Jack Ward American Hereford Association October 31, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phenotypes for training and validation of genome wide selection methods K G DoddsAgResearch, Invermay B AuvrayAgResearch, Invermay P R AmerAbacusBio, Dunedin.
Advertisements

Understanding Conventional and Genomic EPDs
Professor N. Nelson Blue Mtn. Agriculture College.
West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
Matt Spangler University of Nebraska- Lincoln DEVELOPMENT OF GENOMIC EPD: EXPANDING TO MULTIPLE BREEDS IN MULTIPLE WAYS.
John Genho NBCEC Brown Bagger Series
BrownBagger October National Program for Genetic Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle
Develop 50K prediction equation suitable for estimation of Molecular Breeding Values (MBV) for Limousin and LimFlex (hybrid) animals Use 50K imputed genotypes.
Carcass EPD: Where are we, and where are we going? Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Genetic Selection Tools in the Genomics Era Curt Van Tassell, PhD Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory & Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville,
Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansCroatian.
2005 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Projects.
BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
Training, Validation, and Target Populations Training, Validation, and Target Populations Mark Thallman, Kristina Weber, Larry Kuehn, Warren Snelling,
Beef Relationships using 50K Chip Information L.A. Kuehn, J.W. Keele, G.L. Bennett, T.G. McDaneld, T.P.L. Smith, W.M. Snelling, T.S. Sonstegard, and R.M.
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Georgetown Ag Systems.
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
Matt Spangler Beef Genetics Specialist University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Wiggans, 2013Japanese Genomics Tour (1) Dr. George R. WiggansDr. H. Duane Norman Acting Research LeaderInterim Administrator Animal Improvement Programs.
Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansAg Discovery.
1 Application of Molecular Technologies in Beef Production Dan W. Moser, Ph.D Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How Do I Decide What Traits are Important? Carcass/Ultrasound EPDs Bob Weaber GRA-Cornell.
Animal Genetics. Natural Selection n an organisms ability to SURVIVE and pass on its GENETIC information to its offspring.
Bovine Genomics The Technology and its Applications Gerrit Kistemaker Chief Geneticist, Canadian Dairy Network (CDN) Many slides were created by.
Genomics. Finding True Genetic Merit 2 Dam EPD Sire EPD Pedigree Estimate EPD TRUE Progeny Difference Mendelian Sampling Effect Adapted from Dr. Bob Weaber.
NBCEC BROWN BAGGER OCTOBER 8, 2014 Jack Ward AHA, Director of Breed Improvement.
Use of DNA information in Genetic Programs.. Next Four Seminars John Pollak – DNA Tests and genetic Evaluations and sorting on genotypes. John Pollak.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Low-Cost, Low-Density Genotyping and its Potential Applications K.A. Weigel, O. González-Recio, G. de los Campos, H. Naya, N. Long, D. Gianola, and G.J.M.
The Many Measures of Accuracy: How Are They Related? Matt Spangler, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2008 G.R. WiggansDHI-Provo.
T. A. Cooper and G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Council.
Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Cow-Calf Extension Specialist Kansas State University
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
Nuts and Bolts of Genetic Improvement Genetic Model Predicting Genetic Levels Increase Commercial Profitability Lauren Hyde Jackie Atkins Wade Shafer Fall.
WiggansCDCB industry meeting – Sept. 29, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Session 4 – Part 1 Status update on genomically enhanced genetic evaluation by breeds Dr. Matt Spangler, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2008 AIPL Centennial.
NBCEC Brown Bagger: Economic Selection Index Wade Shafer American Simmental Association.
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
Breeding Objectives for Terminal Sires Michael MacNeil USDA ARS Miles City, MT.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansSelect Sire.
Feed Efficiency Genetic Projects. Terms Gain/Feed = Feed Efficiency FE Feed/Gain = Feed Conversion FC: -FE Residual Feed Intake RFI Net Feed Intake NFI:-RFI.
National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium Brown Bagger Seminar Carcass EPDs Integrating Carcass and Ultrasound October 22, 2008 Sally L. Northcutt Genetic.
Whole genome selection and the 2000 bull project at USMARC Larry Kuehn Research Geneticist.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 National Breeders.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle Dr. Fred Rayfield Livestock Specialist Georgia Agricultural Education To accompany lesson.
My vision for dairy genomics
Validation of €uro-Star Replacement Index.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle
Using EPDs in Selection
DNA Technology.
Update on Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluation
WHAT ARE EPD’s?.
Genomic Evaluations.
Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle
Increased reliability of genetic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States from use of genomic information Abstr.
American Simmental Association
Breeding & Genetics.
Presentation transcript:

Jack Ward American Hereford Association October 31, 2012

 Training and Validation  Change from Microsatellites to SNP  Implementation  Future

 Nearly 1200 US Hereford bulls have 50K genotypes and these have been used to train and validate a Hereford Specific genomics panel.  These bulls were done through various projects including US-MARC 2000 bull project, Weight-Trait Project, Genetic Abnormality research and American Hereford Association (AHA) genotyping of high accuracy bulls and young sire candidates.

 June 2012 Saatchi, Garrick AHA TraitEPD Acc.CorrelationNew Acc.Progeny CE BW WW YW Milk MCE Fat REA MARB

EPD Acc.MBV Correlation Trait Heritability Enhanced EPD Acc. Effective Progeny

TraitUS Prediction Raw Corre. 99 UR Bulls Raw Corre. 75 CA Bulls Raw Corre. 59 Unrelated Arg Bulls Raw Corre. 41 US Like Arg Bulls BW WW YW Milk Fat REA Marbling

 Changed labs and technology from Maxxam Analytics to GeneSeek. The platform changed from Microsatellites to SNP’s.  There are four options to AHA membership -Parentage and abnormality testing-$30 -H/P test- $48 -50K Genotype for GE-EPD- $85 -Parentage, Abnormality test, GE-EPD- $100

Breeder Requests Kit (Hair, semen, blood) AHA forwards to Breeder through fax, mail or GeneSeek runs requested tests AHA receives results AHA updates results.

 Produce only an EPD and using MBV as correlated trait.  Only compliant Performance Breeders will get update GE-EPD  Pedigree + MBV + Phenotype  Currently, does not go up and down pedigree. Generated outside the genetic analysis  Because the AHA has access to the Pedigree, Genotypes and Phenotypes, we can recalculate MBV’s at anytime.

 These animals are identified on the web at and under the EPD Search site. You can “Sort by” and find all animals with GE-EPD. Or if you do a search and on an animals detail screen under the EPD you will find logo which means the EPD are enhanced.

 Continue to Collaborate with Scientists, other countries and all research entities.  Continue to build populations of 50K genotypes. Additional 1000 sires by year end.  Continue to collect phenotypes on Economically Relevant Traits (ERT’s) that are hard to measure like Feed Intake and Fertility (Whole Herd Reporting) and Health.  Begin to Sequence Legacy Sires. (8 bulls in 2012) and imputation

 Genomic predictions do work (US Dairy, poultry, swine industries and Angus, Hereford, Simmental, Red Angus)  It is in its infancy  Predictions work well within populations that are closely related.  Phenotypes will still be important to the evolution of Genomics.  It is exciting.