Phase I/II study of oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 plus oral Leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer T. Yoshino 1, W. Koizumi 2,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Randomized phase III study of S-1 alone versus S-1 + cisplatin in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer ( The SPIRITS trial ) SPIRITS: S-1 plus cisplatin.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Efficacy and Safety of Single Agent Sunitinib in Treating Advanced Hepatocelluar Carcinoma Patients After Sorafenib Failure: A Prospective, Open-Label,
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Xeloda ® plus oxaliplatin: rationale in colorectal cancer (CRC)  Oxaliplatin is active in CRC, especially when combined with 5-FU/leucovorin (LV)  Superior.
Van Cutsem E et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract LBA4509. (Oral Presentation)
Phase III studies of Xeloda® in colorectal cancer (CRC)
Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) upregulation Dose- and time-dependent upregulation of TP in human colon cancer xenografts PaclitaxelDocetaxel.
A Phase III trial of 5-FU/l-leucovorin/ irinotecan (FOLFIRI) versus irinotecan/S-1 (IRIS) as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
N. Boku, S. Yamamoto, K. Shirao, T. Doi, A. Sawaki, W. Koizumi, H. Saito, K. Yamaguchi, A. Kimura, A. Ohtsu Gastrointestinal Oncology Study Group of Japan.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Xeloda ® monotherapy in pancreatic cancer: phase II study  42 patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer received intermittent Xeloda 1,250mg/m.
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
Phase I/II Trial of Docetaxel plus Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (D-FOX) in Patients with Untreated, Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Cancer Jaffer.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates TAS102 and BSC vs. Placebo and BSC Reviewer: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October 2011.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Niall C. Tebbutt International randomised phase III study of capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin C in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal.
Safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin – fluoropyrimidine regimens with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC):
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Administered in a Continuous Once-Daily Dosing Regimen in Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
EORTC OSN/CTOS11 Safety of Caelyx combined with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Final.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
Phase III Study of First-Line XELOX Plus Bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 Cycles Followed by XELOX Plus BEV or Single Agent (s/a) BEV as Maintenance Therapy in.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
Discussant: M Ducreux, MD, PhD Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif France TH-302 plus Gemcitabine vs. Gemcitabine in Patients with Untreated Advanced Pancreatic.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
A Phase I Study of MEK162 and FOLFOX in chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer May Cho, Dean Lim, Timothy Synold, Paul Frankel, Lucille Leong,
May 29 - June 2, 2015 TIGER-X: Rociletinib Activity in EGFR T790M Mutant NSCLC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* *CCO.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 SINGLE AGENT DOXORUBICIN VS DOSE INTENSIVE COMBINATION THERAPY WITH EPIRUBICIN / IFOSFAMIDE IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADULT.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Reviewer: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: December 12th, 2011
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, CPT-11: Use and Sequencing (MRC FOCUS)
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
Presentation transcript:

Phase I/II study of oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 plus oral Leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer T. Yoshino 1, W. Koizumi 2, K. Yamaguchi 3, Y. Miyata 4, T. Kato 5, Y. Toh 6, A. Sawaki 7, I. Hyodo 8, T. Nishina 9, N. Boku 1 1 Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, JAPAN, 2 Kitasato University East Hospital, Kanagawa, JAPAN, 3 Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, JAPAN, 4 Saku Central Hospital, Nagano, JAPAN, 5 Minoh City Hospital, Osaka, JAPAN, 6 National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, JAPAN, 7 Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, JAPAN, 8 University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, JAPAN, 9 NHO Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, JAPAN.

Background: The results of phase I portion of the treatment with the oral S-1 (a new oral fluoropyrimidine) plus oral leucovorin (LV) in patients (pts) with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was reported at ESMO Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were grade 3 stomatitis/pharyngitis, nausea, diarrhea, ileus and exanthema. The recommended doses (RDs) for this phase II portion were determined to be S mg/body and LV 25 mg/body orally given twice daily on days 1 to 14 of a 28-day cycle. The PK profiles of S-1 plus LV were similar to those of S-1 monotherapy and UFT plus LV, respectively. The main purpose of this phase II portion is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus LV at RD level in pts with untreated mCRC. Methods: Pts were eligible as follows; unresectable mCRC with no prior chemotherapy or receiving adjuvant chemotherapy completed at least 6 months before, histologically proven adenocarcinoma, PS(ECOG) 0-2, age 20 to 75, measurable lesions, adequate organ function and written informed consent. The pts received mg/body of S-1 plus 25 mg/body of LV twice daily as RD in this phase II portion. The primary endpoint was the objective response rates (RRs), and secondary endpoints were time to progression (TTP) and toxicities. Results: Between Sep 2004 and Jun 2006, 56 pts of 65 enrolled pts received the treatment at RD level. The objective RRs were 57% (37 of 65) for all pts and 57% (32 of 56) for pts at RD, extramurally. Disease control rates (DCRs) were 86% (56 of 65) for all pts and 86% (48 of 56) for pts at RD. Median TTP was 6.8 months for pts at RD. The median survival time is under investigation. During the 6 courses from starting the treatment, the most common grade 3/4 toxicities at RD were as follows: neutropenia, 13%; diarrhea, 27%; stomatitis, 20%; and anorexia 21%. Conclusions: A combination of S-1 plus oral LV is an effective, well tolerated, and convenient regimen in pts with untreated mCRC, without the addition of either oxaliplatin or irinotecan. This trial was supported by Taiho pharmaceutical co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. Updated Abstract

A novel oral fluoropyrimidine derivative consists of 1M tegafur (FT; prodrug of 5-FU), 0.4M of gimeracil (CDHP) and 1M of potassium oxonate (Oxo) A oral leucovorin (LV) enhances anti-tumor activity of S-1 Biological action of S-1 and Leucovorin

Background S-1 monotherapy showed promising activity (response rate (RR) of 37% as 1 st line chemotherapy) against previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with conventional dosage ( mg/body BID) and schedule (28 days of administration periods followed by 14 days rest) Better activity against mCRC is expected when leucovorin (LV) is orally administered with S-1 The efficacy and safety of S-1 plus oral LV have not been studied yet in clinical trials Study Rationale

Level 2 (S-1 28 days administration) is the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination therapy Level 0 (S-1 14 days administration) is the recommended dose (RD), in terms of the continuity of planned 2 courses without any cessation or dose reduction DLTs were diarrhea, stomatitis/pharyngitis, nausea, ileus, and exanthema S-1 plus oral LV may be promising treatment against untreated mCRC, achieving a high response rate of 66.7 % (95% confidence interval; 38.4~88.2 %) The PK parameters of S-1/LV, especially 5-FU and 5-MeTHF, were similar to those of S-1 alone and UFT/LV, respectively Summary of Phase I portion Administration periods of S-1/LV Dosage of S-1: mg/body BID Dosage of LV: 25 mg/body BID administered orally together with S-1

Summary of Phase I portion (continue) ** The PK parameters were recalculated using those from two previous studies 1,2). The values of concentrations at the same sampling time with the present S-1/LV study were used in calculation, and the data from patients with gastrectomy were excluded from this analysis. 1) Hirata K. et al., Clin Cancer Res (1999) 2) Shirao K. et al., J Clin Oncol 22 (17) (2004) PK parameter

Objectives To assess the response rate of S-1/LV at the RD To evaluate the following at the RD Primary endpoint Secondary endpoints Time to progression (TTP) Time to treatment failure (TTF) Overall survival (OS) the safety profile the efficacy about

Key Eligibility Criteria Histologically or pathologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma Advanced, metastatic and unresectable cancer with measurable disease Age 20 – 75 years No prior chemotherapy for the metastatic disease. The adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed if chemotherapy had finished more than 180 days before the entry. Performance Status (ECOG scale) : 0-2 Adequate hematological, renal and liver function Written informed consent Life expectancy > 90 days

Treatment S-1+LV p.o. BID 2 wks-on 2wks-off S-1: mg/body BID Initial dosage (tegafur equivalent) < < 1.5 < mg BID 50 mg BID 60 mg BID Body surface area (m 2 ) LV: 25 mg/body BID administered orally together with S-1 -

Statistical Analysis RR of S-1 monotherapy was 16.7% % Defined as minimum activity was 30% and target activity was 50%  error was 0.05 and  error was 0.2 We estimated 54 patients (pts) of full analysis set were required

Results of phase I/II portion at the recommended dose Period From October 2005 to June 2006 Center 12 centers Patient 56 pts (6 pts – phase I portion) Response RECIST (extramurally) Safety NCI CTCAE v3.0 Patients and Assessments

Patients Characteristics n=56 (RD)

Treatment Courses Total courses during the 6 courses from starting the treatment

Efficacy Response Rate CI: Confidence Interval *: reviewed extramurally

Relative Dose Intensity (RDI) of S-1 During the 6 courses from starting the treatment RDI(%) is calculated by actual DI based on planed DI

Time to Progression (TTP) TTP; 203 days (6.8 Months) [ 95 % CI; ~ 241.0]

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) TTF; 182 days (6.0 Months) [ 95 % CI; ~ 237.0]

Overall Survival (OS) MST: not reached Median follow-up time : 447 days

Common Toxicities During the 6 courses from starting the treatment CTCAE v3.0

Reason for treatment Discontinuation Progressive disease48 pts Rescue surgery due to tumor shrinkage 1 pts Toxicity 2 pts Pt’s refusal 1 pts Total52 pts level 0 (RD): Four pts are ongoing

Summary Major adverse reactions are gastrointestinal toxicities, without Gr4 severe toxicities There are no treatment-related death and the incidence of treatment discontinuation due to toxicity is only 3.8% Promising anti-cancer effect of S-1 with oral LV is shown in this study

A combination of S-1 plus oral LV is an effective, well tolerated, and convenient regimen in pts with untreated mCRC Further investigations of this combination chemotherapy with adding other active agents, such as oxaliplatin and bevacizumab, are warranted Conclusions

References Ohtsu A, et al. Br J Cancer. 2000;83: Hyodo I, et al. ESMO Abstract #349P Shirao K, et al. Cancer 2004; 100: Sugimachi K, et al. Oncology. 1999;57: