LIGO-G040130-00-M State of the LIGO Laboratory Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech LSC Meeting, LLO March 16, 2004 State of LIGO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO-G M May 17, 2006 Installation (INS) Requirements and Design Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Dennis Coyne, Caltech.
Advertisements

LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
LIGO-G D Detector Installation and Commissioning Stan Whitcomb NSF Annual Review 30 April 2001 Caltech.
LIGO- G M State of the LIGO Lab Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Hanford 17 August 2004.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Introduction Dennis Coyne April 12, 2002.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
Dennis Coyne Excomm Jan 26, 2004
G M Advanced R&D1 Seismic Isolation Retrofit Plan for the LIGO Livingston Observatory Dennis Coyne 29 Nov 2001.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO-G W Raab: Searching for Gravitational Waves w/ LIGO1 Why Has Duty Cycle Been Lower in Livingston.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish LSC Meeting 19-Aug-02.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development Update Dennis Coyne LSC Meeting at LLO 16 March 2004.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors David Shoemaker NSF Operations Review Hanford, 26 February 2001.
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
LIGO-G M 1 Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Dennis Coyne LIGO Seminar March 29, 2002.
LIGO-G M Status of LIGO Barry Barish PAC Meeting Caltech 3-June-04 Upper limits on known pulsar ellipticities.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
G D Initial LIGO improvements & Advanced LIGO P Fritschel PAC Meeting LLO, 18 May 2005.
LIGO-G D Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 14 June 2001 Caltech.
4/25/11 G v3 1 Facility Modifications and Preparations (FMP) Technical Status Annual NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project April , 2011 John.
LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF.
Status of LIGO Aspen January, 2005 Nergis Mavalvala LIGO-G D Commissioning and detector improvements for S4.
LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Development, Implementation Plan & Schedule Dennis Coyne April.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
LIGO-G Advanced LIGO Detector upgrade is planned for »Factor of 10 increase in distance probed (‘reach’) »Factor of 1000 increase in event.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
LIGO-G M Planning and Implementation Strategy for Advanced LIGO Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Hanford, August 14, 2001.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress ILIAS, Nov 13 th 2006 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
G R 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO March 2006.
LIGO-G D What can we Expect for the “Upper Limit” Run Stan Whitcomb LSC Meeting 13 August 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory A Personal Reading of.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
LIGO-G D LSC Meeting Nov An Early Glimpse at the S3 Run Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford.
LIGO-G D Commissioning and Detector Plans Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 6 June 2003 Caltech.
TCS and IFO Properties Dave Ottaway For a lot of people !!!!!! LIGO Lab Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of.
LIGO- G D E7: An Instrument-builder’s Perspective Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting Upper Limits Plenary Session 22 May 2002 LIGO Livingston.
Status of LIGO Andri M. Gretarsson Livingston Observatory LIGO-G L.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
LIGO-G D Detector Installation and Commissioning Stan Whitcomb NSF Operations Review 26 February 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LSC Meeting March ‘07 1 LIGO ADVANCED SYSTEMS TEST INTERFEROMETER (LASTI) LASTI Progress and Plans LSC Meeting, LLO Dave Ottaway/Richard Mittleman March.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
23/7/2003LIGO Document G C1 LIGO S2 Overview Philip Charlton California Institute of Technology On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G M Overview of the LIGO Continuing Operations (FY FY2006) Proposal Gary Sanders LIGO PAC9 Meeting December 2000.
G R LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO August 2004.
LIGO- G M LIGO Status Stan Whitcomb Oversight Committee 20 October 2004.
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Prospects and plans : LIGO interferometers Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory LSC meeting, MIT Nov 4-5, 2006.
Aspen January, 2005 Nergis Mavalvala
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
BSC HEPI Pier Amplification
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Commissioning Progress and Plans
Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Status of the LIGO Detectors
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
R&D Highlights Seismic Isolation Suspensions ISC/40m
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Livingston 21 March 2005
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G M State of the LIGO Laboratory Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech LSC Meeting, LLO March 16, 2004 State of LIGO

LIGO-G M A 10 Year Anniversary LIGO’s “near death” experience of early 1994 »LIGO’s second chance What was our hoped for outcome? »The NSB would start LIGO again »We would build it and not get into too much trouble along the way »It would work pretty much the way it was designed »Nature would be very very kind »We would live to upgrade it What has happened? »3 out 5 so far, not bad »>500 members of the LSC (so LIGO Lab a less important idea) »LIGO has become a positive example at NSF and many other venues where big science is scrutinized LIGO is in a remarkable state, not envisioned in 1994

LIGO-G M Building a Scientific Facility that Integrates Research and Education Gary H Sanders NSB Site Visit LIGO Livingston Observatory February 4, 2004 From a site visit of the National Science Board

LIGO-G M Notable activities by year YearFacilityDetectorBroader Impacts 1996 civil constructiondesignsite based planning 1997 vacuum systemfabrication startsLHO teacher workshop 1998 facilities readyfabricationLHO REU 1999 completioninstallation in vacuumLLO REU, LHO SST 2000 early operationinstallation and subsystem commissioning 2001 early operationfull commissioning, coincident operation LLO RET, LHO RET 2002 operationsensitivity studies, science run 1 (S1) LHO LEN formed 2003 S2 and S3, first resultsLLO LEN, LLO SUBR, LABoR, Exploratorium 2004 science running, reach design sensitivity ISE, IPSE, outreach center development complete 1 year runLSC coordination, NSF video Exploit terrestrial limitAdvanced LIGO proposed

LIGO-G M

From Rana’s talk

LIGO-G M From Rana’s talk

LIGO-G M From Rana’s talk

LIGO-G M From Rana’s talk

LIGO-G M From Rana’s talk

LIGO-G M S3: peak sensitivities

LIGO-G M “Availability” S3: reliability & stability

LIGO-G M Major Goals and Tasks After S3 Sensitivity »Operate at high power: achieve designed optical gain –Laser –Thermal compensation system (TCS) –Output mode cleaner (OMC) (thanks to GEO for the loan) »Manage noise in auxiliary degrees-of-freedom »Finish acoustic mitigation »Clean up electronics: RFI mitigation Reliability & Stability »Seismic retrofit at LLO: HEPI »Auto-alignment system: all degrees-of-freedom, at full bandwidth »Address causes of lock-loss

LIGO-G M Seismic Isolation: Hydraulic External Pre-Isolation (HEPI) LASTI Testing/development: »Working on a LASTI HAM chamber »HAM stiffening beam found unnecessary »Verified SOS are OK on HAM table during excitation for system identification »Adapted GDS for HEPI Sys ID l Production: » Part fabrication nearly completed » Being assembled & installed at LLO X-end now Coarse & Fine (PEPI) Actuation Systems HEPI Helical Spring (1 of 2) Vertical Actuator Horizontal Actuator Crossbeam Pier Pump Station Reservoir

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO R&D Pre-Stabilized Laser (PSL) »LZH/MPQ optimizing birefringence compensation »Demonstrated >165 W l Core Optics Components (COC) » Substrate downselect June 2004 » LMA-Lyon confirmed high ~50 ppm/cm average absorption in another two large Crystal Systems » Coating program with LMA-Lyon and CSIRO is underway » Coating scatter loss is a significant issue under investigation High Resolution Image of Scatter from the ITMx,2k HR Coating

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO R&D Seismic Isolation (SEI) »ETF testing continues (sensor characterization, electronics noise reduction, transfer function measurements, controls, …) »HAM & BSC Prototype mechanical design –Difficult to meet stiffness requirements and extremes in payload mass properties –Design review early/mid April l Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) – 40m LAB » Robustly locking the Fabry-Perot Michelson interferometer » Vented & installed the Power & Signal Recycling Mirrors » Mode Cleaner and Fabry-Perot Michelson have locked again! (with intentionally mis-aligned PRM & SRM)

LIGO-G M Commissioning and the Next Science Running Commissioning Goals for discussion at this meeting »H1, H2 –Reach SRD performance in substantial parts of the spectrum for H1 –Get H2 as close to this as possible –Availability should be as it was in S3 (~70%) »L1 –HEPI to be installed and commissioned to isolation goal –L1 sensitivity as close as possible to H1, H2 –L1 availability equal to H1 in S3 (~70%) Drop scimon staffing for S4 to one person per 24 hours, on call Assume next running schedule is an S4 run, a commissioning gap, and a long S5 run

LIGO-G M S4, the Gap, S5 S4 has much improved triple coincidence availability and data quality »L1 runs 24/7 »L1 as sensitive as possible, approaching H1, H2 »S4 begins 8 am Nov 1, ends before Xmas (8 am Dec 20) if all goes well “The Gap” »January - February - March 2005 »Consolidate SRD sensitivity in L1, H1, H2 »Address remaining availability improvement tasks to substantially reach SRD availability goal »Analyze S4 data to inform S5 online analysis S5 begins 8 am April 1, for at least 6 months

LIGO-G M S5, …S6 S5 duration 6 months, running very close to SRD sensitivity and availability Maintenance periods to total < 10% of that time »prescheduled with emphasis on keeping as many IFOs running as possible »start with strawman scheduled maintenance shutdowns starting on some Monday mornings »Modify this dynamically and carefully as insight is gained Inclusive OR »Not scheduled in advance but inserted dynamically as interventions are collected »Add some regular maintenance as experience dictates Shutdown for 1 month at end of S5 for maintenance and IFO studies Initiate S6 for another 6 month run following pattern above Data analysis challenged to keep up

LIGO-G M Summary The LIGO community has accomplished a great deal in the past decade LIGO is entering a new phase of Laboratory/LSC governance, integrating most activities and responsibilities Initial LIGO interferometers are close enough to goals that design appears to be sound Science is appearing at an accelerating pace A new partnership in Louisiana education and outreach may be approved very soon Advanced LIGO is under active consideration by the National Science Board International partnerships are strengthening