Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(your state) Master Farmer Program
Advertisements

What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Louisville, KY August 30, 2011.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Lake Studies Impaired Waters Waters are classified as impaired when they fail to meet state water quality standards and have been placed on the federal.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Tracking Thursday, May 31, 2012 Martin Hurd, Vladislav Royzman, Tetra Tech, Inc. Brian Burch, Megan Thynge,
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
By: Carrie Turner Prepared for: New Jersey Association of Environmental Authorities Annual Conference March 12, 2013 Watershed Management Planning Provides.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Incorporating the 9-Elements into a WMP Lindsey PhillipsMike Archer Source Water CoordinatorState Lakes Coordinator (402) (402)
Components of every Good Watershed Management Plan NDEQ – Planning Unit August 6 th, 2014 NDEQ – Planning Unit gust 6 th 2014.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Water Policy in the US and the EU K H Reckhow and C Pahl-Wostl Part I: US Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Watershed-Based Planning A Framework for Action!.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
Watershed Planning Tools and an Integrated Watershed Approach Stuart Lehman U.S. EPA NPS Control Branch January 19, 2007 Bordentown, NJ.
EPA’S WATERSHED PLANNING APPROACH FOR THE SECTION 319 PROGRAM Dov Weitman Chief, Nonpoint Source Control Branch October.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
District of Columbia TMDL Implementation Planning April 20, 2015 Metropolitan Washington COG.
Tom Singleton Associate VP, Director, Integrated Water Resources an Atkins company Linking TMDLs & Environmental Restoration.
Section 319 Grant Program Nonpoint Source Pollution Control
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Federal Clean Water Act Monitoring and assessments completed statewide Standards not met? Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the “Impaired.
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
STATUS OF GREEN LAKE. Status of Green Lake Lake Management Plan Approved Lake Management Plan Approved Three Grants Awarded Three Grants Awarded.
Amy Walkenbach Illinois EPA 217/
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
La Moine River Ecosystem Partnership: Organizing for Success Dan Moorehouse & Jeff Boeckler.
Deployment of Microbial Source Tracking to Identify Sources of Fecal Pollution in Water C. Hagedorn, A. Hassall, M. Saluta, J. Dickerson, and T. Wade 1.
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should: be designed to restore water quality from nonpoint source impairments using sufficiently analyzed.
Catoctin Creek TMDL Implementation Plan Development June 24, 2004.
Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Water Bureau.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT Dov Weitman Chief, Nonpoint Source Control Branch U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May 4, Federal.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)
Yahara River Watershed RCPP
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
Total Maximum Daily Loads Development for Holdens Creek and Tributaries, and Pettit Branch Public Meeting March 26, 2008.
Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Mike Bira EPA Region 6 NPS Program
Using GIS to Aid in TMDL Modeling
303(d) List March 9, 2016 WQC Jeff Manning, DWR
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
The Nine Elements that Must Be Included in a 319 Watershed Based Plan
Presentation transcript:

Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor, and Director, Center for Watershed Studies Biological Systems Engineering Virginia Tech Center for Watershed Studies

Objectives  Background  What is watershed management?  What is a TMDL?  Review the VA TMDL process with generalizations  Impairment Designation  TMDL Development  Implementation 2

Center for Watershed Studies What is Watershed Management?  Watershed management recognizes that the water quality of our streams, lakes, and estuaries results from…  human activities  watershed characteristics in upstream areas  The goal of watershed management is…  an environmentally and economically healthy watershed that benefits all stakeholders  Each watershed management plan includes…  unique goals  site-specific management strategies to achieve those goals

Center for Watershed Studies What is a TMDL?  A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) quantifies the amount of a particular pollutant a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards (pollutant diet). TMDL =  WLA +  LA + MOS Where: WLA = waste load allocation (point sources) LA = load allocation (nonpoint sources) MOS = Margin of safety  3-phase process  Impairment Designation  TMDL Development  Implementation 4

5 Conceptual TMDL Time Concentration, C (mg/L) Water Quality Standard Existing Condition TMDL Scenario Concentration 5 Center for Watershed Studies

TMDL Process Water quality standards met Clean Implementation Planning How many and what type of ‘fixes’ are needed? Implementation Monitoring 6 Study Watershed study to determine needed pollutant reduction TMDL Development Water quality standards not met Impairment Designation Center for Watershed Studies Adaptive management

TMDL Process Water quality standards met Clean Implementation Planning How many and what type of ‘fixes’ are needed? Implementation Monitoring 7 Study Watershed study to determine needed pollutant reduction TMDL Development Water quality standards not met Impairment Designation Center for Watershed Studies

TMDL Development Phase 1. Determine existing and potential future pollutant loads in the watershed  watershed characterization and pollutant source characterization (model inputs) 2. Link loads to waterbody water quality  pollutant fate and transport modeling  existing and future conditions 3. Define the pollutant load reductions required to achieve applicable water quality criteria  allocation analysis: use model(s) to allocation pollutant loads 8

Center for Watershed Studies 9 Link pollutant sources to water quality with aid of models  Watershed model  Watershed characterization  Source characterization  Climate variability  Fate and transport  Allocation analysis Stream Network = X Models are used to predict how watersheds respond, and to evaluate pollutant reduction options Land use and Management Source: EPA 841-B

Center for Watershed Studies Modeling NPS pollutants 10 (Novotny and Chesters 1981)

TMDL Process Implementation Planning How many and what type of ‘fixes’ are needed? Implementation Monitoring 11 Study Watershed study to determine needed pollutant reduction TMDL Development Water quality standards not met Impairment Designation Center for Watershed Studies Adaptive management

Identify and prioritize appropriate BMPs 12 Center for Watershed Studies

13 Implement BMPs Center for Watershed Studies

Fencing and Riparian Buffer Photos: Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation

Center for Watershed Studies Photo: Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation

TMDL Process Water quality standards met Clean Implementation Planning How many and what type of ‘fixes’ are needed? Implementation Monitoring 16 Study Watershed study to determine needed pollutant reduction TMDL Development Water quality standards not met Impairment Designation Center for Watershed Studies

17

Center for Watershed Studies Watershed Management Planning Steps STEP 1 B UILD P ARTNERSHIPS  ID stakeholders  ID issues of concern  Set preliminary goals  Develop indicators  Conduct outrea ch 18 Source: EPA 841-B

Center for Watershed Studies STEP 1 B UILD P ARTNERSHIPS  ID stakeholders  ID issues of concern  Set preliminary goals  Develop indicators  Conduct outrea ch STEP 2 C HARACTERIZE W ATERSHED  Gather existing data  Create data inventory  ID data gaps  Collect additional data, if needed  Analyze data  ID causes and sources  Estimate pollutant loads Watershed Management Planning Steps 19 Source: EPA 841-B

Center for Watershed Studies STEP 1 B UILD P ARTNERSHIPS  ID stakeholders  ID issues of concern  Set preliminary goals  Develop indicators  Conduct outrea ch STEP 2 C HARACTERIZE W ATERSHED  Gather existing data  Create data inventory  ID data gaps  Collect additional data, if needed  Analyze data  ID causes and sources  Estimate pollutant loads STEP 3 F INALIZE G OALS AND ID S OLUTIONS  Set goals and management objectives  Develop indicators/targets  Determine load reductions needed  ID critical areas  ID management measures needed Watershed Management Planning Steps 20 Source: EPA 841-B

Center for Watershed Studies STEP 1 B UILD P ARTNERSHIPS  ID stakeholders  ID issues of concern  Set preliminary goals  Develop indicators  Conduct outrea ch STEP 2 C HARACTERIZE W ATERSHED  Gather existing data  Create data inventory  ID data gaps  Collect additional data, if needed  Analyze data  ID causes and sources  Estimate pollutant loads STEP 3 F INALIZE G OALS AND ID S OLUTIONS  Set goals and management objectives  Develop indicators/targets  Determine load reductions needed  ID critical areas  ID management measures needed STEP 4 D ESIGN I MPLEMENTATION P ROGRAM  Develop Implementation schedule  Set Interim milestones  Determine how you will measure success  Develop monitoring component  Develop evaluation process  ID technical and financial assistance needed  Assign responsibility Watershed Management Planning Steps 21 Source: EPA 841-B

Center for Watershed Studies STEP 1 B UILD P ARTNERSHIPS  ID stakeholders  ID issues of concern  Set preliminary goals  Develop indicators  Conduct outrea ch STEP 2 C HARACTERIZE W ATERSHED  Gather existing data  Create data inventory  ID data gaps  Collect additional data, if needed  Analyze data  ID causes and sources  Estimate pollutant loads STEP 3 F INALIZE G OALS AND ID S OLUTIONS  Set goals and management objectives  Develop indicators/targets  Determine load reductions needed  ID critical areas  ID management measures needed STEP 4 D ESIGN I MPLEMENTATION P ROGRAM  Develop Implementation schedule  Set Interim milestones  Determine how you will measure success  Develop monitoring component  Develop evaluation process  ID technical and financial assistance needed  Assign responsibility STEP 5 I MPLEMENT W ATERSHED P LAN  Implement management strategies  Conduct outreach/education  Monitor/assess Watershed Management Planning Steps 22 Source: EPA 841-B

Center for Watershed Studies STEP 1 B UILD P ARTNERSHIPS  ID stakeholders  ID issues of concern  Set preliminary goals  Develop indicators  Conduct outrea ch STEP 2 C HARACTERIZE W ATERSHED  Gather existing data  Create data inventory  ID data gaps  Collect additional data, if needed  Analyze data  ID causes and sources  Estimate pollutant loads STEP 3 F INALIZE G OALS AND ID S OLUTIONS  Set goals and management objectives  Develop indicators/targets  Determine load reductions needed  ID critical areas  ID management measures needed STEP 4 D ESIGN I MPLEMENTATION P ROGRAM  Develop Implementation schedule  Set Interim milestones  Determine how you will measure success  Develop monitoring component  Develop evaluation process  ID technical and financial assistance needed  Assign responsibility STEP 5 I MPLEMENT W ATERSHED P LAN  Implement management strategies  Conduct outreach/education  Monitor/assess STEP 6 M EASURE P ROGRESS AND A DJUST  Review and evaluate information  Share results  Prepare annual plans  Make adjustments to program Source: EPA 841-B Watershed Management Planning Steps 23

Center for Watershed Studies Thank you 감사합니다 Brian Benham,