV DNA (log10) > 2.56 CD4 nadir (log2) Prior AIDS event 2.49 ( ); (0.04 – 0.81); (1.18 – 26.78); 0.030

Cardiovascular events person-years of follow-up 4 cardiovascular events including one death –2 validated –2 validation pending –1.7/100 P-Y No renal or hepatic event

Discussion Single treatment interruption resulted in low progression rate at 36 months in this selected population –31% resume therapy for CD4 <300 or B/C CDC event –Few CDC C clinical events 2 cutaneous KS with CD4 > 350/mm /100 P-Y Rapid initial CD4 cell loss after stopping HAART then gradual loss Predictors of month 36 outcome –HIV DNA in PBMCs at entry > 2.56 log –Nadir CD4 –Prior AIDS events

Conclusion In patients who started HAART based on earlier guidelines, long term treatment interruption resulted in a low absolute risk of AIDS defining events or cardiovascular events In addition to CD4 nadir, HIV-DNA level is a useful tool to select patients at risk of disease progression if they undergo a prolonged treatment interruption

Acknowledgements ANRS 116 SALTO study group –Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny (M. Bentata); Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris (M. Kazatchkine, L. Weiss, C. Piketty, M. Karaman); Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris (P-M Girard, J-L Meynard ); Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, Paris (C. Katlama, R. Tubiana, A. Simon); Hôpital Bicêtre (J-F Delfraissy, C. Gougard); Hôpital Henri Mondor, Creteil (Y. Levy, ); Hôpital Tenon, Paris (G. Pialoux); Hôpital Necker, Paris (J-P Viard); Hôpital Saint Jacques, Besançon (B. Hoen); Hôpital Bichat, Paris (P. Yeni, R. Landman); Hôpital Sainte Marguerite, Marseille (JA. Gastaut, I. Poizot-Martin); Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux (JM Ragnaut); Hôpital Saint Jacques, Bordeaux (P. Morlat); Hôpital Brabois, Nancy (T. May); CHU de Caen (C. Bazin); CHU Strasbourg (JM. Lang); Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse (P. Massip); Hôpital de l’Archet, Nice (JP. Cassuto); Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon; Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours (P. Choutet) ANRS 116 SALTO Scientific committee –C. Piketty, L. Weiss, D. Costagliola, C. Rouzioux, M. Burgard, C. Goujard, J- P Viard, Y. Levy, G. Pialoux, J-L Meynard, S. Bachir Cherif, L. Assoumou, MJ. Commoy ANRS 116 SALTO DSMB –JL. Pellegrin, C. Fagard, L. Morand-Joubert, J. Gilquin THE PATIENTS ENROLLED IN THE ANRS 116 SALTO STUDY