PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 16) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Function: Domain and Range
Advertisements

FINESSE FINESSE Frequency Domain Interferometer Simulation Versatile simulation software for user-defined interferometer topologies. Fast, easy to use.
Class question: Why do we use Gaussian beams? One clue: there was no Gaussian beam before Answer 1: It is the simplest fundamental solution that.
Laser Physics EAL 501 Lecture 6 Power & Frequency.
Chapter 2 Propagation of Laser Beams
Nonlinear Optics Lab. Hanyang Univ. Chapter 2. The Propagation of Rays and Beams 2.0 Introduction Propagation of Ray through optical element : Ray (transfer)
Marcus Ng Mentor: Alan Weinstein Co-mentor: Robert Ward
Ray matrices The Gaussian beam Complex q and its propagation Ray-pulse “Kosten- bauder” matrices The prism pulse compressor Gaussian beam in space and.
 Light can take the form of beams that comes as close
Gaussian Beam Propagation Code
Nanophotonics Class 6 Microcavities. Optical Microcavities Vahala, Nature 424, 839 (2003) Microcavity characteristics: Quality factor Q, mode volume V.
COMPUTER MODELING OF LASER SYSTEMS
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
Higher order TEM modes: Why and How? Andreas Freise European Gravitational Observatory 17. March 2004.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
Higher order laser modes in gravitational wave detectors
Computational Physics Approaches to Model Solid-State Laser Resonators Konrad Altmann LAS-CAD GmbH, Germany LASer Cavity Analysis & Design.
Optics, Eugene Hecht, Chpt. 13;
Chapter 8. Second-Harmonic Generation and Parametric Oscillation
Introduction to Optical Electronics
Physics 1C Lecture 26A.
Interaction of radiation with atoms and ions (I) Absorption- Stimulated emission E1E1 E2E2 W 12 =W 21 Spontaneous emission More definitionsCross section.
Chapter 36 Image Formation.
1Lesson 2 Introduction to Optical Electronics Quantum (Photon) Optics (Ch 12) Resonators (Ch 10) Electromagnetic Optics (Ch 5) Wave Optics (Ch 2 & 3) Ray.
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG105 & ECEU646 Optics for Engineers Course Notes Part 8: Gaussian Beams Prof. Charles A.
Nonlinear Optics Lab. Hanyang Univ. Chapter 6. Processes Resulting from the Intensity-Dependent Refractive Index - Optical phase conjugation - Self-focusing.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 3) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 5)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 10) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 4) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
Solving Scalar Linear Systems A Little Theory For Jacobi Iteration
For off-center points on screen, Fresnel zones on aperture are displaced …harder to “integrate” mentally. When white and black areas are equal, light at.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 11) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
Stability Diagram and Stability Criterions As described in textbooks for instance LASERS of A. E. Siegman, the stability diagram initially has been de-
Principal planes method For the purposes of finding images, we can reduce any* optical system to a thin lens. Principal plane distances p 1 and p 2 are.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 9) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 12) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
§3.3 Optical Resonators with Spherical Mirrors We will show the field solutions inside the spherical mirror resonator are Gaussian Beams Z=0 00 z R2R2.
Ray tracing and ABCD matrix Optics, Eugene Hecht, Chpt. 6.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 19) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 6) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 20) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113.
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 8)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 7)
Circle method Wavefront with radius Circle with diameter R(z) R(z) z r
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 12)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 15)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 16)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 21)
Chapter III Optical Resonators
Interaction of radiation with atoms and ions (I)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 15)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 17)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 14)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 13)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 13)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 14)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 18)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 17)
Scalar theory of diffraction
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 10)
Chapter II The Propagation of Rays and Beams
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 5)
Lasers, resonators, Gaussian beams
Laser oscillation Laser is oscillator
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 18)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 11)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 20)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 21)
PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 19)
Presentation transcript:

PHYS 408 Applied Optics (Lecture 16) JAN-APRIL 2016 EDITION JEFF YOUNG AMPEL RM 113

Quiz #8 1.The cavity stability criterion is distinct from the criterion for determining actual resonator modes: T/F 2.The ABCD matrix element transformation of a Gaussian beam can be used to prove that a mirror with radius of curvature equal to that of a Gaussian mode at a certain location, will reflect that Gaussian exactly back on itself: T/F 3.A spherical wave has a well defined wave vector k: T/F 4.I would have done better on the midterm if I had reviewed and understood all of the preceding lecture material: T/F

Quick review of key points from last lecture The stability criterion for curved-mirror cavities is less stringent than the criterion for the cavity to actually support a resonant mode(s). Either ray optics or Gaussian beam optics, both involving the ABCD matrix elements, can be used to derive the cavity stability criterion. Simple ABCD q conversion can be used to easily show that a curved mirror with a radius of curvature matching a Gaussian mode’s curvature at some location, will reflect that Gaussian into a counter-propagating version of exactly the same Gaussian.

A unique Gaussian is “supported” or “conserved” by two mirrors of radii R 1 and R 2 separated by a distance d. It may or may not be stable.

Review up to here: Given R 1 and R 2, can solve for range of d’s where there can be a stable cavity using the stability criterion For a given d, figure out “the Gaussian” for which the radius of curvatures a distance d apart are equal to R 1 and R 2 (see homework #4) one approach is to use q=(Aq+B)/Cq+D) where ABCD correspond to a “round trip” ABCD matrix for the cavity. Solve for q at some z position (say one of the two mirror positions) in terms of the round trip ABCD matrix elements another approach is to use fact that know R(z 1m )=R 1 and R(z 2m )=-R 2, and these two values can be used to solve for q(z) Next?

Additional criterion for actual modes What is the additional criterion? What is  (z) for our Gaussian beam?

Mode criterion What is q and where does it come from? Do any of these terms depend on the curvature of the mirrors?

Free spectral range and allowed mode frequencies

Modified Gaussian Modes (Hermite- Gaussian)

Hermite-Gaussian beams (con’t)

Finally

Intensity distributions

Impact on Free Spectral Range and Allowed Mode Frequencies?  F  Recognize this if you have done the cavity lab?  F 

Real cavities What is the lifetime of all these modes we have solved for so far? Answer: Infinite…as per the definition of a mode (recall?) What has been left out of all in all of this generic mode stability and phase criteria so far, when comparing to real physical systems? Answer: a)reflectivity of at least one of the mirrors must be <1 to allow one to use the modes (intrinsic, unitary) b)Material imperfections (scattering losses, absorption etc.) (extrinsic, non-unitary)