Using Qualitative Methods to Identify System Dynamics and Inform System Evaluation Design Margaret Hargreaves Mathematica Policy Research American Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Focusing an Evaluation Ben Silliman, Youth Development Specialist NC 4-H Youth Development.
Advertisements

Research Strategies: Joining Deaf Educators Together Deaf Education Virtual Topical Seminars Donna M. Mertens Gallaudet University October 19, 2004.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Immigrant Integration as a Complex Adaptive Social Systems Agnes Meinhard, PhD.
November 10, American Evaluation Association
SETTINGS AS COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS AN INTRODUCTION TO COMPLEXITY SCIENCE FOR HEALTH PROMOTION PROFESSIONALS Nastaran Keshavarz Mohammadi Don Nutbeam,
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Open All Areas Partners: difficult to find them (internal and external) and to get them to commit, different goals, coordination of the cooperation, different.
Philip Davies The Challenges Ahead for Impact Evaluation Studies in Poland Using Mixed Methods of Evaluation for Policy Making Purposes.
1 A Tool for Designing Evaluations of Paradigm Shifts in Complex System Interventions Beverly Parsons InSites
Using the Crosscutting Concepts As conceptual tools when meeting an unfamiliar problem or phenomenon.
The Modeling Process Esmaeil Khedmati Morasae Center for Community-Based Participatory Research in Health Tehran University of Medical Sciences Winter.
Gautam Sanka. Analyze and Elucidate the behavior of complex systems Complex Systems Collection of interconnected elements (system) Behavior and Characteristics.
1 Systems Thinking and Evaluation Beverly Parsons, PhD Patricia Jessup, PhD InSites
Getting Connected: The Inaugural Seminar of the Laboratory for Applied Network Research Valentina Kuskova May 20, 2014 NRU HSE International Laboratory.
Return On Investment Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches
Methodology Tips for Constructing Instruments. Matching methods to research paradigm MethodQuantitativeQualitative Written Instrument Standardized Instrument.
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches Dr. William M. Bauer
Systems Dynamics and Equilibrium
Setting Conditions for Self-Organizing Organization Design April 29, 2014 Glenda Eoyang, PhD Human Systems Dynamics Institute
1 ECLIPS Annual Meeting November 6, 2011 Deepening Understanding and Application of Systems Concepts and Development of ECLIPS.
1 Systems Change Theories for Designing Initiatives Dr. Beverly Parsons InSites
1 Qualitative Evaluation Terms Coding/categorization The process of condensing qualitative data through the identification of common themes. Data Matrix.
Rose Asera, Ph.D Rethinking Pre-college Math Summer Institute Aug 22, 2012.
Changing institutional landscapes for wind power implementation. an international comparison Aberdeen, February 21 st 2008 Seminar: “Explaining National.
Theory (and Application) Learning: A change in human performance or performance potential that results from practice or other experience and endures over.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
Skunk Works Evaluation Tools: How do we know if we are having an impact?
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Dimensions of Human Behavior: Person and Environment
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
© 2011 Brooks/Cole, A Division of Cengage Learning Chapter 16 Consultation and Collaboration You must be the change you wish to see in the world. Mahatma.
Semester 2: Lecture 9 Analyzing Qualitative Data: Evaluation Research Prepared by: Dr. Lloyd Waller ©
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
Network Weaving Community of Practice December 12, 2013 C&NN Grassroots Leaders WELCOME.
Implementation and process evaluation: developing our approach Ann Lendrum University of Manchester Neil Humphrey University of Manchester Gemma Moss Institute.
Rethinking Pre-College Math: A Brief Reminder about Why We’re Here and What We’re Trying to Do Overall context/purpose of project Defining characteristics.
Chapter 2 Human System Perspectives. Theoretical Frameworks for Practice Theories about human systems Theories and models of change No one practice framework.
PHSB 612: Interventions Diane M. Dowdy, Ph.D. Spring 2008.
Systemic Perspective Necessary and Sufficient Activities.
Third Sector Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities Presentation to the Public Legal Education in Canada National Conference on “Making an Impact” 26.
Qualitative Research Design for the Librarian/Scholar Dr. Robert V. Labaree Head, The Von KleinSmid Library for International and Public Affairs International.
IS 460 Notes Fundamentals of General Systems Theory by Thomas Hilton.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
How complexity influences evaluation A presentation to the Australasian Evaluation Society Conference Sydney, August 2011 Julie McGeary.
Lesson Objectives All of you should be able to: Identify the parts of any given system. Most of you will be able to: Describe all elements of any given.
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Ch 10 Methodology.
The Concept of the “CLIOS Process”: Integrating the study of physical and policy systems using Mexico City as an example Presentation to the Engineering.
Governance in the Postmodern Era: Implications of an Ecological Worldview Peter J. Robertson Associate Professor School of Policy, Planning, and Development.
© 2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Network Centric Planning ---- Campaign of Experimentation Program of Research IAMWG Dr. David S. Alberts September 2005.
M.Hargreaves, M.Moore, P.Parsons,
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Representing Simple, Complicated and Complex Aspects in Logic Models for Evaluation Quality Presentation to the American Evaluation Association conference,
Evaluating the Impact of a System- Level Intervention Using a Developmental Evaluation Approach S. Elizabeth McGee, MA Evangeline Danseco, PhD Kyle Ferguson.
Deepening Student Impact Via Instructional Practice Data Joe Schroeder, PhD Associate Executive Director, AWSA.
BEST ET AL., 2007 ISIS: Initiative on the Study and Implementation of Systems Systems Thinking in Tobacco Control.
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Module 7 Key concepts Part 2: EVALUATING COMPLEX DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
Workshop 5 Systems Thinking Business case Next steps
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches Dr. William M. Bauer
Created for Sloan-C Conference, Fall 2006
Patterns by Category Group Works Intention Context Context Faith
Presentation transcript:

Using Qualitative Methods to Identify System Dynamics and Inform System Evaluation Design Margaret Hargreaves Mathematica Policy Research American Evaluation Association Conference November 11, 2010

Presentation Goals  What are systems? What is systems change?  How to plan systems change evaluation  What role do qualitative methods play in systems change evaluation?

System Definitions  A configuration of interacting, interdependent parts that are connected through a web of relationships, forming a whole that is more than the sum of its parts (Holland 1998)  Systems are overlapping, nested, and networked; they have subsystems and operate within broader systems (von Bertalanffy 1955; Barabasi 2002)

Systems Thinking  A way of seeing and understanding a situation that emphasizes both the parts and the relationships among the parts rather than the parts in isolation

System Boundaries Delineate what is inside/outside the system or intervention, its parts, or situation of inquiry ◦ Geographical (location) ◦ Organizational (department, unit, function) ◦ Physical (money, materials, staff) ◦ Conceptual (goals, mission, purpose, rules) ◦ Intangibles (perceptions, awareness, mental models) ◦ Natural or human-made

System Relationships Relationships, connections, and exchanges among parts, whole, and environment (context) ◦ Social relationships, formal and informal ◦ Organizational relationships ◦ Flows of information, data, knowledge ◦ Funding flows, streams, budget authorizations ◦ Communication channels and types ◦ Collaborative partnerships ◦ Cause and effect

System Perspectives System perspectives or purposes that focus the energy, attention, action of system agents System parts/agents may differ in worldviews, purposes, or agendas in a given situation Diversity in system perspectives or purposes produces tension and energy within a system (might be productive or destructive) Coherence of purpose or mission among parts can focus, shift patterns of system activity

8 Events and Behaviors Patterns Structures Paradigms Conditions What is happening now? How do patterns play out over time and space? What are the drivers and deep structures? How are they related? M.Hargreaves, M.Moore, P.Parsons,

What is Systems Change? Underlying patterns and structures influence system-wide behaviors, creating system dynamics System change—shifts in patterns and paradigms/structures/conditions of the system These shifts manifest as changes in boundaries, relationships, perspectives, and dynamics over time and space These changes influence and are influenced by changes in events and behaviors

System Change Evaluation Three-part planning process aligns:  Dynamics of the situation  Dynamics of the intervention  Evaluation design and methods

What is the Situation? Describe the situation—the whole, parts, and boundaries Describe the dynamics of the situation’s relationships (where are dynamics random or unknown, simple, complicated, or complex) Describe the diversity of purposes or perspectives within the situation How do deep structures, patterns, and events and behaviors factor into the situation?

What is the Intervention? What is the intervention’s governance—its funding, management, organizational structure, and implementation? What is the intervention’s theory of change—its causal mechanisms and pathways of change? What are the intervention’s intended outcomes— how many, how focused, and at what levels? How does the intervention attend to deep structures, patterns, and events and behaviors?

System Theory of Change System Intervention theory of change ◦ How an intervention plans to trigger the system change process (Funnell and Rogers 2010) Some interventions focus on changing complex systems Some interventions focus on changing individuals operating within complex systems Both approaches benefit from a theory of change (TOC) that attends to different aspects of the system

System Evaluation Design Who are the evaluation’s users? What are the evaluation’s purposes? (developmental, formative, monitoring, or summative) What are the evaluation’s research questions? What are the evaluation’s methods? How will the data be analyzed and interpreted? How does the evaluation attend to deep structures, patterns, and events and behaviors?

Methods: Unknown Dynamics  Case studies, interviews, focus groups, observation of activities  Mapping of community assets  Environmental scans  Needs assessments  Situational analyses

Methods: Simple Dynamics  Randomized experiments  Quasi-experimental comparisons  Regression discontinuity analyses  Hierarchical linear modeling  Performance measurement, monitoring  Program audits, inspections

Methods: Complicated Dynamics  Computer simulation models of stocks, flows, feedback, and causal loops  Social network analysis  Pre-post measurements of change  Interrupted time series analysis  Comparative measurement and monitoring

Methods: Complex Dynamics  GIS spatial analysis  Agent-based modeling  Time trend analysis  Observational or cross-sectional studies  Retrospective analysis  Adaptive learning measurement systems

Role of Qualitative Methods  We recommend mixed methods to explore multiple dynamics  During planning phase, qualitative methods useful to gain a preliminary understanding of a situation and its dynamics  Use this information o develop the rest of the design

Role of Qualitative Methods  What are systems? What is systems change?  How to plan systems change evaluation  What role do qualitative methods play in systems change evaluation?

Contact Information Margaret Hargreaves ◦ ◦