Initiation of Coronal Mass Ejections: Implications for Forecasting Solar Energetic Particle Storms Ron Moore, Alphonse Sterling, David Falconer, John Davis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 9 Prominences and Filaments Filaments are formed in magnetic loops that hold relatively cool, dense gas suspended above the surface of the Sun,"
Advertisements

Coronal Prominence Cavities: Magnetism and Dynamics Sarah Gibson, Giuliana de Toma, Therese Kucera, Kathy Reeves, Donald Schmit, and Alphonse Sterling.
1 A New Model of Solar Flare Trigger Mechanism Kanya Kusano (Hiroshima University) Collaboration with T.Maeshiro (Hiroshima Univ.) T.Yokoyama (Univ. of.
The magnetic nature of solar flares Paper by E.R. Priest & T.G. Forbes Review presented by Hui Song.
The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
CME/Flare Mechanisms Solar “minimum” event this January For use to VSE must be able to predict CME/flare Spiro K. Antiochos Naval Research Laboratory.
What can helicity redistribution in solar eruptions tell us about reconnection in these events? by Brian Welsch, JSPS Fellow (Short-Term ), Space Sciences.
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
What can helicity redistribution in solar eruptions tell us about reconnection in these events? by Brian Welsch, JSPS Fellow (Short-Term ), Space Sciences.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
September 2006 CISM All Hand Meeting Properties of Solar Active Regions and Solar Eruptive Events Yang Liu -- Stanford University
Two energy release processes for CMEs: MHD catastrophe and magnetic reconnection Yao CHEN Department of Space Science and Applied Physics Shandong University.
Vincent Surges Advisors: Yingna Su Aad van Ballegooijen Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of a flare/CME event on 2010 April 8.
SHINE The Role of Sub-Surface Processes in the Formation of Coronal Magnetic Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
MSU Team: R. C. Canfield, D. W. Longcope, P. C. H. Martens, S. Régnier Evolution on the photosphere: magnetic and velocity fields 3D coronal magnetic fields.
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
Discussion Group B: Progress on Initiation Mechanisms 1. Determine topology of initiating field –Initiate broad observational investigation on filament.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Magnetic Field Extrapolations And Current Sheets B. T. Welsch, 1 I. De Moortel, 2 and J. M. McTiernan 1 1 Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley 2 School of Mathematics.
Incorporating Vector Magnetic Field Measurements into MHD models of the Solar Atmosphere W.P. Abbett Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley and B.T. Welsch,
Discussion Summary: Group B –Solar Active Regions And Their Production of Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections Discussion Leaders: George Fisher Hugh Hudson.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
Coronal Mass Ejections: Models and Their Observational Basis (P.F. Chen Living Rev. Solar Phys.) 张英智 中国科学院空间科学与应用研究中心空间天气学国家重点实验室.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
NEWS, RESOURCES, AND MOST RECENT SOLAR WORKING DRAFTS (1) Mauna Loa Solar Observatory Newsletter Feb 2009 (2) Introduction to the Solar and Space Weather.
On the Origin of Strong Gradients in Photospheric Magnetic Fields Brian Welsch and Yan Li Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA ,
DOPPLER DOPPLER A Space Weather Doppler Imager Mission Concept Exploration Science Objectives What are the most relevant observational signatures of flare,
Free Magnetic Energy in Solar Active Regions above the Minimum-Energy Relaxed State (Regnier, S., Priest, E.R ApJ) Use magnetic field extrapolations.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
The Effect of Sub-surface Fields on the Dynamic Evolution of a Model Corona Goals :  To predict the onset of a CME based upon reliable measurements of.
Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
Magnetic configurations responsible for the coronal heating and the solar wind Hwanhee Lee 1, Tetsuya Magara 1 1 School of Space research, Kyung Hee University.
Physics of the relationship of ICMEs to their CME progenitors (Wed AM) Two major efforts are under way to address the structure of CMEs that hit the Earth,
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
CME Initiation: The Matrix Reloaded David Alexander, Rice University.
Coronal Mass Ejection As a Result of Magnetic Helicity Accumulation
Frontiers in Modeling Magnetic Flux Emergence and the Development of Solar Eruptive Activities Organizers: Mark Linton and Yuhong Fan SHINE Liaison: KD.
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
Newark, Wiegelmann et al.: Coronal magnetic fields1 Solar coronal magnetic fields: Source of Space weather Thomas Wiegelmann, Julia Thalmann,
Flare Energy Build-Up in a Decaying Active Region Near a Coronal Hole Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Collaborators: A. A. van Ballegooijen,
Predicting Solar Energetic Particle Events John Davis, Ron Moore, Edward West, Allen Gary NASA/MSFC/NSSTC Solar and Space Physics and the Vision for Space.
The Sun Stellar Evolution: Low Mass Stars White Dwarfs
1 Introduction: Onset of solar flares and coronal mass ejections Yokoyama, T. Dept. Earth & Planetary Science, University of Tokyo Isobe, H. Univ. Tokyo.
Coronal magnetic fields Thomas Wiegelmann, MPI for Solar-System Research, (Former: MPI für Aeronomie) Katlenburg-Lindau Why are coronal magnetic fields.
ISSI Jan 2009 Early Stages of Eruptions Alphonse C. Sterling 1 NASA/MSFC 1 Currently at JAXA/ISAS, Sagamihara, Japan.
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
Forecasting the Solar Drivers of Severe Space Weather from Active-Region Magnetograms and Recent Flare Activity David A. Falconer (UAHuntsville/MSFC),
White light coronagraph showing prominances and streamers The Coronal Magnetic Field.
Observations and nonlinear force-free field modeling of active region Y. Su, A. van Ballegooijen, B. W. Lites, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, P. C. Grigis,
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
Funding from: BOF, Odysseus & GOA (KU Leuven), EC-FP7 (Soteria, Giovanni Lapenta, Lapo Bettarini Centrum voor.
A Numerical Study of the Breakout Model for Coronal Mass Ejection Initiation P. MacNeice, S.K. Antiochos, A. Phillips, D.S. Spicer, C.R. DeVore, and K.
Magnetic Helicity and Solar Eruptions Alexander Nindos Section of Astrogeophysics Physics Department University of Ioannina Ioannina GR Greece.
Reading Unit 31, 32, 51. The Sun The Sun is a huge ball of gas at the center of the solar system –1 million Earths would fit inside it! –Releases the.
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
Shine 2004, A. Sterling CME Eruption Onset Observations: Dimmings Alphonse C. Sterling NASA/MSFC/NSSTC.
Coronal Mass Ejection: Initiation, Magnetic Helicity, and Flux Ropes. L. Boundary Motion-Driven Evolution Amari, T., Luciani, J. F., Aly, J. J., Mikic,
Ward Manchester University of Michigan
Scientists Propose Mechanism to Describe Solar Eruptions of All Sizes
Abstract We simulate the twisting of an initially potential coronal flux tube by photospheric vortex motions. The flux tube starts to evolve slowly(quasi-statically)
Introduction to Space Weather
Takashi Sakurai National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Ron Moore and Alphonse Sterling
Taiyou Zasshikai on May 17, 2004
CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS
Presentation transcript:

Initiation of Coronal Mass Ejections: Implications for Forecasting Solar Energetic Particle Storms Ron Moore, Alphonse Sterling, David Falconer, John Davis NASA/MSFC/NSSTC/UAH

We present a synopsis of the initiation of the strong-field solar magnetic explosions that become large, fast coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and thereby produce the intense, days-long particle storms that could kill astronauts and spacecraft in interplanetary space. Based on observations, physical reasoning, and modeling studies, the inferred basic processes that trigger and drive the explosion are described and illustrated with cartoons. The magnetic field that explodes is a sheared-core bipole that may or may not be embedded in strong surrounding magnetic field, and may or may not contain a flux rope before it starts to explode. Beginning at or soon after the explosion onset, tether-cutting reconnection in the sheared core field unleashes a growing, erupting flux rope. Using a simple model flux rope, we demonstrate that the explosion can be driven by the magnetic pressure of the expanding flux rope, provided the shape of the expansion is “fat” enough. Depending on the details of the pre-eruption configuration and evolution of the magnetic field, the explosion is triggered by one or a combination of three different mechanisms: (1) runaway internal tether-cutting reconnection, (2) runaway external tether-cutting reconnection (a.k.a. breakout reconnection), and (3) ideal MHD instability or loss of equilibrium. No matter how the explosion is triggered, its further growth is driven in basically the same way, by expansion of the growing flux rope erupting from the core of the bipole. The preceding characteristics suggest that once the free magnetic energy (shear and twist in the core field) in the bipole exceeds some limit, an explosion will soon (few hours) be triggered. This, in turn, suggests that the critical factor determining whether a bipole will soon explode is the ratio of the free magnetic energy in the bipole to the magnetic energy content that the bipole would have in its relaxed potential-field configuration (which has no free energy). We expect that when the free- energy buildup increases this ratio to some characteristic critical value (of order 1), the bipole will soon find a way to explode. For an isolated closed solar magnetic field, such as a sunspot active region, the total magnetic energy (the sum of the potential-field energy and the free magnetic energy) and the potential-field energy can be computed from a vector magnetogram of a surface layer of the region, provided the field in and above that layer is in a force-free state (a good approximation above the photosphere in strong-field regions). This is the only plausible way to measure the free/potential energy ratio in solar magnetic fields. So, to test our hypothesis that this ratio is a reliable predictor for strong-field CME explosions, we need highly accurate vector magnetograms of a layer above the photosphere. Obtaining such chromospheric vector magnetograms with enough accuracy to measure the free/potential energy ratio to ~10% or better, requires an advanced solar vector magnetograph mission such as the Magnetic Transition Region Probe (MTRAP) now being considered in the SSSC Roadmap. Abstract

Main Points  The field that explodes is the sheared core of a magnetic arcade and becomes an erupting flux rope as it explodes.  There are three ways to trigger the explosion: - Internal tether-cutting reconnection - External tether-cutting reconnection - Ideal MHD instability  The CME explosion is driven by “fat” expansion of the erupting flux rope.  Critical condition for a CME explosion to be imminent: [Free magnetic energy/Potential magnetic energy] ~ 1.  To measure Free/Potential energy ratio to  10% for CME forecasting, need accurate vector magnetograms of a force-free surface layer.  Need MTRAP.

2002 January 4 (Sterling & Moore, 2004, ApJ, 613, 1221) Onset of a Typical Fast CME

Standard Picture for CME Explosion from an Isolated Bipole

Standard Quadrupolar Topology for Explosive Bipole Embedded in Strong Surrounding Field

Triggering by Internal Tether-Cutting Reconnection

Triggering by External Tether-Cutting Reconnection (a.k.a. Breakout)

Triggering by Ideal MHD Instability

Model Erupting Flux Rope: Magnetic Energy Content: E = (B 2 /8  )Al = (  2 /8  )l/A   E/E = (  l)/l – (  A)/A For  E (  l)/l], i.e., to drive the explosion, flux rope must have “fat” expansion. e.g., for isotropic expansion, A  l 2, and E  1/l

Hypothesis: We posit that the critical physical parameter governing whether an active region will likely produce a CME in the next 24 hours is , the ratio of free to potential magnetic energy:  = Free E mag /Potential E mag We expect that CME production is likely when and only when this ratio exceeds some critical value of order 1: CME occurrence is likely if and only if  >  crit ~ 1

Need MTRAP to measure  and test our hypothesis. To measure , need vector magnetogram of force-free base layer of the active region. For <~10% error in measured , need <~10% error in the vector magnetogram. Free E mag = Total E mag – Potential E mag Total E mag = (1/4  )  ff Obs.B z [Obs.B x x + Obs.B y y]dxdy Potential E mag = (1/4  )  ff Obs.B z [Pot.B x x + Pot.B y y]dxdy