Instructional Leadership Planning Common Assessments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Advertisements

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 7: Preparing for My Mid-Year Conversation.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
Authentic Assessment Abdelmoneim A. Hassan. Welcome Authentic Assessment Qatar University Workshop.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS 3-4-5
SEPT 20 8:00-11:00 WHAT ARE WE MEASURING? HOW DO WE MEASURE? DHS English Department Professional Development.
Everett Public Schools DOK to Unit Planning LMS Department August 28, 2014.
Name of Facilitator Instructional Leadership:. Welcome ©AZ Board of Regents, BEST Professional Development, All rights reserved. Name of Superintendent.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
District Results Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Results Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 59 slides.
ISLLC Standard #4 ISLLC Standard #4 Monitoring Diverse Needs Name Workshop Facilitator.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Supporting Rigorous Curriculum (Overcoming Isolationism) Participants are expected to purchase the book Results Now Instructional Leadership.
Ladder of Inference Instructional Leadership:. © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Name of Superintendent –Welcome & Why Important Name.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Differentiation PLC.
WELCOME TO PIKES PEAK REGIONAL ELD TRAINING: COLORADO ENGLISH LANAGUAGE PROFICIENCY (CELP) STANDARDS Spring 2012 Facilitated by the Pikes Peaks ELD Directors.
Instructional Leadership Planning an Accountability System Name Workshop Facilitator.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Professional Learning Resources Download presentations and resources from today’s sessions!  Go to BISD homepage  Departments  Professional Learning.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Supporting High Standards.
ISLLC Standard #5 ISLLC Standard #5 Supporting Ethical Decision Making Laura Kent, Valerie Cervantez, Velma Kitcheyan Workshop Facilitators.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.
Key Work of School Boards Name Workshop Facilitator.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementing Professional Learning Communities Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #4 Collaborating with Families (and Stakeholders) Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Adult Learning.
ISLLC Standard #4 Planning Collaboration with Families Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #3 Planning for School – wide Behavior Management
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Interventions.
ISLLC Standard #6 The Education System Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership: Implementing Conditions for Success.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
Supporting Rigorous Curriculum (Overcoming Isolationism) Instructional Leadership.
Understanding by Design Stage 2: Determining Acceptable Evidence Summer UBD Workshop, Day 2 August 13, 2014.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
ELA VERTICAL ALIGNMENT Common Core Transition Training SY May 6, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC)
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
ISLLC Standard #3 Implementing Effective Meetings Name Workshop Facilitator.
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
Instructional Leadership: Building Consensus Name Workshop Facilitator.
The Year of Core Instruction
Framing Success with Effective Lesson Objectives and Demonstrations of Learning Introductions, logistics/housekeeping.
Instructional Leadership:
Common Core Standards Building Curriculum Units
Instructional Leadership
Instructional Plan and Presentation Cindy Douglas Cur/516: Curriculum Theory and Instructional Design November 7, 2016 Professor Gary Weiss.
Presentation transcript:

Instructional Leadership Planning Common Assessments

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Superintendent –Welcome –Why Important Welcome

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Agenda / Overview Targeted Objectives Guiding Questions Introductions Agenda & Introductions

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Participants will… –Develop an awareness of the steps for creating a common assessment –Learn about Acceptable Evidence and Cognitive Rigor Matrix –Apply the steps to one of YOUR curriculum units –Create an Action Plan Intended Outcomes

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Stay focused and fully engaged –no competing conversations please Participate to grow –share openly and monitor your listening Be a learner –create your own meaning and application Get your needs met –ask questions that benefit the group –personal questions on breaks Housekeeping –silence cell phones –handle business later – share ONE point …then next person – electronic copies of PowerPoints will be provided Proposed Norms & Expectations

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Student Achievement Teacher Quality Instructional Leadership ImplementingMonitoring Supporting CommunicatingAdvocating Planning Instructional Leadership Key Processes Applied to Rigorous Curriculum & Assessment

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, By the end of the workshop you will develop an action plan –primarily 2 nd row In the column labeled “Current Reality” –Rate yourself on a scale of 1-5 –5 = highly effective –3 = effective (PROFICIENT) –1 = ineffective Action Plan Handout Action Plan

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Rigorous Curriculum – ambitious academic content provided to all students in all academic subjects Rigorous Assessments – –Content, Cognitive, & Context Common Assessments – collaboratively developed, implemented, and interpreted Clarifying Definitions

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, How do school leadership teams and professional learning communities (grade/dept)plan a quality system of common assessments that is predictive of student readiness for the cognitive rigor level required by the common core state standards and future state assessments? Planning Common Assessments Guiding Question PARCC Reading Writing Math Practices

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, “It’s not enough to AIM at the target if the objective is to HIT the target.” Consider the Following

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Read the article: –Linking Formative Assessment to Scaffolding Make notes regarding –The most significant big ideas –Key words (try to identify at least five) – With your table group – Create a summary / representation on chart paper Focus on Planning Assessments…

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, An effective standards-based assessment system… –promotes learning by students –provides accurate and meaningful information –incorporates multiple modes/types –identifies student needs for intervention –includes effective individual diagnostic tools –facilitates a systemic collective response to students who are experiencing difficulty Source: West-Ed, (2000) Spotlight on Research Handout Spotlight On Research

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Effective assessments are… –linked to standards –aligned with important content that is taught and expected to be mastered –designed to meet diverse student needs –cognitively complex based on cognitive level of rigor expectations –authentic Source: Multiple Spotlight on Research

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, The POWER of Common Assessment: –most effective strategy for determining whether the Viable Guaranteed Curriculum is learned –more efficient than assessments created by individual teachers –more equitable for students –better informs instructional practice of individual teachers and teams –builds a team’s capacity to improve its program Source: DuFour Spotlight on Research

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, A quality system of common assessments is predictive of student readiness for the cognitive rigor level required by the common core state standards and future state assessments. It provides “valid” data to inform decisions Bottom Line

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, From the reading & research –What are the common themes? Select ONE – we do this “best” Select ONE – doing this “better” would have the most significant impact on student achievement –Be prepared to explain WHY you selected that one Reflection

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, High Five Directions: –1 st – Find a partner not at your table, share your ONE that would have the most significant impact on achievement & WHY you selected that one. Listen carefully to your partner. –2 nd – Find a new partner (not at your table), share your previous partners ONE & WHY. Stand & high five a partner Rotate & high five a new partner TASK: Share “Most Significant”

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Quality Common Assessments Starts with Alignment Handout Alignment

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Karin K. Hess, Ed.D., Senior Associate National Center for Assessment, Dove, NH Cognitive Rigor Matrix (CRM) Handout Matrix

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Verbs may guide you to the Bloom’s level –What type of thinking is needed to complete the assessment or learning task? What comes after the verb may guide you to the Depth of Knowledge. The intended student learning outcome determines DOK# –What mental processing must occur? –How deeply do you have to understand the content to successfully interact with it? –How complex or abstract is the content? Clarifying the difference! 3/19/

Examples - Moving up DOK Levels 3/19/ Describe the process of photosynthesis Describe how plant cells and animal cells are alike and different Describe the most significant effect of a loss of vitamins and/or minerals on the cell

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Identify/List an assessment item that checks for understanding at that level of cognitive rigor –Think progress monitoring –Think pre-test to determine knowledge/skill 2.Identify/List a learning activities which prepares students to pass that assessment item? –Think scaffolding the learning –Think manageable step toward the standard and/or preparing for next level of rigor Using Cognitive Rigor Matrix (CRM)

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Individually read the article: xxx Make notes regarding The most significant big ideas Key words (try to identify at least five) As a table group, create a representation of the 2-4 most significant ideas on chart paper TASK: Read & Reflect

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Identify priority standards Identify Cognitive Level of Rigor 2.Identify sample assessment items Including criteria or rubric for each assessment item 3.Brainstorm additional assessments Select 2-4 “best” assessments Use CRM to consider various level of assessments NEXT STEP: Create CRM for “scaffolding” 4.Create end-of-unit common assessment Recommend: 3 per standard; 2 at level of rigor; 1 at DOK4 Include criteria or rubric for each assessment item Include exemplars of each level of answer 5.Implement common assessments Planning Common Assessments Handouts: Planning Worksheet Evidence Matrix

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Identify priority standards See MODEL ELA Unit #1 - Reading Standard #1 2.Identify sample assessment item See “The Legends” 3.Brainstorm additional assessments See MODEL Acceptable Evidence (ELA #1) See MODEL Cognitive Rigor Matrix (ELA #1) 4.Create end-of-unit common assessment See MODEL ELA Unit #1 Assessment Sample Planning Handouts: Model Unit Model Item Model Evidence Model Common

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Materials Needed… –YOUR Curriculum Unit Select 1 priority standards OR select 1 State Standard –Acceptable Evidence (worksheet) –Cognitive Rigor Matrix (worksheet) YOUR TURN Planning Common Assessments

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Working in groups of 3-5 persons –Identify one course, one unit, one standard –Access appropriate materials Work through steps for ONE standard 1.Identify standards 2.Identify sample assessment items 3.Brainstorm additional assessments 4.Create end-of-unit common assessment Work Time

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Each group will share … –ONE standard –ONE test item –Why do you think this would be predictive of mastery of the standards? Sharing

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, List Ideas / Strategies from Workshop… –Primarily 2 nd row Next Steps… –What additional data do you need? –Who will you involve in the process? –What resources do you need? Action Plan… –WHO does WHAT by WHEN Workshop Closure – Action Plan

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, In table groups (in a round robin format) –Share one new learning and describe how you will apply it in your job –NO REPEATS! Workshop Closure

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Thank you for your participation! Good Luck in your next steps! Please complete Feedback Closure