Understanding Wisconsin Supreme Court Rule 20:1.14.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 Implications for Front Line Staff Richard Williams Professor of Mental Health Strategy, University of Glamorgan Professor.
Advertisements

Wayne County Pro Bono Conference August 15, 2012 Ethics and Assisted Pro Se Representation.
Ethics in Mediation Sandy Garrett, Chief Disciplinary Council, TBPR Richard Murrell, Moderator.
Who needs a Welfare Guardian? Sue Sue Gates Senor Researcher Donald Beasley Institute P O Box 6189 Dunedin.
Confidentiality and HIPAA
The Work of the Missouri Guardianship Statutory Reform Task Force.
Chapter Four Conflicts of Interest In this chapter, you will learn about: Rules governing conflicts involving clients, including simultaneous and successive.
Safeguarding Adults in Bath & North East Somerset Awareness Session
2009 Mental Capacity Act 2005 Implications for Shared Lives Carers.
Consent and Confidentiality for Children in New Mexico Liz McGrath Executive Director Pegasus Legal Services for Children.
Law 20 Conflicts of Interest. o Based on duties of o Loyalty o Confidentiality o Rules cover: o Concurrent representation of adverse clients o Representation.
Ethical Issues in Data Security Breach Cases Presented by Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Confidentiality A Defining Duty. What are sources of confidentiality obligations? Constitutional law Disciplinary rules Fiduciary responsibility Court.
Week Duty to keep quiet, not talk about cases By product of Fiduciary Duty 2. Right not to be forced to testify about communications --Statutory.
An Advocacy Framework For Attorneys in CVO Cases Children’s Law Center Clinic Seminar 1.
August, Ethical Issues for the Appointed Attorney When Representing Children CHARLES G CHILDRESS August 2009.
Welcome to Class INTRODUCTION TO LEGAL TECHNOLOGY.
Take the Plea: How Forceful Can and Should You Be?
Clients With Diminished Mental Capacity Prof. Barry Kozak Director of the Elder Law Programs, The John Marshall Law School
Scott F. Johnson Maureen MacFarlane.  Attorneys have a myriad of ethical obligations  This presentation covers some of those obligations and considers.
Two Hats, One Lawyer: Demystifying Privilege & Confidentiality Stuart I. Teicher, Esq.
Guardianship Proceedings in North Carolina for Persons with Developmental Disabilities Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities UNC School of.
Confidentiality of MH/DD/SA Records Family Court Conference March 9, 2006 Mark Botts School of Government, UNC.
Legal Ethics for Social Services Attorneys Institute of Government 2006.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
1 Consent for treatment A summary guide for health practitioners about obtaining consent for treatment Bridie Woolnough Resolution Officer Health Care.
Outsourcing: The Ethical Issues Steven M. Richman November 2014.
Ethical Issues of Elder Care. Objectives Apply the concept of decision-specific capacity to older adults. Apply the concept of decision-specific capacity.
LAWYERS ETHICS Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl. APPLICABLE PROFESSIONAL RULES  Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct 
Jill Malat Office of Civil Legal Aid Children’s Representation Program
All in the Municipal Family Concurrent Conflicts, Model Rule 1.7, and the Government Lawyer.
Elderlaw & Ethics Competency Kimberly E. O’Leary Professor, Thomas M. Cooley Law School Director, Sixty Plus, Inc. Elderlaw Clinic Lansing, Michigan The.
Elderlaw & Ethics Confidentiality The Center for Elder Rights Advocacy presents Kimberly E. O’Leary Professor, Thomas M. Cooley Law School Director, Sixty.
GANJI 12 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON GUARDIANSHIP: “Guardianship and Human Rights: Knowledge is Protection” Workshop 2C: Fiduciary Responsibility: Property.
Aging.ohio.gov/services/ombudsman Guardianship in Ohio Ombudsman Continuing Education.
Roles of the Professional “The system depends on every professional doing his/her job.” Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki 2010 Copyright Monica Bogucki.
The Ethics of Internal Investigations SELECTED ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND COMMENTS By: Cecil E. Morris, Jr. Pendleton, Wilson, Hennessey.
The Uniform Collaborative Law Act Gretchen M. Walther, Esq. Harry L. Tindall, Esq.
Jennifer Renne, Esq. ABA Center on Children and the Law Faculty, Georgetown University Law Center Ethics in CINA Cases The Law & Community Health Forum.
Privacy, Confidentiality and Duty to Warn in School Guidance Services March 2006 Disclaimer - While the information in these slides are designed to reflect.
Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.
Ethical Issues and Procedures for Handling Third Party Callers to Your Legal Helpline Keith Morris Sue Wasserkrug David Godfrey.
Avoiding Traps in Internal Investigations H. Lee Barfield II Bass, Berry and Sims PLC November 5, 2010.
John Steele, Attorney at Law
Professional Responsibility Law 115 Wed., Oct. 24.
Do You Have One?. “I represent the city as an organization and I do not represent you and I cannot guarantee the confidentiality of what you tell me.”
Unit 5 Midterm Review. What are some of the components of the ABA?
CBA Presentation March 20, 2013 Linda Siderius The Confidence of Trusted Counsel.
John Steele, Attorney at Law. 2 Confidentiality 3 Topics 1. Definitions 2. Comparison 3. ABA Approach 1. Rule; Exceptions; Other rules 4. California.
FIDUCIARY LAW  STATUS RELATIONSHIP  DISPARITY POWER & NEED  DISPARITY OF POWER & NEED  VOLUNTARY UNDERTAKING  TRUST GIVEN BY ONE  CARE PROMISED BY.
The Law in Action; The Court of Protection Janice White Senior Solicitor 18 th April 2013.
Ethics of Representing Governmental Entities Helen M. Hierschbiel OSB General Counsel.
Carlsmith Ball LLP Confidentiality Issues and Outside Counsel Deborah Bjes October 22 nd, 2015.
12/24/2015Miss Samah Ishtieh1 Managerial Ethics Patient Rights & Nursing Ethics Prepared by: Miss Samah Ishtieh.
Representing Juveniles in Family Court Ashley Case, Esq. Heather Scalzo, Esq.
Established standards of care given with respect and consideration, regardless of race, age, or payment source. Information about your illness, possible.
Professionalism and Ethics for Attorneys ad Litem in Deprivation Cases OCOL Volunteer Training March 21, 2008 Melissa Dorris Carter Office of the Child.
1 Ethical Lawyering Fall, 2006 Class 6. 2 MR 1.1 A lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation requires the legal.
1 Ethical Lawyering Spring 2006 Class 8. 2 Rest. 68 Except as otherwise provided in this Restatement, the attorney-client privilege may be invoked as.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
Disclaimer This presentation is intended only for use by Tulane University faculty, staff, and students. No copy or use of this presentation should occur.
Roles of the Professional “The system depends on every professional doing his/her job.” Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki 2016Copyright Monica Bogucki.
Recognizing the Client
Ethics and the very best practice
Rules of Superintendence Applicable to Guardianships
What are the rules that apply? What are duties of the lawyer?
Ethics for Lawyers – and how that impacts your child’s case
Navigating ethics issues in FERC enforcement investigations
Disclaimer Opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Virginia Department for Aging.
Obtaining Proof of Decision-Making Authority
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Wisconsin Supreme Court Rule 20:1.14

SCR 20:1.14 Overview:  Hypothetical  Review the rule  What are some issues under the rule?  ABA Annotation  Hypothetical

SCR 20:1.14 HYPOTHETICAL: You represent an elderly client, Elbridge, who is the subject of a guardianship proceeding. He was walking outside for several hours in the middle of February with only a light coat on. The temperature was 5 o F.

SCR 20:1.14 The client tells you he is fine. He states he had long underwear on and several layers of clothing on underneath and wasn’t cold. The tips of his fingers look bluish/black even though the incident was about three days ago. He claims his family is seeking a guardianship to get control of and steal his money. You are uncertain of what assets he has.

SCR 20:1.14 He tells you he doesn’t want a guardianship and that someone on the radio told him he should stick up for himself. He says he wants to continue living alone so he can drink, smoke and eat as much sugar as he wants; he doesn’t like his medicine because of its side effects.

SCR 20:1.14 Elbridge’s brother tells you Elbridge said he was fine with the guardianship right after the incident outside. If you were representing Elbridge, what are some concerns? Issues?

SCR 20:1.14 THEMES:  Importance of lawyer’s judgment  Client autonomy v. best interest  Common sense v. requirements of being a lawyer  Moral vs. legal  Advocate v. “adverse” to client

SCR 20:1.14 (a) When a client's capacity to make adequately considered decisions in connection with a representation is diminished, whether because of minority, mental impairment or for some other reason, the lawyer shall, as far as reasonably possible, maintain a normal client-lawyer relationship with the client.

SCR 20:1.14 (a) When a client's capacity to make adequately considered decisions in connection with a representation is diminished, whether because of minority, mental impairment or for some other reason, the lawyer shall, as far as reasonably possible, maintain a normal client-lawyer relationship with the client.

SCR 20:1.14 (a) When a client's capacity to make adequately considered decisions in connection with a representation is diminished, whether because of minority, mental impairment or for some other reason, the lawyer shall, as far as reasonably possible, maintain a normal client-lawyer relationship with the client.

SCR 20:1.14 b) When the lawyer reasonably believes that the client has diminished capacity, is at risk of substantial physical, financial or other harm unless action is taken and cannot adequately act in the client's own interest, the lawyer may take reasonably necessary protective action, including consulting with individuals or entities that have the ability to take action to protect the client and, in appropriate cases, seeking the appointment of a guardian ad litem, conservator or guardian.

SCR 20:1.14 b) When the lawyer reasonably believes that the client has diminished capacity, is at risk of substantial physical, financial or other harm unless action is taken and cannot adequately act in the client's own interest, the lawyer may take reasonably necessary protective action, including consulting with individuals or entities that have the ability to take action to protect the client and, in appropriate cases, seeking the appointment of a guardian ad litem, conservator or guardian.

SCR 20:1.14 (c) Information relating to the representation of a client with diminished capacity is protected by SCR 20:1.6. When taking protective action pursuant to par. (b), the lawyer is impliedly authorized under SCR 20:1.6(a) to reveal information about the client, but only to the extent reasonably necessary to protect the client's interests.

SCR 20:1.14 (c) Information relating to the representation of a client with diminished capacity is protected by SCR 20:1.6. When taking protective action pursuant to par. (b), the lawyer is impliedly authorized under SCR 20:1.6(a) to reveal information about the client, but only to the extent reasonably necessary to protect the client's interests.

SCR 20:1.14 Summary of the rule: (a) Maintain normal attorney-client relationship as much as possible. (b) What to do if lawyer believes there is diminished capacity. (c) Exception to Rule 1.6

SCR 20:1.14 What does it mean to maintain a normal client- lawyer relationship?

SCR 20:1.14  Client determines goals of representation  Attorney determines means  Communication  Confidentiality  Diligence  Avoid conflicts of interest

SCR 20:1.14 Lawyer should:  Treat client with attention and respect  Continue to attempt to communicate and discuss relevant matters  Take action consistent with the client’s directions and decisions.

SCR 20:1.14 Without Rule 1.14, if client is incompetent, lawyer’s authority to act would disappear. Lawyer can initiate protective action, including seeking appointment of a legal representative.

SCR 20:1.14 What should the attorney do if uncertain whether client has diminished capacity? ASSESS the client.

SCR 20:1.14  How assess whether client diminished?  Client’s ability to articulate reasoning for a decision.  Variability of state of mind and ability to appreciate consequences.  Substantive fairness of a decision.  Consistency of the decision with the known long- term commitments and values of the client. ABA Comment to Model Rule 1.14

SCR 20:1.14 If the attorney cannot assess on his or her own, permissible to consult with others. ABA Formal Ethics Opinion (1996) How should the attorney go about consulting with others?

SCR 20:1.14 Attorney may seek to talk with a diagnostician. Limit disclosure to what is necessary to carry out the representation. Also permissible to consult with family or other interested person who can assist with lawyer’s assessment. ABA Formal Ethics Opinion (1996)

SCR 20:1.14 At the heart of capacity is decision-making. Three elements required: 1. Possession of a set of values and goals; 2. Ability to communicate and to understand information 3. Ability to reason and to deliberate about one’s own choices. Charles P. Sabatino, Representing a Client with Diminished Capacity: How Do You Know It and What Do You Do About It?, 16 J. Am. Acad. Matrim. Law. 481, 485 (2000)

SCR 20:1.14  1.14(b) permits a lawyer to take reasonably necessary protective action in certain circumstances, including:  Consulting with individuals or entities that have the ability to take action to protect the client  Seeking the appointment of a GAL, conservator or guardian.

SCR 20:1.14  Comment to 1.14(b) lists possible protective actions:  Consulting with family members  Using a reconsideration period to permit clarification or improvement of circumstances  Using voluntary surrogate decision-making tools such as durable powers of attorney  Consulting with support groups, professional services, adult-protective agencies  Others with ability to protect the client

SCR 20:1.14 Protective action (cont’d):  Seek appointment of a guardian, guardian ad litem or conservator.

SCR 20:1.14 A safe rule of thumb is to take the least restrictive / intrusive action. Appointment of GAL may be appropriate where only issue is the interests of the client in litigation. Broader representation may require appointment of a general guardian.

SCR 20:1.14 If less drastic means are not available and the lawyer thinks a guardian is needed, lawyer may file a petition seeking a guardian for the client. ABA Formal Opinion (1996) However, if a third party is seeking guardianship, lawyer may not represent the third party.

SCR 20:1.14 Seeking the appointment of a guardian is distinguished from seeking to be the guardian. Lawyer should not act as or seek to be appointed as guardian except in the most urgent circumstances. Example: client is being evicted and in order to delay eviction, lawyer files as answer to the eviction complaint to avoid default.

SCR 20:1.14 Withdrawal from representation Rule 1.14 permits but does not require a lawyer to take protective action. If a client’s diminished capacity prevents the lawyer- client relationship from existing, the lawyer may withdraw subject to Rule 1.16.

SCR 20:1.14  Termination of representation must be done “without material adverse effect on the interests of the client.” SCR 20:1.16(b).

SCR 20:1.14 ABA Annotation of Rule 1.14

SCR 20:1.14 What are some steps you would take under Rule 1.14 with respect to Elbridge?