New CPUC Order on Pole Attachments Wireless West Conference Anaheim, California April 21, 2016 Charlotte F. TerKeurst Program Manager Electric Safety and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safety Absolutes Green Lake
Advertisements

August 21, 2012 Western Regional Gas Conference Paul Gustilo Southwest Gas Corporation.
1 PSE&G’s Solar 4 All™ Program: Pole-Attached Solar Installations in Your Area December 22, 2009 January 12, 2010.
2013 ADC INSTALLATION INNOVATION FORUM | PAGE 2 Legal Authorities for Partnerships and Shared Services Jennifer Curtin January 16, 2013.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: numerous photo contributions courtesy of Robert Stephenson of Facilities Joint Use Thanks, Rob!
BS9990 : 2015 Updates and/or Changes
CPUC Procurement Policies Robert L. Strauss California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division - Procurement Section.
Straight Talk on Tough Infrastructure Access Issues Charles A. ZdebskiEric B. Langley Troutman Sanders LLPBalch & Bingham LLP Washington, DCBirmingham,
Utilities in MaineDOT’ s Right of Ways. MaineDOT’ s Jurisdiction All State and State Aid roads. All Facilities and.
Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association Legal Seminar November 6, 2014 Sean Stokes The Baller Herbst Law Group, P.C P Street, N.W. Washington,
Learning Forum: Regulatory Issues Affecting Contracts and Operations in the Near Term Presented to the SEE Joint Use Committee by Charles A. Zdebski Troutman.
Oregon Public Utility Commission Safety & Reliability Section J.R. Gonzalez, P.E., Manager Jerry Murray, Sr. Utility Analyst Gary Putnam, Utility Analyst.
CLIMBING SPACE Section 236
Net Metering and Interconnection Stakeholder Discussion Net Metering and Interconnection Stakeholder Meeting September 21, 2012 Discussion of.
Acquisition of partial interest EASEMENTS. Does USPAP require a definition of the rights being appraised? Std Rule 1-2(e) Identify the characteristics.
Small Cell 101: Building wireless in the public right of way
Commercial Frameworks for Energy Investment Regional Issues and Cooperation Mahama Kappiah ECOWAS Commission May 2008.
City Council Meeting January 18, Background  Staff receiving increasing number of inquiries regarding installation of wireless telecommunications.
Structured Cabling Overview
Scenic Highways The CPUC’s Role in Granting Deviations to PU Code §320 March 18th, 2008 Jack Leutza California Public Utilities Commission.
California Solar Initiative Public Forum Hosted by CCSE October 15, 2008.
Federal Geographic Data Committee’s Coordination Group May 6, 2003 Presented by Donald Draper Campbell Electronic Engineer Technical Analysis Branch Electromagnetic.
Oregon Public Utility Commission Safety and Reliability Section Jerry Murray, Manager Bob Sipler, Utility Analyst What is an “Attachment”? … that’s easy!
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
RF Safety at Wireless Sites
Business Equipment Property Tax Relief Programs BETR / BETE Maine Revenue Services Property Tax Division August 2, 2007.
1 Oncor Electric Delivery Proposed Changes To The 2012 National Electrical Safety Code.
Conference of California Public Utility Counsel October 5, 2009 Data Collection and Broadband Mapping: Presented by Michael Morris California Public Utilities.
1 Availability of Aggregated Customer Usage Information: An Overview of D California Public Utilities Commission Presentation before the California.
THE FEDERAL LIFELINE PROGRAM. Overview Low-income consumers apply for discounts for local telephone service through the telephone company. Low Income.
IRSDA Conference What Do the Amendments to Indiana Code Section Mean to You? Kristina Kern Wheeler, General Counsel Ja-Deen L. Johnson, Consumer.
Telecommunications Law 1. 2 Summary of Proposed Amendments To Scarsdale Zoning Code PRESENTED BY: Joseph Van Eaton.
Small Renewable Generators Tony Marciano Public Utility Commission of Texas May 2, 2007 (512)
Storm Hardening Workshop Docket No Verizon Florida, Inc. July 13, 2006.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE 2007 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL SAFETY CODE.
Los Angeles October 10, 2007 Michael Morris Video Franchising & Broadband Deployment Communications Division California Public Utilities Commission DIGITAL.
Streamlined Environmental Requirements for Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) and Small Cells.
IAEC Reliability Webinar Presented by: Regi Goodale and Ethan Hohenadel December 11,
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
Renewable Generation Interconnection Ken Brunkenhoefer Distributed Generation Consultant
Lee County Electric Cooperative 2007 Hurricane Preparedness Activities.
05/18/001 N.Treadway Distributed Resources and Competitive Energy Markets in Illinois Workshop Session III, “Interconnection Issues” Thursday, May 18,
1 Review of CPUC Role with the Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program on Natural Gas Briefing for California Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications.
BROADBAND ACCELERATION INITIATIVE: POLES, ROW State and Local Government Webinar (FCC) Oct. 5, 2011.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
Role of the Commission and Recent Policy Actions Interconnection Workshop Carol Revelt Utah Public Service Commission December 4, 2007.
Small Cell & Distributed Antenna Systems License Agreements with the City of Dallas Quality of Life and Environment Committee September 28, 2015 Presented.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Department of Sustainable Development and Construction DCA Application to Amend Cell Tower Regulations – Temporary Towers and Height Restrictions.
CPUC Public Agenda 3247 Thursday, January 21, 2010, 10:00 a.m. 505 Van Ness Ave, San Francisco Commissioners: Michael R. Peevey Dian M. Grueneich John.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2006 TAC Subcommittee Review ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.
1 Senate Bill 790 San Diego Energy District Foundation Carlos Velasquez CCA Regulatory Analyst California Public Utilities Commission June 21, 2012.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
Local Government Street Light Discussion Process Overview Version 1 May 2014.
T&D Asset Management “A New Era of Joint Use Cooperation”
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
Permanent Solutions to Temporary Loads: An Alternate Approach to Electrical System Design for Short Term and Mobile Industrial Loading Presented by: Eli.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 10 – Information society and media.
CPUC Resource Adequacy Program – LAO briefing May 25, 2009.
UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.
Presented by Leighton Porter, EIT Monte R. Lee & Company
Application of Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative PUE
Affiliate Rules/Code of Conduct
Economic Development & Housing Committee August 21, 2017
Regulation of Broadcasting
TxDOT Utility Related Issues
North American Numbering Council Summary: Toll Free Assignment Modernization Report & Order (R&O) WC Docket No CC Docket No Matthew.
North Carolina Department of Insurance Office of State Fire Marshal
Smitty’s Two Minute Drill The BIG 5 Drill 1
Presentation transcript:

New CPUC Order on Pole Attachments Wireless West Conference Anaheim, California April 21, 2016 Charlotte F. TerKeurst Program Manager Electric Safety and Reliability Branch Safety and Enforcement Division California Public Utilities Commission

Decision (D.) Issued in Rulemaking In 1998, D provided competitive local exchange carriers and cable television providers with nondiscriminatory access to public utility infrastructure. D now provides commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) carriers with nondiscriminatory access.  Amends most right-of-way rules in D to apply to CMRS.  But adopts CMRS-specific pole-attachment fees (not addressed in this presentation).  Amends General Order (GO) 95 to ensure that CMRS pole installations are safe.  Provides that certain other issues may be considered later. 22

Typical CMRS Attachments (source: AT&T) 3

GO 95 Safety Amendments (page 1 of 3)  Prohibit antenna installations that obstruct pole climbing space or interfere with fall-protection gear. 44

GO 95 Safety Amendments (page 2 of 3)  Require pole- overturning calculations for new pole-top antenna attachments. 55

GO 95 Safety Amendments (page 3 of 3)  Generally prohibit antennas on guard arms.  Clarify requirements for signs regarding radio-frequency radiation of antennas.  Clarify protocols for de-energizing antennas.  Only qualified workers may work on wireless facilities installed above supply lines. 66

Pending Issues (page 1 of 2) D directs that SED shall:  Evaluate whether the definition of “material increase” in existing Rule 44.2 should be revised. Rule 44.2: Any entity planning the addition of facilities that materially increases loads on a structure shall perform a loading calculation… Note: … a material increase in load is an addition which increases the load on a structure by more than five percent per installation, or ten percent over a 12-month span, of the electric utility’s or Communication Infrastructure Provider’s current load. 77

Pending Issues (page 2 of 2) SED shall:  Develop a proposed rule regarding interference with fall-protection gear, to apply to all pole attachments.  Develop a proposed rule regarding pole overturning calculations, to apply to all pole-top (and perhaps other) installations. SED may:  Resubmit its proposed Rule 94.3-D regarding safety factor calculations, and address whether it should apply to all pole attachments, or just CMRS. 88

Upcoming CPUC en banc on Pole Safety April 28, :30 am – 5 pm Ronald Reagan State Building—Auditorium 300 S. Spring St Los Angeles, CA Agenda and media advisory available at:

New CPUC Order on Pole Attachments Daniel J. Shaughnessy April 21, 2016 Fees, Additional Rules & the Interaction with Municipal Design Requirements

$2.50 or 7.4% of a utility’s cost-of- ownership for the host pole for each vertical foot of pole space occupied by CMRS installations Annual Fee Rounded to the nearest whole foot Applies to the pole space that a CMRS attachment renders unusable for non-CMRS attachments Does not apply to electric meters, risers, and conduit associated with CMRS installations. Applies once to each foot of pole height. Parties can agree to different terms

Pole Space Subject to the 7.4% Fee Pole space that a CMRS attachment renders unusable for non-CMRS attachments the space that is physically occupied by the CMRS attachment plus space that cannot be used by communication or supply conductors due to the installation of the CMRS attachment

Pole Space Subject to the 7.4% Fee safety clearance between power lines and antenna is 6 feet Safety clearance between an antenna and communication conductor is 2 feet safety clearance between power lines and a communication conductor is 4 feet possible to install a communication conductor 4 feet above lines pole space that is rendered unusable for communication conductors due to the CMRS antenna is 1 foot safety clearance between power lines and antenna is 6 feet safety clearance between an antenna and communication conductor is 2 feet safety clearance between power lines and a communication conductor is 6 feet no pole space that is rendered unusable for communication conductors due to the CMRS antenna 2’ 4’

Shared Pole Space Attached to Pole in Same Plane The 7.4% fee applies once per each vertical foot of pole length, regardless of the number of CMRS attachments that share the same pole space If attachments in the same pole space are owned by different entities, the 7.4% per-foot fee is allocated equally to each attachment Each Carrier: (6’ x 7.4%) ÷ 2

Pole-Attachment Fees in Excess of 100% Pole-attachment fee for all components of a CMRS installation cannot exceed 100% of the host pole’s cost-of-ownership less the proportion of the pole’s cost-of-ownership that is allocable to the pole space occupied by other attachments 10 feet out of 18 feet of total occupied pole space Proportion of the pole’s total cost-of-ownership that is allocable to the CMRS installation is 10/18, or 55.6%.

Conduits, Risers, and Electric Meters Fee does not apply to conduits, risers, and electric utility meters that are attached to a pole as part of a CMRS installation.

Additional Rules Requests for information regarding the availability of a utility’s infrastructure. Requests to access a utility’s infrastructure, including the contents of the requests Protections for proprietary information Reservations of infrastructure capacity for future use Access to customer premises and notification procedures Expedited dispute resolution procedure

Municipal Design Requirements and Potential Conflicts Numerous CA municipalities regulate the design of wireless facilities on private-owned utility poles Location of Antennas Location of Ancillary Equipment Mounting Concealment/Stealthing Multiple Antennas (vertical vs. horizontal) Co-location Requirements Utility pole height requirements

New CPUC Order on Pole Attachments QUESTIONS? Daniel J. Shaughnessy Land Use – Md W. Ocean Air Drive, Ste 300 San Diego, CA Fees, Additional Rules & the Interaction with Municipal Design Requirements