Science is leading the revolution in targeted, personalised therapies:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6th European Patients’ Rights Day The EMA Geriatric Medicines Strategy and the empowered aging patient Francesca Cerreta EMA (European Medicines Agency)
Advertisements

National Cancer Survivorship Initiative Developing the NCSI 2012 document: taking action to improve outcomes.
The evolving role of real-world evidence to support policy and practice CADTH 2015.
SMC Evaluation Programme. Overview Context Evaluation Programme –Stakeholders –SMC advice Conclusions.
Gwendolyn Ryals, Look at Me Artwork from The Creative Center Julia Brown, Vice President Government Affairs and Market Access CADTH Symposium April 2015.
HTA from an Industry Perspective Janey Shin, Director of Medical Affairs Johnson & Johnson Medical Companies CADTH, 2015.
Irish Health Research: Collaboration and Partnership HSE Regional Library & Information Health Research Seminar Dr. Steevens’ Hospital 11th February 2011.
Clinical Lead Self Care and Prevention
SUCCESS FACTORS IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL MARKETPLACE
Clinical Care Pathways (CCCP): Magic or Maze? Norah Bostock Operations Manager: Governance.
LIMITLESS POTENTIAL | LIMITLESS OPPORTUNITIES | LIMITLESS IMPACT Copyright University of Reading IMPACT AND THE SCIENCES Anthony Atkin (Research Impact.
LIMITLESS POTENTIAL | LIMITLESS OPPORTUNITIES | LIMITLESS IMPACT Copyright University of Reading IMPACT AND THE LIFE SCIENCES Anthony Atkin (Research Impact.
EU - JAPAN FTA Perspectives from the pharmaceutical industry EESC – Hearing on EU - Japan FTA Brussels, 15 January
AIM 2030 Access to Innovative Medicines Draft concept for a new World Bank-led multi-stakeholder initiative August 2014, Andreas Seiter.
Benefits of a strong collaboration with patient groups at national and EU level Susanna Palkonen, Director European Federation.
How to determine medicines benefits policy and program needs?
CHALLENGES FOR PRAGMATIC TRIALS IN EUROPE Donna A. Messner, PhD.
Improving care for people with intellectual disabilities across the life span The ACI Intellectual Disability Network: Maxine Andersson Agency for Clinical.
Access to Personalised Medicine for PDAC patients STSM of the application of an EU-index for barriers Denis Horgan (EAPM) & Angela Brand (IPHG) on behalf.
September 13, 2007SGH&M2B International&Training Workshop What does the European Technology Platform “Innovative Medicines initiative” offer? Vitalijs.
Integrate Risk Evaluation & Mitigation Strategies (REMS) with Health Management Craig Kephart, President & CEO Centric Health Resources, Inc. July 15,
Developing medicines for the future and why it is challenging Angela Milne.
Current Challenges and Future Developments in HTA in the UK Frances Macdonald, 23 rd September 2008 (A personal, Industry View)
PUTTING THE PATIENT AT THE CENTER OF HEALTHCARE RESEARCH Towards a more inclusive model.
Adaptive Licensing UK. Content What is adaptive licensing? Draft criteria for pilot candidate selection EMA Road Map 2015 and work programme 2012 UK perspective.
Privacy Symposium / HIPAA Summit
EHR stakeholder workshop – 10-11th March Toward integration of clinical care and clinical research for better health and high quality healthcare.
Risk Sharing Schemes Dr Rafiq Hasan Director of Market Access
EHFG 7 October 2005 – Patient Safety & Research UK Presidency Workshop on Patient Safety, EHFG, Bad Hofgastein,7 September 2005 Kevin McCarthy, European.
NHSScotland Quality Strategy and Health Works Anne Hendry National Clinical Lead for Quality.
Opportunities in 2012 and Beyond The Way Forward Stuart Semple Director of Pharmacy and Medicines Management Barts Health NHS Trust.
Health Technology Assessment for Pharmaceuticals and New Medical Technologies - Where are we now? The industry perspective Jenny Hughes, Director, Vaccines.
China EU Pharmaceutical Forum
Systemic change by streamlined innovation: personalised medicine Novembre 8, 2013.
Gwendolyn Ryals, Look at Me Artwork from The Creative Center Janey Shin, Director, Real World Evidence Government Affairs and Market Access CADTH Symposium.
Regulatory and Reimbursement Harmonization An Industry Perspective Adrian Griffin | April 2016.
I farmaci innovativi in una prospettiva europea Giuseppe M.C. Rosano, MD, PhD Cardiovascular and Cell Sciences Research Institute, St George's University.
Aligning Policy Agendas The case of personalised care and cure for healthy and active ageing Setting the scene for the DG Regio and Flanders Smart Specialisation.
Patient Engagement throughout the Biopharmaceutical Lifecycle: Tips for Effective Patient Advocate/Industry Collaboration to Improve Patient Access and.
Real World Evidence in Cancer Care: A Payer’s Perspective CADTH SYMPOSIUM 2016 Scott Gavura, Director, Provincial Drug Reimbursement Programs.
The opportunities and challenges of sharing genomics data with the pharmaceutical industry Shahid Hanif, Head of Health Data & Outcomes, ABPI DNA digest.
Conferenceboard.ca Aligning, Foreseeing, and Optimizing HTA in Canada 2016 CADTH Symposium April 12, 2016 Dr. Gabriela Prada Director, Health Innovation.
Continuous Improvement & Real World Evidence: A Public Payer’s Perspective Suzanne McGurn, Assistant Deputy Minister and Executive Officer Ontario Public.
Main topics Who are we at EMA and what is our regulatory experience in Parkinson’s disease (PD) Initiatives available at EMA to stimulate and support.
Integrated Research Methodology
Taxonomy of Strategies
Efficacy and Safety of Medicines
Impact and the Physical Sciences
Health Technology Assessment
Prospects for New Delivery Systems and Reimbursement Models
Better Science, Better Health: New Healthcare Models
FDA-CDRH in the Next Decade A Vision for Change
Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs): Saving Time, Saving Lives Thursday, 4 June 2015, 11:00-12:30 Cercle Cité, Grand Auditorium, Luxembourg.
Finland, a Global Testbed for Personalized Cancer Research?
Innovative Medicines Initiative:
Issues in Hypothesis Testing in the Context of Extrapolation
Regulatory Responses (n=11) Company Responses (n=20)
Regulatory Responses (n=11) Company Responses (n=20)
Public Health Intelligence Adviser
Regulatory and Reimbursement Harmonization
Kaisa Immonen EPF Director of Policy
Building Capacity for Quality Improvement A National Approach
Joint BES/BBS Seminar Patient Preference Studies – Introduction
An introduction to EMA’s support for medicines development
BioCapital Europe 2019, Amsterdam
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
IMI – an opportunity to implement research for patients and with patients Catherine Brett European Parliament Interest Group on Allergy and Asthma
An Agency Perspective on Plain Language Summaries of Publications
An Agency Perspective on Plain Language Summaries of Publications
Presentation transcript:

MAPPs: Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients Removing Regulatory Barriers and Fostering Greater Collaboration Presentation MAPPs are the continuous evaluation of new therapies which reacts to their actual performance in patients over the entire lifecycle of the treatment The goal of MAPPs is to balance timely access for patients with the need to provide evolving information a new therapy’s benefits and risks. MAPPs are being piloted in Europe, and we believe MAPPs will eventually incorporate adaptive clinical trial design, patient centric benefit/risk assessment and continuous evaluation as new real-world evidence becomes available. Such a pathway should enable rapid adaptations based on patient responses. www.efpia.eu

Science is leading the revolution in targeted, personalised therapies: More precise diagnosis based on specific bio-markers of the patient Effective treatments designed to target the underlying cause of the disease Smaller, faster clinical trials Drugs given to those most likely to benefit Less waste + toxicity as we target those most likely to benefit MAPPs will harness many of the scientific breakthroughs being advanced by stratified (personalised) medicines. We have the technical ability to now move beyond a ‘one size fits all’ approach to treatment, we should also be investigating ways to do this in evaluating the effectiveness of new therapies to bring them to market Stratified/personalised medicine also means that we can focus treatments on responders, and do so with less toxicity as we will only treat those people where we see effectiveness of treatments.

The stakeholder relationships for MAPPs visualized The stakeholder relationships for MAPPs visualized. No longer is the regulatory process a series of bilateral discussions between a drug company and a regulator, payer, HTA, etc in a linear fashion… The evidence required and ‘success metrics’ are agreed in advance, and the performance of the therapy is evaluated based on actual evidence generated by how the new therapy performs in patients.

MAPPs imply that ALL stakeholders in the decision making process are involved at the start of designing the MAPPs trial. The evidence required and ‘success metrics’ are agreed in advance, and the performance of the therapy is evaluated based on actual evidence generated by how the new therapy performs in patients.

How Will MAPPs Benefit Stakeholders?* For patients and providers Earlier access to promising new medicinal products Lower realised harm Continuous reduction of uncertainty throughout the lifetime of the product New risk management paradigm that may restore public confidence For regulators Adaptive reimbursement plan to align value with price and utilisation Continuous risk/benefit information flow to better support (follow-on) coverage decisions For payers For the pharmaceutical industry Earlier revenue stream; staggered development costs Decrease risks of (costly) late stage failures and post-market withdrawals This slide must not be skipped. Here we outline the changes needed for the 5 key stakeholder groups to improve regulatory pathways and what the impact of these changes will be. * Based on HG Eichler’s presentation of 4 June 2015

What will change with MAPPs? Transition from … Magic moment  focused life-cycle management Prediction  monitoring and adjustment RCT only  toolkit for evidence generation Big populations  focused populations Emphasis on licensing emphasis on patient access Open utilisation  evidence based utilisation

EMA Adaptive Licensing Pilot EMA has 58 applications as of April 2015, of which roughly one-third have been selected for further discussion Majority of the therapies submitted project are not for primary care use, but would need to be delivered by highly specialised care centres Tools are needed to stimulate designing non linear adaptive pathway, as current pilots are essentially linear in design EMA seeks three tools to assist pilot project: Patient engagement tool allowing in a reproducible way to gage willingness to accept uncertainty Evidence generation linking data from primary care, tertiary care, and hospital databases Model that could help evaluate and design a pathway that considers all the stakeholder opinions simultaneously Implementation of more creative intelligence to get marketing authroisation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIhMCl5Gceg This slide gives an update as of May 5, 2015, as to the status of the EMA MAPPs pilot. If you have time and the technical capability, the youtube link is a video of Hans-Georg Eichler articulating the EMA position of the pilot.

Coordination and Support Action (CSA) in IMI Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients seek to foster access to beneficial treatments for the right patient groups at the earliest appropriate time in the product life-span in a sustainable fashion www.adaptsmart.eu Demonstrated potential benefit Continuous monitoring of a new therapy Measurement and adjustment over the entire lifecycle Objective measures, including real world evidence MAPPs is a key platform of many projects working under the Innovative Medicine’s Initiative under Horizon 2020. IMI2 is a nearly 4 billion Euro public private partnership combining the resources of EFPIA, the European Commission, and many leading EU research institutions in the 28 member states MAPPs activity in IMI2 will be managed in a multi-stakeholder Coordinated Support Action, also in partnership with MIT’s NewDigs.

MAPPs is a key platform of many projects working under the Innovative Medicine’s Initiative under Horizon 2020. IMI2 is a nearly 4 billion Euro public private partnership combining the resources of EFPIA, the European Commission, and many leading EU research institutions in the 28 member states MAPPs activity in IMI2 will be managed in a multi-stakeholder Coordinated Support Action, also in partnership with MIT’s NewDigs.

MAPPs Myths Dispelled “MAPPs only “works” in Rare Diseases” Many aspects of Rare Disease R&D fit with MAPPs but applicable to all areas of development “R&D investments will be lower under MAPPs than Traditional development pathways” Investments before first approval lower, but higher post-launch – company may need to build monitoring infrastructure Lower sales volume after initial targeted approval, but earlier patient access; indication broadens out over time and volume then increases Costs of failure may increase due to accelerated investments (eg manufacturing, parallel work) “Product prices will be lower under MAPPs than traditional development pathways” More targeted patient populations may gain greater health benefits (and therefore value) – even if not fully demonstrated at launch. Investments and risks may increase or decrease Value provided to patients who are within treatment window.

Development Access Regulatory HC delivery Early patient access: combination of existing and new tools within the current legal framework Development Access Regulatory HC delivery GetReal Early and continuous dialogue Big Data for Health Outcomes PAES & PASS Patient preference elicitation for B/R ADAPT SMART REA/HTA Conditional marketing authorisation Rolling review Managing Uncertainties Parallel Scientific & HTA advice Compassionate Use/Early access schemes Pricing/Reimbursement Full marketing authorisation (evt. Subject to conditions) MEAs Accelerated assessment (and decision making)

Summary MAPPs is a paradigm shift that requires new ways of thinking, operating and behaving MAPPs need “safe harbours” to test new models and ideas – EMA pilots and IMI collaborations MAPPs requires an open and early dialogue of all players in the research and healthcare eco-systems

Leopold Plaza Building * Rue du Trône 108 B-1050 Brussels * Belgium EFPIA Brussels Office Leopold Plaza Building * Rue du Trône 108 B-1050 Brussels * Belgium Tel: + 32 (0)2 626 25 55 www.efpia.eu * info@efpia.eu