Physics 222 UCSD/225b UCSB Lecture 15 Extending the Higgs Sector => 2 Higgs Doublet Models (2HDM). I am using the following for today’s lecture: – “Higgs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Higgs Physics at the Large Hadron Collider Markus Schumacher, Bonn University NRW Phenomenology Meeting 2006, Bad Honnef, January 2006.
Advertisements

What do we know about the Standard Model? Sally Dawson Lecture 4 TASI, 2006.
Gennaro Corcella 1, Simonetta Gentile 2 1. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN 2. Università di Roma, La Sapienza, INFN Phenomenology of new neutral.
TeV scale see-saws from higher than d=5 effective operators Neutrino masses and Lepton flavor violation at the LHC Würzburg, Germany November 25, 2009.
The minimal B-L model naturally realized at TeV scale Yuta Orikasa(SOKENDAI) Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
The classically conformal B-L extended standard model Yuta Orikasa Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
Andreas Crivellin Overview of Flavor Physics with focus on the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model and two-Higgs-doublet models Supported by a Marie.
Higgs Boson Mass In Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking Abdelhamid Albaid In collaboration with Prof. K. S. Babu Spring 2012 Physics Seminar Wichita.
NON-OBSERVATION OF HEAVY NEUTRAL SCALARS AT THE LHC Pedro Ferreira ISEL and CFTC, UL Scalars 2013, Warsaw 14/09/2013 Work with A. Arhrib and R. Santos.
Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Stockholm Nov MSSM Higgs Searches at LEP Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University.
Comprehensive Analysis on the Light Higgs Scenario in the Framework of Non-Universal Higgs Mass Model M. Asano (Tohoku Univ.) M. Senami (Kyoto Univ.) H.
Richard Howl The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model University of Southampton UK BSM 2007.
The Top Quark and Precision Measurements S. Dawson BNL April, 2005 M.-C. Chen, S. Dawson, and T. Krupovnikas, in preparation M.-C. Chen and S. Dawson,
CUSTODIAL SYMMETRY IN THE STANDARD MODEL AND BEYOND V. Pleitez Instituto de Física Teórica/UNESP Modern Trends in Field Theory João Pessoa ─ Setembro 2006.
Discovery Potential for MSSM Higgs Bosons with ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration International Europhysics Conference on.
Lausanne 02/03/2001 A.Jacholkowska1 Supersymmetric Higgs(es) in LHC(b) Agnieszka Jacholkowska 2 nd Generator Workshop Lausanne 02/03/2001.
SM and Susy Higgs searches at LEP Magali GRUWÉ CERN QFTHEP Workshop, September 2001.
As a test case for quark flavor violation in the MSSM K. Hidaka Tokyo Gakugei University / RIKEN, Wako Collaboration with A. Bartl, H. Eberl, E. Ginina,
Masses For Gauge Bosons. A few basics on Lagrangians Euler-Lagrange equation then give you the equations of motion:
Energy and Luminosity reach Our charge asks for evaluation of a baseline machine of 500 GeV with energy upgrade to about 1 TeV. (the “about” came about.
The Electroweak Phase Transition within natural GNMSSM models Presenter: Christopher Harman Supervisor: Dr. Stephan Huber University of Sussex Image courtesy.
What do we know about the Standard Model? Sally Dawson Lecture 2 SLAC Summer Institute.
Center for theoretical Physics at BUE
August 22, 2002UCI Quarknet The Higgs Particle Sarah D. Johnson University of La Verne August 22, 2002.
P Spring 2003 L12Richard Kass The properties of the Z 0 For about ten years the Z 0 was studied in great detail at two accelerator complexes: LEP.
1 Electroweak Baryogenesis and LC Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) 8 th ACFA LC workshop July 12, 2005, Daegu, Korea.
2. Two Higgs Doublets Model
H125 & Natural Alignment in the Z3 NMSSM Nausheen R. Shah University of Michigan Aug 7, 2015 In Collaboration with: M. Carena, H. Haber, I. Low & C. Wagner.
Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #24 Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Issues with SM picture Introduction.
Supersymmetric Models with 125 GeV Higgs Masahiro Yamaguchi (Tohoku University) 17 th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow State.
H 1 → a 1 a 1 → µ + µ - τ + τ - ATLAS Experiment: Search of Higgs Boson decaying into a 1 in Next to Minimal SuperSymmetric Model By: Hou Keong(Tim) Lou.
Universality of weak interactions?
QFD, Weak Interactions Some Weak Interaction basics
X ± -Gauge Boson Production in Simplest Higgs Matthew Bishara University of Rochester Meeting of Division of Particles and Fields August 11, 2011  Simplest.
1 Enhancement of in supersymmetric unified models Yukihiro Mimura (National Taiwan University) Talk at SUSY2015, Lake Tahoe.
Yukawa and scalar interactions induced by scalar relevant for neutrino masss generation are: Since is assumed to be an exact symmetry of the model has.
Sally Dawson, BNL Standard Model and Higgs Physics FNAL LHC School, 2006 Introduction to the Standard Model  Review of the SU(2) x U(1) Electroweak theory.
Single Top Quark Studies, L. Li (UC Riverside) ICHEP 08, July Liang Li University of California, Riverside for the CDF, DØ and H1 Collaborations.
Higgs boson pair production in new physics models at hadron, lepton, and photon colliders October Daisuke Harada (KEK) in collaboration.
Update on the MSSM Interpretation of ATLAS Higgs Searches Markus Schumacher, Bonn University ATLAS Physics Workshop, Athens, May 2003 The Higgs Sector.
Monday, Apr. 7, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #20 Monday, Apr. 7, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Super Symmetry Breaking MSSM Higgs and Their.
The Importance of the TeV Scale Sally Dawson Lecture 3 FNAL LHC Workshop, 2006.
Weak Interactions (continued)
BEYOND MFV IN FAMILY SYMMETRY THEORIES OF FERMION MASSES Work done with Zygmunt Lalak and Graham Ross Based on existing ideas but, hopefully, contributing.
Impact of quark flavour violation on the decay in the MSSM K. Hidaka Tokyo Gakugei University / RIKEN, Wako Collaboration with A. Bartl, H. Eberl, E. Ginina,
Renormalization of the Higgs Triplet Model Mariko Kikuchi ( Univ. of Toyama ) Collaborators M. Aoki ( Kanazawa Univ. ), S. Kanemura ( Univ. of Toyama ),
The top quark, effective operators, FCNC and the LHC Rui Santos (U. Southampton) WHEPP XI, Ahmedabad 2010.
Introduction to Flavor Physics in and beyond the Standard Model Enrico Lunghi References: The BaBar physics book,
Lecture 7. Tuesday… Superfield content of the MSSM Gauge group is that of SM: StrongWeakhypercharge Vector superfields of the MSSM.
Vanina Ruhlmann-Kleider DAPNIA/SPP (Saclay) V.Ruhlmann-KleiderPhysics at LHC, Praha Review of Higgs boson searches at LEP Introduction The SM Higgs.
Physics 222 UCSD/225b UCSB Lecture 12 Chapter 15: The Standard Model of EWK Interactions A large part of today’s lecture is review of what we have already.
1 Aslı Sabancı University of Helsinki and Helsinki Insititute of Physics (HIP) Electric Dipole Moments in U(1)’ Models DESY Theory Workshop (Collider Phenomenology)
DIS2003 A.Tilquin Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at LEP What is the Standard Model Why to go beyond and how Supersymmetry Higgs sector.
10/29/2007Julia VelkovskaPHY 340a Lecture 4: Last time we talked about deep- inelastic scattering and the evidence of quarks Next time we will talk about.
1 Quark flavour observables in 331 models in the flavour precision era Quark flavour observables in 331 models in the flavour precision era Fulvia De Fazio.
1-2 Mass Degeneration in the Leptonic Sector Hiroyuki ISHIDA (Tohoku University) Collaboration with : Takeshi ARAKI (MISC) Ref ; T. Araki and H.I. arXiv.
We have the Higgs!!! Now What?? Nausheen R. Shah Wayne State University Oct 14, 2015 In Collaboration with: M. Carena, H. Haber, I. Low & C. Wagner arXiv:1510.xxxxx.
PHYS 5326 – Lecture #19 Wrapping up the Higgs Mechanism
Grand Unified Theories and Higgs Physics
P Spring 2002 L13 Richard Kass The properties of the Z0
Flavor Violating Higgs Decays in Supersymmetry with and without R parity --- Talk at SUSY 06 OTTO C. W. KONG --- Nat'l Central U, Taiwan.
Extending the Higgs Sector => 2 Higgs Doublet Models (2HDM).
Physics 222 UCSD/225b UCSB Lecture 2 Weak Interactions
The MESSM The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
Electroweak Baryogenesis and LC
Weak Interactions (continued)
Physics beyond the SM in Kaon decays --Theory--
Lecture 12 Chapter 15: The Standard Model of EWK Interactions
Lecture 12 Halzen & Martin Chapter 6
Presentation transcript:

Physics 222 UCSD/225b UCSB Lecture 15 Extending the Higgs Sector => 2 Higgs Doublet Models (2HDM). I am using the following for today’s lecture: – “Higgs Hunter’s guide” (1990) – TASI 06 lectures by Rainwater

Logic of Today’s Lecture Reminder of single higgs doublet, i.e. Minimal Standard Model (SM or MSM). Overview of constraints for extending the higgs sector. Focus on 2 higgs doublet models –4 types => discuss 2 of them Focus on 2HDM type 2, as implemented in Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM).

Higgs Field in SM Standad Model assumes the simplest choice for the higgs field: – a complex doublet with Y = 1. Complex for U(1) Doublet for SU(2) Y=1 to make quatum numbers come out right. The superscript indicate the charge according to: Q = T 3 + Y/2

Higgs Ground State in SM This particular choice of multiplets is exactly what we need because it allows us to break both SU(2) and U(1) Y, while at the same time allowing us to choose a ground state that leaves U(1) em unbroken. The latter is accomplished by choosing a ground state that leaves  + = 0. Use the same higgs field to give mass to fermions and bosons.

Extended Higgs Fields There are in principle many choices one could make. The only constraint is that the higgs fields belongs to some multiplet of SU(2) x U(1). And unitarity should not be violated at large s. Apart from that, there are experimental constraints, the most stringent of which are: FCNC are heavily suppressed in nature.

Comments on  =1 Halzen & Martin Exercise 15.4 explores this further. Additional discussion can be found in “Higgs Hunter’s Guide” chapter 4, and references therein. Bottom line: –There are many ways to satisfy this constraints. –In particular, any model with arbitrary number of higgs doublets and higgs singlets will satisfy the constraint.

Comments on FCNC Flavor changing neutral currents in quark sector are heavily suppressed in the SM, proceeding only via “penguin” loops, and other 2nd order weak transitions. Glashow & Weinberg showed that tree-level FCNC are forbidden IFF all fermions of a given electric charge couple to no more than one higgs doublet. => Multi-higgs doublet models are thus ok as long as they obey this rule.

Two higgs Doublet Models Has been studied theoretically, as well as limited experimentally, in great detail because: –It’s a minimal extension of the SM higgs sector. –It satisfies both experimental constraints we mentioned. –It adds new phenomenology by predicting a charged higgs particle. –It is required in the MSSM, as well as “low energy” SUSY models in general.

General 2HDM Potential ; ; All are real. From “Higgs Hunter’s guide”.

A slightly less opaque notation: I will stick with Higgs Hunter’s guide notation as that’s my primary reference.

CP violation In principle, we have the freedom to choose the two vevs to have an arbitrary phase with regard to each other. If on top, 5  6 then we have CP violation in the higgs sector. In the interest of time, we’re going to ignore this. See Higgs Hunter’s guide for details.

Vevs, G F, and m W For Standard Model (H&M Exercise 15.2) For 2HDM this stays the same, except for:

Higgs Boson Spectroscopy One Charged Higgs with mass: One CP-odd neutral Higgs with mass: And two CP-even higgs that mix.

Free Parameters in 2HDM Four higgs masses The ratio of vevs: and a higgs mixing angle, , for the neutral CP-even higgs states to mix.

Some guiding principles Charged higgs mass can be very large, to limit loop contributions to precision data. (Replace a W + with a H + wherever you want.) A 0, CP-odd higgs, doesn’t couple to the Gauge bosons, i.e. no A 0 WW nor A 0 ZZ coupling. It’s mass can also be very large. Of the remaining neutral CP-even h,H, one must be reasonably low mass to meet the m h constraints from indirect measurements.

If M 11 >> M 22 and M 11 >> M 12, then: m H 2 = M 11 m h 2 = M 22 / 2>> This is easy to arrange via appropriate choice of i and without restricting the choice of tan  = v 2 / v 1

Categorizing 2HDM Options III and IV lead to FCNC and are thus not studied any more in any significant way. Option I leads to “fermiphobic” higgs, i.e. higgs that only couples to gauge bosons. MSSM is a special case of Option II.

Comparing Type I & II Type I Type II Up and down fermions couple the same way in type I models. We can thus eliminate fermion coupling to m h entirely while at the same time keeping boson coupling maximal. => cos  = 0 while sin(  -  )=1.

Type-I: Fermiphobic Higgs Example higgs to di-photon decay: This is not allowed. Leave it to you as an exercise to think through what happens to the rest of higgs phenomenology in fermiphobic models.

Comparing Type I & II Type I Type II Up and down fermions couple differently in type II models. We can thus eliminate down quark coupling to m h entirely while at the same time keeping boson coupling maximal. => sin  = 0 while sin(  -  )=1.

BR’s for low mass m h, i.e. below WW threshold. Partial width to bb and tautau are turned off as promised. m h ~110GeV has 50% BR to WW

SM No down-quark couplings

Higgs in MSSM MSSM is basically a type II 2HDM, but with a variety of constraints among the parameters defining the model. The details of these are well beyond the scope of this lecture. Instead, we will simply be descriptive, and focus on the few statements that can be made simply. As reference, we use the TASI06 lectures by Rainwater.

MSSM Higgs Assuming no CP violation, it is convenient to look at the masses of the other 3 higgs states as a function of m A, the mass of the CP-odd higgs. At tree level: This would imply that m h < m Z for large m A, which is of course already ruled out by experiment. Loop corrections propto m t 2 increase m h somewhat.

The details depend on mixing in the stop sector, and v 2 / v 1 m h < 140GeV in all cases, and getting close to the limit requires large v 2 / v 1 or large masses for all other higgs.

SM & WW scattering Without the higgs, we get M  s / m W 2 for large s. This violates unitarity, as previously discussed. (see H&M 15.6 and homework) In SM, higgs, and the hWW vertex of a igm w resolve that. (see H&M Exercise 15.5)

2HDM & WW scattering The same cancellation is still satisfied if: G F now relates to the sum of the squares of the vevs. As a result, the total cross section for higgs associate production is easy to suppress, but difficult to enhance.