AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6.
Advertisements

Implementing NICE guidance
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
An Introduction to the Ethics Review Procedure Lindsay Unwin: Research & Innovation Services, UREC Secretary.
The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
PRESENTATION ON MONDAY 7 TH AUGUST, 2006 BY SUDHIR VARMA FCA; CIA(USA) FOR THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS – INDIA, DELHI CHAPTER.
Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking.
Child Safeguarding Standards
OECD/INFE High-level Principles for the evaluation of financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD.
Strengthening Parent Carer Participation
Dr. Julian Lo Consulting Director ITIL v3 Expert
Children’s Social Care Workload Management System (WMS) A Two-fold approach DSLT 16 th November 2010 Updated with new SWRB standards.
Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?
1 The role of social work in personalised adult social care and support Social Work and Personalisation: Skills for Care Wednesday 25 th June 2014 Lyn.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
Supporting you to understand research governance and ethics Emily Lamont Senior Research Manager NFER Claire Easton Senior Research Manager NFER
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Council for Disabled Children May What is Independent Support? A 2-year programme to provide additional support to young people and parents during.
Improving Corporate Governance in Malaysian Capital Markets – The Role of the Audit Committee Role of the Audit Committee in Assessing Audit Quality.
Audit Commission Presentation Salford City Council Consideration of the financial statements.
Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval
Future Aspirations Dr Maire Shelly Associate Postgraduate Dean North Western Deanery.
Strategic Commissioning
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
Audit Advisory Committee Department of Adult Services, Health and Housing: Public health transition risk (DASHH0083) Red risk 13 November 2012.
OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.
Advocacy and the Care Act Lucy Bonnerjea, Department of Health,
Introduction to Evaluation Odette Parry & Sally-Ann Baker
Report on the Evaluation Function Evaluation Office.
Developing a Referral Management Plan. Background Hospital referral rates in England have increased significantly over recent years, resulting in the.
Transforming Community Services Commissioning Information for Community Services Stakeholder Workshop 14 October 2009 Coleen Milligan – Project Manager.
Cardiff and Vale UHB Bwrdd lechyd Prifysgol Caerdydd a’r Fro NHS R&D Overview How to avoid the common pitfalls? Thomas Fairman Research Liaison Manager.
Countdown to April 2012 Ensuring all students get quality careers education and guidance.
Name Position Organisation Date. What is data integration? Dataset A Dataset B Integrated dataset Education data + EMPLOYMENT data = understanding education.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
Proposed Review of the National Framework for Continuing Care.
Considering the range of stakeholder perspectives in the development and delivery of personalised local services Alex Mills National Services Manager KIDS.
Practical Investment Assurance Framework PIAF Copyright © 2009 Group Joy Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved. Recommended for C- Level Executives.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
Safety Matters: developing practice in safeguarding adults Directors’ Policy Forum 19 June 2008.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
AUDIT OF INTERNAL CONTROL Day V Sessions I & II. Session Overview Periodical audit of existence of internal control in order to examine its effectiveness.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Information Sharing for Integrated Care A 5 Step Blueprint.
CAPA in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services An independent evaluation by the Mental Health Foundation 2009 National CAMHS Support Service.
Business Cases 15 th March What is a business case? Statement of total impact (quality and financial) of undertaking a proposal – what will change.
SUPPORTING PEOPLE PROVIDER FORUMS An overview of Supporting People’s new approach to Performance Monitoring and Quality Assurance.
DECC Framework Contract for Innovation Delivery Support – presentation to potential contractors Thursday 20 October.
Good Governance of Community- based and Community-managed Not-for-Profit Organisations.
WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP TO DELIVER PUBLIC SERVICE CONTRACTS SOME THINGS TO CONSIDER.
Patient and Public Involvement Practice Development Day Thursday 17 October 2013.
12. Reporting Template The template below outlines the key information you need to provide within your evaluation report. Note: use this as a guide as.
Effective Board Governance & role of the Audit Committee Presentation by Cluster Audit Committee – July / August 2012.
Evaluation Planning Checklist (1 of 2) Planning Checklist Planning is a crucial part of the evaluation process. The following checklist (based on the original.
Pre-school Learning Alliance Organising, Operating and Delivering the service at Queens Park Children’s Centre.
How to show your social value – reporting outcomes & impact
Resource 1. Involving and engaging the right stakeholders.
Information Sharing for Integrated care A 5 Step Blueprint
Workforce & Practice Transformation
Equality and diversity – session 2
Personal Wheelchair Budget Programme
Finance Training for Governors
Assess Plan Do Review Resource 1. Resources
Resource 1. Evaluation Planning Template
Gem Complete Health Services
Safeguarding Adults local procedures
Presentation transcript:

AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation question? Consider evidence Will I be able to use the results of the evaluation? Consider context Will these evaluation results provide me with useful information that will be considered “value for money”? Do benefits of conducting the evaluation out way costs and consequences. Do I have the resources and/or skills available to undertake this evaluation? Consider how Will the information I collect be able to answer my evaluation question (the evaluations aims and objectives)? Consider quality and accessibility of data Is it the right time to conduct an evaluation of the service? Consider: Stage of development and complexity of the service Timescales of the service Context the service is operating in Are there other options to doing an evaluation? Consider: Are current project processes such as monitoring enough? Should I consider other options such as clinical audit, quality improvement or research? Resource 1. Do I need to be doing an evaluation? Evaluation requires an investment of time, money and resources and so before you begin you need to assess whether you should be conducting an evaluation before making this investment. The following questions will help you to start to consider whether you need to and can do an evaluation, we recommend that you consider these in partnership with your stakeholders. You may not be able to answer them all straight away but useful to keep in mind when planning your evaluation. For more information on “Evaluability Assessment” the following resources will help: An Evaluability Assessment may be useful in determining whether the service is ready to be evaluated and what type of evaluation is required.

AssessPlanDo Review Resource 2. Resources It is important to consider what resources are required for the evaluation from the outset. This may need to be reviewed throughout the planning process. The resource requirements will be informed by the type of evaluation you need (and quite often impact on the design of your evaluation). This is an important step and should be considered early when planning and developing your service (i.e. business case, QIPP scheme, service specification, intervention, programme or project). QuestionEvaluation Resources Who is responsible for overseeing the delivery of the Evaluation? There will usually be an identified lead for the evaluation who can often be the project/service manager or the commissioner. You will also want to consider your reporting (governance) arrangements for the evaluation, this may be an established project group or committee. Who should be involved in the evaluation? Who can help you to deliver this evaluation? Who are your key stakeholders? Are there local experts that can help? Discuss lay involvement with your PPI lead - service users and their families are often well placed to help evaluate the services. What resources are available to support the evaluation? Include financial resources This could be money and/or staff time depending on the evaluation. If you are conducting an internal evaluation then you will need input from staff. If you need to commission an external evaluation then you will need to also identify a budget (approximately 10% of the project value). Utilise existing data and project resources where possible and appropriate. Who will conduct the evaluation?Evaluations can be conducted internally, externally by an independent organisation or a mixture of the two. What you decide will depend on the purpose of your evaluation (i.e. if it is to inform and improve then an internal evaluation may be adequate; if it is to demonstrate a level of accountability then you need to consider an external evaluation), the level of risk involved to the organisation and the participants and the skills and resources available. Plan your evaluation early in the commissioning cycle. This will enable you to ensure that you use the most appropriate methodology, collect the right data, allocate adequate resources and set appropriate timescales. Our service evaluation guide and website tbc provides you with guidance on commissioning an independent external Evaluation and template to set out your invitation to tender.

AssessPlanDo Review Ethics and Governance If you are doing a service evaluation then you will need to comply with your local and/or organisational ethics and governance processes. These local and organisational processes may vary and so it is important to ensure that you obtain the right advice and seek the right permissions. If you are unsure check with your local experts, these could be a Research and Development lead, Clinical Governance lead, an Evaluation lead or a University Ethics department. Engage with your local research and information governance experts As a service evaluation you do not need any formal ethical approval from an NHS Ethics Committee, however every service evaluation should ensure they apply best practice when it comes to ethics ensuring that adequate safeguards are put in place and that the benefits of conducting an evaluation outweigh the risks. This will involve reviewing your evaluation during the design, delivery and dissemination to ensure any ethical issues are identified and actions are put in place to address them. This will include ensuring appropriate informed consent is obtained from participants, confidentiality and anonymity are maintained and the study complies with your organisation‘s information governance and data protection policies and procedures. Particular consideration needs to made for any participants that may be considered vulnerable such as children and people who lack capacity. We suggest that you keep a record of the result as a part of your evaluation plan as this acts as an audit trail. We also recommend that you check with your own organisation to ensure that you comply with local arrangements when it comes to the governance and ethics of your evaluation. Resource 3. Am I doing an evaluation? Once you have identified the need to do an evaluation and planned your approach it is important that you check that you are doing a service evaluation and not research. To do this we recommend you use the Health Research Authorities tool to help you to assess this or contact your local experts such as your research and development department.