Ad Hominem By: Ashley Crenshaw.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argument, Persuasion, Persuasive Techniques, and Rhetorical Fallacies
Advertisements

Ad Hominem Fallacy By: Lucas Cook and Sydney Hyatt.
Ad Hominem- Poisoning the Well Sydney Collier and Shelby Wood.
Ad Hominem Poisoning The Well Nathan Anderson Kaylie Young Emily Walker.
Ad Hominem The Crucible
Responding to Text Dependent Questions
The Crucible $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 Characters?
Logical Fallacies.
Crucible Bellringer #159/5/12 Directions: Use your notes from yesterday to fill in the blanks below. 1. ___________________is a contrast between what the.
By Madison Kerley and Rachel Haynes.  Presenting the argument in such a way that makes the argument look ridiculous, usually by misrepresenting the argument.
Fallacy Appeal to Ridicule (Appeal to Mockery/ The Horse Laugh) Anna Houchens Tiffany Tolsma.
Red Herring Matt Zuccari Ashley Steenbergen. The man tries to divert the conversation to something that is completely irrelevant but more supportive of.
Logical Fallacies. Definition & Facts  Defects that weaken arguments weaken arguments  Common in politics and politics and advertisements advertisements.
John Proctor’s inner conflict
Logical Fallacy Brett Willis Kaylee Britt. Appeal to Ridicule Definition: a fallacy in which ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an “argument”.
The Crucible Themes.
The Crucible Act 1 Summary
Appeal to Ridicule Emma Doyle, Kelly Moss and Jake Beakes.
Argument from authority
Straw Man Logical Fallacy
The Crucible Act III March 15, 2011.
Paige Basham.  dog·ma·tism [dawg-muh-tiz-uhm, dog-] Show IPA  noun  dogmatic character; unfounded positiveness in matters of opinion; arrogant assertion.
 Red Herring- an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue Have you Done your homework? Do you know what time.
Focus Questions The Crucible: Act I.
Essay Do’s and Don’ts The Crucible Character Analysis Essay.
The Crucible Bellringer #17 9/5/13 1. What does Giles accuse Mr. Putnam of in the beginning of Act III? 2. When Danforth gives John Proctor the offer to.
AD HOMINEM Mallie Wells. DEFINITION Appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special interests rather than to one's intellect or reason. Dictionary.com.
By: Haley Ford Appeal To Ignorance.
APPEAL TO FEAR/SCARE TACTICS Madison Gentry. PICTURE ANALOGY This picture appeals to fear by showing the girl with a man’s hand over her mouth. The girl.
Red Herring Logical Fallacy CAMDYN JOHNSON AND KAREN CRIST.
Characters MotifsMotivesVocabEvents.
APPEAL TO RIDICULE By: Whitney Miles.
Da Straw Man! Dalton Stephens Nick Cairo. What is Straw Man? The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position.
Ad Hominem Brandon Sneed and Tesia Bailey AP English III L. Hughes- 7 th Period.
The Crucible Act III.
The Crucible By Arthur Miller. Preview/Foundation Setting: 1692 in Salem, Massachusetts Point of View: third-person omniscient and first-person Historical.
Ad Populum/ Appeal to Popularity/ Bandwagon Krystal Sims & Makayla Glass.
Slippery Slope in The Crucible
Persuasive  To convince someone to believe in something or do something.  Writers may use language that appeals to the reader’s senses.
Appeal to Ridicule By: Dakota Hunt. Definition Ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an argument, or it presents the opponent's argument.
The Crucible Bo and Maggie Straw Man Fallacy. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than It actually is and claims that the real.
The Straw Man Whitney Phillips 7 th Period. Definition: Straw Man Fallacy- when a character misrepresents another character’s position and then proceeds.
Appeal to Ridicule ASHLEY STEPHENS. Appeal to Ridicule is…  A fallacy in which ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an “argument.”
Dec. Week Three Dec First Hour Only 3: IDENTIFY three characters. For each, list 3-5 things you currently know or think you know about them.
LOGICAL FALLACIES By: Ella Settle. DOGMATISM The tendency to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true, without consideration of evidence or the opinions.
The Crucible logical fallacy project
By: McKinley King Zoe Brownfield. Argument from Authority/ False Authority  Asks audiences to agree with the assertion of a writer based simply on his.
Ad Hominem April Reprogle Brian Hodges Kayce Russell.
The Crucible Arthur Miller. CHARACTERS Local farmer; stern, harsh- tongued; hates hypocrisy; husband of Elizabeth. John Proctor.
Ad Hominem BY: MADDIE COSTLOW. Definition  Ad hominem means “against the man”. As the name suggests, it is a literary term that involves commenting on.
Straw Man GRAYSON HYATT. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than it actually is and claims that the real position has been.
The Crucible List of Characters. Francis Nurse Head of the Nurse family; Respected man in town. Tried to stop the trials by aiding John Proctor.
What are you trying to prove? The Thesis Statement.
The Crucible Act III. Martha Corey is on trial It is clear they don’t believe Martha is not a witch – they think everyone accused is guilty Giles disrupts.
Ad Hominem LUCAS ENGLAND & ZACH ZACCARI A.P. LANGUAGE ROSEMARIE GRICE 7 TH PERIOD.
What Is Dogmatism? Dogmatism is the tendency to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true, without consideration of evidence or the opinions of others.
In this fallacy it is argued that a statement is correct because the statement is made by a person or source that is commonly regarded as authoritative.
Straw Man Fallacy By: Taylor Hudson and Rachel Fields.
“The Crucible” Fallacies: Ad Hominem/Poisoning the Well
Act Three Discussion Questions
Cody Lyles Cheyenne Milan
The Crucible Act 2- Reputations and Hearsay
The Crucible Act 2- Reputations and Hearsay
Circular Reasoning/Begging the Question
The Crucible Fallacies: Post Hoc
By: Ben Leftwich John Miller
Q3,J5.
Katie Trulock and Courtney Sexton
Ad Hominem directed against a person’s characteristics or reputation rather than against his arguments appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special.
Presentation transcript:

Ad Hominem By: Ashley Crenshaw

Definition Ad hominem- attacking an opponent’s character rather than answering his argument. -This picture is an ad hominem attack because it insinuates that President Barack Obama is a terrorist instead of making an argument about his policies. Dictionary.com,. 'The Definition Of Ad Hominem'. N.p., 2015. Web. 12 Mar. 2015.

Ad Hominem Universal Example Ad Hominem is a common fallacy in political advertisements. For example, this ad contains ad hominem because it insults Mitt Romney by simply stating that he is a problem instead of arguing about his policies. Brittneykennedy.files.wordpress.com,. N.p., 2015. Web. 17 Mar. 2015.

Ad Hominem in The Crucible Parris: Beware this man, Your Excellency, he is mischief. (Act III, p. 210) When John Proctor is attempting to defend his wife Parris attacks Proctor’s argument by insulting him in an attempt to weaken Proctor’s statements because Parris wants to ensure that Elizabeth will be found guilty but Parris has no valid arguments against her. Boone, Robert S, and Arthur N Applebee. Mcdougal Littell Literature And Language. Evanston, Ill.: McDougal Littell, 1994. Print.

Ad Hominem in The Crucible Example 2 Proctor: How do you call heaven! Whore! Whore! Abigail is a whore! (Act III, p. 220). Proctor tries to convince the people that Abigail is lying by informing them that Abigail is guilty of fornication. This is ad hominem because Proctor is attacking Abigail’s reputation instead of trying to counter her argument. Boone, Robert S, and Arthur N Applebee. Mcdougal Littell Literature And Language. Evanston, Ill.: McDougal Littell, 1994. Print.

Works cited Dictionary.com,. 'The Definition Of Ad Hominem'. N.p., 2015. Web. 12 Mar. 2015. Brittneykennedy.files.wordpress.com,. N.p., 2015. Web. 17 Mar. 2015. Boone, Robert S, and Arthur N Applebee. Mcdougal Littell Literature And Language. Evanston, Ill.: McDougal Littell, 1994. Print.