Femoral Revision with the Wagner SL Revision Stem by Paul Böhm, and Oliver Bischel J Bone Joint Surg Am Volume 83(7): July 1, 2001 ©2001 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Figs. 1-A, 1-B, and 1-C An 84.8-year-old woman with a periprosthetic fracture was referred to our clinic. Paul Böhm, and Oliver Bischel J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83: ©2001 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
The femoral component was revised through a transfemoral approach. Paul Böhm, and Oliver Bischel J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83: ©2001 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Fifteen months postoperatively, the radiograph showed good restoration of the proximal part of the femur; the patient could walk using two crutches. Paul Böhm, and Oliver Bischel J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83: ©2001 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Figs. 2-A, 2-B, and 2-C A sixty-five-year-old man was seen with septic loosening of a right cemented total hip replacement that had been in situ for eight years. Paul Böhm, and Oliver Bischel J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83: ©2001 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Radiograph made after a single-stage revision arthroplasty through the transfemoral approach in the infected hip. Paul Böhm, and Oliver Bischel J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83: ©2001 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Forty-six months postoperatively, there was excellent restoration of the proximal part of the femur. Paul Böhm, and Oliver Bischel J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83: ©2001 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
System to classify preoperative femoral defects. Paul Böhm, and Oliver Bischel J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83: ©2001 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Survival curve and 95% confidence intervals for the Wagner revision stem, with failure defined as removal for any cause. Paul Böhm, and Oliver Bischel J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83: ©2001 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.