1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
Advertisements

Connecticut Brownfield Sites
Vapor Intrusion. What is Vapor Intrusion? The migration of volatile chemical vapors from the subsurface to overlying buildings.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
Introduction to Brownfields New Partners for Community Revitalization, Inc. June 29, 2009.
Brownfields Redevelopment in Ontario, Canada: Two Case Studies Steven Rose Malroz Engineering Inc. NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Meeting Athens, June 4-7, 2006.
Vermilion County Brownfield Assessment Grant. Overview Brownfield Basics USEPA Brownfield Assessment Grant Vermilion County Assessment Grant Site Selection.
Claremore Medical Office Building From Landfill to Medical Office Building A Brownfield Success Story THE GREEN SIDE OF BROWNFIELD REMEDIATION.
Public Draft Removal Action Workplan Proposed Richmond Bay Campus Site RES Area and Groundwater Public Meeting December 5, © keh.
Denver Federal Center Calibration Silo Removal Project What are the DFC Calibration Silos? Installed in 1981 by Bureau of Mines Support minerals industry.
H23A14 Briton Ferry Gas Works Land Contamination Antreas Christodoulides Georgios Efstathiou Antreas Christodoulides Georgios Efstathiou.
Environmental Investigation by Con Edison Former E115th Street Gas Works November 13, 2007.
Location In the mountain of Colorado consist of numerous sites in Denver area which contaminate with radioactive soils and Debris. There are about 65.
Brownfields are “real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous.
Sam Winer Motors Technical Outreach Support for Communities Michigan State University East Lansing, MI November 29, 2001.
EnviroSense, Inc. An Overview of Environmental Factors in Developing Brownfields Sites in Massachusetts Presented By: Eric S. Wood, P.Hg., PG, LSP President.
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update June 07, 2006 Great Lakes Visitors Center DuPont CRG.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
Sustainability and Best Management Practices Environmental Remediation Russell Downey Pfizer Global Engineering 5 November 2014.
Connecticut Department of Public Works -- Rebecca Cutler – Environmental Analyst.
CCRPC Board Training Climate & Brownfields September 19, 2012 Julie Potter, Senior Planner.
McCoy Field Proposed Keith Middle School Site EPA Proposes Approval of McCoy Field Cleanup Plan.
 EPA’s soil sampling objectives  Technical approach  Technical assistance to DTSC/DOE  Next Steps and Schedule.
1 Facilitating Reuse at RCRA Sites: Innovative Technologies for Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup Introduction Walter W. Kovalick Jr., Ph.D. Associate.
Brandon Real Estate Board - June 19/20031 Your Logo Here ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS Phase I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS Phase I.
Ms. Mandel  I can explain what a Brownfield site is.  I can explain how a Brownfield site is restored to a usable piece of property.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS Risk Based Corrective Action Using site-specific risk assessment to achieve Regulatory Closure.
Brownfields Health Risks & Remediation Diogo Cadima Topic ‘A’ Term Project CET 413.
Triad Approach / Best Management Practices. Triad Approach and BMPs Systematic Planning – Conceptual Site Model (CSM) Dynamic Work Strategies Real-Time.
TURNING BROWNFIELDS. Definition US EPA 1997 abandoned, idled or under-used industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated.
Denver Federal Center Calibration Silo Removal Plan What are the DFC Calibration Silos? Installed in 1981 by Bureau of Mines Support minerals industry.
Review of Work Plan for Leaded Gasoline Tank Bottom Disposal Pit Assessment and Interim Stabilization Measures Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain.
Utilizing CPT/UVIF to Delineate Free- Phase Dowtherm® in the Subsurface Bryan Heath, URS Corporation (URS Diamond) Steve Shoemaker, DuPont Corporate Remediation.
Spectron Superfund Site Proposed Plan Contaminated Shallow Soils U.S. EPA Region III June 26, 2003 Philadelphia, PA Robert J. Sanchez US EPA - Remedial.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Fairbanks Areawide Industrial Reclamation Project ADEC AREAWIDE MANAGEMENT GOALS Janice Wiegers ADEC.
Policy and Legal Framework on Soil Contamination Management in Thailand Workshop on Strengthening Contaminated Soil Monitoring in Vietnam, November.
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
Consideration of Brownfields and Contaminated Properties During NEPA 2014 Real Estate Workshop.
Triangle Park Removal Action Area within the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (Portland, Oregon) Jennifer MacDonald Assistant Regional Counsel Office of.
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model. Typical Site Management Problems: Site complexities  Complicated hydrogeology  Multiple contaminants of concern (COCs)
Brownfields and Community Gardens. Purpose  The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of the Brownfields Program and how it can service.
State and Tribal Government Working Group November 12, 2008 FERNALD NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES SETTLEMENT.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
What is a “Brownfield”? A brownfield site is real estate where the use or expansion, redevelopment, or reuse may be limited by the presence of contamination.
Greener Cleanups in the Region 10 PCB Program Michelle, Mullin R10 PCB Coordinator Clu-In Webinar November 17, 2015.
Coeur d’Alene Basin TLG Repository PFT meeting December 9, 2003.
Case Study – A Brownfield Cleanup in the City of Amsterdam, NY Joseph S. Campisi Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.
1. 2 Presentation Highlights BGOU overview Scope of the Remedial Investigation Investigation results Schedule 2.
Marian Anderson Place Site Update City Commission Special Workshop December 14, 2015.
Marshall Landfill Site.  Patrick Cabbage, Hydrogeologist/Site Manager  Bill Fees, Engineer  Carol Bergin, Public Involvement Coordinator.
Environmental Site Assessments Hazardous Materials/ Regulated Substances Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Why is Coal Ash of Concern and how to assess potential impacts?
Karolina Brownfields Redevelopment Site Ostrava, Czech Republic Thomas C. Voltaggio Senior Advisor Dawson & Associates
Improving The Quality of Site Characerization Jennifer Griffith Northeast Waste Management Officials’ Association.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
GEORGIA PACIFIC WEST PROPOSED INTERIM ACTION Public Meeting & Open House – July 12, 2011.
EPA Targeted Brownfields Assessment Applications for Culturally Sensitive Sites The TseWhitZen Village Cemetery Restoration Project Joanne LaBaw, EPA Matthew.
Performance-Based Management for Brownfields - Best Practices and Approaches November 2006 Eliana Makhlouf, Ph.D., P.E. Marsh Environmental Practice.
Omaha Riverfront Redevelopment Project Brownfields 2004 C. Dale Jacobson, P.E., DEE.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
Environmental Site Assessments
The Prepared Process: The Next Generation
Welcome.
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL SITE PUBLIC MEETING December 6, 2016
Brownfield Corrective Action with Revised RRS
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model
Presentation transcript:

1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006

2 Site History  Power Plant built in 1907 to provide electrification for the railroad  Coal fired plant operated until the 1960s  CT DOT decommissioned the plant in 1986  Property transferred to the Town in 1989  Buildings demolished in 2000

3

4 Site Investigation  Investigations conducted 1997, 1998  EPA –Targeted Brownfields Assessment, 2004  Use of Triad rapidly clarified the principal reuse questions and remedial options for the project team  Provided the basis for focused PCB characterization and removal  Phase III Remedial Investigation Focused Feasibility Study Report, 2005  Identified the extent and levels of contamination to meet state requirements  Identified the alternatives for remediation

5 Targeted Brownfields Assessment, 2004 Utilizing Triad  Thorough characterization of multiple contaminants (TPH, PAHs, PCBs, Arsenic) in soil in a single mobilization of less than one week  Use of EPA Region 1 mobile laboratory for onsite PCB analysis and XRF screening for metals, UV Fluorescence test kits for PAH and TPH  Key ranges of concentrations and safety factors were identified and refined to guide data interpretation and decision-making in the field using real-time methods  These ranges became the focus of collaborative data collection using off-site methods to increase decision confidence

6  Real time data indicated that surface soil consistently exceeded Connecticut's residential reuse criteria for TPH, PAHs, and Arsenic  Historical identification of coal ash fill to a depth of 30 feet reduced the need for deeper samples and indicated cleanup to residential standards was cost prohibitive  Dynamic work strategies allowed step-out sampling in grid elements to define extent of PCB contamination  Data suggesting that limited remedial action, combined with modification of the reuse alternatives could facilitate reuse. Targeted Brownfields Assessment, 2004 Utilizing Triad

7

8 Phase III Remedial Investigation Focused Feasibility Study Report, 2005  Focused sub-grid evaluation of PCB “hotspots” identified during TBA. Original 70X70’ grids subdivided into 10X10’ for delineation.  Additional site wide characterization to meet State concerns  Allowed quick determination of most appropriate remedial strategy

9 PCB GRID SAMPLE RESULTS

10 SITE WIDE SOIL RESULTS

11 CTDEP and Federal Remediation Criteria  Soil  Direct exposure criteria  Residential (R DEC) * and Industrial / Commercial (I/C DEC)  Pollutant Mobility Criteria *  TSCA *  Groundwater  Groundwater Protection Criteria  Volatilization Criteria *  Surface Water Protection Criteria * * Applicable to site

12 REMEDIATION CONCEPTS

13 Remedial Alternatives  No Action  On-site Soil Treatment  Excavation and Off-site Disposal of All Contaminated Soils  Excavation and Off-site Disposal of Pollutant Mobility Criteria and TSCA Clean Up criteria exceeding Soils and Installation of Permanent Cap

14 Selected Alternative - Excavation and Off-site Disposal of PMC and TSCA Exceeding Soils and Installation of Permanent Cap Advantages  Removes highly contaminated soils from site  Permanent cap eliminates direct contact with contaminated soil left on-site  Upon successful completion, site can be easily redeveloped  Selected alternative has been successfully implemented at many sites within CT  Most cost effective remedial alternative

15 Density of Data from Triad Resulted in $200K Cleanup Grant  Data from TBA and Phase III RI was sufficient to allow Greenwich to apply for and receive a $200K Brownfields cleanup grant.  Grant was applied for phase I remediation and construction costs including “hot spot removal”, confirmation sampling, and oversight.  Grant funds were also used for public outreach

16 Phase 1 Remediation – Completed 2005/06  Excavation and Off-site Disposal of Pollutant Mobility Criteria and TSCA Clean Up criteria exceeding Soils  Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil – 175 tons  PCB Soil >50 mg/kg – 20 tons  PCB Soil >10 mg/kg and ≤ 50 mg/kg – 116 tons  On-site Relocation of PCB Soil (> 1 mg/kg and ≤ 10 mg/kg)  Total Construction Cost - $139,000

17 PCB & ETPH SOIL REMEDIATION PLAN

18 Phase 2 Remediation and Shoreline Stabilization  Installation of Permanent Earthen Cap to Render Existing Soils Inaccessible  Total Import of Soil – 45,000 cyd  Shoreline Stabilization and Earthen Cap Protection  Rehabilitation and Installation of Stone Revetment – 1,600 lf of Shoreline  Total Estimated Cost - $3.5M

19 Phase 2 Remediation – Earthen Cap Material  Identification of Potential Earthen Cap Sources  Town of Greenwich Public Safety Center: 10,000 – 15,000 cyd  Connecticut Light & Power (CL&P) Glenbrook Cable: 30,000 – 40,000 cyd  CL&P Provided Items All Analytical Data Necessary for CTDEP Reuse Approval Transportation and Temporary Placement of Materials Installation and Maintenance of E&S Controls Material Processing Payment to Town ($250k - $500k)  Total Estimated Savings - $750k

20