AIMSUN Advanced Interactive Microscopic Simulator for Urban and Non-urban Networks Adopted from Clara Fang/ Ondrej Pribyl.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transport Modelling Traffic Flow Theory 2.
Advertisements

Introduction to VISSIM
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 7 Introduction to Transport Lecture 7: Signal Coordination.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
The INTEGRATION Modeling Framework for Estimating Mobile Source Energy Consumption and Emission Levels Hesham Rakha and Kyoungho Ahn Virginia Tech Transportation.
Step-by-Step Tutorial NEXTA: Simulation Data Visualizer for TRANSIMS
Visual Traffic Simulation Thomas Fotherby. Objective To visualise traffic flow. –Using 2D animated graphics –Using simple models of microscopic traffic.
TYPES OF INTERSECTIONS OF ROAD AND DESIGN PARAMETERS OF INTERSECTION
Transportation & Highway Engineering
CTC-340 Signals - Basics. Terms & Definitions (review) Cycle - Cycle Length - Interval -. change interval - clearance interval- change + clearance = Yi.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
TRANSPORT MODELLING Lecture 4 TRANSPORT MODELLING Lecture 4 26-Sep-08 Transport Modelling Microsimulation Software.
1 Development of Capability-Enhanced PARAMICS Simulation Environment Lianyu Chu, Henry X. Liu, Will Recker California PATH ATMS Center University of California,
Lec 24, Ch.19: Actuated signals and detectors (Objectives) Learn terminology related to actuated signals Understand why and where actuated signals are.
Introduction to Transport
PASSER II SOFTWARE.
Customized Simulation Modeling Using PARAMICS Application Programming Interface Henry Liu, Lianyu Chu & Will Recker Paramics User Group Meeting February.
Optimal Adaptive Signal Control for Diamond Interchanges Using Dynamic Programming Optimal Adaptive Signal Control for Diamond Interchanges Using Dynamic.
Automatic loading of inputs for Real Time Evacuation Scenario Simulations: evaluation using mesoscopic models Josep M. Aymamí 15th TRB National Transportation.
Customized Simulation Modeling Using PARAMICS Application Programming Interface Henry Liu, Lianyu Chu & Will Recker.
A Glimpse inside the Black Box – Network Micro-simulation Models Ronghui Liu Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds, UK
2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 7 Field Operations.
We know traffic Roundabout Capacity and Performance (Revised June 2001) International Conference on Modern Roundabouts, September 1998, Loveland, Colorado,
Transportation Engineering
An Empirical Comparison of Microscopic and Mesoscopic Traffic Simulation Paradigms Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Qi Yang Caliper Corporation 14.
JUTS JSim Urban Traffic Simulator 1 J-Sim Urban Traffic Simulator J-Sim based, XML using grafical and console simulation tool. David Hartman ZČU-FAV-KIV.
RT-TRACS A daptive Control Algorithms VFC-OPAC Farhad Pooran PB Farradyne Inc. TRB A3A18 Mid-Year Meeting and Adaptive Control Workshop July 12-14, 1998.
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
Customized Simulation Modeling Using PARAMICS Application Programming Interface Henry Liu and Lianyu Chu.
Oversaturated Freeway Flow Algorithm
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
Oregon Microsimulation Roundtable March 2012
Considerations when applying Paramics to Strategic Traffic Models Paramics User Group Meeting October 9 th, 2009 Presented Matthew.
Capability-Enhanced PARAMICS Simulation with Developed API Library Lianyu Chu, Henry X. Liu, Will Recker California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways.
1 Modeling Active Traffic Management for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Terry Klim, P.E. Kevin Fehon, P.E. DKS Associates D.
Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.
Integration of Transportation System Analyses in Cube Wade L. White, AICP Citilabs Inc.
Arterial Lane Selection Model Moshe Ben-Akiva, Charisma Choudhury, Varun Ramanujam, Tomer Toledo ITS Program January 21, 2007.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Chapter 20: Actuated Signal Control and Detection
DKS Associates. 2 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Travel Demand vs. Simulation Models Micro vs. Meso Simulation Models US-101 Corridor Modeling.
Dr Hamid AL-Jameel 1 Developing a Simulation Model to Evaluate the Capacity of Weaving Sections.
The Comparison of PARAMICS ( MODELLER ), GETRAM( TEDI ), CORSIM, and VISSIM Roundabout Construction Interchange Construction Workzone Construction Data.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY DTA Anyway: Code Base & Network Development Lisa Zorn DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th, 2012.
Network effects from improved traffic signals Kristina Schmidt Transek AB.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Cooperative lane changing and forced merging model Moshe Ben-Akiva, Charisma Choudhury, Tomer Toledo, Gunwoo Lee, Anita Rao ITS Program January 21, 2007.
Dr. Essam almasri Traffic Management and Control (ENGC 6340) 9. Microscopic Traffic Modeling 9. Microscopic Traffic Modeling.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Network Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
A Dynamic Traffic Simulation Model on Planning Networks Qi Yang Caliper Corporation TRB Planning Application Conference Houston, May 20, 2009.
Behavior Control of Virtual Vehicle
Modeling Drivers’ Route Choice Behavior, and Traffic Estimation and Prediction Byungkyu Brian Park, Ph.D. Center for Transportation Studies University.
Kun-chan Lan and Chien-Ming Chou National Cheng Kung University
Hcm 2010: BASIC CONCEPTS praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
Development of PARAMICS Plug-ins with Application Programming Interfaces Henry X. Liu, Lianyu Chu, Will Recker PATH / UC-Irvine.
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
Performance Evaluation of Adaptive Ramp Metering Algorithms in PARAMICS Simulation Lianyu Chu, Henry X. Liu, Will Recker California PATH, UC Irvine H.
I-270/MD 355 Simulator: An Intelligent Online Traffic Management System Dr. Gang-Len Chang Nan Zou Xiaorong Lai University of Maryland Saed Rahwanji Maryland.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
DSRC and SPaT, SSM, SRM & MAP
September 2008What’s coming in Aimsun: New features and model developments 1 Hybrid Mesoscopic-Microscopic Traffic Simulation Framework Alex Torday, Jordi.
Traffic Simulation L0 – How to use AIMSUN Ing. Ondřej Přibyl, Ph.D.
Network Attributes Calculator
Karen Tsang Bureau of Transport Statistics Department of Transport
Non-recurrent Congestion & Potential Solutions
GREEN WAVE TRAFFIC OPTIMIZATION
* Topic 7 Field Operations
Introduction Traffic flow characteristics
Calibration and Validation
Presentation transcript:

AIMSUN Advanced Interactive Microscopic Simulator for Urban and Non-urban Networks Adopted from Clara Fang/ Ondrej Pribyl

2 Outline Introduction Practical Applications Capabilities Simulation Requirements Simulation Inputs Simulation Outputs Function Limitations

3 Introduction Introduction Developer –Transportation Simulation Systems (TSS), Barcelona, Spain – AIMSUN Ver 4 is integrated with GETRAM Simulation Environment Generic Environment for TRaffic Analysis and Modeling –Traffic Network Graphic Editor (TEDI) –AIMSUN –AIMSUN 3D

4 GETRAM External Applications Shortest Routes Component Network Database TEDI Graphical Editor Costs Routes GETRAM AIMSUN - User Interface AIMSUN2 Kernel GETRAM Extensions Simulated Data Control & Management Actions EMME/2 TRANSYT SCATS Interfaces

5 Microscopic Modeling Approach to Traffic Simulation Based on the movement of individual vehicle –Vehicle positions are updated using car-following logic and lane changing rules –Interactions between vehicles at unsignalized intersections are modeled by right-of-way and gap-acceptance rules –Explicit representation of control strategies at signalized intersections Detailed representation of network geometry and traffic related facilities Modeling of the variability in driver behavior and vehicle dynamics

6 Practical Applications Network traffic operational analysis and network design Evaluation of advanced traffic management systems and adaptive traffic control Evaluation of ramp metering at Minneapolis, USA Dynamic traffic re-routing with VMS by Halcrow Fox, UK Off-line and on-line design of traffic strategies by Momatec at Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany Traffic impact studies by Meritec at Auckland, New Zealand Actuated control system studies by DHV, Holland Public transport priority study by Elsag at Milan, Italy

7 Capabilities Urban networks, freeways, highways, ring roads, interchanges, roundabouts, arterials and any combination of them Public transportation Traffic incidents Vehicle types –cars,buses, trucks, trains or user-defined Fixed vs.Dynamic route choice models Interfaces –EMME/2 –TRANSYT 3D visualization

8 Capabilities Traffic Control and Management –Traffic signals (NEMA controllers) fixed-time, semi-actuated, fully-actuated Adaptive control –Signs –Ramp metering Green time, flow, delay –VMS Different message and Starting time –All kinds of detectors

9 Simulation Requirements (1) Network Geometry Vehicle’s data (2) Traffic Demand (3) Traffic Control Plan (4) Public Transportation (optional) (5) GETRAM Extensions (optional) Modelling parameters ( Default values are provided ) Scenario

10 Simulation Inputs (1) Network Geometry Sections (links) –length, width, number of lanes, speed limits, grade, etc. Nodes (Junctions and Joins) –turning movements for junctions Centroids –traffic source, sink or both Vehicles –type, size, vehicle characteristics Detectors, VMS, etc. Map of the area (optional)

11 TEDI : a user friendly graphic interface for building models TEDI : a user friendly graphic interface for building models

12 Network Model

13 Examples of Sections and Polysections

14 Section Properties

15 Examples of Joins

16 Examples of Junctions - Yellow Box Junction

17 Intersection - Turning Movements

18 Centroids

19 Vehicle Types Transfer between Library and Model

20 Importing backgrounds as.jpg,.bmp,.tif,...files

21 Simulation Inputs (2) Traffic Demand Result Based - Traffic Flows & Turning Proportions –generated at origin centroids and input into the network through the sections connected to the centroid –distributed around the network in accordance to the turning proportions defined in each section of the network. Route Based - O/D matrix and Shortest Paths –generated at origin centroids and input into the network through the sections connected to the centroid –distributed following shortest paths from input section to destination centroid.

22 Traffic Flows and Turning Proportions Define “State”

23 Simulation Inputs Signal –Signal types –Signal groups (turning movements are grouped) –Phases sequences and associated signals groups –Duration of each phase –Offset –Actuated parameters Unsignalized –Priority rules - Yield and Stop sign –Parameters that affect the Gap-acceptance model Ramp metering –Control parameters (green time, flow or delay time)

24 OD Matrix

25 Traffic Generation Arrival Distributions Exponential –Route based modeling Uniform –Result based modeling Normal Constant Other Arrival Models –ASAP (as soon as possible) –External (GETRAM Extensions)

26 Simulation Inputs (3) Traffic Control Signal –Signal types –Signal groups (turning movements are grouped) –Phases sequences and associated signals groups –Duration of each phase –Offset –Actuated parameters Unsignalized –Priority rules - Yield and Stop sign –Parameters that affect the Gap-acceptance model Ramp metering –Control parameters (green time, flow or delay time)

27 Typical signal plan

28 Uncontrolled Fixed External Actuated SCATS Traffic Signal Control Types

29 Traffic Signal Control Plan

30 Simulation Inputs (4) Public Transport (Optional) Public transport lines –Routs Reserved lanes –Bus stops –Vehicle type Timetables –Departure frequency –Fixed schedule PT Plan

31 Simulation Inputs (5) GETRAM Extensions (Optional) Application Programming Interface (API) –Develop external applications (traffic control systems) –Access to the statistical data produced by simulated detectors, VMS or ramp metering –Keep track of a guided vehicle throughout the network and directly control a vehicle movement –Programming in C/C++,or using Python scripting language

32 GETRAM extensions Principle of data exchange

33 Simulation Inputs (6) Modelling parameters Global –Reaction time, queue up speed and queue leaving speed, etc. –Car-following model Maximum number of vehicles, maximum distance, etc. –Lane changing model Percent overtaken, percent recover, etc. Local –Speed limit, turning speed, visibility distance at intersection, distance zone, etc. Vehicle Attributes

34 Simulation Algorithms Vehicle Arrivals Vehicle Attributes Global Simulation Parameters Car-Following Lane Changing Gap Acceptance

35 Vehicle Arrivals User may select among the following models: –Exponential –Uniform –(Truncated) Normal –ASAP –Constant –External Source

36 Vehicle Attributes Length Width (considered for graphics only) Maximum Desired Speed Maximum Acceleration Normal Deceleration Maximum Deceleration Speed Limit Acceptance Minimum spacing

37 Global Simulation Parameters Turning Speed Effects of Grade on Vehicle Performance Drivers’ reaction time - also the simulation time step - affects capacity! Reaction time when vehicle is stopped – affects queuing Speed to join the queue Speed to depart from a queue

38 Models of vehicle movements The vehicle movements is computed based on particular sub-models such as –Car-following model –Lane changing The vehicles are aiming to get to the desired speed… But are constrained by environment –Adjacent vehicles, speed limits, signal light, …

39 Principle In every simulation step (time based triggering) are the parameters recomputed according to following principle: if (it is necessary to change lanes) then Apply Lane-Changing Model endif if (the vehicle has not changed lanes) then Apply Car-Following Model endif

40 Car-Following Based on Gipps Model, which is a function of: –Type of Driver –Geometry of the Section Uses a 2-lanes car-following model to consider the effects of adjacent lanes as a function of: –Area to be considered –Number of vehicles in area

41 Computation of acceleration and deceleration (Source AIMSUN Manual)

42 Lane Changing Uses the Gipps Lane Changing Model It is based on: –Necessity of Lane Change –Desirability –Feasibility Algorithm “asks” each vehicle at every update: Is it necessary, desirable, feasible to change lanes?

43 Gap-Acceptance Used to answer the question: Is it “feasible” to change lanes? Evaluates gap to both upstream and downstream vehicles. There are segemetn sections defined in order to achieve more representative behavior

44 Gap acceptance model (Source AIMSUN Manual)

45 Simulation Outputs Statistical measures In network, O/D matrix, stream, section, turning, type of vehicles level –Mean Flow –Density –Mean Speed and Harmonic Mean Speed –Travel Time –Delay Time –Stop Time and Number of Stops –Queue Length (Mean and Maximum) –Total Travel Length –Fuel Consumed and Pollution Emitted

46 Simulation Outputs Storage of simulation outputs –ASCII files –Database (e.g. Microsoft Access) User- defined time interval Multiple runs Record simulation Comparisons of two sets of time series data (Validation) –Provides charts and statistical indicators –e.g., flows measured at a detector at each interval (5 minutes) vs. field data

47 Function Limitations No signal optimization No control delay output No signal phase switch information output

48 Thank you ! Questions & Comments?