Workshop on Air Quality Data Analysis and Interpretation Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) – US Approach.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving the Emissions Inventory Brad Toups, Manager Industrial Emissions Assessment August 12, 2004 Regulatory Forum.
Advertisements

Directive 2008/50/EC of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe These slides do not provide a complete description of the requirements.
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
Ozone Exceedances Assessment Department of Environmental Quality 5 Parish Baton Rouge Area Exceedances Occurred on: 8/8/02 9/11/02 4/27/037/18/038/18/03.
Houston Regional Monitoring HRM Houston Regional Monitoring Network Overview.
VOCs in Alberta’s Industrial Heartland AMS Annual Conference Rachel Mintz*, Robert D. McWhinney, Beau Chaitan, Curtis Englot, Réal D’Amours Environment.
Clark County Regional Ozone and Precursor Study (CCROPS) Robert A. Baxter, CCM T&B Systems Clark County Air Quality Forum – 03/14/06.
Operational Quality Control in Helsinki Testbed Mesoscale Atmospheric Network Workshop University of Helsinki, 13 February 2007 Hannu Lahtela & Heikki.
Earth and Atmospheric Sciences EAS535 Atmospheric Measurements and Observations II EAS 535
Air toxics measurements in a Seattle neighborhood Doris Montecastro and Hal Westberg Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Dept. of Civil and Environmental.
Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.
Presented by: Mike Hamdan South Coast Air Quality Management District Diamond Bar, CA Presented at: The Tribal Air Monitoring Training, Pechanga Reservation,
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling Division, Applied Modeling Research Branch October 8, 2008.
The Vertical Distribution and Stratification of VOC in the Atmosphere at Kaohsiung Area 2012 International Conference on Environmental Quality Concern,
Diurnal and seasonal cycles of ozone precursors observed from continuous measurement at urban site in Taiwan Kuang-Ling Yang, Chien-Chung Ting, Jia-Lin.
Q2010, Helsinki Development and implementation of quality and performance indicators for frame creation and imputation Kornélia Mag László Kajdi Q2010,
Earth System Sciences, LLC Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases Doug Blewitt, CCM 1.
1 PAMS IN THE OZONE TRANSPORT REGION March 2, 2011 MEDEP Monitoring Meeting Tom Downs, CCM Chief Meteorologist Maine DEP-BAQ
June 12 &13, 2007 Mickey Leland National Urban Air Toxics Workshop II – Houston, Texas 1 Albuquerque, New Mexico Community Scale Ambient Air Monitoring.
Investigation of Spatial Variation of Air Toxics in Three Houston-Area Neighborhoods Using Passive Sampling Thomas H. Stock, Maria T. Morandi, Masoud Afshar,
Updated Ozone CART Analysis, AQAST Meeting St. Louis, MO June 3-4, 2015.
1 Mexico Regional AMDAR Workshop November 2011 Data Quality Monitoring and Control (QM / QC) Axel Hoff Convenor of WMO AMDAR Panel‘s Science and Technical.
Citizen Air Monitoring in the Houston Area Jane Laping, Executive Director Mothers for Clean Air
Conceptual Design of an Enhanced Multipurpose Aerometric Monitoring Network in Central California NOV. 15, 2002 AWMA SYMPOSIUM ON AIR QUALITY MEASUREMENT.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 2 T. W. Tesche Dennis.
2011 National Air Quality Conferences March , 2011 Development of the USEPA Quality Assurance Guidance for the Collection of Meteorological Data.
Air Toxics Monitoring in the Houston- Galveston Area David Brymer, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Total OH reactivity at Cape Corsica during summer 2013
Research Progress Discussions of Coordinated Emissions Research Suggestions to Guide this Initiative Focus on research emission inventories Do not interfere.
Public Meeting to Discuss “Weekend Effect” Research June 23, 1999.
January 24, Update to CCAQS PC Final Projects for CCOS & CRPAQS.
Upper Green River Basin Wyoming Winter Ozone Study WESTAR Oil and Gas Conference September 12, 2007 Cara Keslar Wyoming DEQ - Air Quality Division.
Regional Modeling Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District USA.
Ozone Transport that Impacts on Tribal Land: Case Study Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
Statewide Protocol: Regional Application August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Luis F. Woodhouse.
Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg Results of the Measurement Strategy of the GCOS Reference Upper Air Network (GRUAN) Holger Vömel, GRUAN.
Comparison of simple and advanced regional models in industrial regulation Bernard Fisher Risk Forecasting and Decision Science Environment Agency Examples.
Ozone time series and trends Various groups compute trends in different ways. One goal of the workshop is to be able to compare time series and trends.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
Janice Lam Snyder, SMAQMD December 11, 2015
Baton Rouge Ozone: Cause & Effect A look into the Five Parish Baton Rouge Area Ozone Exceedances October 2, 2003.
Trace Gas Measurements at Appledore Island and Thompson Farm during the ICARTT 2004 Campaign Karl Haase New Mexico Tech Advisor: Dr. Barkley.
Module 11 Module I: Terminology— Data Quality Indicators (DQIs) Melinda Ronca-Battista ITEP Catherine Brown U.S. EPA.
November 16, Retrospective Analysis of Ambient and Emissions Data and Refinement of Study Hypotheses –Task 1: Review of Available Emissions Data.
 Remember Chemistry panel Quality Control:-  In a medical laboratory, it is a statistical process used to monitor and evaluate the analytical process.
Automated Operational Validation of Meteorological Observations in the Netherlands Wiel Wauben, KNMI, The Netherlands Introduction QA/QC chain Measurement.
Presentation to the Air Quality Forum – August 9, 2005 C lark C ounty R egional O zone and P recursors S tudy (CCROPS) Robert A. Baxter, CCM T & B Systems,
Workshop on Air Quality Data Analysis and Interpretation Evaluation of Emission Inventory.
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
Workshop on Air Quality Data Analysis and Interpretation Ozone Formation Potential.
Diagnostic clinical chemistry
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Whole Air Sampler ATom meeting Department of Chemistry UCI Donald R
A.Liudchik, V.Pakatashkin, S.Umreika, S.Barodka
SANAS in the 2008 National Framework Amendment
Hilary Main Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, CA
Session 4: Air Pollution Measurements
Shell Center for Sustainable Development Seminar
Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
Representative Measurements – AQ-Workshop Bucharest, July 2008
Handbook on Meteorological Observations
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
Brief Synopsis of Air Quality and Local/Regional Meteorology
other ‘emerging tools’
EEMEP ASSESSMENT REPORT
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Experience from the EMEP VOC measurements
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Meteorological Measurements for Improved Air Quality Modeling
Presentation transcript:

Workshop on Air Quality Data Analysis and Interpretation Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) – US Approach

PAMS Data Uses  Corroborate precursor emission inventories  Assess changes in emissions; corroborate emissions reductions (control strategy evaluation)  Assess ozone and precursor trends  Provide input to models; evaluate models  Evaluate population exposure

PAMS Sampling Sites  Type 1: Upwind and background characterization  Type 2: Maximum ozone precursor emissions impact  Type 3: Maximum ozone concentration  Type 4: Extreme downwind monitoring

PAMS Sampling Sites Schematic

PAMS Sampling Considerations  Site Location (Types 1-4)  Number of Sites Ozone and Precursors Upper-Air Meteorology  Sampling Frequency Hydrocarbons Carbonyl Compounds Upper-Air Meteorology

Ozone and Precursor Measurements Continuous measurements  Ozone  Nitrogen Oxides  Total Non-Methane Organic Compounds Time integrated sampling  Speciated NMOC’s  Carbonyl Compounds

PAMS Target VOCs COMPOUNDAIRS codeCAS code 1. Ethylene Acetylene Ethane Propylene Propane Isobutane Butene n-Butane t-2-Butene c-2-Butene Isopentane Pentene n-Pentane Isoprene t-2-Pentene c-2-Pentene ,2-Dimethylbutane Cyclopentane ,3-Dimethylbutane Methylpentane Methylpentane n-Hexane Methylcyclopentane ,4-Dimethylpentane Benzene Cyclohexane Methylhexane ,3-Dimethylpentane Methylhexane ,2,4-Trimethylpentane n-Heptane Methylcyclohexane ,3,4-Trimethylpentane Toluene Methylheptane Methylheptane n-Octane Ethylbenzene m & p-Xylene / Styrene o-Xylene n-Nonane Isopropylbenzene n-Propylbenzene m-Ethyltoluene p-Ethyltoluene ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene o-Ethyltoluene ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene n-Decane ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene m-Diethylbenzene p-Diethylbenzene n-Undecane

Collection and Analysis of Speciated NMOCs  Automated Approach – Automated Field GC analysis of Sorbent tube samples Whole-air samples  Manual Approach – Laboratory GC analysis of Sequential sampler for Sorbent tube samples Whole-air samples

PAMs Target Carbonyls Compounds Formaldehyde Acetaldehyde Acetone Propionaldehyde Crotonaldehyde Butyr/isobutyraldehyde Benzaldehyde Isovaleraldehyde Valeraldehyde Tolualdehydes Hexaldehyde 2,5-dimethylbenzaldehyde (Acrolein)

Collection and Analysis of Carbonyl Compounds  Sequential Sampler collecting carbonyl compounds as DNPH derivatives  Laboratory analysis of samples by HPLC

PAMS Sampling Frequency (during O 3 season)  Type 1 - Background 8 – 3 hr ave SNMOC samples every 3 rd day and 1 – 24 hr ave SNMOC sample every 6 th day.  Type 2 - Max. Emissions 8 – 3 hr ave SNMOC samples every 3 rd day and 1 – 24 hr ave SNMOC sample every 6 th day. 8 – 3 hr ave carbonyl samples on the 5 peak O 3 days plus each previous day and 8 – 3 hr samples every sixth day.  Type 3 – Max. Ozone and Type 4 - Downwind 8 – 3 hr ave SNMOC samples every 3 rd day and 1 – 24 hr ave SNMOC sample every 6 th day.

PAMS Surface Meteorological Monitoring  At each monitoring site Wind direction Wind speed Ambient temperature Humidity (e.g., dew point or relative humidity)  At least one network site Solar radiation Ultraviolet radiation Barometric pressure Precipitation

Capabilities and Limitations of Vertical Profiling Systems VariableTowerSodarMini- Sodar RADARRADAR with RASS Radio- sonde Tether- sonde Wind speed m m m m 10m- 10km m Wind direction m m m m 10m- 10km m Wind sigmas m m m m Rel. Hum m 10m- 10km m Temp m m 10m- 10km m

Example flow chart for data analysis

Purpose of Data Validation  Definition "The purpose of data validation is to detect and then verify any data values that may not represent actual air quality conditions at the sampling station. Effective data validation procedures usually are handled completely independently from the procedures of initial data collection. Moreover, it is advisable that the individuals responsible for data validation not be directly involved with data collection." (U.S. EPA, 1984, Sec , p.10)  Why is Data Validation Important? Data validation is necessary to identify data with errors, biases, and physically unrealistic values before they are used for identification of exceedances, for analysis, or for modeling.

Data Validation Definitions  Outliers Data physically, spatially, or temporally inconsistent.  Level 0 Data Validation Conversion of instrument output voltages to their scaled scientific units using nominal calibrations. May incorporate data logger inserted flags.  Level 1 Data Validation Observations have received quantitative and qualitative reviews for accuracy, completeness, and internal consistency. Final audit reviews required.  Level 2 Data Validation Measurements are compared for external consistency against other independent data sets (e.g., comparing surface ozone concentrations with ozone concentrations from nearby aircraft flights, intercomparing radionsonde and radar profiler winds, etc.).  Level 3 Data Validation Continuing evaluation of the data as part of the data interpretation process.

Example of Quality Control Flags FlagDescriptionExplanation 0Valid Observations judged accurate within the performance limits of the instruments. 1Estimated Observations required additional processing because original values were suspect, invalid, or missing. 7Suspect Values judged to be in error because they violate reasonable physical criteria or do not exhibit reasonable consistency, but a specific cause of the problem is not identified. 8Invalid Values judged to be inaccurate or in error, known cause of the inaccuracy or error. 9Missing Observations not collected. Values assigned -999.

Data Validation Procedures  Assemble Level I database.  Place data in a common data format with descriptive information concerning variables, validation level, QC codes, and standard units.  Ensure that results of and suggestions from final audit reports have been incorporated into the database.  Review simple statistics for unrealistic maxima or minima and for consistency with nearby stations (still Level I)  Perform spatial and temporal comparisons of the data (begin Level II).  Perform intercomparisons of the data (e.g., from two different instruments). Data now Level III.

VOC Data Validation Tools & Tips  Overall Total VOC --> Species groups --> Individual species Inspect every species  Time Series Inspect time series for the following: Large "jumps" or "dips" in the concentrations Periodicity of peaks, calibration carryover Expected diurnal behavior (i.e., isoprene) Expected relationships among species High single-hour concentrations of less abundant species

VOC Data Validation Tools & Tips (continued)  Scatter Plots Prepare scatter plots of the following: Total NMOC vs. species group totals, vs. individual species Benzene vs. Toluene, Acetylene, Ethane Species that elute close together Isomers Other  Fingerprints Prepare and inspect fingerprint plots for the following: Identify calibration data. Investigate hours surrounding suspect and invalid data. Obtain overall view of diurnal changes.

VOC Data Validation Tools & Tips (continued)  Additional Data To further investigate outliers, use: Wind direction data Other air quality data (e.g., ozone, NO x ) Subsets of data (e.g., high ozone days only) Industrial or agricultural operating schedules Traffic patterns Other