First results of a pilot population-based faecal occult blood colorectal cancer screening program B. DENIS, P. PERRIN, J.F. EBELIN, P. WEBER, E. KALTENBACH,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A guaiac- based faecal occult blood colorectal cancer screening program involving general practitioners is feasible and cost-effective for mass population.
Advertisements

Organized colorectal cancer screening program with FOBT: participation and diagnostic yield deteriorate with time Results – yield Aim To assess the short.
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance FDA Advisory Committee March, 2002 David Lieberman MD Chief, Division of Gastroenterology Oregon Health Sciences.
Treatment of large and giant colorectal polyps in the real world Stéphanie HUSSON, Guy VENTRE, Frédéric VAGNE, Jean François VIES, Marjorie MUSSO, Jean.
Spotlight on Colorectal Cancer Screening 1 1. Home Screening for Colon Cancer
1 THE POSSIBLE INFLUENCE OF THE MEDICAL STAFF INVOLVED IN THE ORGANIZED CERVICAL CANCER (CC) SCREENING OVER THE RESPONSIVENESS TO THE CENTRALLY ISSUED.
Assessment of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps by general pathologists in community practice Bernard DENIS, Carol PETERS, Catherine CHAPELAIN,
Italian Cervical Screening Programme. 17ème congrés de la Société Marocaine de Cancerologie Avril, Marrakech Marco Zappa ISPO, Scientific Institute.
Screening for Colorectal Cancer Cancer Symposium: Measuring the Benefits of Screening and Treatment October 2007.
The primary care excellence model Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake with a Patient Navigator Dr. Brian Mitchell, Co-Investigator Northern Ontario.
Is upper endoscopy indicated in persons with a positive FOBT and a negative colonoscopy in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program ? Bernard.
Adverse effects of colorectal cancer screening with fecal occult blood test: a population-based organized program Results – serious adverse effects Adverse.
Integrated Cancer Screening Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Sharp L, Tilson L, Whyte S, Ó Céilleachair A
Wilson and Jungner Criteria for Screening 1968
Maureen Sayer Health Improvement Practitioner Cheshire and Merseyside Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Cheshire and Merseyside NHS North West.
Bowel Screening in Scotland – Current Challenges and Possible Solutions Prof. Bob Steele Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee.
Ethical issues and cancer screening. Efficacy The extent to which a specific intervention, procedure, regimen, or service produces a beneficial result.
Stage-specific survival of screen-detected versus clinically diagnosed colorectal cancer - evidence from the FOBT screening trials- Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar.
A CMH Community DocTalk with Robert Wayne, MD, FACS.
Mobilizing Newcomers and Immigrants to Cancer Screening Programs funded by Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) The views expressed herein do not necessarily.
Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: a prospective chart audit Bernard DENIS, Guillaume SCHON, Marcel RUETSCH, Jean Christian GRALL,
TREATMENT OF LARGE AND GIANT COLORECTAL POLYPS IN THE REAL WORLD UEGW, PARIS, 2007 Association pour le Dépistage du Cancer colorectal dans le Haut-Rhin.
FIRST TWO AND HALF YEAR OF NATIONAL SCREENING PROGRAM FOR COLORECTAL CANCERS IN REPUBLIC CROATIA Miroslava Katicic 1, Milan Kujundzic 2, Davor Stimac 3,
Kathrin Strasser-Weippl 1 st Medical Department Wilhelminen Hospital, Vienna Cancer Care in Europe.
Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening, attitudes and information preferences Joan M. Griffin, PhD Greta Friedemann-Sánchez, PhD Diana Burgess,
Slides last updated: June 2015 CRC: CLINICAL FEATURES.
Results and cost of a population-based biennial faecal occult blood colorectal cancer screening program Bernard DENIS, Philippe PERRIN, Jean François VIES,
Colorectal Screening NZ Bowel Screening Pilot. WHO Screening criteria  Impt Health condition  Identifiable Latent or early stage  Understand natural.
1 Cervical cancer screening in Lithuania 2005 Maiori, Italy Juozas Kurtinaitis Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University
COMPARING YIELD AND COST OF FOBT AND FS IN AN AVERAGE RISK POPULATION: RESULTS AFTER 2 SCREENING ROUNDS N.Segnan MD, Ms Epi Center for Cancer Prevention.
An Evidence Based Approach to Colorectal Cancer Screening J. C. Ryan, M.D. Associate Professor of Medicine UCSF and SF VAMC 9/22/2014.
Colorectal cancer screening with the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing: a population-based controlled trial.
Cervical cancer screening: problems and barriers in Estonia Piret Veerus Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics National Institute for Health Development.
Diagnostic accuracy systematic review of rectal bleeding in combination with other symptoms, signs and tests in relation to colorectal cancer Olde Bekkink.
Life expectancy of patients treated with ART in the UK: UK CHIC Study Margaret May University of Bristol, Department of Social Medicine, Bristol.
PREPARED BY Colorectal Cancer Programme Screening for Colorectal Cancer A/P Susan Parry, Gastroenterologist, CD MOH Bowel Cancer Programme.
Brian Cox Research Associate Professor: Cancer epidemiology and screening University of Otago Hugh Adam Cancer Epidemiology Unit Department of Preventive.
Robert E. Schoen, MD MPH Associate Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology Division of Gastroenterology University of Pittsburgh Organizing Colorectal Cancer.
Looking toward the future: Consumer preferences for blood-based screening for colorectal cancer PRESENTER: Dr Ian Zajac AUTHORS: Ian Zajac, Amy Duncan,
This presentation is the intellectual property of the authors. Contact for permission to reprint and/or This.
Yield of colonoscopy for advanced neoplasia in a population-based setting Bernard DENIS, Jacques PICOT, Jean François VIES, Marjorie MUSSO, Paul François.
Do all colorectal polyps require pathological examination? Aim To assess whether it is possible to omit the pathological examination of some polyps without.
BC Cancer Agency CARE & RESEARCH Breast Cancer Mortality After Screening Mammography in British Columbia Women Andrew J. Coldman, Ph.D. Norm Phillips,
Colorectal Cancer Screening Implementation of a public health programme An Expert Group on Colorectal Cancer Screening Cancer Society of Finland, Finnish.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
Insert name of presentation on Master Slide Bowel Screening in Welsh Prisons Hayley Heard Head of Programme.
Camden & Islington Practice Nurse/HCA Event Gali Siegal Health Professional Engagement Facilitator Haringey and Enfield March 2016.
March 2010 Having a Bowel Test Professional Pack.
A Pharmacy Based Bowel Cancer Screening Program. Did You Know? Bowel cancer kills more Australians each year than breast or prostate cancer (AIHW 2012.
Cancer prevention and early detection
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines
More Ontarians need to be screened for colorectal cancer (Sept. 2012)
Bowel cancer screening update GP education event 28 Nov 2017
Repeat Colonoscopy Recommendations
Evaluation of a Spiritually-based Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Knowledge and Screening Among Church-attending African Americans and Whites.
Common indicators related to organization and invitation
Bronx Community Health Dashboard: Colorectal Cancer Created: 12/22/2017 Last Updated: 01/19/2018 See last slide for more information about.
BOWEL CANCER SCREENING 11/7/18
Bowel Screening in Wales
Ruggli M.1), Stebler D.1), Besancon L.1), Vaucher F.1)
Reporting in CRC screening
Citation: Cancer Care Ontario
BOWEL CANCER SCREENING IN LEWISHAM
ESTIMATING THE EFFICIENCY OF THREE NATIONAL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMMES USING THE POPULATION-BASED CANCER REGISTRY DATA IN SLOVENIA Vesna ZADNIK MD,
Colorectal 2 week wait pathways and “Getting FIT”
Faecal Immunochemistry Test - qFIT
Presentation transcript:

First results of a pilot population-based faecal occult blood colorectal cancer screening program B. DENIS, P. PERRIN, J.F. EBELIN, P. WEBER, E. KALTENBACH, P. SAFRA, M. MARIOTTE, J.Y. VOGEL. Results according to age Despite strong evidence that screening reduces both colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and incidence, CRC screening remain underutilized. Aim : to report the first results of a population-based pilot faecal occult blood (FOBT) CRC screening program. Methods : this program took place in the French area of Haut-Rhin ( inhabitants). All 627 general practitioners (GP) were invited to attend paid educational meetings on CRC screening. The screening test used for average risk persons was a biennial non rehydrated FOBT (Hemoccult II) without dietary restriction. Residents aged years were invited twice by mail to visit their GP for a CRC screening. The recall letter included a reply coupon which could be used to specify reasons for non participation. FOBT were provided free of charge by the GPs. Results : after 19 months, 608 GPs (97%) followed a CRC screening training, 78 % of them attended dedicated meetings persons (99.2%) received the first invitation letter and (55.3%) the recall letter (8.3%) persons were excluded for medical reasons (high risk of CRC, concurrent severe disease). 618 (98.6 %) GPs provided tests, 84.3 % of them being completed. Each GP had a mean number of 100 persons having completed a FOBT (range ) persons (36.7%) completed a FOBT. Participation was higher in women (38.3%) than in men (35%)(p<0.001) and ranged from 26.3% to 51.8% according to districts. The impact of the first letter lasted a mean of 6 months and led to 59% of the global participation, that of the recall letter lasted 6 months and led to 30% of the overall participation and 55% of all exclusions. FOBT positivity rate was 3.6%. It was higher in men (4.3%) than in women (3.1%)(p<0.001). The positive predictive value calculated on the 1705 first colonoscopic procedures was 9.8% for CRC (7.2% in women, 12% in men), 19.9% for advanced adenomas (13.7% in women, 25.1% in men) and 11.7% for non advanced adenomas. 26.3% of CRC were in situ. One perforation was recorded. Conclusion : GP's awareness of CRC screening can be increased to a high level. CRC screening rates can be enhanced through a population-based screening program when GPs are motivated and involved. Efforts should be directed at men in the 2nd half of our program, since their participation is lower than women despite a higher CRC risk. Our first results indicate that a participation rate of 60 % should be launched at the end of the program. Despite strong evidence that screening reduces both colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and incidence, CRC screening remain underutilized Aim to report the first results of a population-based pilot faecal occult blood (FOBT) CRC screening program. - This program took place in the French area of Haut-Rhin (0.71 million inhabitants). - All 627 general practitioners (GP) were invited to attend paid educational meetings on CRC screening. - The screening test used for average risk persons was a biennial non rehydrated FOBT (Hemoccult II) without dietary restriction. - Residents aged years were invited twice by mail to visit their GP for a CRC screening. The recall letter included a reply coupon which could be used to specify reasons for non participation. 12 to 15 months after the 1 st invitation, FOBT were mailed to persons who didn’t complete the test and a last recall letter was sent if necessary 6 weeks later. - FOBT analysis was centralized in the Centre d’Examens de Santé of the CPAM in Mulhouse - FOBT were provided free of charge. Financing was ensured through the French Social Security and the Haut-Rhin Administration (Conseil Général du Haut-Rhin). - Start of the program was spread out according to districts over a year from September 2003 to September Results below are those assessed in September 2005, 24 months after the mailing of the first invitations. Conclusions - GP's awareness of CRC screening can be increased to a high level. - when GPs are involved and motivated, CRC screening rates can be enhanced a lot through a population-based screening program. - Our first results indicate that an adjusted screening rate of 60 % should be launched at the end of the program. - Efforts should be directed at men, since their compliance is lower than women despite a higher CRC risk. 13th United European Gastroenterology Week, Copenhagen, 19 october 2005 Results : invitation / exclusion / participation invited population population aged years187,147 1st invitation letter187,147 (100 %) recall letter125,958 (67.3 %) FOB test mailing74,178 (39.6 %) exclusions recent CRC screening11,869 (6.3%) high risk of CRC5,766 (3.1%) concurrent severe disease805 (0.4%) total population excluded18,718 (10.0 %) participation crude participation84,687 (45.3 %) adjusted participation84,687 (50.3 %) Association pour le Dépistage du Cancer colorectal dans le Haut-Rhin (ADECA 68), 39 avenue de la Liberté, Colmar, FRANCE Abstract Background Results : FOBT / colonoscopy CRC screening training 608 GPs (97 %) followed a CRC screening training % attended dedicated meetings % had an individual training FOBT distribution 618 GPs (98.6 %) provided FOBT - mean number of persons having completed a FOBT = 108 / GP (range 1 – 472) % of the FOBT provided by GPs were completed menwomenp total exclusions8,869 (9.8%)9,849 (10.2%)< 0.01 recent CRC screening5,241 (5.8%)6,627 (6.9%)< 0.01 high risk of CRC3,076 (3.4%)2,690 (2.8%)< 0.01 concurrent severe disease414 (0.5%)391 (0.4%)NS crude participation 43.3% 47.1%< 0.01 adjusted participation48.0%52.5%< 0.01 FOBT positivity rate4.1%2.9%< 0.01 PPV for neoplasia645 (51.8%)317 (30.9%)< 0.01 PPV for cancer154 (12.4%)73 (7.2%)< 0.01 PPV for advanced adenoma337 (27.0%)141 (13.7%)< 0.01 detection rate for neoplasia16.4 ‰7.0 ‰< 0.01 detection rate for cancer3.9 ‰1.6 ‰< 0.01 detection rate for advanced adenoma8.6 ‰3.1 ‰< 0.01 CRC stagesn (%) in situ61 (27%) invasive165 (73%) stage 157 (50.9%) stage 226 (23.2%) stage 323 (20.5%) stage 46 (5.4%) stage unknown53 FOBT: 84,687 tests completed - 2,897 (3.4 %) positive - 2,737 (3.3 %) uninterpretable, 1,869 (74.7 %) were completed again % of positive FOBT were followed by a colonoscopy FOBT positivity rate3.4 % PPV for neoplasia42.3 % PPV for cancer10.0 % PPV for advanced adenoma21.0 % detection rate for neoplasia11.4 ‰ screened detection rate for cancer2.6 ‰ screened detection rate for advanced adenoma5.6 ‰ screened Results : diagnostic yield Results according to gender Methods Results : GP’s involvement total exclusions % crude participation % adjusted participation % FOBT positivity rate % PPV for neoplasia % PPV for cancer % PPV for advanced adenoma % detection rate neoplasia ‰ detection rate cancer ‰ detection rate advanced adenoma ‰ Colonoscopy: 2,272 recorded % complete - 5 complications recorded : - 1 perforation - 2 bleeding - 2 abdominal pain Impact of invitations participation exclusions