Demand Response Options Review Carl Raish November 27, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Distributed Generation Task Force November 5, 2007.
Advertisements

ERCOT Analysis of 2005 Residential Annual Validation Using the Customer Survey Results ERCOT Load Profiling Presented to PWG - October 26, 2005.
Demand Response Task Force February 2008 Update. Bridge Solution Short Term Only: Use as “bridge” to long term solution Standardize Energy Impacts: Utilize.
Profiling Working Group March 13, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting March 13, 2007.
Oil & Gas Preliminary Sample Analysis March 30, 2006.
ERCOT Staff Comments Regarding the Proposed Suspension of Residential 2005 Annual Validation RMS Presentation August 10, 2005.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Brad Boles of Cirro Energy ERCOT PWG Vice-Chair for COPS Meeting November 6, 2007.
Profiling Working Group January 11, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting January 11, 2006.
2007 Annual Validation Preliminary Review of Residential Algorithm & Estimate of Migrations February 27, 2007.
ERCOT 2003 UFE ANALYSIS By William Boswell & Carl Raish AEIC Load Research Conference July 13, 2005.
01/21/2008 Nodal COMS Extracts & Reports Market Requirements Review SDAWG Jackie Ashbaugh ERCOT ***NOTE: All information contained in this presentation.
1 ERCOT Load Research Update PWG August 24, 2005.
-- Presentation from PWG -- Workshop on Profile ID Assignment and Annual Review Process June 23, 2005.
1 Profiling Working Group Update to COPS April 15, 2015 Jim Lee (AEP) – Chair Sheri Wiegand (TXU) – Vice Chair.
Three Decimals for Profile Resolution. 2 Pro Case for Three Decimals for Profile Resolution  Generation 15 minute pattern rarely has 2 adjacent equal.
1 AMS Data Workshop ERCOT Overview of AMS Data Processes June 27, 2014 ERCOT June 27, 2014.
RMSUpdate January 6, 2005 Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC.
TX SET Update to RMS Wednesday, October 10, 2007.
RMSUpdate November 4, 2004 Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC.
Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation
1 AEIC Annual Load Research Conference September 12, Reno, NV ERCOT Residential Profile ID Assignments – Dealing with Assignment Accuracy and Migration.
Profiling Working Group August 2, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting August 22, 2006.
1 Presented to ERCOT Retail Market Subcommittee January 9, 2002 Profiling Working Group Darryl Nelson, Chair Load Profiling Operating Guides (LPOG)
UFE 2003 Analysis June 1, UFE 2003 ANALYSIS Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation June 1, 2005.
Advanced Meter Settlement Background and NPRR. Overview PUC Rule (wholesale settlement) Project – Wholesale Settlement Project Filed Deployment.
0 The Basics –There are 4 POLR customer classes: Residential, Small Non-Res. (
1 ERCOT LRS Precision Analysis PWG Presentation February 27, 2007.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Direct Energy ERCOT PWG Chair Ed Echols Of Oncor ERCOT PWG Vice Chair for COPS Meeting.
Profiling Working Group March 14, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting March 14, 2006.
UFE 2005 Analysis 1 UFE 2005 ANALYSIS Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation.
1 PWG Update Report By Ed Echols Of Oncor ERCOT PWG Chair Jim Lee of Direct Energy ERCOT PWG Vice Chair for COPS Meeting Sept 10, 2014.
Demand Response Status Report Calvin Opheim October 9, 2007.
Settlement Accuracy Analysis Prepared by ERCOT Load Profiling.
1 ESI ID SERVICE HISTORY AND USAGE DATA EXTRACT SYSTEM CHANGE REQUEST (SCR 727) February 24, 2003.
1 UFE Workshop Sponsored by COPS October 19, 2004.
DSWG – March 9, 2015 Four-CP Response in ERCOT Competitive Area Carl L Raish.
1 History of UFE (shortened version of presentation provided at UFE Taskforce Workshop on 9/14/2004) UFE Taskforce Meeting February 21, 2006.
Load Profiling Working Group RMS Presentation 8/01/2002 by Ernie Podraza Reliant Energy Retail Group Chair PWG.
MARS 867_03F ROR vs. Settlement vs. 810 Scenarios ERCOT September 2008.
Profiling Working Group October 16, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting October 16, 2003.
MARS Advanced Metering – ERCOT Market Facing Changes Jackie Ashbaugh Manager Data Integrity and Administration 3/9/2009.
1 ERCOT Load Profile Transition Option 1 – 4 Analysis August 21, 2006.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Smart Meter Technology.
Direct Load Control Update Betty Day Manager of Load Profiling and Data Aggregation February 25, 2003 Retail Market Subcommittee.
Distributed Renewable Generation Profile Implementation Plan.
TX SET Update to RMS Wednesday, November 7, 2007.
Profiling Working Group August 14, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting August 14, 2003.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Advanced Meter Technology.
Direct Load Control Update Betty Day Manager of Load Profiling and Data Aggregation February 25, 2003 Retail Market Subcommittee.
MARS Taskforce COPS Update August 10, Definitions AMC – AMS (IDR) meter type settled using the 15-Minute LSE data received from TDSP AMDG – 15 Minute.
Profiling Working Group March 18, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting March 18, 2004.
1DRAFT for DISCUSSION Transition From Non-IDR to IDR Load Profile and LSE 15-minute Data for AMS Market Advanced Readings and Settlements Taskforce 10/9/09.
1 New MO Projects June COMS Extract, Report & Web Services Monitoring & Usage Statistics Jackie Ashbaugh.
1 Commercial Operations Sub-Committee Update to RMS November 10, 2005.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Direct Energy ERCOT PWG Chair Ed Echols Of Oncor ERCOT PWG Vice Chair for COPS Meeting.
Profiling Working Group January 14, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting January 14, 2004.
Oil and Gas Profile Implementation Plan. 2 BUSOGFLT Background ERCOT received Oil and Gas Profile Segment request ERCOT completed.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Brad Boles of Cirro Energy ERCOT PWG Vice-Chair for COPS Meeting December 3, 2007.
1 A Review of Impacts to UFE and Load Ratio Share Based on AV Profile ID Changes Presented by ERCOT Staff to the Profiling Working Group 10/26/2005.
PWG Long Term Strategy How do we maximize scarce resources?
PWG Demand Response Follow Up Jackie Ashbaugh October 23, 2007.
Hypothetical Examples of How Residential Photovoltaic (PV) ESI IDs Could be Settled ERCOT Load Profiling.
Profile Working Group & TX SET Conference Call Thursday, October 11, 2007.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Brad Boles of Cirro Energy ERCOT PWG Vice-Chair for COPS Meeting June 11, 2007.
PWG Profiling Working Group December 18, RMS Presentation by Ernie Podraza, PWG Chair Annual Validation 2002 DLC Implementation.
-- Presentation from PWG -- Profile ID Assignment and Annual Review Process November 17, 2005.
Profiling Working Group
Demand Response – ERCOT discussion items
Presentation transcript:

Demand Response Options Review Carl Raish November 27, 2007

2 2 ERCOT requires a fifteen (15) minute settlement interval Vast majority of Customers do not have this level of granularity Profiles are created using adjusted static models Models estimate customer level interval load based on calendar-type data (season, day of week, time of day) weather data (temperature, wind-speed, cloud-cover, dew-point) Backcasted Profiles are generated the day following a trade day and used for all settlements (initial, final and true-up) Load Profiling Converts monthly kWh reads to fifteen (15) minute intervals Enables the accounting of energy usage in settlements ERCOT Load Profiling

3 3 ERCOT Load Profile Models are documented in Appendix E of the Load Profiling Guide on the ERCOT website ERCOT Load Profiling

4 4 ESI IDs are linked to Load Profile Models by their Load Profile ID Rules for assigning ESI IDs to Load Profile ID are also documented in Appendix D of the Load Profiling Guide ERCOT Load Profiling

5 5 3 Load Profile Groups - 10 Segments Residential (2) Low-Winter Ratio (Non-electric Heat) (Non-electric Heat) High-Winter Ratio (Electric Heat) (Electric Heat) Business (6) Low Load Factor Medium Load Factor High Load Factor Non-Demand IDR Default OGFLT Non-Metered (2) Lighting (Street Lights) Flat (Traffic Signals)

6 6 8 ERCOT Weather Zones

7 7 8WeatherZones 10 Profile Segments 80 Load Profiles Total Profiles

8 8 Profile IDs Additional Fields in the Load Profile ID: –Meter Data Type Code (IDR or NIDR) –Weather Sensitivity Code (NWS or WS) –TOU Schedule Code (NOTOU, TOU01, TOU02, …, TOU12, TOU13) Examples of valid Profile Ids: RESHIWR_COAST_NIDR_NWS_NOTOU RESLOWR_SCENT_NIDR_NWS_NOTOU

9 9 Profiling For Demand Response Adjusted static models cannot capture dynamic control events The Load Profiling Guide specifies that Lagged Dynamic Profiles will be used to settle demand response programs –Interval data collected from a representative sample of program participants to capture load impacts of control events as they occur Each demand response program will need a unique profile (shape) –ERCOT systems need to accommodate numerous additional profiles (shapes), and –A method for linking participating ESIIDs to their specific demand response program

10 Demand Response programs will be CR specific –ERCOT will be assigning each program unique code/codes ESIIDs on a DR program will need to be linked to the code assigned by ERCOT for settlement PWG has considered a number of options to implement the coding Summary of PWG Options

11 Option 1: DR Program Coded in Profile ID Segment ESI IDs participation in a DR program indicated in the Load Profile Segment field –Example : Profile Type Code before: RESLOWR – (RESLOWR no DR program) Profile Type Code after: RESL0001 – (RESLOWR on DR program ‘01’)

12 Option 2: DR Program Coded in TOU Field ESI IDs participation in a DR program indicated in the TOU Schedule field of the Load Profile ID –Examples : TOU Schedule before: NOTOU – (No DR program / No TOU) TOU Schedule after: ‘D0100’ – (DR program ‘01’ / No TOU) TOU Schedule after: ‘D0203’ – (DR program ‘02’ / TOU Schedule ‘03’) TOU Schedule before: D0103 – (DR program ‘01’ / TOU Schedule ‘03’) TOU Schedule after: ‘D0100’ – (DR program ‘01’ / No TOU) TOU Schedule after: ‘NOTOU’ – (No DR program / No TOU) TOU Schedule after: ‘TOU03’ – (No DR program / TOU Schedule ‘03’) TOU Schedule before: TOU05 – (No DR program / TOU Schedule ‘05’) TOU Schedule after: ‘D0105’ – (DR program ‘01’ / TOU Schedule ‘05’) TOU Schedule after: ‘D0200’ – (DR program ‘02’ / No TOU)

13 Option 3: DR Program Coded in Weather Sensitivity Field ESI IDs participation in a DR program indicated in the Weather Sensitivity field of the Load Profile ID First position of WS code ‘D’ for all participants on a DR program –Examples: Weather Sensitivity Code before: NWS – (No DR program / Non WS) Weather Sensitivity Code after: ‘D01’ – (DR program ‘01’ Not WS) Weather Sensitivity Code before: ‘D01’ – (DR program ‘01’ Not WS) Weather Sensitivity Code after : ‘NWS’ – (No DR program / Non WS)

14 Option 4: DR Program Coded in Profile ID Segment (Modified) ESI IDs participation in a DR program indicated in the Load Profile Segment field of the Load Profile ID –Very similar to Option 1 –Definition of the Profile Group changed to always be the first 3 positions –Fourth position would be a Profile Segment Letter –Last 4 positions for DR programs –Example: Profile Type Code before: RESL0000 – (RESLOWR no DR program) Profile Type Code after: RESL0001 – (RESLOWR on DR program ‘01’)

15 Option 5: DR Program Coded in Weather Sensitivity Field (Modified) ESI IDs participation in a DR program indicated in the Weather Sensitivity field of the Load Profile ID –First position of WS code ‘W’ for Weather Sensitive ESI IDs and ‘N’ for Non-Weather Sensitive ESI IDs –Last two positions for DR program –Examples : Weather Sensitivity Code before: NWS – (No DR program Non WS) Weather Sensitivity Code after: ‘N01’ – (DR program ‘01’ Not WS) Weather Sensitivity Code after : ‘W01’ – (DR program ‘01’ WS) Weather Sensitivity Code before : N01 – (DR program ‘01’ Not WS) Weather Sensitivity Code after : ‘NWS’ – (No DR program Non WS) Weather Sensitivity Code after : ‘W01’ – (DR program ‘01’ WS)

16 Option 6: Texas Set Change to Allow Dynamic Profile ID Changes Texas Set changes to automatically update Profile IDs in response to changes to DR program participation –Switch –MoveIn –MoveOut

17 Option 7: IDR Settlement for DR Programs IDR settlement is currently available for DR program participants No Lagged Dynamic Profile would be needed No DR program coding necessary

18 Option 8: DR Program Coded in a New Profile ID Field Extend length of Profile ID field to add a new field for coding DR participation

19 Option 9: Lookup Table to Flip Profile ID Before Settlement Create lookup table to link CRs to DR programs Used in conjunction with Option 1 ESIIDs with invalid CR to DR program relationships identified –Profile Id modified prior to settlement –Profile Ids reverted to original values after settlement completes

20

21 Questions? ON OFF