Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Commercial confidentiality and PSI Razvan Dinca University of Bucharest.
Advertisements

Sui generis system for the protection of non-agricultural geographical indications – the Hungarian example András Jókúti Legal and International Department.
Lisbon System Protection of Geographical Indications - international legal framework National Roving Seminars on Geographical Indications Chennai, January.
Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
1 CHALLENGES TO THE LISBON SYSTEM Presentation by Mihály Ficsor, Vice-President, Hungarian Patent Office WIPO/INPI Forum on Geographical Indications and.
Workshop on wines for making a protected geographical indication Technical File Anabela Alves BELGRADE, SERBIA 30th of January 2013.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
Geographical Indications Law: a new tool for Africa? All Africa House (UCT) Aug. 28, 2012 Seble Baraki Open A.I.R. Research Fellow.
Trademark enforcement in Belarus AIPPI Baltic, Vilnius, 2013 Darya Lando, Head of Legal Department LexPatent, Minsk, Belarus.
Marcus Höpperger Acting Director
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and.
1 XI INT. CONGRESS AAAML A comparison of the three GI schemes in the EU A trade mark practioner’s perspective… Benjamin Fontaine Parma, March 2013.
AIPPI-MIE-MSZJF Budapest 2005 “Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU" Similarities and differences in the enforcement of trademarks and designations.
Management of an IR: Selected forms and procedures to encounter during the lifespan of the IR Israel, February 8, 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
GI Protection for non- agricultural products Portuguese System Brussels Sílvia Lourenço Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial.
Marketing Products identified by their origin (or Geographical Indications) A tool for rural development.
Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU 13th Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU 13th AIPPI-MIE International Conference Budapest, September.
International Treaty in EU PIL
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
Let’s Have An Other Look At The Lisbon Agreement Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
Enforcement measures of GIs through sui generis protection, unfair competition and consumer protection law GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND TRADEMARKS: A GLOBAL.
The international framework for the protection of geographical indications Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN: AN OVERVIEW
SAREE AONGSOMWANG Foundation for Consumers, Thailand.
IPO-PAKISTAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION OF PAKISTAN 1 GIs as Economic Tool for SMEs Development: Current Status of Protection in Pakistan; Future.
Introduction to the GI system. Origin Linked Products (OLP) are products that have a specific link to their area of origin because of their reputation.
Cross-border Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Expressions Pedro A. De Miguel Asensio – UCM AIPPI 2011 Hyderabad.
Czech Presidency High Level Conference on the Future of Quality Policy of Agricultural Products and Foodstuff PDOs/PGIs: The point of view of GI producers.
CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING PROGRAMME ON IPR, WTO RELATED ISSUES AND PATENT WRITING April 28-May 2, 2008 Session 10 GIs negotiations in the WTO and other.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
Data exclusivity, patents and registration of medicines Karin Timmermans TWN Regional Workshop Kuala Lumpur on bilateral trade agreements Aug
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Elements for the Organization of Geographical Indications under Article 22.1 of the TRIPS Agreement Warsaw,
“Legal frameworks for the protection of Geographic Indications” Carmen Bullon FAO Development Law Service.
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
© Melanie Fiedler, Attorney at law 2005 Sofia The Community Trade Mark The functions of a trade mark distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking.
Recently Established Registration Systems for Geographical Indications JAMAICA Loreen Walker Executive Director Jamaica Intellectual Property Office.
International Registration of GIs: Building on Existing Systems Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
CZECH PRESIDENCY HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT QUALITY POLICY Prague, 13 March 2009 DRAFT CONCLUSIONS OF WORKSHOP B: EU.
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the Turkish Patent Institute Istanbul, September 13 to 15, 2011 WIPO TRAINING OF TRAINERS PROGRAM.
Reform(aliz)ing Copyright BCLT, April 18-19, 2013 Three Steps Towards Formalities Prof. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The Hague.
REVIEW OF THE LISBON AGREEMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS Florence Rojal Legal.
1 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY & PROMOTION R.S. JULANIYA DIRECTOR.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 Click to edit Master title style.
World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical indications: the international legal framework; latest developments Bratislava, December 1st., 2009.
Geographical indications of source Dr. Ioannis Kikkis, EPLO, Head of Intellectual Property dpt. 16 March 2015 Workshop on intellectual property protection.
Karl Plsek BMG II/B/71 WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS Bratislava, December 1, 2009 GIs for Foodstuffs, Spirits and Wines- Verification.
Dispute settlement mechanism within the Lisbon system 6 December 2013 Massimo Vittori, Managing Director.
Protection of GIs in the EU - WarsawSlide 1 of 18 The Protection of Geographical Indications - The EU system - TAIEX Seminar on the protection.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 11 – Agriculture and rural development.
Intellectual Property and Public Policy: Application of Flexibilities in the International IP and Trade system --Limitation and Exceptions for Education.
THE GI SYSTEM PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE IN EU Arnaud FAUGAS Legal and international department INAO WIPO SEMINAR ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS DECEMBER 2009 (BRATISLAVA)
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
Recent Developments at the International Level
European Union Law Week 10.
Geographical Indications
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS
1st December 2009, Bratislava
SPCs and the unitary patent package
IP Protection under the WTO
Community protection of geographical indications :
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin The Lisbon System facilitates the protection of appellations of origin.
Presentation transcript:

Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008 Matthijs Geuze, WIPO

Lisbon System Why Built-in Flexibilities in the Lisbon System? The existing variety in means of protection The existing variety in definitions The existing variety in terminology The existing variety in scope of protection

Lisbon System GI Protection Landscape Around the World Laws focusing on business practices Sui generis legislation –concerning specifically defined characteristics of the product or methods of their production Trademark law Other means of protection

Lisbon System GI Definition Landscape: - common denominators of the elements by which definitions aim to capture the value-added of GIs Typicality –characteristics of a product that make the product unique and which allow the product to be identified geographically Reputation –(1) degree of recognition by consumers of the typicality of products and (2) the collective goodwill that they represent on the market

Lisbon System Terminology Landscape appellation of origin indication of geographical origin agricultural and food product label appellation d’origine controlée viticultural area agricultural and food product certificate protected designation of origin indication de provenance vin de pays protected geographical indication geographical designation denominación específica geographical indication indication of source denominación de origen quality wine produced in a specified region reserved descriptiontable wine

Lisbon System Scope of Protection Landscape Use of a recognized GI by a person not eligible or authorized to use it, without any test as to the nature of that use Use which is "false", "incorrect", or "does not correspond to the place specified" Use which might mislead, deceive or create a false impression regarding the geographical origin of the products Misuse, imitation or evocation, even with delocalising qualifiers Use of a GI on products which, while originating in the indicated area, do not meet the production or product requirements on which the use of the IGO is conditional Use damaging or exploiting the reputation, irrespective of whether the public is misled Acts contrary to "good practice" or "honest commercial practices“ Conduct liable to mislead or deceive the public Non-authorized use of reputation or goodwill

Lisbon System Flexibility as to the Means of Protection Rule 5(2)(a)(vi) Lisbon Regulations Records Lisbon Conference 1958, p.815 –Protection of the appellation in the country of origin by virtue of legislative provisions, administrative provisions, a judicial decision or registration at a national Agency Records Lisbon Conference 1958, p. 860 –The Agreement lays down the protection to be provided at a minimum and is not meant to affect in any way already existing agreements on the matter

Lisbon System Lisbon System: Registrable Appellations - Two Cumulative Yardsticks Records Lisbon Conference 1958, p.859 –Definition of « appellation of origin » in Article 2(1) –Without prejudice to national definitions that may be broader or more precise Records Lisbon Conference 1958, p.859 –The word « recognized » in Article 1 means that the appellation is to concern a product enjoying a certain reputation –Definition « country of origin » in Article 2(2)

Lisbon System Basis and Justification for Protection Article 1(2) Lisbon - Recognized and Protected in the Country of Origin, i.e.: –a product with a certain reputation, as defined in Article 2(2); –whose appellation meets the definition of Article 2(1); and –which is protected by virtue of some formal means (law, decree, judicial decision or registration)

Lisbon System Definition - Article 2(2) reputation in the “country of origin”, i.e.: The country whose name, or in which is situated the region or locality whose name, constitutes the appellation of origin which has given the product its reputation

Lisbon System Definition - Article 2(1) Appellation of Origin The geographical denomination of a country, region, or locality, which serves to designate a product originating therein, of which the quality or characteristics are due exclusively or essentially to the geographical environment, including natural and human factors

Lisbon System Definition - TRIPS Geographical Indication Indication which identifies a good as originating in the territory of a Member, or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of the good is essentially attributable to its geographical origin

Lisbon System Scope of Protection (1) Usurpation - Article 3 Lisbon Protection shall be ensured against any usurpation or imitation, even if the true origin of the product is indicated or if the appellation is used in translated form or accompanied by terms such as “type”, etc. Records Lisbon Conference 1958, p.815 Infringement of the exclusive rights of the holders of the right to use the appellation through unlawful appropriation – in certain legislations called usurpation or counterfeiting – or fraudulent imitation

Lisbon System Scope of Protection (2) Unfair Competition - Article 4 Lisbon Confirms the protection that may already exist in a member country by virtue of other international instruments, national law or court decisions Records Lisbon Conference 1958, p.816 Apart from usurpation or counterfeiting, there are a whole range of acts that may qualify as acts of unfair competition and are to be prohibited

Lisbon System Effect of international registration Records Lisbon Conference 1958, p –Other countries will know the precise appellation to be protected –These countries will be required to take position with regard to the appellation –They may refuse protection but, if they don’t, they should, in principle, prevent the appellation from becoming generic Rule 16 Lisbon Regulations –Procedure for notification of invalidation

Lisbon System Effect of a refusal Article 5(3) –The competent authority is entitled to declare, within a time-limit of one year, that protection cannot be ensured –Requirement to indicate the grounds for such a refusal Records Lisbon Conference 1958, p.817 –Refusal can be based on any situation of fact or law preventing the grant of protection –The grounds for refusal constitute the basis for negotiating a possible understanding

Lisbon System How Do Competent Authorities of Lisbon Member States Find Out About the Existence of Any Situation of Fact or Law Preventing the Grant of Protection? –Ex Officio Examination Only? –Third Party Procedures?

Lisbon System Grounds for refusal in practice - refusals based on the definition of Art. 2(1) Denomination does not meet the definition Generic indication of a type of product Just an indication of the origin of products Homonymous denomination that does not meet the definition The denomination is not geographical The denomination is insufficiently precise to be able to meet the definition The competent authority is not convinced that the denomination meets the definition

Lisbon System Grounds for refusal in practice - refusals based on an earlier right Protection of the appellation is prevented by an earlier trademark An opposition or request for cancellation has been filed against the appellation The appellation is refused only partially: it cannot be used to prevent the use of a specified homonymous appellation Protection is refused unless a specified homonymous denomination can coexist

Lisbon System Grounds for refusal in practice - refusals based on an other ground Use of the appellation is likely to generate confusion Registration of the appellation has not taken place in respect of all producers in the region The appellation is against religious values, ethics or public order

Lisbon System Effect of a refusal Records Lisbon Conference 1958, p.817 –The grounds for refusal constitute the basis for negotiating a possible understanding Withdrawal of a refusal –Rule 11 Regulations (« in part or in whole ») –Article 5(6) Agreement - applicable?

Lisbon System THANK YOU Matthijs Geuze WIPO