Specific Language impairment – is it so specific? Anne E. Baker University of Amsterdam
Overview of this talk Introduction: SLI SLI and … - reading problems - ADHD - bilingualism Future work
Collaborators Bilingualism: Elma Blom, N. Çavuş J. de Jong, A. Orgassa, F. Weerman Reading problems: Esther Psarigger, Judith Rispens ADHD: Esther Parigger Thanks to NWO & Marie Curie.
What is SLI? SLI refers to pervasive impairment in the development of language - in the absence of other problems such as deafness, autism etc. Grammar is often a problem - in particular Agreement inflection e.g. Janet drive the car. Pragmatics and semantics can also be affected. Phonology
non-word repetition (NWR) in the literature more than 90% of SLI children perform poorly on the NWR indicating problems with phonological (sound) processing Reading problems (dyslexia) Approximately 50% of children with SLI diagnosed with developmental dyslexia (McArthur et al. 2000) What is the relationship? SLI and......
Results: NWR and dyslexia in SLI (Rispens & Parigger 2008) SLI SLI+DYS TD Only the SLI+DYS is different from TD, p<.001
Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)? 31% with SLI scored in the (sub)clinical range of the inattention and/or hyperactivity scales (VvGK). Do these children perform differently in language and executive functions? SLI and......
Language Problems (Parigger 2007) Semantic problems: Example: Confuses words of similar meaning ‘screw- driver’ for ‘hammer’. Pragmatic problems: Example: Use of terms like ‘he’ or ‘it’ without making clear what talking about. No difference between SLI+ADHD and –ADHD SLI group as whole worse than TD SLI+ADHD worse than SLI-ADHD All SLI worse than TD
Measures of executive functioning CANTAB Inhibition: Stop Signal Task Attention: Rapid Visual Information Processing Working Memory: Spatial Working Memory Shifting Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift
Measures of executive functioning CANTAB Inhibition: Stop Signal Task Attention: Rapid Visual Information Processing Working Memory: Spatial Working Memory Shifting Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift Trend only found: SLI+ADHD worse than SLI-ADHD
SLI and bilingualism Bilingual SLI is SLI in both languages. SLI in only one language is by definition not possible But: SLI may have different linguistic manifestations in the two languages How do SLI and bilingualism interact?
Research design A cross-linguistic comparison of grammatical morphology - in the same bilingual children - whose two languages are typologically different (Turkish and Dutch) The aims are: To identify markers of SLI (adjectival and verbal inflection) To identify markers of (typical) L2 development To gain insight in the interaction of SLI and L2
(1) Example: adjectival inflection (Dutch) Kijk, twee messen. ‘Look, two knives’ Dat is een groot-ø mes en dit is een klein-ø mes ‘That is a big knife and this is a small knife’ Waar is Kikker? ‘Where is Kikker’ Kikker zit op het grot-e mes ‘Kikker sits on the big knife’
Dutch SLI and L2 equivalent to younger TD children Bilingual SLI worse than SLI and L2
Example: elicitation (lezen ‘to read’) VO: Antje leest een boek en Jan leest een krant Antje-subj reads-fin a book-obj OV: Dit is Antje die een boek leest en dat is Jan die een krant leest This is Antje who a book-obj reads-fin and that is Jan who a newspaper-obj reads-fin INV: Hier lees jij en daar leest Jan Here read-fin you-subj and there reads-fin Jan-subj
Dutch Bilingual SLI worse than L1-SLI and L2-TD
Turkish verb inflection L2-TD bilingual SLI no errors a few
Disentangling bilingualism and SLI Different linguistc aspects showing up in the two populations: –Verb inflection is a marker of SLI –Gender assignment and Adjectival agreement constitute a marker of L2 But the difference between bilingual typical and bilingual SLI on the Dutch measures suggests that there is a cumulative effect at work in the SLI bilingual group
Further work -bilingualism, SLI and executive funtions (Aude Laloi) -Executive functioning in different populations and specific aspects of language
Explanations for SLI Specific linguistic component is damaged in part of Universal Grammar Processing of language is impaired Introduction
CONTACT