Yasuyuki Kuroda OF Networks Co., Ltd. Consideration for Power-Saving functionality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Yasuyuki Kuroda OF Networks Co., Ltd. Consideration for Power-Saving functionality.
Advertisements

Doc.:IEEE /0365r1 March 2012 Z. Quan, Qualcomm Inc MAC Header Compression Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0883r1 Submission July 2010 Slide 1 Comment Resolution for “Spatial Reuse” Subgroup Date: Authors: Thomas Derham, Orange.
Submission doc.: IEEE ai May 2012 InterDigital, KDDI, Nokia, Huawei, Intel, Qcomm Slide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai Passive Scanning.
Speaker : 尹培華 Pei-Hwa Yin 指導教授:吳和庭老師 EPON Introduction 1.
MPCP (Multipoint Control protocol)
A Systematic Scheme for Multiple Access in Ethernet Passive Optical Access Networks Maode Ma, Member, IEEE Yongqine Zhu Tee Hiang Cheng, Senior Member,
1 Experiment And Analysis of Dynamic TCP Acknowledgement Daeseob Lim Sam Lai Wing-Ho Gordon Wong.
Next Generation EPON- based Access Network Architecture.
A Novel Multiple Access Scheme for Ethernet Passive Optical Network Professor : Ho-Ting Wu Speaker : Rui-Yi Jian 2004 – 08 – 11.
FiWi Integrated Fiber-Wireless Access Networks
Copyright: S.Krishnamurthy, UCR Power Controlled Medium Access Control in Wireless Networks – The story continues.
Wireless Software R&D Group, IITP RAS Kirill Andreev, Aleksey Kovalenko, Dmitriy Lakontsev Realization of IEEE802.11s draft standard in NS-3.3 Institute.
Chun Nie, Thanasis Korakis, and Shivendra Panwar Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Polytechnic University, Brooklyn A Multi-hop Polling.
Energy-Saving Scheduling in IEEE e Networks Chia-Yen Lin, and Hsi-Lu Chao Department of Computer Science National Chiao Tung University.
Doc.: IEEE /0089r0 Submission Listen interval update Jan 2013 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jinsoo Choi, LG Electronics.
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Multi-Power-Level Energy Saving Management for Passive Optical Networks Speaker: Chia-Chih Chien Advisor: Dr. Ho-Ting Wu Date: 2015/03/25 1.
Energy-Efficient PON with Sleep- Mode ONU Progress, Challenges, and Solutions Speaker: Shieh-Chieh Chien Advisor: Dr. Ho-Tin Wu 2013/09/23 1.
The Design of power saving mechanisms in Ethernet Passive Optical Networks Yun-Ting Chiang Advisor: Prof Dr. Ho-Ting Wu
An SSCOP-based Link Layer Protocol for Wireless LANs Haoli Wang and Aravind Velayutham IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference 1-5 December, 2003 San.
A Cooperative ONU Sleep Method for Reducing Latency and Energy Consumption of STA in Smart-FiWi Networks Speaker: Chia-Chih Chien Advisor: Dr. Ho-Ting.
Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.54 (Networking and Communication 2014), pp Pipelined Dynamic.
Design Considerations for UL Ranging Channels in m Document Number: S80216m-08/321 Date Submitted: Source: Yih-Shen Chen, Kelvin Chou,
DR-MPCP: Delayed REPORT message for MultiPoint Control Protocol in EPON Speaker: Chia-Chih Chien Advisor: Dr. Ho-Ting Wu Date: 2015/11/26 1.
TG4e doc.: IEEE e September 2008 W.-C. Jeong Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /0174r1 Submission Hang Liu, et al. March 2005 Slide 1 A Routing Protocol for WLAN Mesh Hang Liu, Jun Li, Saurabh Mathur {hang.liu,
Speaker: Shieh-Chieh Chien Advisor: Dr. Ho-Ting Wu 2014/05/26 1.
Ethernet Congestion Management Brad Booth, Intel September 2004.
Multi-carrier Handover Method IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1007 Date Submitted: Source:
Data Link Layer.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/1060r0 September 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 Receive Operating Mode Indication for Power Save Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE Submission September 2011 O. Omeni (Toumaz)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Data Link Control. The two main functions of the data link layer are data link control and media access control. The first, data link control, deals with.
Power control Considerations and framework for MS-MS Communications
Supporting Low Power Operation
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2013
Calibration using NDP Vincenzo Scarpa
Local-Traffic-Redirection-Based Dynamic Bandwidth Assignment Scheme for EPON With Active Forwarding Remote Repeater Node Chien Aun Chan, Manik Attygalle,
Power control Considerations and framework for MS-MS Communications
WUR coexistence with existing power save mode
How to collect STAs’ Tx demands for UL MU
IEEE Quality of Service
Gates vs. Windows and Scheduled Traffic
Demand of Being Woken Up While Moving Follow-up
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Ack/BA for mmWave Distribution Networks
Computer Science Division
Providing Faster GAS Response
CCI support of TDD stations
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Sept 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Proposed MAC Comment Resolutions Date Submitted:
Prioritized Active Scanning in TGai
Yun-Ting Chiang Advisor: Prof Dr. Ho-Ting Wu
Comment resolution on CID 20175
MPCP General Description
(60GHz New Technique Proposal)
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Fix the Issue on Number Of HE-SIG-B Symbols
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
Congestion Control Comments Resolution
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Providing Faster GAS Response
A unified transmission procedure for multi-AP coordination
Presentation transcript:

Yasuyuki Kuroda OF Networks Co., Ltd. Consideration for Power-Saving functionality

Concept of Power Saving 2 I introduced that a concept of functional changes which contributes for emerging telecom Power Saving issues at Orland meeting (3av_0803_kuroda_1.pdf). In this presentation, proposals of sequence for REPORT frame transmission are going to be introduced. - If the upstream data does not exist at ONU, only minimum number of Periodic Report frame should be submitted for keep the LINK of OLT. - If the upstream data exist at ONU, Report frames are submitted normally. e.g. 50ms : Periodic Report frame should be submitted for keep the LINK of OLT. - - Input upstream data OLT ONU :Gate frame :Report frame (no request for bandwidth) :Report frame (request for bandwidth) :Upstream data frame

3 The sequence example #1 of GATE/REPORT in Clause Input upstream data OLT ONU : GATE MPCPDU ( Force Report flag=1 ) : GATE MPCPDU( Force Report flag=0 ) : REPORT PCPDU#2 ( Transmission by MACR ) : Upstream data frame > OLT - GRANT is regularly provided by GATE MPCPDU. - GATE MPCPDU which has Force Report flag=1 appears with some interval. > ONU - ONU sends REPORT MPCPDU whenever it receives the GATE MPCPDU which has Force Report flag=1. - Although ONU doesn’t have the upstream traffic, it sends REPORT MPCPDU. - ONU doesn’t send any REPORT MPCPDU when the GATE MPCPDU has Force Report flag=0. - Output power is saved because ONU doesn’t send any REPORT MPCPDU when the GATE MPCPDU has Force Report flag=0. - The upstream latency increases because ONU waits for the GATE MPCPDU which has Force Report flag=1. GATE MPCPDU ( Force Report flag=1 ) REPORT MPCPDU#2 is transmitted - - Latency increases

4 The sequence example #2 of GATE/REPORT in Clause Input upstream data OLT ONU > OLT - GRANT is regularly provided by GATE MPCPDU. - Set every GATE MPCPDU which has Force Report flag =1. > ONU - Although ONU doesn’t have the upstream traffic, it sends REPORT MPCPDU. - ONU sends REPORT MPCPDU whenever it receives the GATE MPCPDU. - The upstream latency is smaller than example #1 because ONU sends REPORT MPCPDU instantly. - The power is larger than example #1 because ONU sends REPORT MPCPDU in response to every GATE MPCPDU. e.g. 1ms : No transmission of REPORT MPCPDU#1 GATE MPCPDU ( Force Report flag = 1 ) : REPORT MPCPDU#2 is transmitted : GATE MPCPDU ( Force Report flag=1 ) : REPORT PCPDU#2 ( Transmission by MACR ) : Upstream data frame

5 The sequence proposal #1 of GATE/REPORT for Power Saving > OLT - GRANT is regularly provided by GATE MPCPDU. - Usually, set GATE MPCPDU which has Force Report flag =0. It is allows that OLT sends GATE MPCPDU which has Force Report flag=1. > ONU - ONU responds to the GATE MPCPDU that has Force Report flag=0. REPORT MPCPDU contains; (a) A REPORT MPCPDU #1 (Periodic Transmission) with maximum interval if ONU requires no upstream traffic. (b) A REPORT MPCPDU #2 (Transmission by MACR) if ONU requires upstream traffic. - ONU sends REPORT MPCPDU #2 (Transmission by MACR) whenever it receives the GATE MPCPDU which has Force Report flag=1. - Output power is saved because ONU sends minimum number of REPORT MPCPDU. - The upstream latency is smaller because ONU sends REPORT MPCPDU instantly. - ONU sends REPORT MPCPDU whenever it receives the GATE MPCPDU which has Force Report flag=1 e.g. 50ms : Periodic Report frame should be submitted to keep the PON-LINK. - - Input upstream data OLT ONU GATE MPCPDU ( Force Report flag = 1 ) : REPORT MPCPDU#2 is transmitted : GATE MPCPDU ( Force Report flag=1 ) : GATE MPCPDU( Force Report flag=0 ) :REPORT MPCPDU#1 ( Periodic Transmission ) : REPORT PCPDU#2 ( Transmission by MACR ) : Upstream data frame

6 The sequence proposal #2 of GATE/REPORT for Power Saving > OLT - GRANT is regularly provided by GATE MPCPDU. > ONU - ONU responds to the GATE MPCPDU that has Force Report flag=0 and 1. REPORT MPCPDU contains; (a) A REPORT MPCPDU #1 (Periodic Transmission) with maximum interval if ONU requires no upstream traffic. (b) A REPORT MPCPDU #2 (Transmission by MACR) if ONU requires upstream traffic. - Output power is saved because ONU sends minimum number of REPORT MPCPDU. - The upstream latency is smaller than example #1 because ONU sends REPORT MPCPDU instantly. - In case of ONU doesn’t meet with condition of (a) and (b), it doesn’t send REPORT MPCPDU even if Force Report flag=1 e.g. 50ms : Periodic Report frame should be submitted to keep the PON-LINK. - - Input upstream data OLT ONU GATE MPCPDU ( Force Report flag = 1 ) : REPORT MPCPDU#2 is not transmitted : GATE MPCPDU ( Force Report flag=1 ) : GATE MPCPDU( Force Report flag=0 ) :REPORT MPCPDU#1 ( Periodic Transmission ) : REPORT PCPDU#2 ( Transmission by MACR ) : Upstream data frame

7 Pros & Cons ( Example #1, #2, Proposal #1, #2 ) Example #1Example #2Proposal #1Proposal #2 Power SavingOutput power is saved because ONU doesn’t send any REPORT MPCPDU when the GATE MPCPDU has Force Report flag=0. The power is larger than example #1 because ONU sends REPORT MPCPDU in response to every GATE MPCPDU. Output power is saved because ONU sends minimum number of REPORT MPCPDU. LatencyThe upstream latency increases because ONU waits for the GATE MPCPDU which has Force Report flag=1. The upstream latency is smaller than example #1 because ONU sends REPORT MPCPDU instantly. Pros Cons

study of the current specification 8 As for the sequence of GATE and REPORT processing, current MPCP specification allows implementation of not only proposal#1 and #2, but also example#1 and #2 or others since it does not specify behaibior of MACR from MAC control client and given GRANT depend upon DBA mechanism which are both out of scope of IEEE OLTONU MACRgate_period ic_timer Force Report flagGrantMACRreport_peri odic_timer Reception of Force Report flag=1 Current Clause 93 Noneless than 50 ms None ( It is decided by operating MACR. ) Noneless than 50 ms A REPORT frame should be issued. Example #1Noneless than 50 ms Force Report flag=1 appears with some interval. GRANT is regularly provided by GATE MPCPDU. ( * 1)less than 50 ms A REPORT frame should be issued. Example #2Noneless than 50 ms Force Report flag = 1the same as aboveNoneless than 50 ms A REPORT frame should be issued. Proposal #1 ( for Power Saving ) Noneless than 50 ms Force Report flag = 0the same as above( *2 )50 msA REPORT frame should be issued. Proposal #2 ( for Power Saving ) Noneless than 50 ms None ( It is decided by operating MACR. ) the same as above( *2 )50 msNone ( Standard violation ) ( * 1) When Force Report flag=0, ONU doesn’t send REPORT. ( * 2) (a) A REPORT MPCPDU #1 (Periodic Transmission) with maximum interval if ONU requires no upstream traffic. (b) A REPORT MPCPDU #2 (Transmission by MACR) if ONU requires upstream traffic.

9 Conclusions 1. Reduction of the number of REPORT frame transmission As conclusion of my study, in order to achieve the reduction of the number of REPORT frame surely, current CL93 may have to be modified in order to restrict improper implementation such as example#1 and 2. However, on the other hand, it seems that concept of MPCP specification is more like framework and open for various venders to implement their policies of DBA mechanism. Therefore, it is not exactly good idea to restrict any kind of implementation 2. Proposal From the reason above, I propose that some text which contain the attention for DBA implementer to reduce the number of REPORT frame transmission as much as possible for Power Saving requirement as informative massage if this is allowed in IEEE rule.