Fast offline dE/dx calibrations Y. Fisyak 11/07/02.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

1 Jim Thomas - LBL A Brief Introduction to the STAR Time Projection Chamber Jim Thomas Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory June 4 th, 2009.
1 STAR TOF Calibration. 2 Detectors TPC(TPX) - tracking MRPC TOF (TOFr) – stop time measurement pVPD/upVPD - start time measurement Particle momentum;
TPC status Marian Ivanov. Outlook TPC performance ExB correction Alignment Nonlinearities and edge effects Drift velocity calibration.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
1 HLT – a source of calibration data One of the main tasks of HLT (especially in the first years) –Monitoring of the detector performance –Analysing calibration.
Jianchun Wang Marina Artuso Syracuse University 11/06/00 MC Simulation of Silicon Pixel Detector.
FMS review, Sep FPD/FMS: calibrations and offline reconstruction Measurements of inclusive  0 production Reconstruction algorithm - clustering.
2011 HV scan SF6 flow-meter accident 2011 Results comparison RPC HV efficiency scan Pigi Paolucci on behalf of RPC collaboration.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, Nantes, July2002 SVT Analysis/Status Update Jun Takahashi – University of Sao Paulo.
28 February, 2003 STAR Collaboration meeting Status of the dE/dx calibration Yuri Fisyak.
1 TPC online  offline calibration November 2002.
JT: 1 The Berkeley Lab STAR TPC Distortions in the Transverse Plane: An Update Jim Thomas.
Status of TPC experiment ---- Online & Offline M. Niiyama H. Fujimura D.S. Ahn W.C. Chang.
TOF Meeting, 9 December 2009, CERN Chiara Zampolli for the ALICE-TOF.
Real data reconstruction A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno) CERN Building 29, December 9th, 2009ALICE TOF General meeting.
TPC online reconstruction Cluster Finder & Conformal Mapping Tracker Kalliopi Kanaki University of Bergen.
STAR Collaboration Meeting Rene Bellwied – Wayne State University July 2004 SVT Calibration and STI tracking status An update of work since the SVT review.
1 xCAL monitoring Yu. Guz, IHEP, Protvino I.Machikhiliyan, ITEP, Moscow.
EPS-HEP 2015, Vienna. 1 Test of MPGD modules with a large prototype Time Projection Chamber Deb Sankar Bhattacharya On behalf of.
E. De LuciaNeutral and Charged Kaon Meeting – 7 May 2007 Updates on BR(K +  π + π 0 ) E. De Lucia.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
June 22, 2009 P. Colas - Analysis meeting 1 D. Attié, P. Colas, M. Dixit, Yun-Ha Shin (Carleton and Saclay) Analysis of Micromegas Large Prototype data.
Tracking, PID and primary vertex reconstruction in the ITS Elisabetta Crescio-INFN Torino.
Tracking in High Density Environment
STAR TPC Cluster and Hit Finder Software Raimond Snellings.
SSD status report Marek Chojnacki, Panos Christakoglou, Enrico Fragiacomo, Marco Van Leeuwen, Massimo Venaruzzo
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Nov 2002T. Ljubicic DAQ100 Calibration Needs 10 to 8 bit (and back!) conversion table Gain correction per pad T0 correction per pad.
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
Wenxin Wang 105/04/2013. L: 4.7m  : 3.6m Design for an ILD TPC in progress: Each endplate: 80 modules with 8000 pads Spatial Resolution (in a B=3.5T.
Marian Ivanov TPC ExB and V drift calibration and alignment.
I.BelikovCHEP 2004, Interlaken, 30 Sep Bayesian Approach for Combined Particle Identification in ALICE Experiment at LHC. I.Belikov, P.Hristov, M.Ivanov,
8 April 2000Karel Safarik: Tracking in ALICE1 Tracking in ALICE  OUTLOOK: Requirements History Tracking methods Track finding Tracking efficiency Momentum.
Detector alignment Stefania and Bepo Martellotti 20/12/10.
(s)T3B Update – Calibration and Temperature Corrections AHCAL meeting– December 13 th 2011 – Hamburg Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
Abhilash Nair STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago 1 STAR.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
Development of the parallel TPC tracking Marian Ivanov CERN.
A. De Caro for the ALICE TOF Offline Group (University of Salerno and INFN)
HMPiD upgrade variant; simulation status N. Smirnov Physics Department, Yale University, May, 06. CERN visit.
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
1 Reconstruction tasks R.Shahoyan, 25/06/ Including TRD into track fit (JIRA PWGPP-1))  JIRA PWGPP-2: Code is in the release, need to switch setting.
Calibration algorithm and detector monitoring - TPC Marian Ivanov.
Particle identification by energy loss measurement in the NA61 (SHINE) experiment Magdalena Posiadala University of Warsaw.
Study of influence of particle identification and resonances excitation on correlation functions mesured by ALICE setup. 1. Influence of particle identification.
Particle Identification of the ALICE TPC via dE/dx
Beam test Analysis Micromegas TPC by Wenxin Wang.
June 4, 2009 STAR TPC review Estimation of TPC Aging Based on dE/dx Measurements Yuri Fisyak.
Feb C.Smith UVA EC energy calibration – g13 pass0 For pass0 data were cooked with CALDB calibration constants reset to nominal 10 channels / MeV.
April12 DST calibration status
New TRD (&TOF) tracking algorithm
TPC status report Marian Ivanov.
Activities on straw tube simulation
Status Report Fenfen An
Event “zero-time” determination with TOF detector
ITS “parallel” tracking
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE
HLT & Calibration.
DCH calibrations 2013 Gordon Lim, UCI.
TPC status - Offline Q&A
Study of dE/dx Performance in TPC at CEPC
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Research algorithm of overlapping clusters in PrimEx
Presentation transcript:

Fast offline dE/dx calibrations Y. Fisyak 11/07/02

Calibration procedure Applying pad correction obtained from pulser data For good clusters (used in track fit, no overlaps) For good global tracks (No. fit points ≥ 30, Track length in TPC > 40 cm) Z =log[(dE/dx) measured /(dE/dx) predicted for π ] Fit Z-distribution with Gauss(μ,σ) + pol3 in +/-3σ range. It is supposed that we have ~80% π and μ corresponds to π. μ should not depend on Time, Pressure Sector, row Drift distance …

Corrections ADC” nonlinearity dE R = Pol N (dE U ), where dE U – uncorrected dE (from tcl), Pol N – polynomial, N = 3 for Inner and = 5 for Outer sectors

Corrections (cont.) Variations with sector / row still exist after pulser correction and are different for different pulser correction periods. Time dependence is accounted by  Correction versus drift distance accounting time variation of O 2 contamination taken from slow control  Pressure - ditto -  After these correction there is no gain time dependence

Corrections (cont.) dX correction fit by φ(μ+(1+σ)z), where φ(z) is Bichsel shape and z = log(dE/dE mostprobable ); μ σ Bichsel predicts increasing most probable value (μ ↑ dX) with dX and decreasing width (σ↓dX) I see (μ ↓ dX) and (σ↑dX). It would be interesting to check this with PAI model.

March 02 : σ = σ CDR = 6.8% 76 cm)

Very preliminary results of Olga Barannikova’s analysis pT

Calibration tables dE/dx corrections: table names ( new, used, not used ) R “ADC” nonlinearity => “TpcAdcCorrection” Z Drift distance =>“TpcDriftDistOxygen”,“TpcZCorrection” Pressure: => “tpcPressure” Time => “TpcTimeGain” SecRow => “TpcSecRowB” has to be redone after Fabrice’s pulser corrections dX correction => “TpcdXCorrection” TPC track length => “TpcLengthCorrection”

Conclusion 1.In present dE/dx calibration model: –Only Sector/Row correction has to be updated after pulser correction update. –The model has to checked => Test Productions –It is important to understand reason for “ADC” nonlinearity: Pulser (for ADC itself) Detailed simulation of cluster finder 2.Time dependence is taken out by Pressure and Drift corrections. 3.To make dE/dx calibration in fast offline it is necessary to have: Access to monitoring tables (tpcGas and might be tpcGainMonitor) A reasonable measurement of track momenta in [0.4,0.5]GeV/c range Statistics : precision ~1% => 24*10K good track (~50%) in momentum range [0.4,0.5] GeV/c (~20%) => 2.4 M tracks. (Now I am using statistics ~50M tracks)